• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 6
      NFL Week 6
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Moneyline Picks
      • NFL ATS Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • Week 6 Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | General Discussion

    If Christ died on the cross for all of humanity

    «First Previous 394041 ... 213214215 Next Last»
    matt4000
    RJSmith
    KittyKatz286
    Rostos
    SirJohnDrake
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 256999
    Posts: 5358
    «First Previous 394041 ... 213214215 Next Last»
     
    matt4000
    matt4000
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 1104
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2011 - 10:01 PM ET #951

    KittyKat,

    Something cannot come from nothing...

    One piece of evidence is the fact that the universe exists. To explain this fact, we are faced with a couple of choices. Either something came from nothing, or something has always existed. If the latter is true, then either matter is eternal or mind (intelligence) is eternal. Even though some have denied that the universe actually exists, saying that it only seems to be here, to do so is absurd because our own senses indicate that there is such a thing. The immediate question that comes to mind is, how did it come about?

    The axiomatic principle of cause and effect states that something cannot come from nothing, that every effect must have an adequate cause. The wristwatch that I wear on my left arm did not just happen all by itself, someone had to build it. Therefore, our first choice is answered. Something did not come from nothing. Therefore, something has always existed. What is it? Is it lifeless matter? Or is it intelligent mind?

    In dealing with this question, Bertrand Russell, a noted unbeliever, once said in a debate on the British Broadcasting Company, that the universe is "just there, and that's all." However, this kind of response does not satisfy inquiring minds who want to know. The principle of cause and effect further affirms that a series of effects must have a beginning, a first cause capable of producing it. There is a scientific law, the second law of thermodynamics, which states that everything in the universe is running down, as from a starting point. It is now believed by most scientists that the universes is losing energy and slowly running down. This leads to the conclusion that matter is not eternal. There is only one alternative. There must an eternal, intelligent Mind which serves as the first cause to explain the existence of the universe.

    Reply
    KittyKat,

    Something cannot come from nothing...

    One piece of evidence is the fact that the universe exists. To explain this fact, we are faced with a couple of choices. Either something came from nothing, or something has always existed. If the latter is true, then either matter is eternal or mind (intelligence) is eternal. Even though some have denied that the universe actually exists, saying that it only seems to be here, to do so is absurd because our own senses indicate that there is such a thing. The immediate question that comes to mind is, how did it come about?

    The axiomatic principle of cause and effect states that something cannot come from nothing, that every effect must have an adequate cause. The wristwatch that I wear on my left arm did not just happen all by itself, someone had to build it. Therefore, our first choice is answered. Something did not come from nothing. Therefore, something has always existed. What is it? Is it lifeless matter? Or is it intelligent mind?

    In dealing with this question, Bertrand Russell, a noted unbeliever, once said in a debate on the British Broadcasting Company, that the universe is "just there, and that's all." However, this kind of response does not satisfy inquiring minds who want to know. The principle of cause and effect further affirms that a series of effects must have a beginning, a first cause capable of producing it. There is a scientific law, the second law of thermodynamics, which states that everything in the universe is running down, as from a starting point. It is now believed by most scientists that the universes is losing energy and slowly running down. This leads to the conclusion that matter is not eternal. There is only one alternative. There must an eternal, intelligent Mind which serves as the first cause to explain the existence of the universe.

     
    RJSmith
    RJSmith
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 7618
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2011 - 10:06 PM ET #952

    Still no evidence of god's or gods' exsitence.
    Hell, not even Christians can agree what god is. There are thousands of different Christian sects.
    Some believe god is a light-skinned male with a long white beard sitting on a throne up in the sky..
    And how about the god of the person, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists (don't have a god though).

    In short: god is what YOU make him/her/it to be. It's man-made.
    Reply
    Still no evidence of god's or gods' exsitence.
    Hell, not even Christians can agree what god is. There are thousands of different Christian sects.
    Some believe god is a light-skinned male with a long white beard sitting on a throne up in the sky..
    And how about the god of the person, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists (don't have a god though).

    In short: god is what YOU make him/her/it to be. It's man-made.
     
    RJSmith
    RJSmith
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 7618
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2011 - 10:07 PM ET #953

    Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

    Like something can come from nothing?



    Like your god?god
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

    Like something can come from nothing?



    Like your god?god
     
    matt4000
    matt4000
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 1104
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2011 - 10:10 PM ET #954

    There are those who abstain from all religion but accept that there has to have been a First Cause outwith the material world, a Creator who kickstarted all that is. It doesn't, philosophically, follow that the Creator plays any active part in the ongoing creation and change. Since the word "God" carries so much baggage, you might prefer another abstract word -- so I'm offering "The Gamemaster".
    the "big bang"
    Something else?
    matter and energy are interchangeable. there is no evidence to suggest that there was ever 'nothing'.
    That's a really good question! Unfortunately you probably won't get a really good answer. In fact I think this question is just going to mess up my head.
    the first thing came from...the first thing!!wow.i'm good!
    There is no "first cause", people just have difficulty wrapping their brains around the idea that the universe has always existed. There never was a beginning. And there will never be an ending either.
    Sounds like you mean 'if SOMETHING can come from nothing'. My guess is that there was always something, in one form or another. Nothing can't generate something.
    Reply
    There are those who abstain from all religion but accept that there has to have been a First Cause outwith the material world, a Creator who kickstarted all that is. It doesn't, philosophically, follow that the Creator plays any active part in the ongoing creation and change. Since the word "God" carries so much baggage, you might prefer another abstract word -- so I'm offering "The Gamemaster".
    the "big bang"
    Something else?
    matter and energy are interchangeable. there is no evidence to suggest that there was ever 'nothing'.
    That's a really good question! Unfortunately you probably won't get a really good answer. In fact I think this question is just going to mess up my head.
    the first thing came from...the first thing!!wow.i'm good!
    There is no "first cause", people just have difficulty wrapping their brains around the idea that the universe has always existed. There never was a beginning. And there will never be an ending either.
    Sounds like you mean 'if SOMETHING can come from nothing'. My guess is that there was always something, in one form or another. Nothing can't generate something.
     
    matt4000
    matt4000
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 1104
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2011 - 10:11 PM ET #955

    Deists can't answer where God came from either.
    Elsewhere..
    The first thing came probably from empty space ( according to a theory from quantum mechanics) ; but iam not sure if space was nothing.
    "nothing" is just aword or descritpion ofless than or empty.it is almost impossible to have nothing in our existence because we have never experienced it in reality..its just a figure of speech, but if it helps.the first "thing" wld not be an identifying entity to itself to know if it were the 1st "thing" in the 1st place lol.confused yet?..sorry..i havent actually got a clue lol
    Who says there was a first thing? 
    What if the universe has always existed (and always will exist)?
    There was no beginning (and there'll be no end).
    A circle of life..
    The first thing was always here. What was the first thing?
    nobody knows
    from the energy in to mass that is something
    Nothing from nothing is not possible according to Einstein's equation E=Mc squared. Also, the first law of thermodynamics is that energy can become matter, and matter can become energy ( hence the atomic bomb). Mankind has been debating your question for centuries, and there is still no one answer, only theories and conjecture. It seems it requires a certain amount of faith to accept our reality as it is. The information we seek on this question is not available to us..yet. What was the original singularity that caused our universe to become?and more important, why? All the evidence at this time in history seems to indicate that our assumption that ours is the ONLY universe to be in error. There may in fact be not only other universes, but other DIMENSIONS from which the original matter of our universe may have come from. But that is only conjecture. I believe in the final analysis, the questions of this type are simply unanswerable in our current plane of existence and experience. Simple logic indicates there is something going on here we cannot understand.
    Reply
    Deists can't answer where God came from either.
    Elsewhere..
    The first thing came probably from empty space ( according to a theory from quantum mechanics) ; but iam not sure if space was nothing.
    "nothing" is just aword or descritpion ofless than or empty.it is almost impossible to have nothing in our existence because we have never experienced it in reality..its just a figure of speech, but if it helps.the first "thing" wld not be an identifying entity to itself to know if it were the 1st "thing" in the 1st place lol.confused yet?..sorry..i havent actually got a clue lol
    Who says there was a first thing? 
    What if the universe has always existed (and always will exist)?
    There was no beginning (and there'll be no end).
    A circle of life..
    The first thing was always here. What was the first thing?
    nobody knows
    from the energy in to mass that is something
    Nothing from nothing is not possible according to Einstein's equation E=Mc squared. Also, the first law of thermodynamics is that energy can become matter, and matter can become energy ( hence the atomic bomb). Mankind has been debating your question for centuries, and there is still no one answer, only theories and conjecture. It seems it requires a certain amount of faith to accept our reality as it is. The information we seek on this question is not available to us..yet. What was the original singularity that caused our universe to become?and more important, why? All the evidence at this time in history seems to indicate that our assumption that ours is the ONLY universe to be in error. There may in fact be not only other universes, but other DIMENSIONS from which the original matter of our universe may have come from. But that is only conjecture. I believe in the final analysis, the questions of this type are simply unanswerable in our current plane of existence and experience. Simple logic indicates there is something going on here we cannot understand.
     
    matt4000
    matt4000
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 1104
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2011 - 10:12 PM ET #956

    Big Bang Theory and/or God's creation. whatever you believe in.
    If this question is answered, that would be end of all our research. I can confidently say that answer to this question will never be found out by us.

    Because research is all about verifiable data/proof. How "universe" was created out of nothing does not lend itself to this kind of verifiable proof.

    If we try to think too hard about this, I get a wierd feeling that my Brain will crash like our windows-operatingsystem :)
    Nothing - or thong
    the first thing came from a mummy thing and a daddy thing
    GOD
    One of the laws of thermodynamics shows that material things left unattended will die.i.e. an apple rotting. So the material world is slowly decaying and may have been for a long time. again this implies there must have been a beginning to the material universe. If one believes there is a spiritual dimension it would not necessarily be limited by physical constraints. I read a lengthier discourse on this subject by people much more qualified in a book by Chicago Tribune legal editor Lee Strobel. The book was called The Case for the Creator. Hope it helps. Cheers
    matter e.g atoms
    Who says nothing comes from nothing? Anything that doesnt yet exsist comes from nothing so clearly something comes from nothing.
    Reply
    Big Bang Theory and/or God's creation. whatever you believe in.
    If this question is answered, that would be end of all our research. I can confidently say that answer to this question will never be found out by us.

    Because research is all about verifiable data/proof. How "universe" was created out of nothing does not lend itself to this kind of verifiable proof.

    If we try to think too hard about this, I get a wierd feeling that my Brain will crash like our windows-operatingsystem :)
    Nothing - or thong
    the first thing came from a mummy thing and a daddy thing
    GOD
    One of the laws of thermodynamics shows that material things left unattended will die.i.e. an apple rotting. So the material world is slowly decaying and may have been for a long time. again this implies there must have been a beginning to the material universe. If one believes there is a spiritual dimension it would not necessarily be limited by physical constraints. I read a lengthier discourse on this subject by people much more qualified in a book by Chicago Tribune legal editor Lee Strobel. The book was called The Case for the Creator. Hope it helps. Cheers
    matter e.g atoms
    Who says nothing comes from nothing? Anything that doesnt yet exsist comes from nothing so clearly something comes from nothing.
     
    RJSmith
    RJSmith
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 7618
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2011 - 10:20 PM ET #957

    "Nothing from nothing is not possible according to Einstein's equation E=Mc squared."

    It's a theory.
    This is the difference between science and religion.
    The most talented scientists have from day one tried to disprove Einstein's theory or find another theory. For example the people at CERN who might or might not have found that neutrinos can travel faster than light.

    Religious people are static. Do not change opinion even when we find life on distant planets they will still say "Yeah, but Jesus was there too..they just didn't acknowledge him as God"

    Reply
    "Nothing from nothing is not possible according to Einstein's equation E=Mc squared."

    It's a theory.
    This is the difference between science and religion.
    The most talented scientists have from day one tried to disprove Einstein's theory or find another theory. For example the people at CERN who might or might not have found that neutrinos can travel faster than light.

    Religious people are static. Do not change opinion even when we find life on distant planets they will still say "Yeah, but Jesus was there too..they just didn't acknowledge him as God"

     
    KittyKatz286
    KittyKatz286
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 1988
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2011 - 10:25 PM ET #958

    Matt 
    Reply
    Matt 
     
    matt4000
    matt4000
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 1104
    Posted: Oct. 30, 2011 - 10:52 PM ET #959

    KittyKat,

    Off to bed. Just wanted u to see that I know where your argument comes from!
    Reply
    KittyKat,

    Off to bed. Just wanted u to see that I know where your argument comes from!
     
    Rostos
    Rostos
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 27785
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 12:10 AM ET #960

    Something cannot come from nothing IN THIS UNIVERSE.

    The person who asks "then where did God come from" are appealing to the fallacy of equivocation. When they ask this question they ARE MAKING AN ASSUMPTION that the laws of physics in this world APPLY those outside.

    A big no no in the world of philosophy

    Reply

    Something cannot come from nothing IN THIS UNIVERSE.

    The person who asks "then where did God come from" are appealing to the fallacy of equivocation. When they ask this question they ARE MAKING AN ASSUMPTION that the laws of physics in this world APPLY those outside.

    A big no no in the world of philosophy

     
    SirJohnDrake
    SirJohnDrake
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2006
    Posts: 14765
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 1:12 AM ET #961

    Quote Originally Posted by archsage:



    (You, KittyKatz, have not done that. What you have shown was that you don't understand Christianity very well (which is the fault of many frail-faith, 'stupid', and hide-bound Christians, not your fault at all, bro). You haven't committed that sin, so you don't have to worry about never being forgiven. For one such as you, there is always hope, and always love. Christ died for you so that you may not perish into oblivion. Of course, the enemy will tell you otherwise. Either way, God makes room for your volition, you choose what you want. You are the master of your fate.

    I disagree with you, KK has shown ample evidence that he will not bow down to God, the Creator of the universe and everything that exists.

    He cannot be redeemed. Not only on this thread has he shown his true and unwavering blasphemus hatred of God but if you would to go to this other thread titled, "Post your tough questions regarding Christianity" you will see more of the same blasphemus hatred of God coming from him.

    He and his atheiest buddy system are both unredeemable. A lot of us have tried to change their stubborn stance but to no avail. You cannot blame us Christians who have tried to save them, Rostos and I and others have tried and tried but again to no avail. You need to go back from the start of this thread to see the evidence yourself and also check the other thread I mentioned above.

    On pg. 35 #851 he said, "Like I said, I accept your explanation within the context of the bible, but practically, it makes no sense and I could never live by it. If someone blasphemes god, I'm not gonna think poorly of him. If someone murders someone else, I'm gonna wish death upon him. So while I acknowledge your explanation, simply put, I reject it as impractical."

    On pg. 35 #853 he said, "Well I guarantee that I will NEVER accept god, not even on my death bed... but even as a believer, I just can't fathom how you could think it's worse for someone to badmouth god than murder."

    On pg. 35 #872 he said, "I believe with 99.999 (continuing to infinity)% certainty there is no god.

    "Furthermore, assuming, once again, that god exists, there is absolutely NO DOUBT that he is NOT all-good/kind/just, etc." This is also blatantly obvious. Aside from the fact that if you attribute all things in this world to god, then god is the biggest mass murderer of al time, we have the problems I brought up before. God punishes people for not believing in him while trying his hardest to conceal his existence. Additionally, my example to SJD proves this as fact if your god exists. Quick recap: we have 2 people, person A is a christian who always murders and sins but repents and loves god. Person B is an atheist who always helps people and is a perfect man, but he ridicules god and denounces his existence. SJD has told me that god will condemn Person B for all eternity. Simple logical reasoning concludes that a god that would do that is by no means all good.

    "God is a spiteful asshole and if it were possible, he deserves to be damned to hell for all eternity."

    Above is just an example of just three of his posts, but there are many more just like that and some of them he uses the "F" word in front of God. So I don't agree with you when you tell him he hasn't committed that sin of blasphemy toward God and furthermore I say this guy is beyond saving. In his last post above #872 I also told him person A would also be condemned but he doesn't mention that.

    The bible states it very clearly, anybody who blasphemies God can never be forgiven because in essence it is the equivalent of rejecting Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior with such finality where no future repentance is possible. So that person will still have his/her sin debt to pay when he/she dies his/her physical death here on earth and when God judges him and sees that he/she has rejected Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior he/she will be condemned.

    As a Christian believer that I am, I have to tell it like how it really is, the truth and nothing but the truth. I don't hate them or despise people who are atheists but I surely just feel sorry for them that the wrath of God will come crushing down on them one day.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by archsage:



    (You, KittyKatz, have not done that. What you have shown was that you don't understand Christianity very well (which is the fault of many frail-faith, 'stupid', and hide-bound Christians, not your fault at all, bro). You haven't committed that sin, so you don't have to worry about never being forgiven. For one such as you, there is always hope, and always love. Christ died for you so that you may not perish into oblivion. Of course, the enemy will tell you otherwise. Either way, God makes room for your volition, you choose what you want. You are the master of your fate.

    I disagree with you, KK has shown ample evidence that he will not bow down to God, the Creator of the universe and everything that exists.

    He cannot be redeemed. Not only on this thread has he shown his true and unwavering blasphemus hatred of God but if you would to go to this other thread titled, "Post your tough questions regarding Christianity" you will see more of the same blasphemus hatred of God coming from him.

    He and his atheiest buddy system are both unredeemable. A lot of us have tried to change their stubborn stance but to no avail. You cannot blame us Christians who have tried to save them, Rostos and I and others have tried and tried but again to no avail. You need to go back from the start of this thread to see the evidence yourself and also check the other thread I mentioned above.

    On pg. 35 #851 he said, "Like I said, I accept your explanation within the context of the bible, but practically, it makes no sense and I could never live by it. If someone blasphemes god, I'm not gonna think poorly of him. If someone murders someone else, I'm gonna wish death upon him. So while I acknowledge your explanation, simply put, I reject it as impractical."

    On pg. 35 #853 he said, "Well I guarantee that I will NEVER accept god, not even on my death bed... but even as a believer, I just can't fathom how you could think it's worse for someone to badmouth god than murder."

    On pg. 35 #872 he said, "I believe with 99.999 (continuing to infinity)% certainty there is no god.

    "Furthermore, assuming, once again, that god exists, there is absolutely NO DOUBT that he is NOT all-good/kind/just, etc." This is also blatantly obvious. Aside from the fact that if you attribute all things in this world to god, then god is the biggest mass murderer of al time, we have the problems I brought up before. God punishes people for not believing in him while trying his hardest to conceal his existence. Additionally, my example to SJD proves this as fact if your god exists. Quick recap: we have 2 people, person A is a christian who always murders and sins but repents and loves god. Person B is an atheist who always helps people and is a perfect man, but he ridicules god and denounces his existence. SJD has told me that god will condemn Person B for all eternity. Simple logical reasoning concludes that a god that would do that is by no means all good.

    "God is a spiteful asshole and if it were possible, he deserves to be damned to hell for all eternity."

    Above is just an example of just three of his posts, but there are many more just like that and some of them he uses the "F" word in front of God. So I don't agree with you when you tell him he hasn't committed that sin of blasphemy toward God and furthermore I say this guy is beyond saving. In his last post above #872 I also told him person A would also be condemned but he doesn't mention that.

    The bible states it very clearly, anybody who blasphemies God can never be forgiven because in essence it is the equivalent of rejecting Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior with such finality where no future repentance is possible. So that person will still have his/her sin debt to pay when he/she dies his/her physical death here on earth and when God judges him and sees that he/she has rejected Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior he/she will be condemned.

    As a Christian believer that I am, I have to tell it like how it really is, the truth and nothing but the truth. I don't hate them or despise people who are atheists but I surely just feel sorry for them that the wrath of God will come crushing down on them one day.

     
    KittyKatz286
    KittyKatz286
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 1988
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 1:26 AM ET #962

    My overall point is:

    If you murder, you can repent and possibly be "saved."

    If you blaspheme god and don't repent, you cannot be "saved."

    This attribute of the religion is something I could never live by, so therefore, I reject god.

    And btw, I feel like I should've mentioned this before. I was raised Jewish and was Bar Mitzvah'd at age 13 (also that was the last time I ever set foot in a synagogue or did anything associated with religion ever). So my unfamiliarity with the Christian religion is because of that. However, please do not take this admission as an assumption that I hate Christianity because I was Jewish. I think both are equally stupid along with every other religion in the world. It is just that Christianity is the most prominent and person and Christians believe in the same god basically so the distinction seems unnecessary. Anyway...carry on.
    Reply
    My overall point is:

    If you murder, you can repent and possibly be "saved."

    If you blaspheme god and don't repent, you cannot be "saved."

    This attribute of the religion is something I could never live by, so therefore, I reject god.

    And btw, I feel like I should've mentioned this before. I was raised Jewish and was Bar Mitzvah'd at age 13 (also that was the last time I ever set foot in a synagogue or did anything associated with religion ever). So my unfamiliarity with the Christian religion is because of that. However, please do not take this admission as an assumption that I hate Christianity because I was Jewish. I think both are equally stupid along with every other religion in the world. It is just that Christianity is the most prominent and person and Christians believe in the same god basically so the distinction seems unnecessary. Anyway...carry on.
     
    SYSTEM
    SYSTEM
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2004
    Posts: 1702
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 2:11 AM ET #963

    Quote Originally Posted by SirJohnDrake:

    I disagree with you, KK has shown ample evidence that he will not bow down to God, the Creator of the universe and everything that exists.

    He cannot be redeemed. Not only on this thread has he shown his true and unwavering blasphemus hatred of God but if you would to go to this other thread titled, "Post your tough questions regarding Christianity" you will see more of the same blasphemus hatred of God coming from him.

    He and his atheiest buddy system are both unredeemable. A lot of us have tried to change their stubborn stance but to no avail. You cannot blame us Christians who have tried to save them, Rostos and I and others have tried and tried but again to no avail. You need to go back from the start of this thread to see the evidence yourself and also check the other thread I mentioned above.

    On pg. 35 #851 he said, "Like I said, I accept your explanation within the context of the bible, but practically, it makes no sense and I could never live by it. If someone blasphemes god, I'm not gonna think poorly of him. If someone murders someone else, I'm gonna wish death upon him. So while I acknowledge your explanation, simply put, I reject it as impractical."

    On pg. 35 #853 he said, "Well I guarantee that I will NEVER accept god, not even on my death bed... but even as a believer, I just can't fathom how you could think it's worse for someone to badmouth god than murder."

    On pg. 35 #872 he said, "I believe with 99.999 (continuing to infinity)% certainty there is no god.

    "Furthermore, assuming, once again, that god exists, there is absolutely NO DOUBT that he is NOT all-good/kind/just, etc." This is also blatantly obvious. Aside from the fact that if you attribute all things in this world to god, then god is the biggest mass murderer of al time, we have the problems I brought up before. God punishes people for not believing in him while trying his hardest to conceal his existence. Additionally, my example to SJD proves this as fact if your god exists. Quick recap: we have 2 people, person A is a christian who always murders and sins but repents and loves god. Person B is an atheist who always helps people and is a perfect man, but he ridicules god and denounces his existence. SJD has told me that god will condemn Person B for all eternity. Simple logical reasoning concludes that a god that would do that is by no means all good.

    "God is a spiteful asshole and if it were possible, he deserves to be damned to hell for all eternity."

    Above is just an example of just three of his posts, but there are many more just like that and some of them he uses the "F" word in front of God. So I don't agree with you when you tell him he hasn't committed that sin of blasphemy toward God and furthermore I say this guy is beyond saving. In his last post above #872 I also told him person A would also be condemned but he doesn't mention that.

    The bible states it very clearly, anybody who blasphemies God can never be forgiven because in essence it is the equivalent of rejecting Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior with such finality where no future repentance is possible. So that person will still have his/her sin debt to pay when he/she dies his/her physical death here on earth and when God judges him and sees that he/she has rejected Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior he/she will be condemned.

    As a Christian believer that I am, I have to tell it like how it really is, the truth and nothing but the truth. I don't hate them or despise people who are atheists but I surely just feel sorry for them that the wrath of God will come crushing down on them one day.


    you and your god are an ass
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SirJohnDrake:

    I disagree with you, KK has shown ample evidence that he will not bow down to God, the Creator of the universe and everything that exists.

    He cannot be redeemed. Not only on this thread has he shown his true and unwavering blasphemus hatred of God but if you would to go to this other thread titled, "Post your tough questions regarding Christianity" you will see more of the same blasphemus hatred of God coming from him.

    He and his atheiest buddy system are both unredeemable. A lot of us have tried to change their stubborn stance but to no avail. You cannot blame us Christians who have tried to save them, Rostos and I and others have tried and tried but again to no avail. You need to go back from the start of this thread to see the evidence yourself and also check the other thread I mentioned above.

    On pg. 35 #851 he said, "Like I said, I accept your explanation within the context of the bible, but practically, it makes no sense and I could never live by it. If someone blasphemes god, I'm not gonna think poorly of him. If someone murders someone else, I'm gonna wish death upon him. So while I acknowledge your explanation, simply put, I reject it as impractical."

    On pg. 35 #853 he said, "Well I guarantee that I will NEVER accept god, not even on my death bed... but even as a believer, I just can't fathom how you could think it's worse for someone to badmouth god than murder."

    On pg. 35 #872 he said, "I believe with 99.999 (continuing to infinity)% certainty there is no god.

    "Furthermore, assuming, once again, that god exists, there is absolutely NO DOUBT that he is NOT all-good/kind/just, etc." This is also blatantly obvious. Aside from the fact that if you attribute all things in this world to god, then god is the biggest mass murderer of al time, we have the problems I brought up before. God punishes people for not believing in him while trying his hardest to conceal his existence. Additionally, my example to SJD proves this as fact if your god exists. Quick recap: we have 2 people, person A is a christian who always murders and sins but repents and loves god. Person B is an atheist who always helps people and is a perfect man, but he ridicules god and denounces his existence. SJD has told me that god will condemn Person B for all eternity. Simple logical reasoning concludes that a god that would do that is by no means all good.

    "God is a spiteful asshole and if it were possible, he deserves to be damned to hell for all eternity."

    Above is just an example of just three of his posts, but there are many more just like that and some of them he uses the "F" word in front of God. So I don't agree with you when you tell him he hasn't committed that sin of blasphemy toward God and furthermore I say this guy is beyond saving. In his last post above #872 I also told him person A would also be condemned but he doesn't mention that.

    The bible states it very clearly, anybody who blasphemies God can never be forgiven because in essence it is the equivalent of rejecting Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior with such finality where no future repentance is possible. So that person will still have his/her sin debt to pay when he/she dies his/her physical death here on earth and when God judges him and sees that he/she has rejected Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior he/she will be condemned.

    As a Christian believer that I am, I have to tell it like how it really is, the truth and nothing but the truth. I don't hate them or despise people who are atheists but I surely just feel sorry for them that the wrath of God will come crushing down on them one day.


    you and your god are an ass
     
    Rostos
    Rostos
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 27785
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 2:23 AM ET #964

    Quote Originally Posted by SYSTEM:


    you and your god are an ass

    How can you describe an attribute of something that doesnt exist in your mind?

    Its like someone telling me that kangaroos play baseball on the planet mars, even though i dont believe those kangaroos exist, i go on and call those Kangaroos "dickheads".

    Its like calling someone a married bachelor.....Or a squared circle.

    But, inconsistent illogical explanations are your norm, so this doesnt surprise one bit.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SYSTEM:


    you and your god are an ass

    How can you describe an attribute of something that doesnt exist in your mind?

    Its like someone telling me that kangaroos play baseball on the planet mars, even though i dont believe those kangaroos exist, i go on and call those Kangaroos "dickheads".

    Its like calling someone a married bachelor.....Or a squared circle.

    But, inconsistent illogical explanations are your norm, so this doesnt surprise one bit.

     
    archsage
    archsage
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 50
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 8:34 AM ET #965

    Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:


    Archsage...I respect the fact that you try to ground your arguments in fact as well. I think my problem here is that I know the bible is a book of stories, or at least part of it is. There are things discussed in the bible that can't possibly be true. Therefore, I do not accept it as a source of evidence. That pretty much renders any argument a Christian can make, irrelevant. So, from that regard, I apologize, because it makes it really difficult to be on the side you're on. So I try to avoid things that rely on the bible, but somehow it always comes back to it.


    If you don't want to give the Bible any special precedence then that's fine. Treat it, at least, as any other secular historical documents found from around those times. Nonetheless, it isn't the Scriptures that is important, but the message behind them. Luckily, Christianity is not Bible-worship (as some idolatrous Christians love to do), but as Jesus Himself said, "the [Scriptures] are talking about me". Worship of the book over reality itself is part of the reasons why the Pharisees, who were very religious, were rejected by God.

    Instead of focusing on the Bible as 'evidence' let's look at it only as a collection of Law, Prophecy, History, Poems, Proverbs, Songs, News, Doctrine, Letters and Allusion written by various people from paupers to kings over the course of a thousand years, collected and manifested into a single volume used as a convenient source of literature concerning a common message.

    With that in mind, we can examine any part of the Scriptures that trouble you, or anything, while not rejecting the work as a whole because of a single sentence or two is disagreeable with you. Hopefully you'll find that approach much more rational. And, because the Scriptures are, in fact, coherent (at least in the common message portrayed) you'll find the initial disagreement to be more of a misconception than anything.

    I don't expect to force you to read this entire post, it is pretty long, however it is good for you to read it all, as each paragraph has good information. If you are pressed for time, you can start reading from here.

    I suppose the best way to begin however is how Genesis began, not with any arguments for the existence of God, but a plain display of the nature of mankind, and it's overall fate. In that way, we can start with a few points:

    1. Everybody, being repercussions of "Adam" (or, if you reject the term "Adam", just note that we are naturally copies of the same type of entity, Humans), are innately sinful -- our volition is naturally out of sync with "God" (if you reject the term "God", then just replace the word, Perfection).
    2. Everybody has sinned (does something wrong).
    3. No one lives forever. Even this Universe, which is vast and grand, is poised to either expand into oblivion, or re-collapse into singularity. Ultimately, there is nothing for us but death in the end.
    A piece of Scripture to keep in mind, Genesis 3:19 NKJV

    19 In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread
          Till you return to the ground,
          For out of it you were taken;
          For dust you are,
          And to dust you shall return.”

    This is, of course, just the beginning. There is much more than this 'gloom and doom' of course. Else reality would be a very depressing place! Anyway, if you're with me, say so. If there's something confusing or something wrong with what I said, just let me know and we can go over it. Just don't ignore it, as that would be dishonest of you.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by KittyKatz286:


    Archsage...I respect the fact that you try to ground your arguments in fact as well. I think my problem here is that I know the bible is a book of stories, or at least part of it is. There are things discussed in the bible that can't possibly be true. Therefore, I do not accept it as a source of evidence. That pretty much renders any argument a Christian can make, irrelevant. So, from that regard, I apologize, because it makes it really difficult to be on the side you're on. So I try to avoid things that rely on the bible, but somehow it always comes back to it.


    If you don't want to give the Bible any special precedence then that's fine. Treat it, at least, as any other secular historical documents found from around those times. Nonetheless, it isn't the Scriptures that is important, but the message behind them. Luckily, Christianity is not Bible-worship (as some idolatrous Christians love to do), but as Jesus Himself said, "the [Scriptures] are talking about me". Worship of the book over reality itself is part of the reasons why the Pharisees, who were very religious, were rejected by God.

    Instead of focusing on the Bible as 'evidence' let's look at it only as a collection of Law, Prophecy, History, Poems, Proverbs, Songs, News, Doctrine, Letters and Allusion written by various people from paupers to kings over the course of a thousand years, collected and manifested into a single volume used as a convenient source of literature concerning a common message.

    With that in mind, we can examine any part of the Scriptures that trouble you, or anything, while not rejecting the work as a whole because of a single sentence or two is disagreeable with you. Hopefully you'll find that approach much more rational. And, because the Scriptures are, in fact, coherent (at least in the common message portrayed) you'll find the initial disagreement to be more of a misconception than anything.

    I don't expect to force you to read this entire post, it is pretty long, however it is good for you to read it all, as each paragraph has good information. If you are pressed for time, you can start reading from here.

    I suppose the best way to begin however is how Genesis began, not with any arguments for the existence of God, but a plain display of the nature of mankind, and it's overall fate. In that way, we can start with a few points:

    1. Everybody, being repercussions of "Adam" (or, if you reject the term "Adam", just note that we are naturally copies of the same type of entity, Humans), are innately sinful -- our volition is naturally out of sync with "God" (if you reject the term "God", then just replace the word, Perfection).
    2. Everybody has sinned (does something wrong).
    3. No one lives forever. Even this Universe, which is vast and grand, is poised to either expand into oblivion, or re-collapse into singularity. Ultimately, there is nothing for us but death in the end.
    A piece of Scripture to keep in mind, Genesis 3:19 NKJV

    19 In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread
          Till you return to the ground,
          For out of it you were taken;
          For dust you are,
          And to dust you shall return.”

    This is, of course, just the beginning. There is much more than this 'gloom and doom' of course. Else reality would be a very depressing place! Anyway, if you're with me, say so. If there's something confusing or something wrong with what I said, just let me know and we can go over it. Just don't ignore it, as that would be dishonest of you.
     
    Quantum_Leap
    Quantum_Leap
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2010
    Posts: 14521
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 9:50 AM ET #966

    He never dies that day on the cross. It is impossible to die in a few hours in a crucifixion. It is meant to last days. His body was hustled away before Passover (all person stay in their homes) and was gone the next day. His cohorts helped him. More than likely Roman guards were bribed (very common). Most likely he made the long journey back to India where he began his studies. It was a hoax. The tragic part is how many people believed in the hoax, and how many died believing in it, or killed others who didn't share their beliefs in Jesus. The religion was made after Jesus, not made by him.
    Reply
    He never dies that day on the cross. It is impossible to die in a few hours in a crucifixion. It is meant to last days. His body was hustled away before Passover (all person stay in their homes) and was gone the next day. His cohorts helped him. More than likely Roman guards were bribed (very common). Most likely he made the long journey back to India where he began his studies. It was a hoax. The tragic part is how many people believed in the hoax, and how many died believing in it, or killed others who didn't share their beliefs in Jesus. The religion was made after Jesus, not made by him.
     
    archsage
    archsage
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 50
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 10:35 AM ET #967

    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    He never dies that day on the cross. It is impossible to die in a few hours in a crucifixion. It is meant to last days. His body was hustled away before Passover (all person stay in their homes) and was gone the next day. His cohorts helped him. More than likely Roman guards were bribed (very common). Most likely he made the long journey back to India where he began his studies. It was a hoax. The tragic part is how many people believed in the hoax, and how many died believing in it, or killed others who didn't share their beliefs in Jesus. The religion was made after Jesus, not made by him.


    Any verifiable sources, consensus among modern historians, coherent explanation given the unparalleled phenomena raised consequently raised, etc., other this 'random' internet post of yours?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    He never dies that day on the cross. It is impossible to die in a few hours in a crucifixion. It is meant to last days. His body was hustled away before Passover (all person stay in their homes) and was gone the next day. His cohorts helped him. More than likely Roman guards were bribed (very common). Most likely he made the long journey back to India where he began his studies. It was a hoax. The tragic part is how many people believed in the hoax, and how many died believing in it, or killed others who didn't share their beliefs in Jesus. The religion was made after Jesus, not made by him.


    Any verifiable sources, consensus among modern historians, coherent explanation given the unparalleled phenomena raised consequently raised, etc., other this 'random' internet post of yours?
     
    SYSTEM
    SYSTEM
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2004
    Posts: 1702
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 10:58 AM ET #968

    Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

    How can you describe an attribute of something that doesnt exist in your mind?

    Its like someone telling me that kangaroos play baseball on the planet mars, even though i dont believe those kangaroos exist, i go on and call those Kangaroos "dickheads".

    Its like calling someone a married bachelor.....Or a squared circle.

    But, inconsistent illogical explanations are your norm, so this doesnt surprise one bit.


    you're right, if your god of the bible was real, then it would be an ass, but sjd is an ass   better? 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

    How can you describe an attribute of something that doesnt exist in your mind?

    Its like someone telling me that kangaroos play baseball on the planet mars, even though i dont believe those kangaroos exist, i go on and call those Kangaroos "dickheads".

    Its like calling someone a married bachelor.....Or a squared circle.

    But, inconsistent illogical explanations are your norm, so this doesnt surprise one bit.


    you're right, if your god of the bible was real, then it would be an ass, but sjd is an ass   better? 
     
    archsage
    archsage
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 50
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 12:45 PM ET #969

    Quote Originally Posted by SYSTEM:


    you're right, if your god of the bible was real, then it would be an ass, but sjd is an ass   better? 


    I'm sorry, this is more of an aside but, I don't understand why you post in this sort of manner. Are you trying to distinguish yourself from the behavior of your opponent?

    If you believe that your worldview truly is honorable, don't dishonor yourself by acting in an undignified manner. The more recent posts made by our fellow man, KittyKatz are good examples of a more honorable way of posting. Maybe, if you want to maintain a high level of integrity and respect for your own 'philosophy', you should study how KittyKatz has been posting recently and emulate that.

    As it is, your posting style has exemplified nothing more than juvenile retorts, lacking both tact and delicacy, as well as academic intellectualism and rational reasoning. Of course, I only say this because I know that you are a much more intelligent person than you have been portraying. I'd appreciate it if you would act according to your own ability, instead of devolving your nature into these 'not-so-clever' remarks.

    Just so you know, I'm not defending nor supporting your side in your discussion with Rostos or sjd (mainly because I wasn't paying attention to what you guys were saying, I'm really just conversing with KittyKatz at the moment). I'm just commenting on your posting style, is all.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SYSTEM:


    you're right, if your god of the bible was real, then it would be an ass, but sjd is an ass   better? 


    I'm sorry, this is more of an aside but, I don't understand why you post in this sort of manner. Are you trying to distinguish yourself from the behavior of your opponent?

    If you believe that your worldview truly is honorable, don't dishonor yourself by acting in an undignified manner. The more recent posts made by our fellow man, KittyKatz are good examples of a more honorable way of posting. Maybe, if you want to maintain a high level of integrity and respect for your own 'philosophy', you should study how KittyKatz has been posting recently and emulate that.

    As it is, your posting style has exemplified nothing more than juvenile retorts, lacking both tact and delicacy, as well as academic intellectualism and rational reasoning. Of course, I only say this because I know that you are a much more intelligent person than you have been portraying. I'd appreciate it if you would act according to your own ability, instead of devolving your nature into these 'not-so-clever' remarks.

    Just so you know, I'm not defending nor supporting your side in your discussion with Rostos or sjd (mainly because I wasn't paying attention to what you guys were saying, I'm really just conversing with KittyKatz at the moment). I'm just commenting on your posting style, is all.
     
    archsage
    archsage
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 50
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 12:51 PM ET #970

    Quote Originally Posted by RJSmith:

    "Nothing from nothing is not possible according to Einstein's equation E=Mc squared."

    It's a theory.
    This is the difference between science and religion.
    The most talented scientists have from day one tried to disprove Einstein's theory or find another theory. For example the people at CERN who might or might not have found that neutrinos can travel faster than light.

    Religious people are static. Do not change opinion even when we find life on distant planets they will still say "Yeah, but Jesus was there too..they just didn't acknowledge him as God"



    This is just plain wrong. I suspect that it comes from plain ignorance however. If you did even an elementary study of Christianity and the understanding of the Christian doctrine from the early Christian era when the view was still just a "jewish cult", towards the world leading belief system it is today, you'll clearly see the challenging of theological theories and understanding of reality that you see in nearly every other knowledge-based system that exists.

    Theological sciences are no different from any other kind of science. If you were to study Theology then you would most likely not be saying such erroneous things.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by RJSmith:

    "Nothing from nothing is not possible according to Einstein's equation E=Mc squared."

    It's a theory.
    This is the difference between science and religion.
    The most talented scientists have from day one tried to disprove Einstein's theory or find another theory. For example the people at CERN who might or might not have found that neutrinos can travel faster than light.

    Religious people are static. Do not change opinion even when we find life on distant planets they will still say "Yeah, but Jesus was there too..they just didn't acknowledge him as God"



    This is just plain wrong. I suspect that it comes from plain ignorance however. If you did even an elementary study of Christianity and the understanding of the Christian doctrine from the early Christian era when the view was still just a "jewish cult", towards the world leading belief system it is today, you'll clearly see the challenging of theological theories and understanding of reality that you see in nearly every other knowledge-based system that exists.

    Theological sciences are no different from any other kind of science. If you were to study Theology then you would most likely not be saying such erroneous things.
     
    SirJohnDrake
    SirJohnDrake
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2006
    Posts: 14765
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 2:50 PM ET #971

    Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

    How can you describe an attribute of something that doesnt exist in your mind?

    Its like someone telling me that kangaroos play baseball on the planet mars, even though i dont believe those kangaroos exist, i go on and call those Kangaroos "dickheads".

    Its like calling someone a married bachelor.....Or a squared circle.

    But, inconsistent illogical explanations are your norm, so this doesnt surprise one bit.

    Sister system is just a confused gal...lol She is just being her normal self by spewing out inconsistent illogical explanations...in a nut shell that's a very good description of that confused gal...lol

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:

    How can you describe an attribute of something that doesnt exist in your mind?

    Its like someone telling me that kangaroos play baseball on the planet mars, even though i dont believe those kangaroos exist, i go on and call those Kangaroos "dickheads".

    Its like calling someone a married bachelor.....Or a squared circle.

    But, inconsistent illogical explanations are your norm, so this doesnt surprise one bit.

    Sister system is just a confused gal...lol She is just being her normal self by spewing out inconsistent illogical explanations...in a nut shell that's a very good description of that confused gal...lol

     
    Quantum_Leap
    Quantum_Leap
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2010
    Posts: 14521
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 2:56 PM ET #972

    Quote Originally Posted by archsage:



    Any verifiable sources, consensus among modern historians, coherent explanation given the unparalleled phenomena raised consequently raised, etc., other this 'random' internet post of yours?

    Do YOU have any?

    There is no scoence here, except the FACT that it is very improbable to die on the same day (friday) as you are placed on the cross.

    The next day is Passover, so person will not be out to see anything at all, but they will be looking for Jesus to kill hiom AFTER Passover.

    Therefore he is taken from the cross (alive) and is whisked out of Jerusalem before person can find him.

    We can only go by biblical accounts and they confirm the day was before Passover.

    Noone can find Jesus after Passover.

    The wealthy cohorts of Jesus likely paid off Pontius Pilate to schedule the crucifixtion for this day. Jesus was hardly in Jerusalem a day and he was already stirring trouble by knocking over the tables of money exchangers. The ruckus was deliberate to stage his "death" and resurrection.

    Horus is a similar myth from Egyptology centuries old and has parallel stories of a expiation of sins to appease God, a death and 3 day resurrection and so on (incl. virgin birth).

    If there is no body to be found, then he escaped, and he was aided by his disciples (cohorts). The idea (plan) was to upset Jewish eschatology and subvert the upholders of Jewish law with a greater "truth."

    Jesus' beliefs , such as "son of God," are from Hindu beliefs that we are all "sons of God," therefore we are all divine. When he says "I am the Son of God," he is saying exactly what hindus believed. He isn't satying he is the only son of God at all--to believe so is to miss the point entirely.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by archsage:



    Any verifiable sources, consensus among modern historians, coherent explanation given the unparalleled phenomena raised consequently raised, etc., other this 'random' internet post of yours?

    Do YOU have any?

    There is no scoence here, except the FACT that it is very improbable to die on the same day (friday) as you are placed on the cross.

    The next day is Passover, so person will not be out to see anything at all, but they will be looking for Jesus to kill hiom AFTER Passover.

    Therefore he is taken from the cross (alive) and is whisked out of Jerusalem before person can find him.

    We can only go by biblical accounts and they confirm the day was before Passover.

    Noone can find Jesus after Passover.

    The wealthy cohorts of Jesus likely paid off Pontius Pilate to schedule the crucifixtion for this day. Jesus was hardly in Jerusalem a day and he was already stirring trouble by knocking over the tables of money exchangers. The ruckus was deliberate to stage his "death" and resurrection.

    Horus is a similar myth from Egyptology centuries old and has parallel stories of a expiation of sins to appease God, a death and 3 day resurrection and so on (incl. virgin birth).

    If there is no body to be found, then he escaped, and he was aided by his disciples (cohorts). The idea (plan) was to upset Jewish eschatology and subvert the upholders of Jewish law with a greater "truth."

    Jesus' beliefs , such as "son of God," are from Hindu beliefs that we are all "sons of God," therefore we are all divine. When he says "I am the Son of God," he is saying exactly what hindus believed. He isn't satying he is the only son of God at all--to believe so is to miss the point entirely.

     
    SirJohnDrake
    SirJohnDrake
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2006
    Posts: 14765
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 3:01 PM ET #973

    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    He never dies that day on the cross. It is impossible to die in a few hours in a crucifixion. It is meant to last days. His body was hustled away before Passover (all person stay in their homes) and was gone the next day. His cohorts helped him. More than likely Roman guards were bribed (very common). Most likely he made the long journey back to India where he began his studies. It was a hoax. The tragic part is how many people believed in the hoax, and how many died believing in it, or killed others who didn't share their beliefs in Jesus. The religion was made after Jesus, not made by him.

    I've heard a lot of atheist making this claim. Very easy after the fact to just throw in all kinds of false rumors.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    He never dies that day on the cross. It is impossible to die in a few hours in a crucifixion. It is meant to last days. His body was hustled away before Passover (all person stay in their homes) and was gone the next day. His cohorts helped him. More than likely Roman guards were bribed (very common). Most likely he made the long journey back to India where he began his studies. It was a hoax. The tragic part is how many people believed in the hoax, and how many died believing in it, or killed others who didn't share their beliefs in Jesus. The religion was made after Jesus, not made by him.

    I've heard a lot of atheist making this claim. Very easy after the fact to just throw in all kinds of false rumors.

     
    archsage
    archsage
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 50
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 3:55 PM ET #974

    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    Do YOU have any?

    There is no scoence here, except the FACT that it is very improbable to die on the same day (friday) as you are placed on the cross.

    The next day is Passover, so person will not be out to see anything at all, but they will be looking for Jesus to kill hiom AFTER Passover.

    Therefore he is taken from the cross (alive) and is whisked out of Jerusalem before person can find him.

    We can only go by biblical accounts and they confirm the day was before Passover.

    Noone can find Jesus after Passover.

    The wealthy cohorts of Jesus likely paid off Pontius Pilate to schedule the crucifixtion for this day. Jesus was hardly in Jerusalem a day and he was already stirring trouble by knocking over the tables of money exchangers. The ruckus was deliberate to stage his "death" and resurrection.

    Horus is a similar myth from Egyptology centuries old and has parallel stories of a expiation of sins to appease God, a death and 3 day resurrection and so on (incl. virgin birth).

    If there is no body to be found, then he escaped, and he was aided by his disciples (cohorts). The idea (plan) was to upset Jewish eschatology and subvert the upholders of Jewish law with a greater "truth."

    Jesus' beliefs , such as "son of God," are from Hindu beliefs that we are all "sons of God," therefore we are all divine. When he says "I am the Son of God," he is saying exactly what hindus believed. He isn't satying he is the only son of God at all--to believe so is to miss the point entirely.



    So you have no verifiable sources,modern historical consensus or   coherent explanation other this 'random' internet post of yours? Just wanted to point that out.

    Note that for every claim that I have made, I have provided substantial reasoning for it. Unlike you, I do not spew out conspiracy theories, rumors and other non-academic nonsense that would never hold up in serious institutions concerning the understanding of certain historicity of subjects and those related areas of the sciences.

    I do not appreciate unintelligent premises, of which you seem to be full of. Unless you are willing to back up your clearly academically unsupported claims, then you have no proper place within this discussion. Logic and rational reason is key.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

    Do YOU have any?

    There is no scoence here, except the FACT that it is very improbable to die on the same day (friday) as you are placed on the cross.

    The next day is Passover, so person will not be out to see anything at all, but they will be looking for Jesus to kill hiom AFTER Passover.

    Therefore he is taken from the cross (alive) and is whisked out of Jerusalem before person can find him.

    We can only go by biblical accounts and they confirm the day was before Passover.

    Noone can find Jesus after Passover.

    The wealthy cohorts of Jesus likely paid off Pontius Pilate to schedule the crucifixtion for this day. Jesus was hardly in Jerusalem a day and he was already stirring trouble by knocking over the tables of money exchangers. The ruckus was deliberate to stage his "death" and resurrection.

    Horus is a similar myth from Egyptology centuries old and has parallel stories of a expiation of sins to appease God, a death and 3 day resurrection and so on (incl. virgin birth).

    If there is no body to be found, then he escaped, and he was aided by his disciples (cohorts). The idea (plan) was to upset Jewish eschatology and subvert the upholders of Jewish law with a greater "truth."

    Jesus' beliefs , such as "son of God," are from Hindu beliefs that we are all "sons of God," therefore we are all divine. When he says "I am the Son of God," he is saying exactly what hindus believed. He isn't satying he is the only son of God at all--to believe so is to miss the point entirely.



    So you have no verifiable sources,modern historical consensus or   coherent explanation other this 'random' internet post of yours? Just wanted to point that out.

    Note that for every claim that I have made, I have provided substantial reasoning for it. Unlike you, I do not spew out conspiracy theories, rumors and other non-academic nonsense that would never hold up in serious institutions concerning the understanding of certain historicity of subjects and those related areas of the sciences.

    I do not appreciate unintelligent premises, of which you seem to be full of. Unless you are willing to back up your clearly academically unsupported claims, then you have no proper place within this discussion. Logic and rational reason is key.
     
     
    archsage
    archsage
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 50
    Posted: Oct. 31, 2011 - 4:10 PM ET #975

    Just to point out a single thing concerning your single "fact". You said, and I quote:
    • ...FACT that it is very improbable to die on the same day (friday) as you are placed on the cross.
    You do understand that the Christ was not just "placed on the cross", but tortured way before then, thus putting him in a near fatal state long before he even started walking down la Via Dolorosa? You also understand that the guy was pierced in his side by a Roman officer with a lance while he was still upon the Cross, right?

    Or did you just conveniently "forget" those?

    I'll repeat what I said again, if there is any kind of action I dislike more than anything, is the complete distortion of reality to suit some sort of worldview  -- something that only embraces unnecessary anti-intellectualism and encourages ignorance. It's the same foolishness that the European "Catholics" used to deceive Christians into fighting in pointless wars for a "pope", it's the same foolishness that politicians used to trick into voting them into unparallelled governmental power, it's the same foolishness atheistic naturalists use into creating superficial "schisms" between a person's faith and scientific phenomena and thus crippling the scientific community as a whole, it's the same foolishness many super-fundamentalist Christians use when they reject every thing that comes out of scientific academia, and it's the same foolishness that you are attempting to blaspheme the intelligence of posters here with.

    Either post with intellectual honesty or don't bother posting at all.
    Reply
    Just to point out a single thing concerning your single "fact". You said, and I quote:
    • ...FACT that it is very improbable to die on the same day (friday) as you are placed on the cross.
    You do understand that the Christ was not just "placed on the cross", but tortured way before then, thus putting him in a near fatal state long before he even started walking down la Via Dolorosa? You also understand that the guy was pierced in his side by a Roman officer with a lance while he was still upon the Cross, right?

    Or did you just conveniently "forget" those?

    I'll repeat what I said again, if there is any kind of action I dislike more than anything, is the complete distortion of reality to suit some sort of worldview  -- something that only embraces unnecessary anti-intellectualism and encourages ignorance. It's the same foolishness that the European "Catholics" used to deceive Christians into fighting in pointless wars for a "pope", it's the same foolishness that politicians used to trick into voting them into unparallelled governmental power, it's the same foolishness atheistic naturalists use into creating superficial "schisms" between a person's faith and scientific phenomena and thus crippling the scientific community as a whole, it's the same foolishness many super-fundamentalist Christians use when they reject every thing that comes out of scientific academia, and it's the same foolishness that you are attempting to blaspheme the intelligence of posters here with.

    Either post with intellectual honesty or don't bother posting at all.
    All Forums | General Discussion
    «First Previous 394041 ... 213214215 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 461,514
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,420
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 275,414
    • Thursday 10/15/2026 725
    • PART DEUX 209
    • All About streak Survivor! 6,007
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,395
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 43,587
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 107,512
    • Seahawks vs Broncos in-game live 1,161

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.