My how fast your tune changes. If u read through this thread you would realize that for this system April is a data collecting month - and it has been stated many times to proceed with caution the first few weeks. That is why we are doing some analysis with the plays.
Love guys that come out of nowhere make some ignorant comments cause they have no clue whats going on and start criticizing....lol to you sir.
haha ok sorry I tend to skip over the comments made by profiles with no pics who joined a week ago and have 15 comments. Force of habit. The play I said I added to my personal plays technically fell under the criteria of the system and I get told I don't know what I'm doing. Hmm?? haha ok I'll leave you guys to your fact finding missions. I'll just make the plays quietly and not say a word. Best of luck to all of you I like the system and think it'll work out for all of us in the long run.
0
Quote Originally Posted by odieo:
My how fast your tune changes. If u read through this thread you would realize that for this system April is a data collecting month - and it has been stated many times to proceed with caution the first few weeks. That is why we are doing some analysis with the plays.
Love guys that come out of nowhere make some ignorant comments cause they have no clue whats going on and start criticizing....lol to you sir.
haha ok sorry I tend to skip over the comments made by profiles with no pics who joined a week ago and have 15 comments. Force of habit. The play I said I added to my personal plays technically fell under the criteria of the system and I get told I don't know what I'm doing. Hmm?? haha ok I'll leave you guys to your fact finding missions. I'll just make the plays quietly and not say a word. Best of luck to all of you I like the system and think it'll work out for all of us in the long run.
haha ok sorry I tend to skip over the comments made by profiles with no pics who joined a week ago and have 15 comments. Force of habit. The play I said I added to my personal plays technically fell under the criteria of the system and I get told I don't know what I'm doing. Hmm?? haha ok I'll leave you guys to your fact finding missions. I'll just make the plays quietly and not say a word. Best of luck to all of you I like the system and think it'll work out for all of us in the long run.
Good riddance sir. I encourage you to read through this thread and understand why we are analyzing some of the plays at this point in the season. Then maybe you'll get a clue.
PS - that SD pick lookin solid - Oswalt really lookin like hes in pain....lol. Nice cappin.
0
Quote Originally Posted by zcecil:
haha ok sorry I tend to skip over the comments made by profiles with no pics who joined a week ago and have 15 comments. Force of habit. The play I said I added to my personal plays technically fell under the criteria of the system and I get told I don't know what I'm doing. Hmm?? haha ok I'll leave you guys to your fact finding missions. I'll just make the plays quietly and not say a word. Best of luck to all of you I like the system and think it'll work out for all of us in the long run.
Good riddance sir. I encourage you to read through this thread and understand why we are analyzing some of the plays at this point in the season. Then maybe you'll get a clue.
PS - that SD pick lookin solid - Oswalt really lookin like hes in pain....lol. Nice cappin.
No sir. If you read through the posts I strongly encouraged laying off a few of the picks - exactly what I have been trying to get through ur obvious thick skull - lol. Like i said, you no clue. GTFO brah.
0
Quote Originally Posted by zcecil:
Didn't you go 0-5 today?
No sir. If you read through the posts I strongly encouraged laying off a few of the picks - exactly what I have been trying to get through ur obvious thick skull - lol. Like i said, you no clue. GTFO brah.
So are you even making any of these plays that you are posting? Seems silly to put this in a thread where people are actually making the plays they post and you're just collecting the data, can't you just use google spreadsheet?
0
So are you even making any of these plays that you are posting? Seems silly to put this in a thread where people are actually making the plays they post and you're just collecting the data, can't you just use google spreadsheet?
I'm sorry haha I'm sorry. It was just too easy to give you a hard time. For real this time I'll see you in some other threads I guess...best of luck in the future. Like I said this system will be interesting. I actually like it unlike some people who called it worthless earlier in the thread. See you guys around lolololol
0
I'm sorry haha I'm sorry. It was just too easy to give you a hard time. For real this time I'll see you in some other threads I guess...best of luck in the future. Like I said this system will be interesting. I actually like it unlike some people who called it worthless earlier in the thread. See you guys around lolololol
For the time being lets post ALL the "Official" plays. I can tell you personally though I will not be playing all of them at this point in the season, but lets also outline the borderline plays and discuss.
Rough day yesterday:
ARZ HOU PITT OAK SD
0fer's are never fun!
Luckily I only fired on 3 of these plays - should have gone with my gut on OAK, but POIZEN offered some good analysis - which in hindsight was spot on! McCarthy pitched a gem - SEA bats slumping - unfortunately for us OAK bats were even worse! Seeing how that game played out i'd make the same play @ +135 again - props to POIZEN on that one - too bad it didn't work out.
Hopefully the dogs will be barking today!
0
For the time being lets post ALL the "Official" plays. I can tell you personally though I will not be playing all of them at this point in the season, but lets also outline the borderline plays and discuss.
Rough day yesterday:
ARZ HOU PITT OAK SD
0fer's are never fun!
Luckily I only fired on 3 of these plays - should have gone with my gut on OAK, but POIZEN offered some good analysis - which in hindsight was spot on! McCarthy pitched a gem - SEA bats slumping - unfortunately for us OAK bats were even worse! Seeing how that game played out i'd make the same play @ +135 again - props to POIZEN on that one - too bad it didn't work out.
I just quickly did the picks for April 22. I left out the Cards game even though I didn't see McClellan on the top 20 in ERA in NL.
Cubs
White Sox
Blue Jays
Diamondbacks
Royals
Indians
Padres
Vegas,
My book has CHC, TOR, and CLE all at negative numbers - my book is also a POS though...lol...as I stated before in this thread and POIZEN agreed - I do not consider a team with a negative number a dog - and would be very wary about playing teams around even money - these games are generally a coin flip and this system is designed to find a slight edge when you're getting a good price.
CWS are eliminated - Verlander #12 on the ratings.
SD is technically an official play however I will 100% be laying off. Cole is 1 inning short of being on the first list and if you take his numbers and plug them into the first list he would be a #20 - this alone is enough to get me off this pick as well as the SD bats have been God awful the past week or so.
Just my two cents....as always play 'em as you like
0
Quote Originally Posted by vegastime:
I just quickly did the picks for April 22. I left out the Cards game even though I didn't see McClellan on the top 20 in ERA in NL.
Cubs
White Sox
Blue Jays
Diamondbacks
Royals
Indians
Padres
Vegas,
My book has CHC, TOR, and CLE all at negative numbers - my book is also a POS though...lol...as I stated before in this thread and POIZEN agreed - I do not consider a team with a negative number a dog - and would be very wary about playing teams around even money - these games are generally a coin flip and this system is designed to find a slight edge when you're getting a good price.
CWS are eliminated - Verlander #12 on the ratings.
SD is technically an official play however I will 100% be laying off. Cole is 1 inning short of being on the first list and if you take his numbers and plug them into the first list he would be a #20 - this alone is enough to get me off this pick as well as the SD bats have been God awful the past week or so.
Just my two cents....as always play 'em as you like
Kinda a weaksauce day for this system - as I stated above I will NOT be play SD, however they are an official play.
I am also leaning on throwing out CIN as McCleallan is #32 on ratings and at this point in the season that is close enough for me - anyone else have thoughts on this play?
Get the best number you can and fire away!!
0
Odie's Official System Plays for 4/22:
ARZ CIN KC SD
Kinda a weaksauce day for this system - as I stated above I will NOT be play SD, however they are an official play.
I am also leaning on throwing out CIN as McCleallan is #32 on ratings and at this point in the season that is close enough for me - anyone else have thoughts on this play?
I believe the White Sox are a no-play. Verlander is #12 on the list. Also, K.C. is a dog of greater then +150. BOL
KC opened under +150 and has moved since - the article states to consider plays that open under +150 what they do after that i guess in insignificant. I actually think there is some value in this play, pertaining to this system. Perhaps this is worth some discussion as a possible tweak in the system - anyone else have thoughts on this?
0
Quote Originally Posted by wizardem:
I believe the White Sox are a no-play. Verlander is #12 on the list. Also, K.C. is a dog of greater then +150. BOL
KC opened under +150 and has moved since - the article states to consider plays that open under +150 what they do after that i guess in insignificant. I actually think there is some value in this play, pertaining to this system. Perhaps this is worth some discussion as a possible tweak in the system - anyone else have thoughts on this?
This system is sucking ass so far this year it is 39-48-4, I have been following all the games and getting hosed on most that I bet on. Last night it was 0-4. I can see how it could work but so far not so much i will continue following it though I will only be betting on games that I agree with based on my own research.
0
This system is sucking ass so far this year it is 39-48-4, I have been following all the games and getting hosed on most that I bet on. Last night it was 0-4. I can see how it could work but so far not so much i will continue following it though I will only be betting on games that I agree with based on my own research.
This system is sucking ass so far this year it is 39-48-4, I have been following all the games and getting hosed on most that I bet on. Last night it was 0-4. I can see how it could work but so far not so much i will continue following it though I will only be betting on games that I agree with based on my own research.
The goal of this system is to try and hit between 45%-50% and you will profit because all the plays are plus money. 39-48 is 44%. As i've state 1 million times already April is a bad month for this system as the sample size for pitching is far too small - that is why it was recommended to wait 2-3 weeks and not start on opening day.
Honestly getting a little sick of the haters posting their nonsense when this system is JUST getting started.
If you have constructive criticism of the system please post so it can be discussed.....but posting and saying "oh this system was 0-4 last night - it SUCKS!" is just plain stupid.
FWIW 39-48-4 in April for this system is actually really solid.
0
Quote Originally Posted by woodsywins1616:
This system is sucking ass so far this year it is 39-48-4, I have been following all the games and getting hosed on most that I bet on. Last night it was 0-4. I can see how it could work but so far not so much i will continue following it though I will only be betting on games that I agree with based on my own research.
The goal of this system is to try and hit between 45%-50% and you will profit because all the plays are plus money. 39-48 is 44%. As i've state 1 million times already April is a bad month for this system as the sample size for pitching is far too small - that is why it was recommended to wait 2-3 weeks and not start on opening day.
Honestly getting a little sick of the haters posting their nonsense when this system is JUST getting started.
If you have constructive criticism of the system please post so it can be discussed.....but posting and saying "oh this system was 0-4 last night - it SUCKS!" is just plain stupid.
FWIW 39-48-4 in April for this system is actually really solid.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.