Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by JerryWrasse: Not much for teasers but why tease the pats to 8.5? You're losing a point in value. 8 is not a dead number
|
LeagueCapper | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by stockboy: EASY there Einstein. I would be careful calling people MORONS if you don't know the difference between "your" and "you're". Easy now |
Mack05 | 81 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tinoker55: really so your gonna compare Tyrees catch with a horrible call on the 1 yard line. different in every way. Pats fan or not...at least be a man about it and admit the Seahawks outplayed the Pats with 4 injured on defense and the win was a gift, run and they win..period. You're way off. Keep crying in those tissues
|
glenn217 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Polar_Bear: David Tyree, a bum of a receiver does not make a fluke catch, he posts this years ago.....If Wes Welker catches a simple 10 yard pass with no one around him, he posts this years ago. It goes both ways. Almost every posted in this thread (besides you) is a donkey
|
glenn217 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gilligansisland: mysticrich let it go. year after year of brady bashing makes you look like a numbskull. shut up and crawl back under your rock. Great win brutha. Let the clowns keep hating. They just jealous of the best.
|
Mack05 | 81 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MYSTICRICH: i could care less about rings they mean nothing to me Brady still sucks he threw little dinky dunky passes nothing impressive He threw a pick in the Red Zone which took off either 3 or 7 points , then he throws a pick in the 3rd quarter that leads to 7 points , so he cost the patriots 10 to 14 points with his stupid INT's , if Seattle runs the ball at the 1 yd line they win the SB and Brady's a goat again Undisputed greatest QB to ever play the game now with 4 rings. How does that taste MysticBitch?
|
NFLJOE | 53 |
|
|
MysticBitch
|
MYSTICRICH | 40 |
|
|
They must have some good crack in Taiwan
|
miumiu921 | 81 |
|
|
Good to see you Mac. Although I hate to see you on the Seabags. I don't like the deflategate distraction (although the Pats can use this as fuel for us against the world) and the fact that they looked so good last week/Seattle so bad. However, I think they match-up very well with the Seahawks. I expect to see them stack the box to contain Lynch with a spy on Wilson and hope their corners can contain the Seattle wideouts. They are underrated, but NE's secondary is in the same league as Seattle. Also think Seattle's DLine is overrated and have been getting pushed around recently. No pressure on Brady = good luck.
|
glyde69 | 50 |
|
|
Good to see you posting again Mac. Wish I saw this before the Pats game. Was a bit hesitant to unload but would have had I seen this. Hope ya keep posting when you can bro.
|
andarmac99 | 16 |
|
|
No it wasn't. And neither was the Seahawks
|
Buzz44 | 18 |
|
|
Forgot to mention that I am extremely high on my Pats this year (no bias.) If they can keep their core guys healthy, I think they have a real shot at winning this whole thing. Don't sleep on their defense this year. It might even be the better unit!
|
andarmac99 | 81 |
|
|
Good to see you back buddy. Hope to see you at least a bit this year. Nice nail on the Bags. Ecstatic to see that we see eye to eye on pretty much everything so far. Love the Bucs, Titans and Balty in week 1. Also looking at Houston, Dallas and Denver/Chicago in a tease. Any thoughts on those games? Slammed some win totals including KC U, Car U, Atl U, Ind U and Dal U. Also slammed Saints division (+145), and parlayed Seattle and NE to win division at a juicy +140. Will look into your Tenny and Tampa overs as I lean your way on both there. Good luck this year bud.
|
andarmac99 | 81 |
|
|
|
VegasVandal | 18 |
|
|
terrible terrible news. best book there is. any idea why?
|
Angelus | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tbeckham: are you slow tinfoils? the instant the game goes over the money should be paid out regardless if its the 2nd or 9th inning because once it goes over there is no other possible outcome. |
KobezKing | 32 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tinfoils: You guys ever seen a sure under go over in the 9th inning? You can't have it both ways. The reason for the 8 1/2 inning rule is to ensure both over and under is protected. What if you had the over 6 in a 1-0 game with the visiting team having loaded the bases, with no outs, in the top of the 6th? Who's to say they won't score 10 runs in the inning? Then those with the over will be bitching that they should play on while the under guys would be demanding their money. Yeah but in this case the O/U is already decided. It was 7.5 and the Over has already hit. Rules should be changed to payout O/Us that have already been decided.
|
KobezKing | 32 |
|
|
Who's Lobse?
|
Nba9 | 3 |
|
|
Good writeup on the Under bud and great points.
|
zamigo6 | 205 |
|
|
Van do you still like France with the Ribery injury? In other words, would you still make the same bet today knowing he was out? Thanks for all the info and gl.
|
vanzack | 1042 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.