Game 4 New Method
C. Michigan 166.64 (R) 224.11 (P) 390.75 TYDS 13.23 YPPT
W. Michigan 103.56 (R) 194.95 (P) 298.51 TYDS 17.00 YPPT
Projected Score
C. Michigan (27.79) 28
W. Michigan (19.30) 20
GL
Game 4 New Method
C. Michigan 166.64 (R) 224.11 (P) 390.75 TYDS 13.23 YPPT
W. Michigan 103.56 (R) 194.95 (P) 298.51 TYDS 17.00 YPPT
Projected Score
C. Michigan (27.79) 28
W. Michigan (19.30) 20
GL
Game 4 New Method
C. Michigan 166.64 (R) 224.11 (P) 390.75 TYDS 13.23 YPPT
W. Michigan 103.56 (R) 194.95 (P) 298.51 TYDS 17.00 YPPT
Projected Score
C. Michigan (27.79) 28
W. Michigan (19.30) 20
GL
Game 5 New Method
Marshall 107.02 (R) 165.15 (P) 272.17 TYDS 14.22 YPPT
W. Virginia 199.71 (R) 244.85 (P) 444.56 TYDS 16.22 YPPT
Projected Score
Marshall (17.39) 17
W. Virginia (29.16) 30
GL
Game 5 New Method
Marshall 107.02 (R) 165.15 (P) 272.17 TYDS 14.22 YPPT
W. Virginia 199.71 (R) 244.85 (P) 444.56 TYDS 16.22 YPPT
Projected Score
Marshall (17.39) 17
W. Virginia (29.16) 30
GL
Game 6 New Method
Houston 136.92 (R) 378.71 (P) 515.63 TYDS 12.71 YPPT
Tulane 164.78 (R) 213.04 (P) 377.82 TYDS 19.03 YPPT
Projected Score
Houston (38.8) 38
Tulane (21.6) 21
GL
Game 6 New Method
Houston 136.92 (R) 378.71 (P) 515.63 TYDS 12.71 YPPT
Tulane 164.78 (R) 213.04 (P) 377.82 TYDS 19.03 YPPT
Projected Score
Houston (38.8) 38
Tulane (21.6) 21
GL
Game 7 New Method
BYU 151.52 (R) 260.00 (P) 411.52 TYDS 9.73 YPPT
San Diego St. 60.43 (R) 226.46 (P) 286.89 TYDS 14.44 YPPT
Projected Score
BYU (40.55) 41
San Diego St. (21.61) 21
GL
Game 7 New Method
BYU 151.52 (R) 260.00 (P) 411.52 TYDS 9.73 YPPT
San Diego St. 60.43 (R) 226.46 (P) 286.89 TYDS 14.44 YPPT
Projected Score
BYU (40.55) 41
San Diego St. (21.61) 21
GL
Game 8 New Method
Virginia Tech 230.53 (R) 251.41 (P) 481.94 TYDS 9.83 YPPT
Georgia Tech 249.48 (R) 118.33 (P) 367.81 TYDS 18.41 YPPT
Projected Score
Virginia Tech (47.28) 45
Georgia Tech (21.73) 21
GL
Game 8 New Method
Virginia Tech 230.53 (R) 251.41 (P) 481.94 TYDS 9.83 YPPT
Georgia Tech 249.48 (R) 118.33 (P) 367.81 TYDS 18.41 YPPT
Projected Score
Virginia Tech (47.28) 45
Georgia Tech (21.73) 21
GL
Game 9 New Method
Baylor 156.35 (R) 225.37 (P) 381.72 TYDS 14.17 YPPT
Iowa St. 228.64 (R) 191.82 (P) 420.46 TYDS 16.70 YPPT
Projected Score
Baylor (25.18) 24
Iowa St. (26.93) 27
GL
Game 9 New Method
Baylor 156.35 (R) 225.37 (P) 381.72 TYDS 14.17 YPPT
Iowa St. 228.64 (R) 191.82 (P) 420.46 TYDS 16.70 YPPT
Projected Score
Baylor (25.18) 24
Iowa St. (26.93) 27
GL
lou4062
Go back to simple math as it is more accurate. I am working on a improved SOS multiplier system taking into account Offensive/Defensive Efficiency vs. expected efficiency. (Using Sagarin Power Ratings/Schedule ex. Wake Forest 75.77/69.61= 1.042) I hope to post projected scores using this new method for a few games sometime later today.
GL
lou4062
Go back to simple math as it is more accurate. I am working on a improved SOS multiplier system taking into account Offensive/Defensive Efficiency vs. expected efficiency. (Using Sagarin Power Ratings/Schedule ex. Wake Forest 75.77/69.61= 1.042) I hope to post projected scores using this new method for a few games sometime later today.
GL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.