I've been out of town and just caught up to this thread, and first, it should be said that in a sea of unreadable articles around these parts, you did pen a good one, Joe. Nice work.
This Joe always likes it when other Joes promote the good of the name.
That said, I don't want to be a wet blanket here either, but the Sunday Ticket idea smacks to me of one of those fan walkouts. It's a good idea in theory, but it's going to fall apart in execution. Not to be a d*ck, but I have the Ticket and I'm not going to cancel it, and I'm as upset about this thing as anybody.
Sadly, the Ticket idea is one of those cutting off your nose to spite your face things. Now, if you are one of many who doesn't care to watch the NFL without a bet on it and are going to cancel your subscription anyway, then, sure, all of you canceling on the same day is a nice gesture, but really I think that's going to be about it.
Right now the NFL is the 800 lb. gorilla and, as mentioned above, the number of subscribers overall would swallow up the few hundred, even thousand or two that protest.
The other thing I wonder about is this. Do we really need publicity?
One of the things I agree with in the article, that I've been saying for some time, is that the promotion and advertising that specific companies have done has been a killer to us. I personally want to beat the marketing department at Sportsbook.com with a blunt object for about 27 consecutive hours. The stuff some of these companies have done is akin to having Vito stand outside a police station with a whiteboard asking for action it's that unbelievably stupid.
The truth is, it's easier politically and faux-morally to condemn gambling across the board and accept a fight against it, either tacitly or overtly, than to stand up for it. In part because of the stigma, but also because again, as mentioned above, gamblers for the most part enjoy their anonymity.
But what gamblers have in this fight is money. And money, in many ways in this country, is still speech (yes, I'm a liberal, and yes, I just said that).
So, in my opinion, what we need to do is put that money to good use and get a lobby. The poker players--who some sports guys blame for all of this--aren't our enemy, and nor are we theirs. Same with the horse folk. There should be room for us all on the same bus because once one of us gets thrown in the dock, there's no reason they won't eventually come for the others whenever they feel like it.
I think it's time we use our money to find our voice and pay for democracy the way all the other lobbies do.
As the article says, we're at an impasse, but that doesn't mean the only way to go from here is up. If we do nothing, there's a very good chance that impasse becomes isolation, that isolation becomes illegality, and then everyone who doesn't want to drive 600 miles or fly four hours to a corporate casino somewhere suddenly becomes a criminal.