All Forums | Systems & Strategies

NHL Home Chase 3 Games Variation Plus 2

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10440
Posts: 249
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2800
Posted: #26
hehehe


Vancouver
Nashville -113
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #27
Did anyone play the Bruins in regulation only to minimize juice?  I thought about it, but I decided not to.  I wouldn't be surprised at all to see that game go into overtime. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 32
Posted: #28
Boston   -154  at -0.5    
Boston   +164 at -1.5     
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by expertcapper:



Pittsburgh
Boston  -170                (even the reg and PL cashed in ! )

TB
Washington -120 use the -.05 line   (nice hit here)

Vancouver
Nashville -113        

Good luck and Happy New Years


Well another winning day which brings the record to 69 - 1. Now I am getting impressed with the success rate of the wins. Really thought it was gonna slow down with big bets to be risked but so far, so good.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #30
This continues to be incredible! 
 
Lets go Anaheim tonight!!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2800
Posted: #31
69-1` guys whohoooooooooo


Philadelphia
Anaheim -125        the Ducks get this one
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #32

Damn it Ducks!  I almost bought the +1.5, but couldn't force myself to lay that kind of juice...wish I had now.

Let's go Predators tonight...and Stars! 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 307
Posted: #33
Im Not to sure about the Stars, they are only 38% for away games, and Edm is 40% at home. If anything I would bet Edm.
I also like the Predators
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 5
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by seahawksanders:

Damn it Ducks!  I almost bought the +1.5, but couldn't force myself to lay that kind of juice...wish I had now.

Let's go Predators tonight...and Stars! 

i dont undrestand how the stars fit this system.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 307
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by hittman2001:

i dont undrestand how the stars fit this system.

They don't,  take Edm.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2800
Posted: #36
todays games

Dallas
Edmonton -110    favorite has won the last 5 matches here
Goodluck
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #37
NASHVILLE should also be a play since they lost their first game of the chase
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #38
Edmonton always causes confusion on this it seems.  They are a bottom 8 home team, so we fade them I thought.  Nashville is definitely a play, but I thought Edmonton was a fade play.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #39
Edmonton has: Dallas, NYI, Vancouver, San Jose, and St. Louis on this homestand. 
 
I would almost bet anything that you will win on either side of this.  No way they lose them all or win them all. 
 
Going by the actual system though, which one is right? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by seahawksanders:

Edmonton has: Dallas, NYI, Vancouver, San Jose, and St. Louis on this homestand. 
 
I would almost bet anything that you will win on either side of this.  No way they lose them all or win them all. 
 
Going by the actual system though, which one is right? 


Good point. I think the way to handle this is to choose one side, either back edmonton at home or fade them all the way through. I can't see then winning all of losing all the games so I guess the only luck involved here is choosing the series that is gonna last the shortest amount of time. Obviously, there is still the slim chance that it will happen but I'd go for fading them all the way through as well. Just a feeling but system here is expert's choosing and Dallas has not done well away so it's not that bad of a bet to choose edmonton.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #41
Thanks Elithe, at least someone understands what I'm trying to say. 
 
Also, by the systems initial rules Edmonton is a fade.  They currently are the 4th worst home team in the league. 
 
Again though, you're probably going to win either way, so good luck to both sides.  I love the flexibility and capping sense this system has though.  Great job guys, let's keep it going! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by seahawksanders:

Thanks Elithe, at least someone understands what I'm trying to say. 
 
Also, by the systems initial rules Edmonton is a fade.  They currently are the 4th worst home team in the league. 
 
Again though, you're probably going to win either way, so good luck to both sides.  I love the flexibility and capping sense this system has though.  Great job guys, let's keep it going! 


True. However, by the system rules, expert's handicapping takes precedence over the fade list since other factors need to be taken into consideration. This is why I find it interesting to track and profit from this system.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #43
^ Bingo.
 
Thanks again! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #44
Nashville choked that one away for us. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by expertcapper:



Dallas
Edmonton -110          ( great pick )

but   Nashville    which was the second game of the chase so gotta keep chasing

Can now officially say that 70 units have been won with the 70 - 1 record but need to factor in the series losses that might get larger depending on the outcome of the Nashville chase. BOL to all

Seahawks - Hope you took the home side for Edmonton .
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #46
Unfortunately not Elithe (I had already placed my bet before I posted here...obviously I need to check here BEFORE posting).  Nice call guys, touche!  Looks like I have my own personal chase going now.
 
Game 3 tomorrow with Anaheim will be nerve-racking. The Rangers came through last week on a game 3, let's hope the Ducks can do the same! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by seahawksanders:


 
Game 3 tomorrow with Anaheim will be nerve-racking. The Rangers came through last week on a game 3, let's hope the Ducks can do the same! 


And, another one coming with Nashville so it's starting to get pretty tough out there. I'm not too sure why but I don't have a good feeling about these ones. Anaheim still has 2 more games which they should be able to win while Nashville has 3 more to go. Buckle up  !
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #48
Yeah Elithe, I'm squirming over Anaheim tonight.  I'm debating on playing the regulation line (+113) and then putting a small play on the overtime prop (+315) for insurance.  I thought for sure they would get Columbus in game one.
 
And yeah, Nashville scares me even more.  If they manage a win I am done with them the rest of the season.  I play some teams larger than others, thankfully Nashville I played fairly small. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 3552
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by seahawksanders:

Yeah Elithe
 
And yeah, Nashville scares me even more.  If they manage a win I am done with them the rest of the season.  I play some teams larger than others, thankfully Nashville I played fairly small. 


I can go by Eli btw.  But, I'm wondering how you decide the size of the unit you wanna chase depending on the team, Any factors in particular?  I was also thinking about the regulation line for Anaheim but tought to tell with these two teams.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 432
Posted: #50
Sorry Eli.
 
I just base it on the team themselves and who their homestand is against. 
 
I always go big on the top tier teams (Detroit, Boston, Washington, San Jose, etc), but I dont feel comfortable going the same amount on a Nashville, LA, St. Louis, etc). 
 
I did go big/normal on Anaheim though and what to do with them is stressing me out.  I'm thinking about a round-robin ML parlay with NJ, Vancouver, and Montreal to off-set a potential Ducks loss.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.