Smart, I completely agree here. I have learned the hard way that in many
games the matchup simply doesn't matter. I did extended research on
that. For example, the psychological situation a team is in, can trump
everything but it's not reflected in the spread. These situations can
often be translated into statistical trends. That's why it's called "on
any given Sunday". In 2015 I worked to much with fundamentals and I fell
for a lot of traps last season and that won't happen again. Now my way
of capping combines those four main factors:
Situational/psychological angles
Fundamentals
Public perception vs. reality -> line value
The "integrity" of the NFL
Some of these do correlate with each other. Under Pete Carroll, the Seahawks have been
outscored 0-94 during the playoffs in first halfs when they had an early
east coast start. Last year the Jets were off a close game at Foxboro,
had to travel to Oakland and missed 20 tackles during that game. The
Rams were off their home opening OT win vs. the Seahawks, had to travel
coast to coast to Washington and lost 10-24 as -4 favs. Sometimes teams
just aren't ready to play a certain game/opponent because the spot
doesn't allow their minds and bodies to prepare 100%.
another fine post imo xs and os are so overated. there is so much randomness in the nfl on each play that just cos player a is better than player b blah blah blah or this o line is better than this d line etc mean nothing to me. to me its all about situational spots and line value because without doubt there are flat spots etc and you are always betting against the line so that is where you need to find a percieved edge. gl again
0
Smart, I completely agree here. I have learned the hard way that in many
games the matchup simply doesn't matter. I did extended research on
that. For example, the psychological situation a team is in, can trump
everything but it's not reflected in the spread. These situations can
often be translated into statistical trends. That's why it's called "on
any given Sunday". In 2015 I worked to much with fundamentals and I fell
for a lot of traps last season and that won't happen again. Now my way
of capping combines those four main factors:
Situational/psychological angles
Fundamentals
Public perception vs. reality -> line value
The "integrity" of the NFL
Some of these do correlate with each other. Under Pete Carroll, the Seahawks have been
outscored 0-94 during the playoffs in first halfs when they had an early
east coast start. Last year the Jets were off a close game at Foxboro,
had to travel to Oakland and missed 20 tackles during that game. The
Rams were off their home opening OT win vs. the Seahawks, had to travel
coast to coast to Washington and lost 10-24 as -4 favs. Sometimes teams
just aren't ready to play a certain game/opponent because the spot
doesn't allow their minds and bodies to prepare 100%.
another fine post imo xs and os are so overated. there is so much randomness in the nfl on each play that just cos player a is better than player b blah blah blah or this o line is better than this d line etc mean nothing to me. to me its all about situational spots and line value because without doubt there are flat spots etc and you are always betting against the line so that is where you need to find a percieved edge. gl again
Thanks to all for chiming in or just reading. Let's have a good start into the season. Just keep a few things in mind:
1. It's a marathon, not a sprint. 2. One loss or one bad week doesn't define your season. 3. What counts is your ROI after the Super Bowl, not your ATS record after September.
0
Thanks to all for chiming in or just reading. Let's have a good start into the season. Just keep a few things in mind:
1. It's a marathon, not a sprint. 2. One loss or one bad week doesn't define your season. 3. What counts is your ROI after the Super Bowl, not your ATS record after September.
Suuma, What is your feel for that SD line? Best I'm finding is +7 -120. Think I should lock it in or wait til closer to kickoff. I know it's just an educated guess just curious how you think it will move
0
Suuma, What is your feel for that SD line? Best I'm finding is +7 -120. Think I should lock it in or wait til closer to kickoff. I know it's just an educated guess just curious how you think it will move
Suuma, What is your feel for that SD line? Best I'm finding is +7 -120. Think I should lock it in or wait til closer to kickoff. I know it's just an educated guess just curious how you think it will move
I thought that it's moving down because Jamaal Charles probably isn't going to play or will be on a snap count.
0
Quote Originally Posted by azplaya:
Suuma, What is your feel for that SD line? Best I'm finding is +7 -120. Think I should lock it in or wait til closer to kickoff. I know it's just an educated guess just curious how you think it will move
I thought that it's moving down because Jamaal Charles probably isn't going to play or will be on a snap count.
My sign in name is obsessed..I am a female who is and has been obsessed with football for a very long time..I have been watching your picks and playing your picks..I am looking forward to following you on your picks..I need all the help I can get..
Thanks obsessed.
0
Hi Suuma,
My sign in name is obsessed..I am a female who is and has been obsessed with football for a very long time..I have been watching your picks and playing your picks..I am looking forward to following you on your picks..I need all the help I can get..
One thing I didn't mention is that I play with a bookie and just do straight games with the spread, and love to do parlays..I don't know how to do anything else..
I don't know anything about playing units or buying points, so I hope this won't be a problem for me.
Thanks again
0
One thing I didn't mention is that I play with a bookie and just do straight games with the spread, and love to do parlays..I don't know how to do anything else..
I don't know anything about playing units or buying points, so I hope this won't be a problem for me.
My sign in name is obsessed..I am a female who is and has been obsessed with football for a very long time..I have been watching your picks and playing your picks..I am looking forward to following you on your picks..I need all the help I can get..
Thanks obsessed.
suuma's first groupie
0
Quote Originally Posted by obsessed:
Hi Suuma,
My sign in name is obsessed..I am a female who is and has been obsessed with football for a very long time..I have been watching your picks and playing your picks..I am looking forward to following you on your picks..I need all the help I can get..
My sign in name is obsessed..I am a female who is and has been obsessed with football for a very long time..I have been watching your picks and playing your picks..I am looking forward to following you on your picks..I need all the help I can get..
Thanks obsessed.
0
Hi Suuma,
My sign in name is obsessed..I am a female who is and has been obsessed with football for a very long time..I have been watching your picks and playing your picks..I am looking forward to following you on your picks..I need all the help I can get..
I am very cautious with the Jets this year,
because this time they play a schedule on which teams are able to expose
Ryan Fitzpatrick and the mediocre offensive line. But I really like
their week one matchup against the
Bengals. You can’t run on the Jets (best run DVOA by far in 2015) and
that’s what the Bengals need to do in order to avoid a lot of difficult
passing situations with a completely downgraded receiving corps. Andy
Dalton was put into the perfect QB situation
in 2015 but it won’t be so perfect in 2016. He will regress to the
mean. It is the same scenario than in 2014: without Jones & Eifert,
you can handcuff Green and the offense is limited. Revis is fresh off a
wrist surgery, an injury that limited him in 2015.
People say he declined but he still allowed the lowest completion
percentage of all qualifying CBs at 44.2%. I don’t see how Tyler Boyd
can step into Jones’ shoes right out of the gate. Personally, I would
make this line -3 in favor of the Jets. No homerism
here, I just don’t see what others see in the Bengals early on without
Eifert and Burfict. The Jets defense is going to win this game alone.
Todd Bowles is at his best when he knows what he is getting, and he
knows what he gets from the Bengals offense. The
Jets offense won’t be as much challenged as the Bengals offense will be
and Marshall & Decker will once again create their fair share of
mismatches against an average Bengals secondary. Give me Jets at plus
money in what I expect to be a low scoring affair.
Something like 20-10 Jets.
Fantastic writeup suuma. I'm personally looking for a Jets +3 line, but don't see it getting there. I might just have to take the +2.5 :)
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Bengals @ Jets
I am very cautious with the Jets this year,
because this time they play a schedule on which teams are able to expose
Ryan Fitzpatrick and the mediocre offensive line. But I really like
their week one matchup against the
Bengals. You can’t run on the Jets (best run DVOA by far in 2015) and
that’s what the Bengals need to do in order to avoid a lot of difficult
passing situations with a completely downgraded receiving corps. Andy
Dalton was put into the perfect QB situation
in 2015 but it won’t be so perfect in 2016. He will regress to the
mean. It is the same scenario than in 2014: without Jones & Eifert,
you can handcuff Green and the offense is limited. Revis is fresh off a
wrist surgery, an injury that limited him in 2015.
People say he declined but he still allowed the lowest completion
percentage of all qualifying CBs at 44.2%. I don’t see how Tyler Boyd
can step into Jones’ shoes right out of the gate. Personally, I would
make this line -3 in favor of the Jets. No homerism
here, I just don’t see what others see in the Bengals early on without
Eifert and Burfict. The Jets defense is going to win this game alone.
Todd Bowles is at his best when he knows what he is getting, and he
knows what he gets from the Bengals offense. The
Jets offense won’t be as much challenged as the Bengals offense will be
and Marshall & Decker will once again create their fair share of
mismatches against an average Bengals secondary. Give me Jets at plus
money in what I expect to be a low scoring affair.
Something like 20-10 Jets.
Fantastic writeup suuma. I'm personally looking for a Jets +3 line, but don't see it getting there. I might just have to take the +2.5 :)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.