@222bad, so what's your point? That NC-State's been puttin up those totals against bad defenses? Cuz, newsflash: Carolina is a bad defense.
Easy big guy, just pointing out who they've played and where, and yes without Strickland not an overpowering D. Now that he's gone, maybe the team defense now becomes more of a focus.? Just throwing shit out there, don't take anything personal.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DannySatan:
@222bad, so what's your point? That NC-State's been puttin up those totals against bad defenses? Cuz, newsflash: Carolina is a bad defense.
Easy big guy, just pointing out who they've played and where, and yes without Strickland not an overpowering D. Now that he's gone, maybe the team defense now becomes more of a focus.? Just throwing shit out there, don't take anything personal.
Also some quick thoughts on Miss +6, Wisky -7 and Wash -7 if you got some time.
Thanks, your time is much appreciated. GL
Washington's only road victory on the year comes over Utah.............................................by 4. Too chalky for me w/ a young team that goes to Zona next.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dosan23:
Also some quick thoughts on Miss +6, Wisky -7 and Wash -7 if you got some time.
Thanks, your time is much appreciated. GL
Washington's only road victory on the year comes over Utah.............................................by 4. Too chalky for me w/ a young team that goes to Zona next.
Easy big guy, just pointing out who they've played and where, and yes without Strickland not an overpowering D. Now that he's gone, maybe the team defense now becomes more of a focus.? Just throwing shit out there, don't take anything personal.
I can assure you that I'm not taking anything personal; no worries.
0
Quote Originally Posted by 222bad:
Easy big guy, just pointing out who they've played and where, and yes without Strickland not an overpowering D. Now that he's gone, maybe the team defense now becomes more of a focus.? Just throwing shit out there, don't take anything personal.
I can assure you that I'm not taking anything personal; no worries.
Is there anyway NC State hangs with UNC tonight? I believe Strickland being out helps NC State quite a bit. Thanks in advance for your insight.
I think it's possible they hang with UNC. Game's going to be a track meet if neither coach is willing to change that, and if that's the case, it's hard to take the points. UNC has been chewing people up and spitting them out at home.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cbuc:
Is there anyway NC State hangs with UNC tonight? I believe Strickland being out helps NC State quite a bit. Thanks in advance for your insight.
I think it's possible they hang with UNC. Game's going to be a track meet if neither coach is willing to change that, and if that's the case, it's hard to take the points. UNC has been chewing people up and spitting them out at home.
to be honest with you nropp ??? I didn't see much from your picks again yesterday. are you sure you look at your games before your make decision for the real gamblers on here?? I sure did like florida state yesterday, how about you ?? ha ha
0
to be honest with you nropp ??? I didn't see much from your picks again yesterday. are you sure you look at your games before your make decision for the real gamblers on here?? I sure did like florida state yesterday, how about you ?? ha ha
See some value with Tenn Tech. In the past week, EKU's gone to a 2OT game with Martin, and just played a faster than normal, I mean really fast Longwood team that plays zero defense. Tech's more talented, but they don't guard the three-point line, which is where almost all of EKU's points come from.
Slight value on SEMO. Peay's on third game end of roady, and SEMO with revenge from last year's tourney. SEMO's taken care of business at home, different atmosphere there this year. And they match up with Peay a ton better than they have in past years. Going to be a bunch of slashing and creating in this one. Team that does it better should win.
I think Montana's too big, and too talented, but they let teams launch from beyond the arc and that's what EWU does on offense. Tough game.
No thoughts on Idaho State. Generally not interested in any game in the Big Sky unless it involves Montana or Weber State. Teams 3-9 in that conference are pretty even and can win on any given night.
GL
THANKS FOR STOPPING BY BRO
0
Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:
See some value with Tenn Tech. In the past week, EKU's gone to a 2OT game with Martin, and just played a faster than normal, I mean really fast Longwood team that plays zero defense. Tech's more talented, but they don't guard the three-point line, which is where almost all of EKU's points come from.
Slight value on SEMO. Peay's on third game end of roady, and SEMO with revenge from last year's tourney. SEMO's taken care of business at home, different atmosphere there this year. And they match up with Peay a ton better than they have in past years. Going to be a bunch of slashing and creating in this one. Team that does it better should win.
I think Montana's too big, and too talented, but they let teams launch from beyond the arc and that's what EWU does on offense. Tough game.
No thoughts on Idaho State. Generally not interested in any game in the Big Sky unless it involves Montana or Weber State. Teams 3-9 in that conference are pretty even and can win on any given night.
I just don't see how UNC is supposed to score enough points to win by 13, when a) they're without arguably their best defensive player, and b) their opponent tonight has scored 75+ in 8 of their last 9 games.
Of course the have. Look who they have played. (all mentioned in the post) Most any team can hang 75+ points on these teams, and most do...
UNC wins by 13 if they continue to do 3 things. Two, of them they consistently do:
1) Score. 85.1 ppg. Thats good for #1 in the country.
2) Rebound. 46.4 rpg. That's good for #1 in the country.
3) Defense. Well, this is where it gets tricky. If they play like they did vs FSU and UNLV, whelp, anyone can pull one out on em'. They play like they did vs VT 2nd half and they can beat anyone...
Its going to be a good game, and it wont be easy for UNC...
0
Quote Originally Posted by DannySatan:
I just don't see how UNC is supposed to score enough points to win by 13, when a) they're without arguably their best defensive player, and b) their opponent tonight has scored 75+ in 8 of their last 9 games.
Of course the have. Look who they have played. (all mentioned in the post) Most any team can hang 75+ points on these teams, and most do...
UNC wins by 13 if they continue to do 3 things. Two, of them they consistently do:
1) Score. 85.1 ppg. Thats good for #1 in the country.
2) Rebound. 46.4 rpg. That's good for #1 in the country.
3) Defense. Well, this is where it gets tricky. If they play like they did vs FSU and UNLV, whelp, anyone can pull one out on em'. They play like they did vs VT 2nd half and they can beat anyone...
Its going to be a good game, and it wont be easy for UNC...
UF lost to Rutgers and UT on road. Mississippi is undefeated at home with a recent win against Miss State. I would recommend not laying anything on UF.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Rutgers has also beaten Uconn and Notre Dame at home, two teams that are much better than any of those Ole Miss wins at home.
Tennessee's home performance is also better than Ole Miss.
Please, no comparisons of Florida's offense and Mississippi State's offense in this thread. I was on Ole Miss that game. Good spot for them. This is not.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by will79:
UF lost to Rutgers and UT on road. Mississippi is undefeated at home with a recent win against Miss State. I would recommend not laying anything on UF.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Rutgers has also beaten Uconn and Notre Dame at home, two teams that are much better than any of those Ole Miss wins at home.
Tennessee's home performance is also better than Ole Miss.
Please, no comparisons of Florida's offense and Mississippi State's offense in this thread. I was on Ole Miss that game. Good spot for them. This is not.
They kicked their best player off the team recently and now their remaining best player, Lockett, who leads the team in scoring, rebounds, assists and steals, is doubtful. He missed the last game and they got drilled by 20 by one of the worst teams in the country...Utah! Tough for me to see Arizona State ML...in fact, I am inclined to lay the wood.....but that's just my opinion.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Az St ML ?
and
Arizona State ML????
They kicked their best player off the team recently and now their remaining best player, Lockett, who leads the team in scoring, rebounds, assists and steals, is doubtful. He missed the last game and they got drilled by 20 by one of the worst teams in the country...Utah! Tough for me to see Arizona State ML...in fact, I am inclined to lay the wood.....but that's just my opinion.
Thoughts about the WAC - Nevada's been a cover machine but NM State is very tough at home; Hawaii's playing very well too (lost with 2 guys out last week, but better than usual on the road) getting 8 at Utah State. Looking at the road dogs...and I kind of like Utah and all those points off a big win over a decimated Arizona State team.
0
Thoughts about the WAC - Nevada's been a cover machine but NM State is very tough at home; Hawaii's playing very well too (lost with 2 guys out last week, but better than usual on the road) getting 8 at Utah State. Looking at the road dogs...and I kind of like Utah and all those points off a big win over a decimated Arizona State team.
Loymary? healthy and playing well SFO? Foster out for sclar and they've struggled against uptempo teams Riverside? Played well at home Lbst just went on road and won b2b against their best comp in bigwest. letdown? Fla und? Miss is offensively challenged Nmexst?
Rough spot for St. Mary's, and Loyola MMT playing good, good basketball. I got no interest though.
Foster loss is a decent sized loss for Clara, but honestly, neither of these teams play a single lick of defense.
I see value in Riverside, yes. Long Beach State tail end of roady coming off big win. But not a big fan of the matchups, and not sure how Martin's going to score. Could be wrong, but I think UC Santa Barbara went zone in that loss. Long Beach won't be doing any of that tonight.
No interest in fading a Nevada team who's as hot as any team in the country, especially with NMST coming back from the island.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by fantasychamp:
Loymary? healthy and playing well SFO? Foster out for sclar and they've struggled against uptempo teams Riverside? Played well at home Lbst just went on road and won b2b against their best comp in bigwest. letdown? Fla und? Miss is offensively challenged Nmexst?
Rough spot for St. Mary's, and Loyola MMT playing good, good basketball. I got no interest though.
Foster loss is a decent sized loss for Clara, but honestly, neither of these teams play a single lick of defense.
I see value in Riverside, yes. Long Beach State tail end of roady coming off big win. But not a big fan of the matchups, and not sure how Martin's going to score. Could be wrong, but I think UC Santa Barbara went zone in that loss. Long Beach won't be doing any of that tonight.
No interest in fading a Nevada team who's as hot as any team in the country, especially with NMST coming back from the island.
One game that stood out to me was Bill and Mary catching 8 or so at Jim Madison. I like the road team to maybe get the outright.
One thing that stood out ot me last night was the SMU Tulane game flying over 109. I don't think the linemakers have caught on t the fact that Tulane is now pushing tempo, it appears.
Yah, I spit out my pop when I saw that score.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Trec:
One game that stood out to me was Bill and Mary catching 8 or so at Jim Madison. I like the road team to maybe get the outright.
One thing that stood out ot me last night was the SMU Tulane game flying over 109. I don't think the linemakers have caught on t the fact that Tulane is now pushing tempo, it appears.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
and 
Hot Forum Topics
