Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
replied to
***Maxwesties * Fri. Mar. 22, 2024 * NCAA * Tournament Rd. of 64 * College Basketball Plays***
in College Basketball |
Macwestie1 | 52 |
|
![]() |
|
UglyKidJoe | 5 |
|
![]() |
UNC+4 rivalry. Final four. UNC has 4 kids that can put 20+. Bacot can get on the boards. Yes Duke has lottery picks. I just feel like the free throw shooting of UNC and the ability to post numbers from numerous players keeps it very close. I bet very small, like 25 bucks a play but this is where my money will be. |
johnkar3 | 3 |
|
![]() |
IMO not the same teams playing this go round. Also it doesn't matter the record, I have seen terrible teams on both sides win regular season games. This one comes down to who gets the rolls Saturday.
|
jwf | 18 |
|
![]() |
I am a fan of UNC. I read a post years ago that you always take an unranked home team that is favored against a ranked opponent. Being a fan of UNC I rarely bet them in football or basketball aside for UNC vs Puke in basketball with a 25 dollar for fun bet. Does UNC cover tomorrow? I fear my "homer" perspective my have my judgement skewed. Thoughts? |
johnkar3 | 12 |
|
![]() |
Wow. Been following Wussieman for a decade or so...this hit hard and I have never even met. My thoughts and prayers are with your family and friends. Until the other side sir. |
WussieMan | 174 |
|
![]() |
Very nice Mac. Couldn't have happened to a better poster. Good luck tonight.
![]() |
Macwestie1 | 130 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by johnkar3: nvm. I see where you are staying off.
Van how do you feel about the over 2.5 with bel/eng? |
vanzack | 799 |
|
![]() |
Van how do you feel about the over 2.5 with bel/eng? |
vanzack | 799 |
|
![]() |
Good to see u post Van. How do you feel about the over in this coming World Cup 3rd place match?
|
vanzack | 33 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by dick747: what if there are two fixes applied to the same game but for opposite outcome......................... ![]() That would be an oxymoron. Which means Jeb will be president. |
BigUnit | 17 |
|
![]() |
Yes the fix it in. Goodell and Blandino are both from NY. NY is 3rd in dairy production while Wisconsin is 2nd. A GB loss and failure to cover will result in loss of production due to the mild depression that Wisky residents will experience. Also will result in GB backers wagering losses to trickle down to NY crime families as we all know they still run Vegas. Now with this shift in capital, it is almost certain several "farms" will be wagered which should tilt the dairy production standings allowing NY to move up to 2nd. This shift will then allow Hillary Clinton to use this shift as a campaign tool on her way to being elected at which time Goodell and Blandino with both be on her payroll. So it all boils down to Hillary being elected in 2016. Go Pack!
|
BigUnit | 17 |
|
![]() |
Just need one. Vanzack
|
ninoed | 24 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
estes1717 | 35 |
|
![]() |
Gl Mac . Nice $ last weekend!
|
Macwestie1 | 100 |
|
![]() |
Van appreciate the post.
I get it with all the pub on the boys and the road record, the Peyton factor and Carolina has trouble scoring with the rookies at wr. Do u not think Brady has heard enough of the flaco vs pats record? Or do u cap by the numbers only?
|
vanzack | 257 |
|
![]() |
Ne 27. Balty 18
Gb 24. Dal 33 Den 27. Ind 30 Sea 19. Car 9
|
NFL-1975 | 101 |
|
![]() |
Van, I enjoy tailing ur picks, so I would prefer you post your 5 favorites. Do you also take the over in women's World Cup? Best of luck. Enjoyed the thread.
|
rudy22 | 74 |
|
![]() |
Will you be taking the over in the 3/4 match in the upcoming World Cup?
|
vanzack | 347 |
|
![]() |
replied to
SUPERBOWL BOMB PLAY >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GREEN BAY , GREEN BAY , GREEN BAY , GREEN BAY
in NFL Betting
I am a bit curious as to why you waited until it got back to 3...Or did you ever have a chance at 2.5? I am still on the fence and admittedly a "wanna be" when it comes to reading lines. With that said I would be grateful if you would share your thoughts on my theory about the BOWL linesmaker strategy. My theory is probably a simple one and I probably show my ignorance but I believe that Vegas knows that GB(in this example) is probably too much for PITT...and my sole basis for that is I consider myself a square bettor, or at least according to covers I often like the square side. I gamble for fun, but I aspire to gamble for real, for real money. I usually play 25 to 50 bucks a play and may go several months without playing anything, but I get bored and throw out 50 on something usually tailing someone that happens to agree with what I thought to begin with...anywho, My "square" opinion is that Vegas wants ME and my square buddies to jump in on Pitt, with BOTH feet. I mean it looks too easy to take Ben and the 7th ring stuff, plus one thing I have noticed is usually the "talking heads" are dead wrong...they have been talkin D all week(I work alot of hours so correct me if I am wrong) but IMO this game goes over and GB wins...33-17 or so...So going back to my first question, is the live move to GB-3 what swayed you or did u place this at -2.5 earlier in the week and just posting the current line to avoid the BS?? Any help is appreciated! Thanks and GOOD LUCK!!
|
reservoir-dogs | 62 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.