College predictions are posted in college football forum.
Do u know when week 8 nfl predictions will be up ???
Do u know when week 8 nfl predictions will be up ???
Do u know when week 8 nfl predictions will be up ???
I am starting work on this now. I will need 8-10 games of stats before testing begins.
GL
I am starting work on this now. I will need 8-10 games of stats before testing begins.
GL
I ran the numbers on the NFL games yesterday using the exact formula Rough used in post # 41 but made adjustments to numbers for example if the defense gives up less than the opp. it is a plus instead of a minus because the are better against the league . (ex. Dolphins 61 Opp 89.1) Dolphins are a +28.1 and on the YPPT if the OFF is higher than the opp it is a negitive for instance the opp score a pt every 15.4 yds where the Jets take 16.1 yds so the become a -.7 So it goes like this on OFF higher than opp allow a positive and lower a negitive. ON YPPT OFF if it is higer than OPP it is a negitive. AS for DEF if R+P is lower than OPP allow it is a Positive. And on DEF if YPPT is higher it is a positive. I KNOW WTF! Anyway these are the scores from yesterday w/hfa
INDY 30 STL 18 (42-6)
SF 18 HOU 21 (21-24)
SD 24 KC 13 (37-7)
NE 40 TB 10 no/hfa (35-7)
MIN 17 PIT 23 (17-27)
GB 17 CLE 20 (31-3)
BUF 23 CAR 17 (20-9)
NYJ 20 OAK 12 (38-0)
ATL 21 DAL 24 (21-37)
NO 20 MIA 24 (46-34)
CHI 20 CIN 23 (10-45)
ARI 24 NYG 17 (24-17)
PHI 24 WAS 17 ( ? ) (27-17) Not Bad, Plus my Teaser was a Winner
THANKS ROUGH AND VG FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK!!
I ran the numbers on the NFL games yesterday using the exact formula Rough used in post # 41 but made adjustments to numbers for example if the defense gives up less than the opp. it is a plus instead of a minus because the are better against the league . (ex. Dolphins 61 Opp 89.1) Dolphins are a +28.1 and on the YPPT if the OFF is higher than the opp it is a negitive for instance the opp score a pt every 15.4 yds where the Jets take 16.1 yds so the become a -.7 So it goes like this on OFF higher than opp allow a positive and lower a negitive. ON YPPT OFF if it is higer than OPP it is a negitive. AS for DEF if R+P is lower than OPP allow it is a Positive. And on DEF if YPPT is higher it is a positive. I KNOW WTF! Anyway these are the scores from yesterday w/hfa
INDY 30 STL 18 (42-6)
SF 18 HOU 21 (21-24)
SD 24 KC 13 (37-7)
NE 40 TB 10 no/hfa (35-7)
MIN 17 PIT 23 (17-27)
GB 17 CLE 20 (31-3)
BUF 23 CAR 17 (20-9)
NYJ 20 OAK 12 (38-0)
ATL 21 DAL 24 (21-37)
NO 20 MIA 24 (46-34)
CHI 20 CIN 23 (10-45)
ARI 24 NYG 17 (24-17)
PHI 24 WAS 17 ( ? ) (27-17) Not Bad, Plus my Teaser was a Winner
THANKS ROUGH AND VG FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK!!
I've run 2 different sets of SOS with these being the projected outcomes for each. ( Adjusted to realistic scores.)
Philadelphia 27 30
Washington 10 10
Both projections are very similar in Total Yds & YPPT .
(Philly 360-379 Yds. / 12.8 - 13.3 YPPT)
(Wash. 209-223 Yds. / 24.3 - 25.2 YPPT)
GL
I've run 2 different sets of SOS with these being the projected outcomes for each. ( Adjusted to realistic scores.)
Philadelphia 27 30
Washington 10 10
Both projections are very similar in Total Yds & YPPT .
(Philly 360-379 Yds. / 12.8 - 13.3 YPPT)
(Wash. 209-223 Yds. / 24.3 - 25.2 YPPT)
GL
I did not read this whole tread because it is 1000 posts but i did read the first few. Unless something has changed Is this not the Dudley method??
The dudley was effective throughout the 80's maby early 90's but then it just got cought up with. Books cought up with it and the public widley used and I guess still uses it. Adding mass used saragin rating is not going to be enough to give you a long term edge over the books. Im not saying this doesn't give a good steping stone or a good place to start handicapping your game. But this is just not enough to get an edge on the books.
You want to know the best way to check if this will be a profitable system?? Write down the wagers over the next 200 bets. If you can beat the closing line by on average just 1 point i will stand corrected
I did not read this whole tread because it is 1000 posts but i did read the first few. Unless something has changed Is this not the Dudley method??
The dudley was effective throughout the 80's maby early 90's but then it just got cought up with. Books cought up with it and the public widley used and I guess still uses it. Adding mass used saragin rating is not going to be enough to give you a long term edge over the books. Im not saying this doesn't give a good steping stone or a good place to start handicapping your game. But this is just not enough to get an edge on the books.
You want to know the best way to check if this will be a profitable system?? Write down the wagers over the next 200 bets. If you can beat the closing line by on average just 1 point i will stand corrected
I did not read this whole tread because it is 1000 posts but i did read the first few. Unless something has changed Is this not the Dudley method??
The dudley was effective throughout the 80's maby early 90's but then it just got cought up with. Books cought up with it and the public widley used and I guess still uses it. Adding mass used saragin rating is not going to be enough to give you a long term edge over the books. Im not saying this doesn't give a good steping stone or a good place to start handicapping your game. But this is just not enough to get an edge on the books.
You want to know the best way to check if this will be a profitable system?? Write down the wagers over the next 200 bets. If you can beat the closing line by on average just 1 point i will stand corrected
Dudley Method is the starting. The way this system calculates yardage and adding SOS makes way different.
I did not read this whole tread because it is 1000 posts but i did read the first few. Unless something has changed Is this not the Dudley method??
The dudley was effective throughout the 80's maby early 90's but then it just got cought up with. Books cought up with it and the public widley used and I guess still uses it. Adding mass used saragin rating is not going to be enough to give you a long term edge over the books. Im not saying this doesn't give a good steping stone or a good place to start handicapping your game. But this is just not enough to get an edge on the books.
You want to know the best way to check if this will be a profitable system?? Write down the wagers over the next 200 bets. If you can beat the closing line by on average just 1 point i will stand corrected
Dudley Method is the starting. The way this system calculates yardage and adding SOS makes way different.
Philadelphia | 41 | 19 |
N.Y. Jets | 21 | 18 |
Indianapolis | 15 | 22 |
Detroit | 10 | 26 |
Dallas | 22 | 20 |
Chicago | 13 | 23 |
Buffalo | 22 | 17 |
Baltimore | 22 | 14 |
San Diego | 10 | 31 |
Tennessee | 21 | 24 |
Arizona | 8 | 46 |
Green Bay | 24 | 25 |
New Orleans | 25 | 30 |
Philadelphia | 41 | 19 |
N.Y. Jets | 21 | 18 |
Indianapolis | 15 | 22 |
Detroit | 10 | 26 |
Dallas | 22 | 20 |
Chicago | 13 | 23 |
Buffalo | 22 | 17 |
Baltimore | 22 | 14 |
San Diego | 10 | 31 |
Tennessee | 21 | 24 |
Arizona | 8 | 46 |
Green Bay | 24 | 25 |
New Orleans | 25 | 30 |
I have some advice- GO CASH WOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOO
I have some advice- GO CASH WOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOO
NBA TEST FORMULA
This is a test formula using last seasons stats. Do not consider this a formula play in any way. System uses very similar principles as football system, using POINTS PER ATTEMPT in each shooting situation in place of YPPT.
Test Projection
2 PTA PPA 3PTA PPA FTA PPA
Boston 57.83 .962 16.95 1.065 22.93 .821
Cleveland 56.67 .961 19.56 1.067 26.08 .771
Projected Score
Boston 92.47
Cleveland 95.44
Remember this is in the trial phase I need this years stats for more accurate results.
GL
NBA TEST FORMULA
This is a test formula using last seasons stats. Do not consider this a formula play in any way. System uses very similar principles as football system, using POINTS PER ATTEMPT in each shooting situation in place of YPPT.
Test Projection
2 PTA PPA 3PTA PPA FTA PPA
Boston 57.83 .962 16.95 1.065 22.93 .821
Cleveland 56.67 .961 19.56 1.067 26.08 .771
Projected Score
Boston 92.47
Cleveland 95.44
Remember this is in the trial phase I need this years stats for more accurate results.
GL
NBA TEST FORMULA
This is a test formula using last seasons stats. Do not consider this a formula play in any way. System uses very similar principles as football system, using POINTS PER ATTEMPT in each shooting situation in place of YPPT.
Test Projection
2 PTA PPA 3PTA PPA FTA PPA
Boston 57.83 .962 16.95 1.065 22.93 .821
Cleveland 56.67 .961 19.56 1.067 26.08 .771
Projected Score
Boston 92.47
Cleveland 95.44
Remember this is in the trial phase I need this years stats for more accurate results.
GL
NBA TEST FORMULA
This is a test formula using last seasons stats. Do not consider this a formula play in any way. System uses very similar principles as football system, using POINTS PER ATTEMPT in each shooting situation in place of YPPT.
Test Projection
2 PTA PPA 3PTA PPA FTA PPA
Boston 57.83 .962 16.95 1.065 22.93 .821
Cleveland 56.67 .961 19.56 1.067 26.08 .771
Projected Score
Boston 92.47
Cleveland 95.44
Remember this is in the trial phase I need this years stats for more accurate results.
GL
I think an unfair assumption about laziness......my fit for some, but some may just not have the technical skills to do it and are asking for help. That seems reasonable.
Congrats to the array of success stories in this thread.
I think an unfair assumption about laziness......my fit for some, but some may just not have the technical skills to do it and are asking for help. That seems reasonable.
Congrats to the array of success stories in this thread.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.