A conference having 6 teams in the top 10 at the end of the regular season is smoke and mirrors? 
If anyone is wondering what type of SEC-hater this thread is about, this guy is definitely one of them.
A conference having 6 teams in the top 10 at the end of the regular season is smoke and mirrors?
If anyone is wondering what type of SEC-hater this thread is about, this guy is definitely one of them.
In post #65 you said the SEC only had a “good team or two at the top.”
In post #73 you said Alabama and A&M are great.
In post #75 you said LSU and Florida are good.
So what is it? Did you forget what you posted earlier today? Did your opinion change over the course of a few hours? Or are you simply trolling?
In post #65 you said the SEC only had a “good team or two at the top.”
In post #73 you said Alabama and A&M are great.
In post #75 you said LSU and Florida are good.
So what is it? Did you forget what you posted earlier today? Did your opinion change over the course of a few hours? Or are you simply trolling?
We all know why you delusional SEC-haters are frustrated with the SEC. They have dominated college football for the last decade and it pisses you off.
The SEC has 6 straight BCS Championships and in six weeks it’s going to be 7 straight. It’s understandable that you’re jealous, but I would think by now you’d be use to it.
We all know why you delusional SEC-haters are frustrated with the SEC. They have dominated college football for the last decade and it pisses you off.
The SEC has 6 straight BCS Championships and in six weeks it’s going to be 7 straight. It’s understandable that you’re jealous, but I would think by now you’d be use to it.
. good point 
. I see your debating skills are not up to par .
I had a feeling your might attempt to claim that (seeing as how that was your only opinion other than manning up and attempting you were wrong) so that’s why I included what post you made each statement in. There was no need for manipulation because that’s simply what said. People can easily check each post and see that’s exactly what you posted.
Sorry kid, but there’s no editing on covers. What you posted is there for everyone to see.
Based on your previous posts it’s pretty obvious you’re just a bitter and jealous man that blindly hates the SEC and can’t even put forth an even mildly intelligence argument. Not only are you talking out of your behind, but you keep changing what your opinion is and can’t even remember what you posted a few hours ago. At least some of the other SEC-haters can occasionally have a somewhat intelligent conversation.
I had a feeling your might attempt to claim that (seeing as how that was your only opinion other than manning up and attempting you were wrong) so that’s why I included what post you made each statement in. There was no need for manipulation because that’s simply what said. People can easily check each post and see that’s exactly what you posted.
Sorry kid, but there’s no editing on covers. What you posted is there for everyone to see.
You are mincing about good vs great etc... I explained my position in post #79. Feel free to mince all you want but that is not the point here.
Based on your previous posts it’s pretty obvious you’re just a bitter and jealous man that blindly hates the SEC and can’t even put forth an even mildly intelligence argument. Not only are you talking out of your behind, but you keep changing what your opinion is and can’t even remember what you posted a few hours ago. At least some of the other SEC-haters can occasionally have a somewhat intelligent conversation.
You contradicted yourself yet again. Previously you said the SEC only had a “good team or two.” Then you said “outside of a Bama and A&M (and a few other non-SEC teams) the rest of the SEC is good.”
Can you really not remember the things you’ve posted a few hours before or is it that your opinion changes hourly?
The SEC All Conference Team could probably beat some NFL teams. I think Alabama, Georgia, Florida, LSU, and A&M by themselves would be enough to beat Notre Dame.
And I find it interesting how you praise Notre Dame then claim “the bottom half of the SEC needs to focus on beating the Sun Belt” when the mighty fighting Irish beat Purdue at home by 3 points, beat BYU at home by 3 points, and beat Pittsburgh at home by 3 points in triple OT.
I should know better than to respond to trolling, but here goes:
ND has won the games on their schedule. (Ala is 6-6 ATS in all their blowout wins which includes 3 southern small fry). Most of NDs' opponents are long term rivals and play their best when ND comes to town, and are not intimidated by the Irish. ND as an independent travelled all over the country. Their style of play is conservative, mistake free, and keep opponents out of the endzone. How many TDs has Bama allowed? I also believe that outside of A&M and LSU, other SEC teams do not give their best when Bama's game is on the schedule. PAC12 teams and BIG12 likewise hurt themselves by defeating each other. Perhaps that's the edge we are seeing the last few years. It certainly helps put the SEC team into the last game scenario, while they play their best poker hands and rarely play west of the Mississippi or north of the Mason-Dixon line.That being said, the line is correct, but the polls are wrong: BAma should be #1 -- ND #2.
Why do you speculate on the NFL? What QB would you use from the SEC right now to lead such a squad? Sorry, college kids would be destroyed and manhandled by ANY NFL team. Dumb speculation.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
