Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by Mcmanus: @don juan Quote Originally Posted by don juan: Believe me, The third pick will not be Fields. I'm starting to think that it's really going to be Mac Jones.. Mac Jones fits Shanny's offense like a glove. The fans seem to want Fields but it will be Jones. Wait until this immobile statute takes a couple of hits. Jimmy G was pretty good, until he started getting knocked down.
Mac Jones 40 time: 4.79
Jimmy G 40 time: 4.97
I wouldn't describe Jimmy G as immobile....
Thank you America
0
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by Mcmanus: @don juan Quote Originally Posted by don juan: Believe me, The third pick will not be Fields. I'm starting to think that it's really going to be Mac Jones.. Mac Jones fits Shanny's offense like a glove. The fans seem to want Fields but it will be Jones. Wait until this immobile statute takes a couple of hits. Jimmy G was pretty good, until he started getting knocked down.
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg: Sshhh.... some around here don't want to hear about this possibility as there is ZERO percent chance they take Pitts LOL blitzkrieg...so I'm not allowed to have an opinion? San Fran IS in win now mode. John Lynch shoulda roasted Coach Shanny's AZZ mid-3rd Qtr in the 2019 SUPE (if he was thinking like a safety/destroyer in his heyday), and he's not gonna wait for Justin or Trey to "develop". He could be out of a job by then. You think Fields, Jones, or Lance are better NOW than Jimmy G. In a year they wouldn't be better, either. And San Fran can crush it with a passing offense including the best TE right now (Kittles) and prolly a future Gronk (Pitts), and Deebo and Brandon. At least you're not calling me a moron like new boy beginnings. Wonder if he cleaned off his Coach Shanny poster yet?
Dude.... I was agreeing with you in that it is a plausible scenario. An underrated one and one that "some don't want to hear about" because they believe there is ZERO percent chance of it happening (despite what the odds say). There was sarcasm in my sentence that unfortunately did not play out as written, my apologies. I am of the firm camp the pick isn't Fields for reasons you stated and more.
Draft props are all for fun, no real money being bet as the limits the books put out are miniscule. I forgot who said it the other day but one of the directors basically conceded that the draft is worthless to them and breaking even / small losses are accepted.
Thank you America
0
@DB51daBEARS
Quote Originally Posted by DB51daBEARS:
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg: Sshhh.... some around here don't want to hear about this possibility as there is ZERO percent chance they take Pitts LOL blitzkrieg...so I'm not allowed to have an opinion? San Fran IS in win now mode. John Lynch shoulda roasted Coach Shanny's AZZ mid-3rd Qtr in the 2019 SUPE (if he was thinking like a safety/destroyer in his heyday), and he's not gonna wait for Justin or Trey to "develop". He could be out of a job by then. You think Fields, Jones, or Lance are better NOW than Jimmy G. In a year they wouldn't be better, either. And San Fran can crush it with a passing offense including the best TE right now (Kittles) and prolly a future Gronk (Pitts), and Deebo and Brandon. At least you're not calling me a moron like new boy beginnings. Wonder if he cleaned off his Coach Shanny poster yet?
Dude.... I was agreeing with you in that it is a plausible scenario. An underrated one and one that "some don't want to hear about" because they believe there is ZERO percent chance of it happening (despite what the odds say). There was sarcasm in my sentence that unfortunately did not play out as written, my apologies. I am of the firm camp the pick isn't Fields for reasons you stated and more.
Draft props are all for fun, no real money being bet as the limits the books put out are miniscule. I forgot who said it the other day but one of the directors basically conceded that the draft is worthless to them and breaking even / small losses are accepted.
What do you think about 1st defensive player picked? It seems almost Surtain (see what I did there ) he goes first. Even with all the talk of the Eagles trying to draft down before my cowboys to grab a CB. Rarely like to pay juice but -142 seems like a given. BOL on any draft wagers BB.
Im currently seeing
Surtain -119
Horn +175
Parsons +450
Also heard Tebow is trying out for Jaguars as a tight end...the Urban Meyer clownshow should be epic this year
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
0
Quote Originally Posted by jaybucko:
What do you think about 1st defensive player picked? It seems almost Surtain (see what I did there ) he goes first. Even with all the talk of the Eagles trying to draft down before my cowboys to grab a CB. Rarely like to pay juice but -142 seems like a given. BOL on any draft wagers BB.
Im currently seeing
Surtain -119
Horn +175
Parsons +450
Also heard Tebow is trying out for Jaguars as a tight end...the Urban Meyer clownshow should be epic this year
I have no clue buddy, i didnt key in on that area...sprinkled a few totals and players...nothing serious...got Lance to go #3 +195 a few days ago...soap opera for us tonight
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
0
@jaybucko
I have no clue buddy, i didnt key in on that area...sprinkled a few totals and players...nothing serious...got Lance to go #3 +195 a few days ago...soap opera for us tonight
Dude.... I was agreeing with you in that it is a plausible scenario. An underrated one and one that "some don't want to hear about" because they believe there is ZERO percent chance of it happening (despite what the odds say). There was sarcasm in my sentence that unfortunately did not play out as written, my apologies. I am of the firm camp the pick isn't Fields for reasons you stated and more. Draft props are all for fun, no real money being bet as the limits the books put out are miniscule. I forgot who said it the other day but one of the directors basically conceded that the draft is worthless to them and breaking even / small losses are accepted.
Sorry, Blitzkreig...I thought you were hitting the "sarcasm" button...my bad. Getting touchy around here lol.
Cheers
1
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
Dude.... I was agreeing with you in that it is a plausible scenario. An underrated one and one that "some don't want to hear about" because they believe there is ZERO percent chance of it happening (despite what the odds say). There was sarcasm in my sentence that unfortunately did not play out as written, my apologies. I am of the firm camp the pick isn't Fields for reasons you stated and more. Draft props are all for fun, no real money being bet as the limits the books put out are miniscule. I forgot who said it the other day but one of the directors basically conceded that the draft is worthless to them and breaking even / small losses are accepted.
Sorry, Blitzkreig...I thought you were hitting the "sarcasm" button...my bad. Getting touchy around here lol.
From unimpeachable source: As of last night, Aaron Rodgers’ wish list was 49ers, Broncos, Raiders (not necessarily in that order). He wanted Packers to take the 49ers’ offer. Next move by Rodgers is TBD.
0
ProFootballTalk
@ProFootballTalk
From unimpeachable source: As of last night, Aaron Rodgers’ wish list was 49ers, Broncos, Raiders (not necessarily in that order). He wanted Packers to take the 49ers’ offer. Next move by Rodgers is TBD.
Quote Originally Posted by Eddy_Winslow: bet365 just changed the favorite of "number 3 overall pick" from Jones to Lance, then took it off the board.you can still get him to be top 5 -125 at Bet365, Jones is -350
saw that, very weird they didn't adjust those odds. They just took it off the board.
buy $BTC
0
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Quote Originally Posted by Eddy_Winslow: bet365 just changed the favorite of "number 3 overall pick" from Jones to Lance, then took it off the board.you can still get him to be top 5 -125 at Bet365, Jones is -350
saw that, very weird they didn't adjust those odds. They just took it off the board.
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Quote Originally Posted by Eddy_Winslow: bet365 just changed the favorite of "number 3 overall pick" from Jones to Lance, then took it off the board.you can still get him to be top 5 -125 at Bet365, Jones is -350 saw that, very weird they didn't adjust those odds. They just took it off the board.
Hard to imagine that was an oversight on their part, starting to like Chase as first none QB taken, Atlanta trades out of 4 or takes QB, feel like Bengals are taking chase at 5 for sure.
22nd
0
Quote Originally Posted by Eddy_Winslow:
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Quote Originally Posted by Eddy_Winslow: bet365 just changed the favorite of "number 3 overall pick" from Jones to Lance, then took it off the board.you can still get him to be top 5 -125 at Bet365, Jones is -350 saw that, very weird they didn't adjust those odds. They just took it off the board.
Hard to imagine that was an oversight on their part, starting to like Chase as first none QB taken, Atlanta trades out of 4 or takes QB, feel like Bengals are taking chase at 5 for sure.
The Rodgers soap opera has the potential to blow up the 3rd overall pick situation.
sports book directors were stating that they had more money riding on the 3rd overall pick prop than any other draft bet out there.... if this decision was a SNF or MNF bet guess where the discussion would be going
Thank you America
0
The Rodgers soap opera has the potential to blow up the 3rd overall pick situation.
sports book directors were stating that they had more money riding on the 3rd overall pick prop than any other draft bet out there.... if this decision was a SNF or MNF bet guess where the discussion would be going
The Rodgers soap opera has the potential to blow up the 3rd overall pick situation. sports book directors were stating that they had more money riding on the 3rd overall pick prop than any other draft bet out there.... if this decision was a SNF or MNF bet guess where the discussion would be going
My large local said a month ago that this prop was holding more money that any pending NFL future ....
A online book rep was on our local sports talk show saying it's easily the most bet nfl prop in their 22 year history
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
The Rodgers soap opera has the potential to blow up the 3rd overall pick situation. sports book directors were stating that they had more money riding on the 3rd overall pick prop than any other draft bet out there.... if this decision was a SNF or MNF bet guess where the discussion would be going
My large local said a month ago that this prop was holding more money that any pending NFL future ....
A online book rep was on our local sports talk show saying it's easily the most bet nfl prop in their 22 year history
Stupid pick lance These athletic qbs don't generally last Accuracy is key in the nfl this guy lacks it Plus he has little experience and played in fcs They already got a qb garappolo. Now what Gave up 3 firsts and a 3rd. Will set the 9ers back years
Russell Wilson is athletic seems like he is holding up just fine ...
The game changed , pocket qbs are almost dinosaurs now ..
Crappolo stinks and still could get traded
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:
Stupid pick lance These athletic qbs don't generally last Accuracy is key in the nfl this guy lacks it Plus he has little experience and played in fcs They already got a qb garappolo. Now what Gave up 3 firsts and a 3rd. Will set the 9ers back years
Russell Wilson is athletic seems like he is holding up just fine ...
The game changed , pocket qbs are almost dinosaurs now ..
Stupid pick lance These athletic qbs don't generally last Accuracy is key in the nfl this guy lacks it Plus he has little experience and played in fcs They already got a qb garappolo. Now what Gave up 3 firsts and a 3rd. Will set the 9ers back years
The lack of experience, and playing for a small program, are both concerning. My question is, if the Niners hadn’t moved up was this kid #3 pick? What other team would have taken a chance on him with a top pic?
0
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:
Stupid pick lance These athletic qbs don't generally last Accuracy is key in the nfl this guy lacks it Plus he has little experience and played in fcs They already got a qb garappolo. Now what Gave up 3 firsts and a 3rd. Will set the 9ers back years
The lack of experience, and playing for a small program, are both concerning. My question is, if the Niners hadn’t moved up was this kid #3 pick? What other team would have taken a chance on him with a top pic?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
