Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump.
Obviously they are both accurate!
1
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Trump logic the blame for 9-11 is on the suit in the seat, that is a farce, as is the farce that Biden is to blame for the Israel invasion . 9-11 was not due to Bush and none of the current stuff is about Biden either. Dont fall for partisan cud chewing, be smarter than this..
@wallstreetcappers
Wallstreetcappers nailed it
1
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Trump logic the blame for 9-11 is on the suit in the seat, that is a farce, as is the farce that Biden is to blame for the Israel invasion . 9-11 was not due to Bush and none of the current stuff is about Biden either. Dont fall for partisan cud chewing, be smarter than this..
I’d like to see you flip the script every so often around here and make yourself actually seem as bi-partisan as you always say you are …. you are engaging in conversations here that are not solely based on the fact that you must perform your moderating duties that require you to halt “ the attacking nature “ of members that have gone too far . you are thoroughly enjoying yourself in some of these conversations , as you are immersed in the intoxicating embrace of communication and all it’s gifts , and you are touching upon a myriad of topics that could be labeled “ personal pleasure “ rather than “ job requirements “ …. Can we see some exchanges with you and the Democratic members here also ? You can’t possibly agree with everything that they post or believe . Can you ? you leave most of them to die a silent death . why is that ? I think that’s what’s missing . This pattern or equation that I’m always seeing has it’s constants , but it also needs some variables . All you do is attack certain member’s points , but others nary see a word typed out to them . makes no sense . Unless you are 100 percent standing behind the convictions of the people that you never choose to enter into conversations with , I do not see how from time to time you don’t offer them up a rebuttal as well . That would make things a little more fair and balanced around here . Plus it would give you some street cred . And it would take some of the heat off of the back of your neck because these facts that I’ve stated are accurate and glaringly obvious . you not telling us something ? Are those other members not worth your time ? Do you feel that they aren’t up to your standards for discussion or something . Lost causes ? This always struck me as odd . Just looking for some clarity . please don’t say that we’ve been over this already . because this is straight politics . much respect
respect to you and knowledge is supreme
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
0
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato:
I’d like to see you flip the script every so often around here and make yourself actually seem as bi-partisan as you always say you are …. you are engaging in conversations here that are not solely based on the fact that you must perform your moderating duties that require you to halt “ the attacking nature “ of members that have gone too far . you are thoroughly enjoying yourself in some of these conversations , as you are immersed in the intoxicating embrace of communication and all it’s gifts , and you are touching upon a myriad of topics that could be labeled “ personal pleasure “ rather than “ job requirements “ …. Can we see some exchanges with you and the Democratic members here also ? You can’t possibly agree with everything that they post or believe . Can you ? you leave most of them to die a silent death . why is that ? I think that’s what’s missing . This pattern or equation that I’m always seeing has it’s constants , but it also needs some variables . All you do is attack certain member’s points , but others nary see a word typed out to them . makes no sense . Unless you are 100 percent standing behind the convictions of the people that you never choose to enter into conversations with , I do not see how from time to time you don’t offer them up a rebuttal as well . That would make things a little more fair and balanced around here . Plus it would give you some street cred . And it would take some of the heat off of the back of your neck because these facts that I’ve stated are accurate and glaringly obvious . you not telling us something ? Are those other members not worth your time ? Do you feel that they aren’t up to your standards for discussion or something . Lost causes ? This always struck me as odd . Just looking for some clarity . please don’t say that we’ve been over this already . because this is straight politics . much respect
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato: Yeah I gotcha on that , I understand but someone , at some point , has to break the chain of mediocrity that is keeping progress at bay …… it takes a real motherfucker to not fall victim , or to be the prey , of everything that has kept people back from accomplishing great things . It’s gonna involve taking some lumps and not taking the easy way out , but guess what ? I believe we are those motherfuckers I stand by these words that I wrote on page 1 of this very thread . On this last page alone you have gone “ all in “ with 5 monster posts towards certain members that in your eyes have a specific affiliation . Where are these kinds of posts , let alone smaller sized posts that provoke discussion for the other side to counter ? so that they may also explain their position on topics and subjects ? Do you just not even bother with them because it’s not worth it ? and because they are below your standards of communication and conversation ? or do you stand 100 percent behind everything that they believe in ? And that’s the reason why you never engage with them in these kinds of tumultuous debates ? INQUIRING minds would like to know , and this may not be a NATIONAL issue per se , but it is a Covers Politics Forum one …… And again , even though I do not understand why I feel the need to repeat myself for the umpteenth time , I will do it anyway as a sign of diligence towards peace : I am not attacking you , I respect you , and my passion is to gain knowledge , and that is why I am asking these questions , and there is no other reason , malicious or otherwise
I think the make and the patterns adorning our fabric are much closer than you believe my friend
wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
0
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato:
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato: Yeah I gotcha on that , I understand but someone , at some point , has to break the chain of mediocrity that is keeping progress at bay …… it takes a real motherfucker to not fall victim , or to be the prey , of everything that has kept people back from accomplishing great things . It’s gonna involve taking some lumps and not taking the easy way out , but guess what ? I believe we are those motherfuckers I stand by these words that I wrote on page 1 of this very thread . On this last page alone you have gone “ all in “ with 5 monster posts towards certain members that in your eyes have a specific affiliation . Where are these kinds of posts , let alone smaller sized posts that provoke discussion for the other side to counter ? so that they may also explain their position on topics and subjects ? Do you just not even bother with them because it’s not worth it ? and because they are below your standards of communication and conversation ? or do you stand 100 percent behind everything that they believe in ? And that’s the reason why you never engage with them in these kinds of tumultuous debates ? INQUIRING minds would like to know , and this may not be a NATIONAL issue per se , but it is a Covers Politics Forum one …… And again , even though I do not understand why I feel the need to repeat myself for the umpteenth time , I will do it anyway as a sign of diligence towards peace : I am not attacking you , I respect you , and my passion is to gain knowledge , and that is why I am asking these questions , and there is no other reason , malicious or otherwise
I think the make and the patterns adorning our fabric are much closer than you believe my friend
Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity.
Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year.
@thirdperson
There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would.
1
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity.
Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year.
@thirdperson
There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would.
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would.
Biden reversed immigration policy w/ an executive order ; it was a Policy that was working under Trump. Let's start there.
Biden knows what should be done if he was serious, but refuses to because he wants chaos on the southern border. You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution.
IT IS A ""RESPONSIBILITY"" OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to protect the Borders..
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would.
Biden reversed immigration policy w/ an executive order ; it was a Policy that was working under Trump. Let's start there.
Biden knows what should be done if he was serious, but refuses to because he wants chaos on the southern border. You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution.
IT IS A ""RESPONSIBILITY"" OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to protect the Borders..
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would.
And just the other day he came right out and admitted it!!
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would.
And just the other day he came right out and admitted it!!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would. Biden reversed immigration policy w/ an executive order ; it was a Policy that was working under Trump. Let's start there. Biden knows what should be done if he was serious, but refuses to because he wants chaos on the southern border. You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution. IT IS A ""RESPONSIBILITY"" OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to protect the Borders..
So help us out here, just what does the constitution say about immigration?
1
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would. Biden reversed immigration policy w/ an executive order ; it was a Policy that was working under Trump. Let's start there. Biden knows what should be done if he was serious, but refuses to because he wants chaos on the southern border. You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution. IT IS A ""RESPONSIBILITY"" OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to protect the Borders..
So help us out here, just what does the constitution say about immigration?
US constitution says little about immigration. Federal government isn't granted power to remove non-citizens. They have constitutional rights such as equal protection under the law. So open border is the original migration policy for much of US history.
1
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
what does the constitution say about immigration?
US constitution says little about immigration. Federal government isn't granted power to remove non-citizens. They have constitutional rights such as equal protection under the law. So open border is the original migration policy for much of US history.
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would. Biden reversed immigration policy w/ an executive order ; it was a Policy that was working under Trump. Let's start there. Biden knows what should be done if he was serious, but refuses to because he wants chaos on the southern border. You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution. IT IS A ""RESPONSIBILITY"" OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to protect the Borders.. So help us out here, just what does the constitution say about immigration?
Protect the Border ! This is "" illegal "" immigration !!
Are you really this dense ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would. Biden reversed immigration policy w/ an executive order ; it was a Policy that was working under Trump. Let's start there. Biden knows what should be done if he was serious, but refuses to because he wants chaos on the southern border. You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution. IT IS A ""RESPONSIBILITY"" OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to protect the Borders.. So help us out here, just what does the constitution say about immigration?
Protect the Border ! This is "" illegal "" immigration !!
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would. Biden reversed immigration policy w/ an executive order ; it was a Policy that was working under Trump. Let's start there. Biden knows what should be done if he was serious, but refuses to because he wants chaos on the southern border. You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution. IT IS A ""RESPONSIBILITY"" OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to protect the Borders.. So help us out here, just what does the constitution say about immigration? Protect the Border ! This is "" illegal "" immigration !! Are you really this dense ?
According to the Cato intuition ,isn’t an invasion. Read the article and maybe you will gain some knowledge. Maybe but I doubt it. Since migration isn’t an invasion there is no reason to protect their borders under the constitution.
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12: Quote Originally Posted by Rush51: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Romney accuses republicans of obstructing bipartisan efforts to improve border security. Republican Tillis says it's all about politics and not having the courage to disagree with Trump. He broke immigration system and won't let anyone fix it. Huge backlogs in processing force border officials to allow many migrants to enter the US. Experts say more personnel and resources are needed to deal with overwhelmed capacity. Rather than work with democrats to solve problem, republicans want border chaos to blame democrats in election year. @thirdperson There is just no question that is what is going on here. trump is behind the scenes telling his MAGA sheep in congress to do his bidding just so he can win in Novemeber and become the fascist dictator he warned he would. Biden reversed immigration policy w/ an executive order ; it was a Policy that was working under Trump. Let's start there. Biden knows what should be done if he was serious, but refuses to because he wants chaos on the southern border. You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution. IT IS A ""RESPONSIBILITY"" OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to protect the Borders.. So help us out here, just what does the constitution say about immigration? Protect the Border ! This is "" illegal "" immigration !! Are you really this dense ?
According to the Cato intuition ,isn’t an invasion. Read the article and maybe you will gain some knowledge. Maybe but I doubt it. Since migration isn’t an invasion there is no reason to protect their borders under the constitution.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
0
@THEMUGG
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
You are so full of shit.In your own post #93 you write out that nobody is FORCING anybody to do anything."Wants" and "signed up to participate" are not FORCING anybody to do anything.They are "wanting" people to do it,and hoping they "sign up to participate",that is not forcing.
In the 2nd paragraph of your post #93,see where you printed out "city councilmen WANTS migrants housed in affluent private residences.Now tell me how that means "FORCING residents to sponsor said immigrants in their homes".Him WANTING to do it,and them FORCING residents to do it,are two totally different things.
Then you later state "He later reported that no one had signed up to participate".Why would he be waiting for people to sign up,if they were "FORCING residents to sponsor said immigrants in their homes".Waiting for people to sign up is a voluntary thing,forcing them is definitely not a voluntary thing.
Oh,and to you the words "forcing" and "getting pressured from the city" are the same.Even in your pea sized brain you know that ain't what it means,that's why you added the little "and to me the words forcing and getting pressured from the city are the same".Oh how convenient that you make that assumption,to make it sound like your story ain't the complete bull shit that it is.
You can take that crow and shove it up in the same spot your head is,up your ass.
0
@soup-can
You are so full of shit.In your own post #93 you write out that nobody is FORCING anybody to do anything."Wants" and "signed up to participate" are not FORCING anybody to do anything.They are "wanting" people to do it,and hoping they "sign up to participate",that is not forcing.
In the 2nd paragraph of your post #93,see where you printed out "city councilmen WANTS migrants housed in affluent private residences.Now tell me how that means "FORCING residents to sponsor said immigrants in their homes".Him WANTING to do it,and them FORCING residents to do it,are two totally different things.
Then you later state "He later reported that no one had signed up to participate".Why would he be waiting for people to sign up,if they were "FORCING residents to sponsor said immigrants in their homes".Waiting for people to sign up is a voluntary thing,forcing them is definitely not a voluntary thing.
Oh,and to you the words "forcing" and "getting pressured from the city" are the same.Even in your pea sized brain you know that ain't what it means,that's why you added the little "and to me the words forcing and getting pressured from the city are the same".Oh how convenient that you make that assumption,to make it sound like your story ain't the complete bull shit that it is.
You can take that crow and shove it up in the same spot your head is,up your ass.
I wasn't comparing the events that happened on Jan 6th to 9-11.I was commenting that these 2 Presidents sat there and did fucking nothing while our country was being attacked.One sat there for 7 minutes,one sat there and watched for 180 minutes.I was strictly commenting on the fact that our supposed leaders both sat there and did nothing.Some real leaders there,right?You say the 2 situations aren't "even on the same level and never will be".So tell me which one do you think is worse,George sitting there for 7 minutes and doing nothing while we're being attacked,or trump sitting there for 180 minutes watching us being attacked,and doing nothing?
One sat there for 7 minutes listening to kids read a story while our country was being attacked,and did nothing to help the situation.People in the government were waiting to hear from him on how to handle the situations they were in.Dire situations with who knew how many planes were hijacked.What's dumb fuck George doing,sitting there getting read children's stories for 7 minutes.Maybe the pentagon don't get hit if Georgie don't sit there for 7 minutes listening to children's stories.You say "No one can process any kind of reaction in those minutes",you can't process a reaction in 7 minutes,what are you a fuckin zombie?
The other president sat there for 3 hours watching our country getting attacked,and did absolutely nothing in those 3 hours to help.I notice you wrote a whole paragraph,the one starting out with "I know the comparison was about presidents reaction time".And in that paragraph you talk about what happened on 9-11.But never once even mention in your whole post about what happened on Jan 6th.You spent more time talking about FDR marrying his 5th cousin,and your opinion on if incest is worse then being a dumbass.Then you ever did about a traitor sitting there for 3 hours watching our country being attacked.
And when we're talking reaction time,we ain't talking about like a reflex reaction,we're talking about George sitting there for 7 minutes doing nothing to help.And you sit there and defend him sitting there for 7 minutes with the comment "Everyone was frozen,you can't fault 7 minutes".No everybody wasn't frozen,just George was.The air traffic controllers weren't frozen,the people who acted and took down the plane in PA weren't frozen,they actually did something about it.If you heard that your family was being attacked,would you sit there for 7 minutes doing nothing?
You wanna debate this stuff,c'mon let's do it.
0
@soup-can
I wasn't comparing the events that happened on Jan 6th to 9-11.I was commenting that these 2 Presidents sat there and did fucking nothing while our country was being attacked.One sat there for 7 minutes,one sat there and watched for 180 minutes.I was strictly commenting on the fact that our supposed leaders both sat there and did nothing.Some real leaders there,right?You say the 2 situations aren't "even on the same level and never will be".So tell me which one do you think is worse,George sitting there for 7 minutes and doing nothing while we're being attacked,or trump sitting there for 180 minutes watching us being attacked,and doing nothing?
One sat there for 7 minutes listening to kids read a story while our country was being attacked,and did nothing to help the situation.People in the government were waiting to hear from him on how to handle the situations they were in.Dire situations with who knew how many planes were hijacked.What's dumb fuck George doing,sitting there getting read children's stories for 7 minutes.Maybe the pentagon don't get hit if Georgie don't sit there for 7 minutes listening to children's stories.You say "No one can process any kind of reaction in those minutes",you can't process a reaction in 7 minutes,what are you a fuckin zombie?
The other president sat there for 3 hours watching our country getting attacked,and did absolutely nothing in those 3 hours to help.I notice you wrote a whole paragraph,the one starting out with "I know the comparison was about presidents reaction time".And in that paragraph you talk about what happened on 9-11.But never once even mention in your whole post about what happened on Jan 6th.You spent more time talking about FDR marrying his 5th cousin,and your opinion on if incest is worse then being a dumbass.Then you ever did about a traitor sitting there for 3 hours watching our country being attacked.
And when we're talking reaction time,we ain't talking about like a reflex reaction,we're talking about George sitting there for 7 minutes doing nothing to help.And you sit there and defend him sitting there for 7 minutes with the comment "Everyone was frozen,you can't fault 7 minutes".No everybody wasn't frozen,just George was.The air traffic controllers weren't frozen,the people who acted and took down the plane in PA weren't frozen,they actually did something about it.If you heard that your family was being attacked,would you sit there for 7 minutes doing nothing?
What is the difference between a "inner-city' and just a regular city,is there an outer city?Do you mean like a big city compared to just an average sized city?
Of course I know a lot of big cities vote democratic,I know Chicago hasn't had a republican mayor since the 1930's.But are you trying to say no cities have republican mayors,since "inner city votes DEM every time"?So since inner cities vote DEM every time,of course I'm gonna need luck finding a republican mayor of a big city with lots of homeless.According to you I'm gonna need luck finding a republican mayor (since inner-city votes DEM every time) at all.Let alone one with lots of homeless,or for the matter,no homeless at all.To be honest I don't know what a lot of other cities have as their mayors.I gotta believe some decent sized cities have some republican mayors,and if there is some cities with republican mayors.My question was and is"What do republican mayors or city leaders do about their homeless situations".If there are no republican mayors of cities with homeless problems,what did these republican leaders do to get it that way?What programs or solutions are they using?Or were there just no homeless problems ever?
I will let you know when my suburb of Chicago starts asking residents to house homeless people.And I will also let you know if and when my suburb asks residents to house migrants,cause that hasn't happened yet either.So I do agree it's really odd behavior to give preference to illegal aliens over our own U.S. citizens,but that's not what is happening here.You'll have to seek out who are the people wanting to do that.As I explained in my post #91,there are different programs geared towards both sets of people.Here,the homeless aren't worse off because of the migrant situation.One has nothing to do with the other.
0
@Rush51
What is the difference between a "inner-city' and just a regular city,is there an outer city?Do you mean like a big city compared to just an average sized city?
Of course I know a lot of big cities vote democratic,I know Chicago hasn't had a republican mayor since the 1930's.But are you trying to say no cities have republican mayors,since "inner city votes DEM every time"?So since inner cities vote DEM every time,of course I'm gonna need luck finding a republican mayor of a big city with lots of homeless.According to you I'm gonna need luck finding a republican mayor (since inner-city votes DEM every time) at all.Let alone one with lots of homeless,or for the matter,no homeless at all.To be honest I don't know what a lot of other cities have as their mayors.I gotta believe some decent sized cities have some republican mayors,and if there is some cities with republican mayors.My question was and is"What do republican mayors or city leaders do about their homeless situations".If there are no republican mayors of cities with homeless problems,what did these republican leaders do to get it that way?What programs or solutions are they using?Or were there just no homeless problems ever?
I will let you know when my suburb of Chicago starts asking residents to house homeless people.And I will also let you know if and when my suburb asks residents to house migrants,cause that hasn't happened yet either.So I do agree it's really odd behavior to give preference to illegal aliens over our own U.S. citizens,but that's not what is happening here.You'll have to seek out who are the people wanting to do that.As I explained in my post #91,there are different programs geared towards both sets of people.Here,the homeless aren't worse off because of the migrant situation.One has nothing to do with the other.
Quote Originally Posted by soup-can: The comparison of GWB waiting 7 minutes in a Florida grade school after planes hit the Trades and Trumps 3 hours watching our country? being attacked?? This isn't even on the same level and never will be, if you think Jan 6th and 9/11 are comparable you really are bat shit crazy. On a scale of 1-10 of Attacks on the USA, Jan 6th might be 4. The 9/11 would be a 99!! remind me again how many in congress died on Jan 6th? The ONLY Attack that compares to 9/11 is Pearl Harbor under Franklin D. Roosevelt, who actually married his 5th cousin. Is it just me or is incest worse than being a dumbass? I know the comparison was about presidents reaction time but the events that happened under these POTUS need to be included. The morning 9/11 happened NOBODY knew what to do in those first minutes. Everyone was frozen, you can't fault 7 minutes. Then the pentagon was hit. The plane that went down in PA was going for the white house. No one can process any kind of reaction in those minutes. There are so many other presidents that we can only read about from the 1800's but most of them supported Slavery and even owned their own slaves. I would rank all of them and FDR way over any recent president since WWII Let's debate stuff. Yep... the left is delusional... This is the first time I've ever seen an ""insurrection"" fought w flagpoles and campaign signs...where is FDR ? I'm sure he would call Jan.6th a date which shall live in infamy !!! ( not really). Lol.
Why what other insurrections have you seen?Let me hit you with a flagpole or a fence post,or a fire extinguisher.And we'll see how tough you are,I'll guarantee you won't be making jokes about it then tough guy.The so-called party of "Law & Order",making jokes about cops getting hit with flagpoles,how patriotic of you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
Quote Originally Posted by soup-can: The comparison of GWB waiting 7 minutes in a Florida grade school after planes hit the Trades and Trumps 3 hours watching our country? being attacked?? This isn't even on the same level and never will be, if you think Jan 6th and 9/11 are comparable you really are bat shit crazy. On a scale of 1-10 of Attacks on the USA, Jan 6th might be 4. The 9/11 would be a 99!! remind me again how many in congress died on Jan 6th? The ONLY Attack that compares to 9/11 is Pearl Harbor under Franklin D. Roosevelt, who actually married his 5th cousin. Is it just me or is incest worse than being a dumbass? I know the comparison was about presidents reaction time but the events that happened under these POTUS need to be included. The morning 9/11 happened NOBODY knew what to do in those first minutes. Everyone was frozen, you can't fault 7 minutes. Then the pentagon was hit. The plane that went down in PA was going for the white house. No one can process any kind of reaction in those minutes. There are so many other presidents that we can only read about from the 1800's but most of them supported Slavery and even owned their own slaves. I would rank all of them and FDR way over any recent president since WWII Let's debate stuff. Yep... the left is delusional... This is the first time I've ever seen an ""insurrection"" fought w flagpoles and campaign signs...where is FDR ? I'm sure he would call Jan.6th a date which shall live in infamy !!! ( not really). Lol.
Why what other insurrections have you seen?Let me hit you with a flagpole or a fence post,or a fire extinguisher.And we'll see how tough you are,I'll guarantee you won't be making jokes about it then tough guy.The so-called party of "Law & Order",making jokes about cops getting hit with flagpoles,how patriotic of you.
What Illinois should start doing is releasing prisoners from Cook County Jail and Stateville,with the only requirement being they agree to hop on a bus to Texas,and stay there.See how Texas likes that trade off.
0
What Illinois should start doing is releasing prisoners from Cook County Jail and Stateville,with the only requirement being they agree to hop on a bus to Texas,and stay there.See how Texas likes that trade off.
You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution.
Decades ago, bipartisan immigration reforms were blocked in congress that could help fix broken system according to Congress research service. US can benefit greatly from more legal immigration and less illegal immigration. There could have been more economic growth, tax revenue and funding for social security.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
You don't need to pass "more" legislation to enforce what is embedded in our Constitution.
Decades ago, bipartisan immigration reforms were blocked in congress that could help fix broken system according to Congress research service. US can benefit greatly from more legal immigration and less illegal immigration. There could have been more economic growth, tax revenue and funding for social security.
you are so angry, just a suggestion but there is help for that. Turn that frown upside down, lets just remember you are the one who decided to call me out for one word. The state of Illinos () forced to eat crow. After this last rant of yours which reminds me of a teenage girl, I am now GLAD that I am living in your head rent free. I love how you just key in on a certain word and got so bent you can't do anything else but argue a post from 3 pages ago.
this is me
this is you
Get your stuff together man, do the letters f o mean anything to you?
Wait did I mis type that? Did I leave a letter out? You must be my long-lost administrative assistant so let me know before my next meeting, its so hard to find free help these days
2
@MrWhatsItToYa
you are so angry, just a suggestion but there is help for that. Turn that frown upside down, lets just remember you are the one who decided to call me out for one word. The state of Illinos () forced to eat crow. After this last rant of yours which reminds me of a teenage girl, I am now GLAD that I am living in your head rent free. I love how you just key in on a certain word and got so bent you can't do anything else but argue a post from 3 pages ago.
this is me
this is you
Get your stuff together man, do the letters f o mean anything to you?
Wait did I mis type that? Did I leave a letter out? You must be my long-lost administrative assistant so let me know before my next meeting, its so hard to find free help these days
@darkhorse12 Article 1/sec. 10 gives states the right to defend their own borders........Dementia Joe is actually fighting Texas on that. He's also ignoring Title 8, subsection 1324.
Darkhorse12 is right. Under the law, migrants aren't invaders because of no armed hostility, no attempt to overthrow government and no declaration of war. Being an illegal migrant isn't a crime. Texas governor is relying on flawed legal arguments that cannot be justified in court. He is illegally defying supreme court, federal government and rule of law.
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
@darkhorse12 Article 1/sec. 10 gives states the right to defend their own borders........Dementia Joe is actually fighting Texas on that. He's also ignoring Title 8, subsection 1324.
Darkhorse12 is right. Under the law, migrants aren't invaders because of no armed hostility, no attempt to overthrow government and no declaration of war. Being an illegal migrant isn't a crime. Texas governor is relying on flawed legal arguments that cannot be justified in court. He is illegally defying supreme court, federal government and rule of law.
"Let me hit you with a flagpole or a fence post, or a fire extinguisher." - angry poster
yes, this is how you attack a country, this is how you overthrow a government. with flagpoles and fire extinguishers
Someone needs to do a side by side of this Jan 6 and Woodstock '99. Those kids were the real terrorists, no free water for days on an airport runway in 100-degree heat.
Why did the Chili Peppers give out candles so angry law-abiding citizens could make fire? Oh wait, the thirsty people were forced to rebel because the people in charge wanted more $$$?
"Dumb F George" could be as low as you go, as dumb as you say he was/is, he still was president and even short minded people should respect that. The short fuse that's shown in your comments, there is no way you have kids or show any respect for anyone other than yourself.
I still stand firm on what I said about the deep state of covers- this is a classic example, an angry poster hung up on one or two words and just arguing to bait another keyboard warrior to spat. leading to box or ban, all my free spell checker is doing is trying to bait. Fish on
4
"Let me hit you with a flagpole or a fence post, or a fire extinguisher." - angry poster
yes, this is how you attack a country, this is how you overthrow a government. with flagpoles and fire extinguishers
Someone needs to do a side by side of this Jan 6 and Woodstock '99. Those kids were the real terrorists, no free water for days on an airport runway in 100-degree heat.
Why did the Chili Peppers give out candles so angry law-abiding citizens could make fire? Oh wait, the thirsty people were forced to rebel because the people in charge wanted more $$$?
"Dumb F George" could be as low as you go, as dumb as you say he was/is, he still was president and even short minded people should respect that. The short fuse that's shown in your comments, there is no way you have kids or show any respect for anyone other than yourself.
I still stand firm on what I said about the deep state of covers- this is a classic example, an angry poster hung up on one or two words and just arguing to bait another keyboard warrior to spat. leading to box or ban, all my free spell checker is doing is trying to bait. Fish on
What Illinois should start doing is releasing prisoners from Cook County Jail and Stateville,with the only requirement being they agree to hop on a bus to Texas,and stay there.See how Texas likes that trade off.
About equal as several South American countries that have the opportunity to empty their prisons and send them to Texas.
As far Bush waited 7 minutes, , that's too funny. In your mind, all of the military sat on their hands waiting for Bush to respond? Nobody do anything until the president stops reading to the children.
And Trump was supposed to stop the protest gone bad? Secret Service would even let him walk to the Capitol. Ray Epps is on video saying to a crowd "We must go into the Capitol" and he only got probation. Trump said "march patriotically and peacefully and cheer on our Congressmen and Senators".
I can post a video or transcript of Trump saying just that. Would you like to hear it?
3
Quote Originally Posted by MrWhatsItToYa:
What Illinois should start doing is releasing prisoners from Cook County Jail and Stateville,with the only requirement being they agree to hop on a bus to Texas,and stay there.See how Texas likes that trade off.
About equal as several South American countries that have the opportunity to empty their prisons and send them to Texas.
As far Bush waited 7 minutes, , that's too funny. In your mind, all of the military sat on their hands waiting for Bush to respond? Nobody do anything until the president stops reading to the children.
And Trump was supposed to stop the protest gone bad? Secret Service would even let him walk to the Capitol. Ray Epps is on video saying to a crowd "We must go into the Capitol" and he only got probation. Trump said "march patriotically and peacefully and cheer on our Congressmen and Senators".
I can post a video or transcript of Trump saying just that. Would you like to hear it?
@THEMUGG No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress. No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Bingo......& Texas, as the rest of the country, is being invaded, compliments of Dementia Joe Biden.
3
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
@THEMUGG No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress. No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Bingo......& Texas, as the rest of the country, is being invaded, compliments of Dementia Joe Biden.
) forced to eat crow. After this last rant of yours which reminds me of a teenage girl, I am now GLAD that I am living in your head rent free. I love how you just key in on a certain word and got so bent you can't do anything else but argue a post from 3 pages ago. 
, that's too funny. In your mind, all of the military sat on their hands waiting for Bush to respond? Nobody do anything until the president stops reading to the children. 
Hot Forum Topics
