Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:
GB will ironically have an easier time beating the physical Bucs in Florida/warm weather as oppOsed to frigid GB. Things have a funny way of going full circle.
Hmm. Yeah, idk. I feel like they rather play at home again still.
|
budwiser | 79 |
|
|
This GB defense is turning up the wick right now. They have faced Kyler Murray, Patrick Mahomes and Russell Wilson over the past three weeks. They held those 3 guys to a combined 62-of-110 (56.3%), 601 yards, 1 total TD, 4 INT.
I think their offense can still play way better as they get some offensive lineman back from injury to open up the playbook. I do think they're the favorite in the NFC right now. |
ActionMagnet | 17 |
|
|
Rodgers isn’t in play. Atleast not logistically for Green Bay. |
Clutch424 | 6 |
|
|
@chic-cardinals Absolutely he’s lost velocity. He throws up ducks that hangs in the air for a long time. Mahomes, Wilson, Rodgers, you can see just how much zip they have. It flys down the field. It doesn’t take long to come down. |
ChOmP | 36 |
|
|
@chic-cardinals What did they do against Buffalo? Stopped them in the red zone numerous times. This team is charged up ready to win another. These Bucs corners won’t hold up against these KC receivers. We’ve seen it already.
|
ChOmP | 36 |
|
|
@NutinButtLove What impressed me is how causally KC beat the shit out of Buffalo.
These Chiefs weapons make it so easy for Mahomes, you’re spot on with Green Bay having long, lanky, receivers, they need a guy like Rondale Moore to blow the top off defenses. I think Tampa’s secondary gets torched. Fuck, they even gave up a ton of yards yesterday. |
BadBear72 | 26 |
|
|
Mahomes gonna show this Tampa defense up. I’d like to see the Bucs secondary run with Tyreek and contain Kelce all game. Not to mention Hardman is a deep threat. Tampa got torched by Green Bay’s receivers. Fucking laughable.
Packers lost because of Mike Pettine, a legit trash can. Spags won’t be shown up.
KC has got this. |
ChOmP | 36 |
|
|
Mike Remmers is a good backup. Shouldn’t be much drop off. |
ActionMagnet | 4 |
|
|
@Cash333 You’re joking right?
Dude, their secondary doesn’t match up at all with these KC weapons. Tampa is going to get thrown up just like earlier.
Fuck, even Green Bay threw all over them with way less weapons. Andy Reid also has the coaching advantage. |
ActionMagnet | 80 |
|
|
@ActionMagnet Lmao, it also took the Packers to get hosed on numerous no calls to pull this one out.
Imagine what KC could do to this Tampa secondary after the Packers torched it today. |
ActionMagnet | 80 |
|
|
GL.
|
Gettinghot4now | 22 |
|
|
GL. I hope so. |
BET2WIN4 | 6 |
|
|
He most likely will be on a snap count. He hasn’t played in months either. I’m not saying he won’t be a factor, but I wouldn’t count on it. |
Goldilockss | 23 |
|
|
@mrusso I do find it a little interesting that Bowles sent those blitz packages in that game. Tampa was getting carved up early so he just sent extra guys in creative ways. He did what he had to do so they could win, but I wonder if he shouldn’t have shown his hand. It’s something you can adjust to, and it Green Bay adjusted right than they should be fine.
You really have to wonder if the Bucs lose this game, if Todd Bowles just waited to show Rodgers those pressure packages in the playoffs, that Tampa would surely be victorious. |
mrusso | 45 |
|
|
@begginerboy Oh, I’d agree Pettine sucks, their defense would be much better with a good coordinator. Spags is a great DC and he definitely has the advantage, but I still trust Green Bay to put up points and go toe to toe with the Chiefs. Both offenses are very efficient, and can put up points with ease. I think it would be a shootout, but like I said, I disagree with you on Lafleur not being a good coach.
Probably won’t matter anyway because I think Tampa wins. I may be a fan, but I’m not biased at all. I cap games for a matchup standpoint, and Tampa matches up well against Green Bay. I do think the Packers would have an easier time beating KC than Tampa. |
undermysac | 43 |
|
|
@lancer89074 It wasn’t really the Bucs secondary. It was the blitzing that held the Packers down. I’ll give credit to Dean, he made a great play, the other pick was tipped. I’ve watched the all-22 and the Packers had open receivers all over. |
mrusso | 45 |
|
|
You’re spot on with the books. They do not want Tampa or KC winning it all. If both make it, that’s the worst case scenario for them.
On the NFL side, I think Green Bay vs KC would draw the biggest audience. Just on a matchup alone, it appears to be the most exciting one. |
RagnarLothbrok | 7 |
|
|
@begginerboy Mahomes is also a young QB though. He even said the thing he needed to improve the most in his game was on the mental side. He’s actively learning day by day. He will get more freedom in a few years. Rodgers being an experienced, smart qb, shouldn’t be a knock on Lafleur’s coaching ability. |
undermysac | 43 |
|
|
@begginerboy Rodgers had that same freedom to call plays in the McCarthy era and where did that get them McCarthy’s last two years in Green Bay?
Rodgers has the same freedom now, to check out of a play and use another one. I don’t think it’s fair to question his coaching ability until he has actually proven he isn’t a good coach. |
undermysac | 43 |
|
|
@begginerboy Like I said earlier, I disagree. This offense schemes guys wide open. He also brought that zone running game over to GB and it’s very good. I think you’re giving Rodgers too much credit here. |
undermysac | 43 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.