Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@Rush51 So Hamas retorting on that festival and Israel running unstopped to destroy all not of their faith is Bidens fault? Ukraine threatening to join NATO which goes against what they agreed upon is Bidens fault? Super logic here... Yes, anybody that's paying attention knows that none of this happens unless Joe didn't advertise his weakness w the Afghanistan debacle... but he did it, then advertised that a minor Russian incursion might be ok,.. then became a news agency saying for sure Russia was going to invade. Joe is for sure one of our weakest & worst presidents. We all would've been much better if he just stayed home and played cribbage w his other senile friends.
|
DogbiteWilliams | 92 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@wallstreetcappers No, you do not 'see Trump exclusively' doing that. You are simply blinded by your hatred for the man. To be honest, you lost all credibility about Trump a long time ago. But the point of this is Harris and the Democrats running a fear-based campaign. Of course, it is Harris. At least Trump has the sense to mention how well the economy and the world was doing when he was in charge. That is NOT fear-based, unless you want to say he is trying to scare the folks into thinking the Democrats cannot do what he did. You might be right about that. But at least he is pointing out good things and positive things he wants to do if he gets back in office. Harris cannot point to anything good or anything positive that she would do. She cannot differeniate herself from Biden and his losing policies. Therefore, she only resorts to fear and scare tactics. As, was pointed out above, the Democrats have been using the Fascist terminology and running campaigns on reductio ad Hitlerum since WWII. Then they are using the SS scare tactic again, the dividing of 'rich' for 'not paying their fair share of taxes, the fear of women being forced to 'die' in childbirth, the fear of parents being separated from their kids. The new bogeyman of course is the project 2025 nonsense, which Trump has nothing to do with. Now, Harris is saying that 'Trump wants total power'. None of these things your guys are trying to scare the folks with have ever happened and will not happen. No one is trying to do way with SS -- but you guys keep pushing this scare tactic. There is no way Trump tried to be a dictator before and will not again. There are far more than enough checks and balances built into the Federalist system for that to happen. Yet, they continue to use this scare-tactic. Like one guy put it: They can give all kinds of reasons to hate Trump and not vote for him but they can't give ONE good reason why to vote for Harris other than she is not Trump. It is very sad they have to resort to this; but far sadder that you guys continue to fall for it. Yeah, I've noticed this as well. I even put up with watching her Town Hall last week. Lol. ... For those undecided voters out there ( and I have no idea how you can be at this juncture), let's hope they wisen up and realize this in time before election day. I don't know when it happened, but common sense has become so uncommon these days. |
DogbiteWilliams | 92 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@Raiders22 Right and that is where the partisan glasses are used. I see Trump exclusively running the fear and meandering campaign, that is all he has. So you are right, ONE is doing just that and it is Trump. When someone does not have a platform or depth and uses lies and insults as a narrative, that is a fear based campaign. Of course you are partisan and you think it is Harris, I at least see more of a roadmap and structure to her campaign versus the thanksgiving dinner yammering which is Trump. Who is using a fake illegals destroying your life as 100% of the voice to their voter base? Who is using lies about life being so horrible for the last four years? Ive owned property over a long period of time and my house has gone up in value more during the last four years than any four year period of my life. The SPX was at 3700 in 2021 and is at 5800 now, this is in the face of higher interest rates than no president has experienced since Carter. I just filled up gas yesterday it was at 3 bucks a gallon . If the entire substance of your campaign media message is that life is worse (which is isnt) and that illegals are taking your job and wrecking your life, what do you call that? New Wars, ( that's plural by the way), inflation, and a border crisis. None of this was happening 4 years ago, so Take off those partisan glasses. Those are facts that can't be disputed |
DogbiteWilliams | 92 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:
Rush... hope all well with you!!!.. they invite crime by saying criminals will be bailed out. Hey Scooby, doing well. Hope all is well with you, too. |
Zeus4par | 228 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Quote Originally Posted by chilitokid: walgreens closing 1200 stores…..#1 reason - THEFT!
Changing customers behavior is the main reason why more Walgreen stores are closing. Fewer customers are visiting stores. They prefer to shop online or elsewhere.
Yeah, like refusing to find a Walgreens worker to open up the locked up glass case that is protecting the shampoo bottle. I don't blame the customer for just leaving. And Walgreens ain't gonna keep a store open for very long when most of the store is locked up. It just can't do so profitably for very long.. But, for sure you could blame the 'mentally challenged' DAs across this country that are de-criminalizing criminal behavior. "They" are the source of the problem. I mean, at what point do the people living in these communities start voting for tough-on-crime DAs, and put this "soft on crime" shit in the garbage once and for all ?
|
Zeus4par | 228 |
|
|
Good write-up Raiders... I think your rationale was spot on ; it's just so darn difficult to predict the "neutral rate" for interest rates. It appears that that number is quite a bit higher than predicted 3 months ago when you posted this. I just looked at a chart on the Russell 2000 and see that it is slightly down in that 3-month time frame. In the last few weeks, the 10-year Treasury has shot up, perhaps in anticipation of a Trump victory, perhaps the Bond vigilantes are rearing their ugly head with all our debt. There are so many factors that go into the 10-year yield, and I think its direction and rapid move has surprised quite a few people, including myself. Me personally, I don't bet on the direction of the market, and keep 10% in a Mid-Cap Index, and 10% in a Small-Cap , and balance accordingly. If I feel an opportunity is out there, I prefer to buy individual stocks when I feel that the market has overreacted to a piece of news specific to that company. i.e. CRWD was a golden opportunity earlier this year. |
Raiders22 | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Martylee:
I bet under 8.5 large already for game 1 I think this is the great play , as well as First 5 innings Under. With a 5PM PST start, also don't forget that shadows could be an added factor early in this game, impacting the hitters. So add shadows onto a 5 day layoff... Not a good combination. I think the F5 under is a live play.
|
leventis72 | 10 |
|
|
Dodgers have the better Hitters, Relief Pitching, and maybe a push on starting pitching. Having said that, It's amazing to think that the Dodgers have been able to put together a credible starting rotation with a complete starting rotation on the DL throughout most/all of the season !! (Tony Gonsolin, Dustin May, Clayton Kershaw, Shohei Ohtani, Tyler Glasnow). And youngsters Gavin Stone, River Ryan, and Emmet Sheehan all went down with season-ending injuries, too !! A couple of big wild cards are; 1). The health of Freedie Freeman , even though a couple of days ago he said he feels it is 100% and expects to be in the starting line up Game #1. But this ankle injury can be a nagging injury that can resurface itself. 2) Will Dave Roberts go with a "bullpen session" in Game 4, or opt to go with Flaherty on 4 days of rest ?
Dodgers win 4 Games to 2
|
Kaufee | 281 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tech65:
Lions will never win a big game with a defense like they have. Geno picked them apart. Agreed.. I was surprised at that. I thought DET would easily handle SEA , due in part to the SEA defense having played inept QBs to that point.
|
ppmbryan | 13 |
|
|
Even if you actually won this bet, and cashed in your investments to make this bet, you're still a dipsh*t and on your way to financial ruin. |
RenoRealtor | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by RenoRealtor:
I will be cashing out stock and investments first thing in the morning to put every dime I have on the Ravens to beat the Bengals next week. It does not get any better than this. you are welcome! $Summerofhunter Yeah, you're not to be taken seriously with shit talk like this |
RenoRealtor | 41 |
|
|
He is coming back. His announcement would've happened by now if he was retiring, IMO. |
ActionMagnet | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69: So many turds, but Covers refuses to get a flush button..... If you have never had a bad day gambling, either you dont gamble or its your first day. I still kinda amazes me, bizarre as it may be after a couple decades, that random people on the internet will go out of their way to talk shit or try and act superior to someone that goes out of their way to post picks and interact with said strangers....all for the love of "the process" and love of sports betting. There are so many cool people on this site, but somehow the trolls overshadow them and get the focus. I find it entertaining, but have seen many a good egg just pack up and leave.... See ya next week Van So many turds ? Actually, there's quite a few people ( myself included) that have kept it positive on a tough week for Van. Keep it positive Train. There's more of us than them.Did you read my whole post? Yeah, I did... so many cool people,... and so many turds. Your words. And yet you come here in the thread to focus on the"" few"" negative ones. Give it a rest. |
vanzack | 201 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ccbulldog:
are sadly mistaken. Sallah ain't no head coach and Rogers can only do so much at 40 yrs old. Those are 2 primary reasons why I played a future on NYJ to not make the playoffs before the season started, at +150 Having said that, slow starts by BAL, CIN, and MIA are not helping the cause |
ccbulldog | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
So many turds, but Covers refuses to get a flush button..... If you have never had a bad day gambling, either you dont gamble or its your first day. I still kinda amazes me, bizarre as it may be after a couple decades, that random people on the internet will go out of their way to talk shit or try and act superior to someone that goes out of their way to post picks and interact with said strangers....all for the love of "the process" and love of sports betting. There are so many cool people on this site, but somehow the trolls overshadow them and get the focus. I find it entertaining, but have seen many a good egg just pack up and leave.... See ya next week Van So many turds ? Actually, there's quite a few people ( myself included) that have kept it positive on a tough week for Van. Keep it positive Train. There's more of us than them. |
vanzack | 201 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ccbulldog:
It amazes me how a team can look like the best in the league one week and like crap the next, or vise versa. How is anybody supposed to make any money. I really do believe there are certian weeks where some teams decide in advance they are gonna just mail it it. No, part of this business is thinking about the big picture. Here, you have an away 3-0 (away) team playing a good 1-2 ( home) team. Some times you just have to ask yourself who wants it/ needs it more. So, I don't think BUF is mailing it in. BAL just wants it more.
|
PUSSYGALORE333 | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by RXistrash:
Quote Originally Posted by smellybunty: Yes, far superior to Brady,Montana and Mahomes. No question. I am not just talking football. I said the history of sport. Any sport. Those guys may be overall better QBs but most impact athlete of all time…Lamar is up there. Deion… Bo Jackson. Messi. Thats about it. Lamar didn't play professional baseball, did he ? ( deion and bo did) Also, Mahomes and Brady could've played professional baseball ?
Maybe you could make an argument that Brady is a better " athlete " than Lamar. Ponder that... |
RXistrash | 33 |
|
|
He is quite possibly the best player in NFL History the last 45 minutes or so. |
RXistrash | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet: Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: Thanks guys. Too much of a bullwhip effect in what I am currently doing. I have to fix it this week. My ratings and numbers need to react quicker. Case in point.... Commanders. Their offense is on a stretch that is epic, but my numbers on them only creep up because of trailing data dragging it down. That is probably the hardest thing to accomplish in analyzing the NFL. To get this right. Too much or too little history will kill you. As it is today. Time to get to work. Traction, and therefore near future units will be way down I expect. Doesnt this apply to the Bills? still confident in your Ravens pk? Confident? You have to be. Nothing that happened today changes the way I feel about Balt tonight. So I am going with the plan. It is already in place. I will sit down and do retrospective tomorrow - like I always do. I expect it to be very bad with the main predictors, and I expect my units to go down until I start showing traction - but that doesnt change tonight for me. Would totally understand if someone didnt have the same resolve. Its just how I do things. I could bet black after 10 reds and feel the same as the first one, because I believe in the process. Exactly, Van. " Trust the Process." You've put in enough time and effort into this craft to prove that your system works over long periods of time.
|
vanzack | 201 |
|
|
This is equally a bet on KC at -3 or less, and against an ATL team that had no business of winning their previous game. KC.
|
tahoejoe2 | 7 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.