All Forums | College Football

Do SEC-haters actually believe the retarded things they post?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 16890
Posts: 224
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 27292
Posted: #51
Middleman must be a bookie who lost all his money on the SEC today. Go cry somewhere else mang nobody cares about you punk
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 1645
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by middleman820:

WHEN YOUR LIFE REVOLVES AROUND COLLEGE FOOTBALL AND YOU HAVE 20,000 POST'S IN 5 YEARS AND YOUR FAVORITE TV SHOW IS WWE RAW I THINK YOUR A REDNECK WITHOUT A LIFE! 

Oh hell man you may have 20,000 post in 5 years also. It's easy when you use Emoticon's  as many people do.

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #53

Quote Originally Posted by Osirus13:

Shooter- post 31... I'll even give away Yankee titles as I refuse to give any credit to coll football champs. Basketball is different. They decide it on the court

College football is decided on the field.  If you play in a decent conference and win your games 9 times out of 10 you’re in the championship game.   I wish they would have an 8 team playoff, but the way they have it now isn’t as bad as some people make it out to be.

Take this season for example. Notre Dame is the only unbeaten left standing (that’s not on probation) and they will play the 12-1 champion of the hardest conference in college football.

Seems fair to me.

Besides: if there was an 8 team playoff system the SEC would have at least two teams in it every year (hell, at least 4 of the 8 teams would be from the SEC this season).  I seriously doubt the SEC's title count would be much different.

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

People who rally around the SEC are insecure, and need something bigger than themselves to latch into for feeling more secure, more connected and maybe powerful for a brief moment.

Some people say the same thing about sports fans in general.

I don’t agree with either generalization.

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by cam2smitty:


Do you really believe an NCAA Tournament format is feasible for determining a football champion? Football requires much more time due to the physical toll the game takes on the players as well as the time to prepare for highly complex schemes. The new play-in format should be great for the game.

Football is America's pass time. You need to accept this fact instead of walking around bitter about nobody coming to watch you play your non-contact sport in high school. 
yes of course I think it's a good way to decide a champ. They also use a tournament in: nfl, nba, MLB, NHL, coll ws, anything! It's how you do it. Coll football draws there natl champs out of a hat. Fraud champs. Sorry bama fans.  Win a championship in bball where a computer doesn't put you there please
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1009
Posted: #56

Quote Originally Posted by estes1717:

Middleman must be a bookie who lost all his money on the SEC today. Go cry somewhere else mang nobody cares about you punk

YOU LUCAN JAKE LAKE AND EDDOTHE BOOK ARE COMPLETE D AZZES.GEORGIA"S GOT YOUR A HOLE
PUCKERING RIGHT NOW!!!

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #57
Shooter to respond to your last post. Well 2nd to last post. In the nfl the giants were7-7 at one point yet won sb. Nobody complained. Why do you have to be undefeated or one of 7 11-1 teams? Too many teams similar there. Why can't a 10-2 team win a natl title over a 11-1 team?

Also your opinion on fla st and acc. The acc is awful always has been. Sadly I think it's actually better now then in the 90s early 2000s. Fsu isn't really an acc team. They are just stuck there. Talent level is top notch. So Fsu won NATl titles in the 90s, played in a few others they lost in98, 2000 etc. 14 straight top 5 finishes. Why now are people saying they cant play cuz of acc? They got respect back then. Yesterday's game doesn't mean anything. Those teams go back and forth. Fsu won last 2 games
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1009
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by Lucan:

 

All people in the south or not the same and that goes elsewhere also. The south is not the only place were people or screwing their kin folks. It's been going on all over for hundreds of years. Do your family tree, you may find out your great grandpa married his cousin, or sister.  

Every full blooded inbreed person i know or the most dangerous people on earth and will cut your throat or shoot you between the eyes and then (f) your brains out threw you nose. When you mixed family blood by a birth it makes people go crazy. It makes their eyes yellow and they stand out in a crowd. 

Plus if someone is an inbreed it's not their fault who screwed who before they was born.  

So if you live in the south the inbreed word is one word you need to take out your vocabulary.

 

THIS STATEMENT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF!!!YOU STILL THINK THE SOUTH WON THE CIVIL WAR!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1009
Posted: #59
Quote Originally Posted by Lucan:

Oh hell man you may have 20,000 post in 5 years also. It's easy when you use Emoticon's  as many people do.

 

  580 is close to 20,000
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1009
Posted: #60

Quote Originally Posted by estes1717:

Middleman must be a bookie who lost all his money on the SEC today. Go cry somewhere else mang nobody cares about you punk

YOUR MOTHER' ALSO YOUR COUSIN ACCORDING TO LUCAN!IT IS  NOT YOUR FAULT! 

ROLL TIDE !!! 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1009
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

I can’t tell if the SEC-haters on this board are delusional morons that honestly believe the idiotic things they post or if they are simply trolls.

  LOOK AT THE INBREDS THAT AGREE WITH YOU? IT'S NOT THEIR FAULT  MANG!!! ESTES 1717 USUALLY JUST GIVE THE FINGER, LUCAN SAY'S IT'S OK TO BE INBRED AND EXPLAINS IT TO A T WITH SOME RATIONALE.LOOK AT EDDOTHEBOOKS TOP 10? JAKETHELAKE WANTS THE MAC IN THE BCS?THESE PEOPLE THAT AGREE WITH YOU ARE THE MORONS .PEOPLE THAT DISAGREE HAVE OTHER OPINIONS AND UNTIL THERE IS A LEGIT PLAYOFF ,THEN THERE WILL BE DISAGREEMENTS! 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by Osirus13:

Shooter to respond to your last post. Well 2nd to last post. In the nfl the giants were7-7 at one point yet won sb. Nobody complained. Why do you have to be undefeated or one of 7 11-1 teams? Too many teams similar there. Why can't a 10-2 team win a natl title over a 11-1 team?

Also your opinion on fla st and acc. The acc is awful always has been. Sadly I think it's actually better now then in the 90s early 2000s. Fsu isn't really an acc team. They are just stuck there. Talent level is top notch. So Fsu won NATl titles in the 90s, played in a few others they lost in98, 2000 etc. 14 straight top 5 finishes. Why now are people saying they cant play cuz of acc? They got respect back then. Yesterday's game doesn't mean anything. Those teams go back and forth. Fsu won last 2 games

I’m not sure what you’re arguing about in your first paragraph.  I already posted “I wish they would have an 8 team playoff.”

As for your second paragraph: I have no idea what you’re talking about.  At no point in this thread did I even mention FSU or the ACC.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 5843
Posted: #63
Osirus-

You just sound like a bitter FSU fan- quit hating on the SEC- really it's pathetic the way you whine about it- If FSU would have won the National Championship then you wouldn't be here saying college football is a fraud sport- get the fu_k out of here with that crap- And you really thing the ACC is better now than in the 90's when FSU was kicking behind on a yearly basis? The fact is FSU used to dominate the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball- that is not the case lately- Two prime examples were yesterday's games where Florida and S. Carolina dominated in the trenches. As much as people hate it- the SEC was 4-0 against the ACC yesterday.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #64

Quote Originally Posted by middleman820:

  LOOK AT THE INBREDS THAT AGREE WITH YOU? IT'S NOT THEIR FAULT  MANG!!! ESTES 1717 USUALLY JUST GIVE THE FINGER, LUCAN SAY'S IT'S OK TO BE INBRED AND EXPLAINS IT TO A T WITH SOME RATIONALE.LOOK AT EDDOTHEBOOKS TOP 10? JAKETHELAKE WANTS THE MAC IN THE BCS?THESE PEOPLE THAT AGREE WITH YOU ARE THE MORONS .PEOPLE THAT DISAGREE HAVE OTHER OPINIONS AND UNTIL THERE IS A LEGIT PLAYOFF ,THEN THERE WILL BE DISAGREEMENTS! 

I’m talking about the morons that make idiotic claims like the SEC isn’t the best conference in college football, but then they can’t name a conference that’s better.  Are you one of them?

And there will ALWAYS be disagreements about the format; playoffs or not.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 6840
Posted: #65
SEC is overrated and that is that. Good team or two at the top but after that the SEC is 

Read that this is the first 10 win season since 1998. Wonder why 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 6840
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:

SEC is overrated and that is that. Good team or two at the top but after that the SEC is 

Read that this is the first 10 win season since 1998. Wonder why 

Should say first 10 win season for A&M
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by blowoutgm:

Osirus-

You just sound like a bitter FSU fan- quit hating on the SEC- really it's pathetic the way you whine about it- If FSU would have won the National Championship then you wouldn't be here saying college football is a fraud sport- get the fu_k out of here with that crap- And you really thing the ACC is better now than in the 90's when FSU was kicking behind on a yearly basis? The fact is FSU used to dominate the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball- that is not the case lately- Two prime examples were yesterday's games where Florida and S. Carolina dominated in the trenches. As much as people hate it- the SEC was 4-0 against the ACC yesterday.
no, I would still say its a fraud. Fsu won it all in 1993, 1999, and lost to Oklahoma in 2000. All though they were good enough I don't know if they deserve bids in those games. So, still a fraud
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 14174
Posted: #68
Yes. The acc is better now than the 90s. As bad as it is now it was awful then. Fsu didn't come close to losing games
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

I’m talking about the morons that make idiotic claims like the SEC isn’t the best conference in college football, but then they can’t name a conference that’s better.  Are you one of them?

And there will ALWAYS be disagreements about the format; playoffs or not.

 

SEC is the best on many levels. But ND isn't playing the SEC All Conference Team, as so many posters assume they are from how they talk and rant. ND has the #9 rated SOS, compared to #20 for Alabama. That was before last night's game when ND travelled all across country to play in LA, while Bama stayed in state to demolish a depleted Auburn team. They also went into Norman as 10 point underdogs and won handily.The bottom half of the SEC needs to focus on beating the Sun Belt conference before trashing ND's undefeated record and schedule.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:

SEC is overrated and that is that. Good team or two at the top but after that the SEC is 

Read that this is the first 10 win season since 1998. Wonder why 

So the SEC has 6 teams in the top 10, but they only have one or two good teams.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


Should say first 10 win season for A&M

Johnny Manziel.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 23227
Posted: #72
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

SEC is the best on many levels. But ND isn't playing the SEC All Conference Team, as so many posters assume they are from how they talk and rant. ND has the #9 rated SOS, compared to #20 for Alabama. That was before last night's game when ND travelled all across country to play in LA, while Bama stayed in state to demolish a depleted Auburn team. They also went into Norman as 10 point underdogs and won handily.The bottom half of the SEC needs to focus on beating the Sun Belt conference before trashing ND's undefeated record and schedule.

The SEC All Conference Team could probably beat some NFL teams.  I think Alabama, Georgia, Florida, LSU, and A&M by themselves would be enough to beat Notre Dame.

And I find it interesting how you praise Notre Dame then claim “the bottom half of the SEC needs to focus on beating the Sun Belt” when the mighty fighting Irish beat Purdue at home by 3 points, beat BYU at home by 3 points, and beat Pittsburgh at home by 3 points in triple OT.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 6840
Posted: #73
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

So the SEC has 6 teams in the top 10, but they only have one or two good teams.


smoke and mirrors. that is all it is. 

Outside of Bama and A&M (who are great). Give me OU, ND, K St, Oregon, Stanford, and Ohio St. all day long.

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1947
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


smoke and mirrors. that is all it is. 

Outside of Bama and A&M (who are great). Give me OU, ND, K St, Oregon, Stanford, and Ohio St. all day long.

 

Florida, Georgia and LSU would all have winning records if they played each of those teams.
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 6840
Posted: #75
Quote Originally Posted by FlamingoBarnes:


Florida, Georgia and LSU would all have winning records if they played each of those teams.

In all seriousness I completely disagree. I think that if FL and LSU and Georgia played those teams (especially FL and LSU) than it would be very close but those other teams would win more times than not. 

Fl and LSU are good of course but they are nothing special at all.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.