Yes, i am a hypocrite because i am said i am perfect and sin free..
I have said that everywhere.......i was wondering when someone was going to pick that up........
Yes, i am a hypocrite because i am said i am perfect and sin free..
I have said that everywhere.......i was wondering when someone was going to pick that up........
How do you know i dont give to others? How?
What is the difference between going out and buying a very expensive shirt or having a bet on a game? Or going out to a very expensive dinner or having a bet on a game?
Where does it say in the bible that gambling is a sin? The bible simply warns of the dangers of gambling, that is the differemce.
How do you know i dont give to others? How?
What is the difference between going out and buying a very expensive shirt or having a bet on a game? Or going out to a very expensive dinner or having a bet on a game?
Where does it say in the bible that gambling is a sin? The bible simply warns of the dangers of gambling, that is the differemce.
Atheists talking about simple logic....
Please, please, please breakdown the following statement - i dare...
1.All things that begin to exist have a cause
2.The universe (TIME, SPACE AND MATTER) BEGAN to exist
3. Therefore the universe has a cause (spaceless, timeless, immaterial cause)
I am waiting in aticipation.
Keep in mind the first and second laws of thermodynamics...
Atheists talking about simple logic....
Please, please, please breakdown the following statement - i dare...
1.All things that begin to exist have a cause
2.The universe (TIME, SPACE AND MATTER) BEGAN to exist
3. Therefore the universe has a cause (spaceless, timeless, immaterial cause)
I am waiting in aticipation.
Keep in mind the first and second laws of thermodynamics...
Atheists talking about simple logic....
Please, please, please breakdown the following statement - i dare...
1.All things that begin to exist have a cause
2.The universe (TIME, SPACE AND MATTER) BEGAN to exist
3. Therefore the universe has a cause (spaceless, timeless, immaterial cause)
I am waiting in aticipation.
Keep in mind the first and second laws of thermodynamics...
Atheists talking about simple logic....
Please, please, please breakdown the following statement - i dare...
1.All things that begin to exist have a cause
2.The universe (TIME, SPACE AND MATTER) BEGAN to exist
3. Therefore the universe has a cause (spaceless, timeless, immaterial cause)
I am waiting in aticipation.
Keep in mind the first and second laws of thermodynamics...
Only my argument?
Did i go and observe by experiment and science that the universe is expadning and came from a point of singulairty?
This is the view from cosmology that the universe began to exist, the rest is from philosophy. You dont even need to tap into philosoply to know that things that begin to exist have a cause.
No one can break down this argument, but i thought science eliminates God?
Only my argument?
Did i go and observe by experiment and science that the universe is expadning and came from a point of singulairty?
This is the view from cosmology that the universe began to exist, the rest is from philosophy. You dont even need to tap into philosoply to know that things that begin to exist have a cause.
No one can break down this argument, but i thought science eliminates God?
Only my argument?
Did i go and observe by experiment and science that the universe is expadning and came from a point of singulairty?
This is the view from cosmology that the universe began to exist, the rest is from philosophy. You dont even need to tap into philosoply to know that things that begin to exist have a cause.
No one can break down this argument, but i thought science eliminates God?
Only my argument?
Did i go and observe by experiment and science that the universe is expadning and came from a point of singulairty?
This is the view from cosmology that the universe began to exist, the rest is from philosophy. You dont even need to tap into philosoply to know that things that begin to exist have a cause.
No one can break down this argument, but i thought science eliminates God?
It has everything to do with your argument...
How does my argument fail? How?
To say it fails, you need to breakdown each premise or at least one of the premises......You have failed to do so.
It has everything to do with your argument...
How does my argument fail? How?
To say it fails, you need to breakdown each premise or at least one of the premises......You have failed to do so.
Because the argument simply points to a timeless, spaceless and immaterial cause of the universe.......
I didnt say God....
remember, the atheist doesnt believe in anything unless it can be observed in a natrualistic sense.
Because the argument simply points to a timeless, spaceless and immaterial cause of the universe.......
I didnt say God....
remember, the atheist doesnt believe in anything unless it can be observed in a natrualistic sense.
No, you're not entirely right. The Gospels in the New Testament are not opinions from the authors but rather they represent first-hand witness accounts.
They are testimonies depitcting the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. This is how we get all the quotes coming from Jesus as noted in their writings by these first-hand witnesses.
So these Gospels can't be catergorized as opinions from the authors. So its a form of evidence based on personal experiences.
Additionally, outside the Bible, Jesus is also mentioned by his near-contemporaries. Extra-Biblical and secular writers (many hostile) point to Jesus' existence, including the Roman writings of Tacitus, Seutonius, Thallus and Pliny, and the Jewish writings of Josephus and the Talmud. Gary Habermas has cited a total of 39 ancient extra-Biblical sources, including 17 non-Christian, that witness from outside the New Testament to over 100 details of Jesus' life, death, and resurrection
Biblical archaeological are not opinions but rather its the scientific study of the life and cultures of ancient peoples, as by excavation of ancient cities, relics, artifacts, etc.
The fascinating study has furnished background material for illustrating, illuminating and in many cases authenticating of the message and meaning of the Old and New Testament Scriptures. Archaeologists studying ancient civilizations by uncovering ruins and examining artifacts, are with increasing success confirming the accuracy of the Biblical texts.
Scientific discoveries like the big bang supports the claim that the universe had a beginning, likewise the second law of thermodynamics also supports this claim and so we know that the universe had a beginning.
So either the universe was popped into existence from nothing with absolutely no cause or the universe was caused to exist by something outside it. In chapter one of Genesis of the Holy Bible we read that "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"
So your argument in stating that my evidences are soley based on opinions is not a totally accurate one. Philosophical reasons are basicly opinions so you are right in regards to it being opinions.
So there are evidences outside of the bible, you have to do your research and seek them and don't just come to this thread thinking oneday somebody is going to hand over to you the concrete proof you seek...stop being foolish and start being realistic!
No, you're not entirely right. The Gospels in the New Testament are not opinions from the authors but rather they represent first-hand witness accounts.
They are testimonies depitcting the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. This is how we get all the quotes coming from Jesus as noted in their writings by these first-hand witnesses.
So these Gospels can't be catergorized as opinions from the authors. So its a form of evidence based on personal experiences.
Additionally, outside the Bible, Jesus is also mentioned by his near-contemporaries. Extra-Biblical and secular writers (many hostile) point to Jesus' existence, including the Roman writings of Tacitus, Seutonius, Thallus and Pliny, and the Jewish writings of Josephus and the Talmud. Gary Habermas has cited a total of 39 ancient extra-Biblical sources, including 17 non-Christian, that witness from outside the New Testament to over 100 details of Jesus' life, death, and resurrection
Biblical archaeological are not opinions but rather its the scientific study of the life and cultures of ancient peoples, as by excavation of ancient cities, relics, artifacts, etc.
The fascinating study has furnished background material for illustrating, illuminating and in many cases authenticating of the message and meaning of the Old and New Testament Scriptures. Archaeologists studying ancient civilizations by uncovering ruins and examining artifacts, are with increasing success confirming the accuracy of the Biblical texts.
Scientific discoveries like the big bang supports the claim that the universe had a beginning, likewise the second law of thermodynamics also supports this claim and so we know that the universe had a beginning.
So either the universe was popped into existence from nothing with absolutely no cause or the universe was caused to exist by something outside it. In chapter one of Genesis of the Holy Bible we read that "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"
So your argument in stating that my evidences are soley based on opinions is not a totally accurate one. Philosophical reasons are basicly opinions so you are right in regards to it being opinions.
So there are evidences outside of the bible, you have to do your research and seek them and don't just come to this thread thinking oneday somebody is going to hand over to you the concrete proof you seek...stop being foolish and start being realistic!
Because the argument simply points to a timeless, spaceless and immaterial cause of the universe.......
I didnt say God....
remember, the atheist doesnt believe in anything unless it can be observed in a natrualistic sense.
Because the argument simply points to a timeless, spaceless and immaterial cause of the universe.......
I didnt say God....
remember, the atheist doesnt believe in anything unless it can be observed in a natrualistic sense.
Either Christianity is correct and all other religions are false or Christianity is false and other religions are correct but not exclusively.
There is very good evidence to show that Christianity is true.
The historicity of Christ is one.
Either Christianity is correct and all other religions are false or Christianity is false and other religions are correct but not exclusively.
There is very good evidence to show that Christianity is true.
The historicity of Christ is one.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.