OakleyDoak

They're as bent as MSNBC.
Doesn't fit their narrative.

Can't incriminate an assumed member of their base without doing damage to the party.
And that is what is too risky for them, not the immediate safety of citizens.

FOX'  Hannity does it too oft as well.

Truthfulness is positively uplifting.

If ya can't stand the heat quit being a hypocrite troll.

Conscientious for all  trumping  Loyalty to a group.

Good for gorDON

Impropriety vs your opponent = admirable trait
Impropriety inside your own tent = tactical flaw of character 

Hillary was pre-wrapped with two bows preserved for delivery.

When you adhere to the idea 'the end justifies the means' you'll do what you got to do to WIN.

Where's the brotherly love for the city of Philly ?

Who are those hypocrites   of ?  Their  own supporters gettin' too excited ?! 

Then the people said : "What does all this mean? What are you trying to tell us?" ~ Ezekiel 24:19 

                                           

However,yes,I believe that the criterion for firearms being designated AW's should be expanded even further !

How many guns can you guys fire at 'one time?' TWO,most likely,right ?!
But some of you certainly don't want to be legally restricted to owning only two guns,right ?
Admit it,some of you guys enjoy gun shows,handling your guns,firing them either at a target range or whilst hunting,cleaning them,concealing them as you deem most securely,but at your ready for use.

ADMIT IT, you ENJOY GUNS and the possession of one / many !
If YOU LIKE your gun(s),simply acknowledge THAT !

Well,do you ?

"loopholes" ~ 'cause them guns create a "whole" lotta "loops" of grief,anguish,and heartache around the loved ones of victims of gun deaths !

THIS, is NOT one of your usual QUALITY posts !

Alexander Hamilton would be acknowledged as being Republican, today ?

I just now read article 29 again.

Too often,people have selective interpretation in lieu of subjective interpretation which causes them to acknowledge points in any given narrative to support an issue they are a proponent of. 

Whether you agree or not with Hamilton,Jay,or Madison on any particular article / issue / idea / op. is still preferential politics as it is today.

And maybe we need to designate a wider array of guns as "Assault Weapons" so as not to promote the 'arbitrariness' of the term, and to be prepared for a tyranny ! Certainly not to effort preventing further gun deaths,especially of innocent people.

Yeah, I know,some of you want the ability,er,right to obtain whatever type of weaponry you so desire.
Afterall,Hamilton indicated the absurdity of a militia not being of equal strength to its government. And by God,the militia that most of you are referring to is everyday citizens armed and ready for 'revolt.'

And what exactly are some of you afraid that such tyrannical implementations will subtract from your life ??
And those of you who seem so assured that tyranny is on the horizon,if not imminent,do you know something the rest of us don't ?

Celebrate safely !

Armed security whom are properly trained =
Armed security everywhere = Ideally !

However, security from what ? Which potential weapon in the hand(s) of an assailant is our primary concern ? A bomb,knife,chainsaw,broken bottle,shotgun ? Which can do the most destruction in proportion to its current availability / obtainability ?

Assault Weapons as casual armament for civilians =

Shadow Market production and the inability to locate and seize all AW's in circulation will offer yet another imperfect system.
However,again,without availability and obtainability as the situation is now,any law that prohibits further manufacturing and possession would certainly reduce if not completely prevent mass shootings with AW's...Assault Weapons - I'm not alluding to the firearms that will still be lawful !