Narrowed down to:
D'backs
Reds
Rocks/Marls Un 8.5 -120 Chacin/Sanchez
Narrowed down to:
D'backs
Reds
Rocks/Marls Un 8.5 -120 Chacin/Sanchez
Narrowed down to:
D'backs
Reds
Rocks/Marls Un 8.5 -120 Chacin/Sanchez
1) Yes, a dog can have a long winning streak and conversely a fav can have a long losing streak.
2) Yes, it is rare, but a dog with a top 20 pitcher is a play. If dog and fav are both top 20, play the under.
1) Yes, a dog can have a long winning streak and conversely a fav can have a long losing streak.
2) Yes, it is rare, but a dog with a top 20 pitcher is a play. If dog and fav are both top 20, play the under.
This system is sucking ass so far this year it is 39-48-4, I have been following all the games and getting hosed on most that I bet on. Last night it was 0-4. I can see how it could work but so far not so much i will continue following it though I will only be betting on games that I agree with based on my own research.
Woody, anyone who started this system at the beginning of the year wasn't paying attention. For instance, how did you place wagers the first five games? There were no Sagarin ratings on any pitchers this year so how would you know if they were top 20? And even after the first week, are you going to trust a pitchers numbers based on one start? This is why I make sure that the starting pitcher is in the top portion of the ratings based on innings pitched, and also why I started tracking this on Monday 4/18.
This system is sucking ass so far this year it is 39-48-4, I have been following all the games and getting hosed on most that I bet on. Last night it was 0-4. I can see how it could work but so far not so much i will continue following it though I will only be betting on games that I agree with based on my own research.
Woody, anyone who started this system at the beginning of the year wasn't paying attention. For instance, how did you place wagers the first five games? There were no Sagarin ratings on any pitchers this year so how would you know if they were top 20? And even after the first week, are you going to trust a pitchers numbers based on one start? This is why I make sure that the starting pitcher is in the top portion of the ratings based on innings pitched, and also why I started tracking this on Monday 4/18.
Taurus, I think it is VERY important to use the Sagarin ratings for this system. It is what the article is based on, and more importantly, the pitchers are rated based on his NPERA versus a standard ERA. What this is doing, as you can see, is giving you WAY too many picks per day. In the long run, it's going to be hard to win with 8-12 plays per day. Just my opinion for what its worth.
GL
Taurus, I think it is VERY important to use the Sagarin ratings for this system. It is what the article is based on, and more importantly, the pitchers are rated based on his NPERA versus a standard ERA. What this is doing, as you can see, is giving you WAY too many picks per day. In the long run, it's going to be hard to win with 8-12 plays per day. Just my opinion for what its worth.
GL
Taurus, I think it is VERY important to use the Sagarin ratings for this system. It is what the article is based on, and more importantly, the pitchers are rated based on his NPERA versus a standard ERA. What this is doing, as you can see, is giving you WAY too many picks per day. In the long run, it's going to be hard to win with 8-12 plays per day. Just my opinion for what its worth.
GL
Taurus, I think it is VERY important to use the Sagarin ratings for this system. It is what the article is based on, and more importantly, the pitchers are rated based on his NPERA versus a standard ERA. What this is doing, as you can see, is giving you WAY too many picks per day. In the long run, it's going to be hard to win with 8-12 plays per day. Just my opinion for what its worth.
GL
Taurus, I think it is VERY important to use the Sagarin ratings for this system. It is what the article is based on, and more importantly, the pitchers are rated based on his NPERA versus a standard ERA. What this is doing, as you can see, is giving you WAY too many picks per day. In the long run, it's going to be hard to win with 8-12 plays per day. Just my opinion for what its worth.
GL
Taurus, I think it is VERY important to use the Sagarin ratings for this system. It is what the article is based on, and more importantly, the pitchers are rated based on his NPERA versus a standard ERA. What this is doing, as you can see, is giving you WAY too many picks per day. In the long run, it's going to be hard to win with 8-12 plays per day. Just my opinion for what its worth.
GL
Here is the link: https://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin.htm
Here is the link: https://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin.htm
I actually don't hate Cin or SD. Volquez for Cincy can be overpowering and his best effort came on the road this year, plus that have some decent bats. As far as SD goes, if you can get a top 20 with the dog, you got to love that. Phily hitting .213 vs lefties on the road, SD hitting .288 vs lefties at home. I like SD.
I actually don't hate Cin or SD. Volquez for Cincy can be overpowering and his best effort came on the road this year, plus that have some decent bats. As far as SD goes, if you can get a top 20 with the dog, you got to love that. Phily hitting .213 vs lefties on the road, SD hitting .288 vs lefties at home. I like SD.
Narrowed down to:
D'backs
Reds
Rocks/Marls Un 8.5 -120 Chacin/Sanchez
Bob, you've got the wrong Sanchez. Sanchez with SF is a top 20, not Fla.
Narrowed down to:
D'backs
Reds
Rocks/Marls Un 8.5 -120 Chacin/Sanchez
Bob, you've got the wrong Sanchez. Sanchez with SF is a top 20, not Fla.
You are correct - got teams mixed up.
However a winner never the less!
Gotta get lucky once in awhile!
You are correct - got teams mixed up.
However a winner never the less!
Gotta get lucky once in awhile!
You are correct - got teams mixed up.
However a winner never the less!
Gotta get lucky once in awhile!
You are correct - got teams mixed up.
However a winner never the less!
Gotta get lucky once in awhile!
Got Indians @ +105
Also laying the 115 Hudson/Lince Un 6.5
Dodgers W L3 = NP for me
Also a Mets fan but bet against them in this system. A win-win situation for me if they lose I'm glad a few bucks go into my roll if they win I'm just as happy to see it. Probably a RO today its pouring on LI.
Got Indians @ +105
Also laying the 115 Hudson/Lince Un 6.5
Dodgers W L3 = NP for me
Also a Mets fan but bet against them in this system. A win-win situation for me if they lose I'm glad a few bucks go into my roll if they win I'm just as happy to see it. Probably a RO today its pouring on LI.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.