We hit Rutgers and Ncstate. Ill had their chances - just didn't get it done. I knew when Ward picked up the ball and ran with it - he was going to fumble - unfortunately he did. Before that he hits the QB after he clearly released the ball - He wanted to be a hero - ended up being a goat - anyways spilled milk.
Record stands at 5-3. Let's look at some numbers:
VT 96 17 52 48 (100)
3.5 Cincy 29 101 51 96 (147)
Cincy opens as a 3.5 fav. currently around 3. Cincy is better in total off. rank at 29 and better sagarin rank at 51; their composite is 147. VT is better in Total def. and Sched. strength - their composite is 100. Wen you have a small fav. with a larger/worst composite - that typically means you go with the top team/ VT.
I'm taking VT, Duke, Miami, BC. I didn't realize it but I guess i'm taking the ACC teams. I'll come back later with the Neb/USC game. Good luck all.
We hit Rutgers and Ncstate. Ill had their chances - just didn't get it done. I knew when Ward picked up the ball and ran with it - he was going to fumble - unfortunately he did. Before that he hits the QB after he clearly released the ball - He wanted to be a hero - ended up being a goat - anyways spilled milk.
Record stands at 5-3. Let's look at some numbers:
VT 96 17 52 48 (100)
3.5 Cincy 29 101 51 96 (147)
Cincy opens as a 3.5 fav. currently around 3. Cincy is better in total off. rank at 29 and better sagarin rank at 51; their composite is 147. VT is better in Total def. and Sched. strength - their composite is 100. Wen you have a small fav. with a larger/worst composite - that typically means you go with the top team/ VT.
I'm taking VT, Duke, Miami, BC. I didn't realize it but I guess i'm taking the ACC teams. I'll come back later with the Neb/USC game. Good luck all.
Let's look at some numbers:
Neb 35 47 26 62 (88)
5.5 Usc 31 68 18 28 (46)
Usc opens up as a 5.5 fav...currently 7.5. USC is better in all categories except Total def. I know Neb. has gone thru a coaching change, and other issues.....however, I look at things from a number stand point and the data indicates Neb. should keep it close. I'm taking Neb + 7.5 Good luck all.
Let's look at some numbers:
Neb 35 47 26 62 (88)
5.5 Usc 31 68 18 28 (46)
Usc opens up as a 5.5 fav...currently 7.5. USC is better in all categories except Total def. I know Neb. has gone thru a coaching change, and other issues.....however, I look at things from a number stand point and the data indicates Neb. should keep it close. I'm taking Neb + 7.5 Good luck all.
vetran - yes...near Tysons corner - you?
That Duke game was beautiful - had a parlay on the over/duke - that came thru - was hoping they would win it su. Who knows what would have happened with the psu/bc game if bc kicker would have made it - choices and consequences - spilled milk let's move on.
We hit vt, duke and neb so we went 3-2 on Saturday - record stands at 8-5. Let's look at some numbers:
Clem 62 1 22 51 (73)
pk Okl 20 54 14 24 (38)
Okl opens up as a Pk - currently okl is a 4.5 fav. Okla is better in every category above except def. One would think go with okal, however, lot's of data already this bowl season that supports taking the top team with this scenario ( duke, Rutgers, neb, psu, cmich - (yeah I know) - the one that didn't do it was Miami). Even previous seasons the top team often comes out on top or keeps it close. I'm taking Clem but being careful.
In the first game - I recognize Trickett is out. However, I still like Wva - 1.5 or 2 pts. whatever it is.
In the late game I think Ark takes it.
Good luck all.
vetran - yes...near Tysons corner - you?
That Duke game was beautiful - had a parlay on the over/duke - that came thru - was hoping they would win it su. Who knows what would have happened with the psu/bc game if bc kicker would have made it - choices and consequences - spilled milk let's move on.
We hit vt, duke and neb so we went 3-2 on Saturday - record stands at 8-5. Let's look at some numbers:
Clem 62 1 22 51 (73)
pk Okl 20 54 14 24 (38)
Okl opens up as a Pk - currently okl is a 4.5 fav. Okla is better in every category above except def. One would think go with okal, however, lot's of data already this bowl season that supports taking the top team with this scenario ( duke, Rutgers, neb, psu, cmich - (yeah I know) - the one that didn't do it was Miami). Even previous seasons the top team often comes out on top or keeps it close. I'm taking Clem but being careful.
In the first game - I recognize Trickett is out. However, I still like Wva - 1.5 or 2 pts. whatever it is.
In the late game I think Ark takes it.
Good luck all.
vet - thanks appreciate that - i'm with ya.
wood - look at post #40
Based on the way the lines are going up with Clem and Ark - thinking about taking them in a teaser - hate laying the 20% juice but it increases the margin of error - anyone good with calculating teaser odds - worth it not worth it?
vet - thanks appreciate that - i'm with ya.
wood - look at post #40
Based on the way the lines are going up with Clem and Ark - thinking about taking them in a teaser - hate laying the 20% juice but it increases the margin of error - anyone good with calculating teaser odds - worth it not worth it?
We hit Ark and Clem.......wva didn't do it. - record stands at 10-6. Let's look at some numbers for today:
ND 36 71 35 41 (76)
8 LSU 80 8 11 3 (14)
LSU opens up as a 8 pt fav. the line has jumped around a bit - down to 7 back to 8, maybe 7.5. On paper LSU dominates in total def. at 8, sagarin rank at 11 and schedule strength at 3. While ND is only better with total off. at 36.
Purely based on the numbers, patterns and historical results - i'm going with ND and the points. My heart says LSU but the numbers and the data indicate ND. I recognize they are starting Zaire vice Golson - anytime there is a qb change in college or nfl - you gotta be careful.
For the record - I'm taking ND. Also, i'm going with Louisville and Stanford.
Good luck all.
We hit Ark and Clem.......wva didn't do it. - record stands at 10-6. Let's look at some numbers for today:
ND 36 71 35 41 (76)
8 LSU 80 8 11 3 (14)
LSU opens up as a 8 pt fav. the line has jumped around a bit - down to 7 back to 8, maybe 7.5. On paper LSU dominates in total def. at 8, sagarin rank at 11 and schedule strength at 3. While ND is only better with total off. at 36.
Purely based on the numbers, patterns and historical results - i'm going with ND and the points. My heart says LSU but the numbers and the data indicate ND. I recognize they are starting Zaire vice Golson - anytime there is a qb change in college or nfl - you gotta be careful.
For the record - I'm taking ND. Also, i'm going with Louisville and Stanford.
Good luck all.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.