Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
All I have to say is I've been riding the ACC moneytrain this post season, not stopping now.. they been covering and winning SU as dogs big time.. BC, wake, Nc St, Unc, The U, Fla st, Clemson all won outright and/or covered.. Clemson wins by 4 tonite 27-23
|
Boom_Boom | 131 |
|
|
Steelers will beat Pats in Afc title game, Pittsburgh is getting the best time for bye week, they will go in as wild card and blow through Afc post season.. It reminds me of 07' when pats were undefeated and played a pesky NYG team in regular season only to be upset by same team in Super Bowl.. Pittsburgh only team that really could've beat pats up to this point(lousy kicker at that time and first game as defense under Butler, so yeah Gronk had his way) but they are starting to find an identity, and yes without Edelman and Lewis, becoming thin.. Better off taking Pittsburgh to win Super Bowl at like 20-1.. Only fitting it be in SF just to shove it in those niners faces as well.. Pittsburgh beats Carolina 34-29
|
Absolutxedge22 | 16 |
|
|
There was some major fights going down in Vegas as the dumb fuck refs fixed the game for Puke, and 2nd half made Vegas a ton of $, this is biggest debacle, like Seattle calling for a pass, fuck the refs, I too had it at +5.5, FIX.. U can leave it at 5.. Who cares unless u NEED Puke to cover.. Right? Fuck them
|
estes1717 | 21 |
|
|
Stone cold lock... James "Caan" Hahn.. Cool costumer, got the distance and control not to mention killer bunker play.. His carefree demeanor should help to not get overwhelmed putting.. Riviera was a tough place and he held up.. (Plus I had him at 200-1??????). He will be my longshot here
|
samuelsosa | 15 |
|
|
I agree w Indiana state, the Shockers are solid, no doubt, this could be a trap.. Also like The U to finally close out a double digit lead and roll the Noles.. Plus like Duquesne being 6-0 ats at home.. Feels right
|
cjm2008 | 18 |
|
|
My picks for the Rice burner classic:
DJ Palmer Horschel Oosthuizen Dubisson And super longshot. Leishman.. Like handicapping the ponies, needed a "Mudder" in there w a front runner like DJ. Best of luck.. And thanks again to my boy James "jimmy" Hahn for the huge payout for me last week???????? |
CMJohnson1 | 32 |
|
|
37-20. Hawks win easy. 1 pick 6 as well..
|
jerryjr | 19 |
|
|
And you will never get your ?? back if u bet New England.. This only took 10secs to read, correct?
|
SuperGuido | 7 |
|
|
Teams that have scored 40-plus in the playoffs are just 3-22 against the spread in their following game since 1996! The last time a team posted 40-plus points, the Patriots went on to lose to Denver in last year's AFC Championship.
Also teams that have a pick 6 in the Super Bowl are 12-0!! Take it for what it's worth.. Last year and this year Pats scored 40 on colts in playoffs and In turn got beat the following game, cocky? Perhaps.. Or weak opponent they beat up on to make em look good.. Maybe or how about both.. Seahawks, they are notorious for pick 6 and last year was what put the ponies out to pasture before half, I believe Seattle can set Brady up for another pick 6.. And I truely believe the Hawks win this game rather easily, 37-20.. Now I am a Steelers fan so I am unbiased towards either team, just going w the facts.. Also remember a east coast team traveling west and playing a late game tends to lose their internal clock, their timing , alas Baltimore barely escaping SF 2yrs ago. Take your time and thinks about this. Good luck to all |
SuperGuido | 7 |
|
|
Here's a trend for you, a team w a pick 6 in the Super Bowl is 12-0!!! Seahawks will get another and blowout the hapless pats much like KC did by 27 w Alex smith(Seattle only lost by 4 to them if u try using that) 37-20
|
Bet_The_House | 9 |
|
|
Colts vs Pats- Historically, the Patriots have owned the series versus the Colts. New England has won five straight going back to 2010. It also includes last season’s divisional round game, one that the Pats won 43-22 as 7.5-point favorites in Gillette. However, it should be noted that the underdog in the series when these two teams tangle is a solid 14-5-2 ATS going back over the last 21 meetings. New England is also a lousy 0-5 ATS in their last five AFC Championship games as well (3-11 ATS in their last 14 playoff games too). I have a slight lean towards Luck and colts.. Copycat score from last week 35-31 Pats eek it out Packers vs Seahawks- The curtain had barely closed on the Packers defeat of the Cowboys last week before the online betting sites tabbed Seattle as 7.5 point favorites. That line has held during the early betting, even under heavy public action on Green Bay, a weekly betting darling. It might be one of the squarest bets in the game each week, but it is hard to ignore the league’s best offense getting seven and the hook. Green Bay will have to buck a recent trend as they are just 3-7 against the spread in their last ten on the road against winning teams. Seattle has four ATS wins in their last five playoff games at home and are 5-1 against the spread in their last six playoff games overall. Seattle 26-16. |
NFL-1975 | 101 |
|
|
'14 Seahawks 15.9 17.6 22.6
'13 Seahawks* 14.4 15.1 23.4 '08 Steelers* 13.9 14.6 22.0 '02 Buccaneers* 12.3 15.1 21.7 '00 Ravens* 10.3 11.9 20.7 '85 Bears* 12.4 16.4 21.5 '77 Falcons 9.2^ 10.4 17.1 '76 Steelers 9.9 12.6 19.2 '75 Rams 9.6 11.6 20.6 '71 Vikings 9.9 10.0 19.3 *Won Super Bowl ^NFL record Defenses avg ppg-next best teams avg-league avg... Seahawks are the real deal on D.. Ask manning, Brees, Brady.. Funny thing is Luck has best them cause he has the one thing the rest don't, youth, and mobility and can throw it(sorry Kaepernick fans) Hawks roll throw GB & Super Bowl again, 48-21( like Tampa bay did to Oakland?) |
SuperGuido | 5 |
|
|
'14 Seahawks 15.9 17.6 22.6
'13 Seahawks* 14.4 15.1 23.4 '08 Steelers* 13.9 14.6 22.0 '02 Buccaneers* 12.3 15.1 21.7 '00 Ravens* 10.3 11.9 20.7 '85 Bears* 12.4 16.4 21.5 '77 Falcons 9.2^ 10.4 17.1 '76 Steelers 9.9 12.6 19.2 '75 Rams 9.6 11.6 20.6 '71 Vikings 9.9 10.0 19.3 *Won Super Bowl ^NFL record These are the stats for the defenses avg ppg.. Then the next best teams avg and then league avg. seahawks gonna pound last 2 games, alas how they did last year or reminds me of the Bucs when they pounded raiders 48-21(and high flying raiders offense..pfft). Seahawks up their w the Steel Curtain |
LeagueCapper | 100 |
|
|
Tamsmooth-- I believe that the public( as usual) loooooves offense and who's to blame them.. So why wouldn't they jump on Patriots and Packers+pts.. I'm gonna also have some funds on the ML for colts to win su.. Russel Wilson I've watched from his days w the wolf pack to the badgers to the seahawks ( I'm a miami hurricanes fan, so seen him enough in ACC) lol. And I'm a fan of his, (steelers for life here though). And he is a very smart and alert Qb.. When he is put to that " he isn't big gamer" label on him he shows up and bears "the best" QBs. And I believe Luck is got that same mojo now being seasoned in a few playoff games
|
SuperGuido | 5 |
|
|
I concure.. At first glance my reaction was to jump on GB at 7.5, then the more I broke it down(cowboys should've won then We would be talking about Seattle revenge factor) I found myself thinking, "how many times have I played sports w an injury, one that before game time was sore as hell and played through it, yet knowing it wasn't my best it was gonna be a rough go". I see Rodgers trying to play the 2-3second passing game, Seattle will rush just 3-4 guys knowing they don't need more than that to get to him dropping 7-8 in coverage, complete umbrella and bracket job against their wideouts, yes Seattle will be missing Richardson and by no means are they flashy on offense, but was Baltimore.. Was the Ny giants of recent years, we know the Hawks weren't last year but threw up 39 on offense while the D added the other 9.. I'm a Steelers fan so I can care less who wins, it's about the handicapping for a big payday in the end
|
SuperGuido | 5 |
|
|
When I start a thread I first think, what is the most useful info I can give, with some many angles out there it's hard to decipher all that info.. But I will give it a shot:
Colts vs Pats- Historically, the Patriots have owned the series versus the Colts. New England has won five straight going back to 2010. It also includes last season’s divisional round game, one that the Pats won 43-22 as 7.5-point favorites in Gillette. However, it should be noted that the underdog in the series when these two teams tangle is a solid 14-5-2 ATS going back over the last 21 meetings. New England is also a lousy 0-5 ATS in their last five AFC Championship games as well (3-11 ATS in their last 14 playoff games too). I have a slight lean towards Luck and colts.. Copycat score from last week 35-31 Pats eek it out Packers vs Seahawks- The curtain had barely closed on the Packers defeat of the Cowboys last week before the online betting sites tabbed Seattle as 7.5 point favorites. That line has held during the early betting, even under heavy public action on Green Bay, a weekly betting darling. It might be one of the squarest bets in the game each week, but it is hard to ignore the league’s best offense getting seven and the hook. Green Bay will have to buck a recent trend as they are just 3-7 against the spread in their last ten on the road against winning teams. Seattle has four ATS wins in their last five playoff games at home and are 5-1 against the spread in their last six playoff games overall. Seattle 26-16. |
SuperGuido | 5 |
|
|
Wow according to that Heritage lines I'm off on Seattle being any good in Super Bowl or respect the AFC less. Lol. I still like my lines Come Sunday, manning had his day in the sun, damn near 40, and he won't let go, alas like Farve.. He has been fantastic, no question the ultimate field General.. IF Rodgers and company can sneak by Seattle they go in w most confidence and beat the pats or colts... I believe public doesn't wanna see Seahawks again.. Fun stat.. Since Rodgers era Pack is 6-0 ats when scoring 28 or more in playoffs/postseason..will they put up 28 on legion of boom?
|
SuperGuido | 9 |
|
|
"IF" Rodgers and Pack make it that dude be getting best treatment for 2 weeks, he be better than ready, a week ago the NFC was -1.5/51.5 all because they was disillusioned by manning and broncos believing they would be the AFC reps, not to be, since they took a dive( to me over a month ago) the line went up as high as NFC -3/49.. I believes lines to be pretty accurate.. There's some history to go back on, Pats at home vs green bay 12' won 31-27 and this year Pack at home won 26-21.. A lot of tight lines.. 13' luck Vs Wilson at Indy. 34-28.. Just crunching #'s and giving out what I feel is gonna be the lines for any of these potential match ups.. ( really hoping for a Colts vs GreenBay game or at worst Pats BS GreenBay.. Seattle's D is the Steel curtain of the now)
|
SuperGuido | 9 |
|
|
Seattle vs Patriots. Hawks -4.5/48.5
Seattle vs Colts. Hawks -7.5/ 51.5 Green Bay vs Patriots. GB -1.5/53 Green Bay vs Colts. GB -5.5/54.5 These are my insider #'s.. Crunched down to best #'s avalible.. Now of course after Sundays games w injuries ect.. Those lines i would change.. For conference championship games I'm predicting Green Bay and over.. Pack lose 27-23... And for the AFC title tilt, colts get payback #2, 36-27...and win outright, behind a much improved run offense and D |
SuperGuido | 9 |
|
|
Under is stone cold lock.. 13 turnovers combined in the 2 semi's, won't have even 4 turnovers in this game, without the turnover and even shorter fields over is dead
|
PoeticJustice | 37 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.