Ok how about I make you a deal, I intentionally tried to avoid your baiting messages but you persist so I guess I will engage with you. I've stated MANY MANY times that we allow more in this area of the site outside of the box than anywhere else. If you want me to cherry pick A message in the middle of a large thread with many people and lots of subplots I can do that, but then if I do that I would likely ban about 5 of you guys for breaking the rules in the same way you seek to have midnight boxed. If you want to play it that way let me know because YOU are one of the worst members in this area for trolling and stalking, baiting and antagonizing...but hey you want me to box someone for the word rapist I can do that and I can also ban/box several of you when otherwise we have and do look the other way.
If you want to play police you MUST be above reproach or risk having a bad outcome when you are caught doing similar yourself, and you for sure are guilty of similar context rule breaking as the quoted and much much more.
0
@Jarrett75
Ok how about I make you a deal, I intentionally tried to avoid your baiting messages but you persist so I guess I will engage with you. I've stated MANY MANY times that we allow more in this area of the site outside of the box than anywhere else. If you want me to cherry pick A message in the middle of a large thread with many people and lots of subplots I can do that, but then if I do that I would likely ban about 5 of you guys for breaking the rules in the same way you seek to have midnight boxed. If you want to play it that way let me know because YOU are one of the worst members in this area for trolling and stalking, baiting and antagonizing...but hey you want me to box someone for the word rapist I can do that and I can also ban/box several of you when otherwise we have and do look the other way.
If you want to play police you MUST be above reproach or risk having a bad outcome when you are caught doing similar yourself, and you for sure are guilty of similar context rule breaking as the quoted and much much more.
He was running a game show before he was president, yet people voted for him...
He likes being the center of attention like most people on TV
Don't blame Trump, blame social media as it has and will continue to ruin millions of people...oh look, lil timmy just took his first bite of pizza...imagine how we all got on with our lives before social media...no one gave two shits about lil timmy eating pizza except his family now everyone has to know about it....
social media has no business in our politics, yet here we are....it's the day and times we are in....don't like it and it doesn't belong but is the sign of the times unfortunately....
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
But that's who he is...
He isn't your typical politician
He was running a game show before he was president, yet people voted for him...
He likes being the center of attention like most people on TV
Don't blame Trump, blame social media as it has and will continue to ruin millions of people...oh look, lil timmy just took his first bite of pizza...imagine how we all got on with our lives before social media...no one gave two shits about lil timmy eating pizza except his family now everyone has to know about it....
social media has no business in our politics, yet here we are....it's the day and times we are in....don't like it and it doesn't belong but is the sign of the times unfortunately....
@Jarrett75 Ok how about I make you a deal, I intentionally tried to avoid your baiting messages but you persist so I guess I will engage with you. I've stated MANY MANY times that we allow more in this area of the site outside of the box than anywhere else. If you want me to cherry pick A message in the middle of a large thread with many people and lots of subplots I can do that, but then if I do that I would likely ban about 5 of you guys for breaking the rules in the same way you seek to have midnight boxed. If you want to play it that way let me know because YOU are one of the worst members in this area for trolling and stalking, baiting and antagonizing...but hey you want me to box someone for the word rapist I can do that and I can also ban/box several of you when otherwise we have and do look the other way. If you want to play police you MUST be above reproach or risk having a bad outcome when you are caught doing similar yourself, and you for sure are guilty of similar context rule breaking as the quoted and much much more.
please tell me what I have said that is worth a trip to the box. I've been very polite, some might say a prince even.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@Jarrett75 Ok how about I make you a deal, I intentionally tried to avoid your baiting messages but you persist so I guess I will engage with you. I've stated MANY MANY times that we allow more in this area of the site outside of the box than anywhere else. If you want me to cherry pick A message in the middle of a large thread with many people and lots of subplots I can do that, but then if I do that I would likely ban about 5 of you guys for breaking the rules in the same way you seek to have midnight boxed. If you want to play it that way let me know because YOU are one of the worst members in this area for trolling and stalking, baiting and antagonizing...but hey you want me to box someone for the word rapist I can do that and I can also ban/box several of you when otherwise we have and do look the other way. If you want to play police you MUST be above reproach or risk having a bad outcome when you are caught doing similar yourself, and you for sure are guilty of similar context rule breaking as the quoted and much much more.
please tell me what I have said that is worth a trip to the box. I've been very polite, some might say a prince even.
@Jarrett75 Ok how about I make you a deal, I intentionally tried to avoid your baiting messages but you persist so I guess I will engage with you. I've stated MANY MANY times that we allow more in this area of the site outside of the box than anywhere else. If you want me to cherry pick A message in the middle of a large thread with many people and lots of subplots I can do that, but then if I do that I would likely ban about 5 of you guys for breaking the rules in the same way you seek to have midnight boxed. If you want to play it that way let me know because YOU are one of the worst members in this area for trolling and stalking, baiting and antagonizing...but hey you want me to box someone for the word rapist I can do that and I can also ban/box several of you when otherwise we have and do look the other way. If you want to play police you MUST be above reproach or risk having a bad outcome when you are caught doing similar yourself, and you for sure are guilty of similar context rule breaking as the quoted and much much more.
I haven't even spoken to Midnight for him to come into my thread to make a horrible comment like that. Please tell me, I can't wait to hear the terrible terrible things I have said. I have for the most part avoided this area, because I know you are super partisan and since I have come back, I've been civil, honest. but civil. And I didn't once ask you to box Midnight, but you can delete his abhorrent comment as I don't think it has any place in the discussion
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@Jarrett75 Ok how about I make you a deal, I intentionally tried to avoid your baiting messages but you persist so I guess I will engage with you. I've stated MANY MANY times that we allow more in this area of the site outside of the box than anywhere else. If you want me to cherry pick A message in the middle of a large thread with many people and lots of subplots I can do that, but then if I do that I would likely ban about 5 of you guys for breaking the rules in the same way you seek to have midnight boxed. If you want to play it that way let me know because YOU are one of the worst members in this area for trolling and stalking, baiting and antagonizing...but hey you want me to box someone for the word rapist I can do that and I can also ban/box several of you when otherwise we have and do look the other way. If you want to play police you MUST be above reproach or risk having a bad outcome when you are caught doing similar yourself, and you for sure are guilty of similar context rule breaking as the quoted and much much more.
I haven't even spoken to Midnight for him to come into my thread to make a horrible comment like that. Please tell me, I can't wait to hear the terrible terrible things I have said. I have for the most part avoided this area, because I know you are super partisan and since I have come back, I've been civil, honest. but civil. And I didn't once ask you to box Midnight, but you can delete his abhorrent comment as I don't think it has any place in the discussion
midnight feels that Trump is a rapist, that is his opinion similar to how you guys think Joe has dementia, is there a possibility Trump is a rapist? Yep...there is. Is there a possibility Joe has dementia? Yep there is...
So using your logic anyone who slanders one of these two should be boxed, correct? Calling Trump a rapist is different than slandering Biden how exactly?
And yes you troll the other side like crazy and no you are not at all polite in how you interact on a consistent basis. Just quit complaining that midnight calls Trump a rapist, unless that is you want the same scrutiny used on EVERYONE in this forum, and of course we do not monitor the way you suggest or this would be a ghost town long long ago.
You conspiracy theorist guys make me laugh.
0
midnight feels that Trump is a rapist, that is his opinion similar to how you guys think Joe has dementia, is there a possibility Trump is a rapist? Yep...there is. Is there a possibility Joe has dementia? Yep there is...
So using your logic anyone who slanders one of these two should be boxed, correct? Calling Trump a rapist is different than slandering Biden how exactly?
And yes you troll the other side like crazy and no you are not at all polite in how you interact on a consistent basis. Just quit complaining that midnight calls Trump a rapist, unless that is you want the same scrutiny used on EVERYONE in this forum, and of course we do not monitor the way you suggest or this would be a ghost town long long ago.
Speaking, in general, in here if you are not with one side is instant eyebrow raising....it's the equivalent of trying to swim in a body of water with piranhas and live to tell about it....that is, if the body of water was biased and not actually a body of sand
Do you know why it's easier to build a man out of snow versus one out of sand?
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
@Jarrett75
Speaking, in general, in here if you are not with one side is instant eyebrow raising....it's the equivalent of trying to swim in a body of water with piranhas and live to tell about it....that is, if the body of water was biased and not actually a body of sand
Do you know why it's easier to build a man out of snow versus one out of sand?
Same goes to you, as one of the conspiracy theorists is that how you want it played? I said to you specifically that any further issues might not go the way you like, but after your last stalking incident you are still here so do you want us to be Old Testament on things or be understanding to the way you guys troll the other side consistently?
The reality is that the other group really self isolates, there are many who do not engage with you guys and they post stuff you do not like, but they are NOT engaging with you or breaking the rules in person to person posting per the rules we have set. Just because they post stuff about Trump or the RNC you do not like, it is not even remotely the same as trolling, stalking, antagonizing OTHER MEMBERS. While you and many others break the rules by harassing other members because you do not like their content and their messages, and you feel justified because the message bothers you. They are not breaking the rules posting in the politics forum about how they dislike Trump and the RNC, that is not breaking the rules. Yet you conspiracy guys think because they are not boxed or banned means they are being treated differently, they are NOT being treated differently per the rules of the site. So if annoying RNC and anti-Trump stuff bothers you then QUIT ENGAGING with them, just skip their threads and posts and move along.
If a member is breaking the SITE rules, report it and then it will be decided what recourse there is, stop trolling and harassing and breaking the rules, that is what you guys completely miss in this dynamic. There is no conspiracy, they post annoying DNC loving stuff, sorry but that does not break the rules.
0
@ABooksNightmare
Same goes to you, as one of the conspiracy theorists is that how you want it played? I said to you specifically that any further issues might not go the way you like, but after your last stalking incident you are still here so do you want us to be Old Testament on things or be understanding to the way you guys troll the other side consistently?
The reality is that the other group really self isolates, there are many who do not engage with you guys and they post stuff you do not like, but they are NOT engaging with you or breaking the rules in person to person posting per the rules we have set. Just because they post stuff about Trump or the RNC you do not like, it is not even remotely the same as trolling, stalking, antagonizing OTHER MEMBERS. While you and many others break the rules by harassing other members because you do not like their content and their messages, and you feel justified because the message bothers you. They are not breaking the rules posting in the politics forum about how they dislike Trump and the RNC, that is not breaking the rules. Yet you conspiracy guys think because they are not boxed or banned means they are being treated differently, they are NOT being treated differently per the rules of the site. So if annoying RNC and anti-Trump stuff bothers you then QUIT ENGAGING with them, just skip their threads and posts and move along.
If a member is breaking the SITE rules, report it and then it will be decided what recourse there is, stop trolling and harassing and breaking the rules, that is what you guys completely miss in this dynamic. There is no conspiracy, they post annoying DNC loving stuff, sorry but that does not break the rules.
To use the lines you use on some of us...that is your opinion
We are still entitled to our opinion on this site, correct? Or, has that also now been added to the manifesto of unposted rules that we are to abide by because you say so....
Practice what you preach is what I was taught as young man...are you, sir, practicing what you preach here in these forums?
I think this is a question many people would like to know and I believe where the slight of hand is deceiving.....
One Russian Cosmonaut said to another, "Look, Yuri, you can tell the Americans have been here already. See, they opened a _____ on the moon!"
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
To use the lines you use on some of us...that is your opinion
We are still entitled to our opinion on this site, correct? Or, has that also now been added to the manifesto of unposted rules that we are to abide by because you say so....
Practice what you preach is what I was taught as young man...are you, sir, practicing what you preach here in these forums?
I think this is a question many people would like to know and I believe where the slight of hand is deceiving.....
One Russian Cosmonaut said to another, "Look, Yuri, you can tell the Americans have been here already. See, they opened a _____ on the moon!"
The only people saying it’s an unwinnable proxy war are those who are pro-Putin.
Isn’t this an extreme over-generalization? There are a lot of top-level folks that are not for funding this war and say it is unwinnable BUT are certainly not pro-Putin.
0
@Sidehatch
The only people saying it’s an unwinnable proxy war are those who are pro-Putin.
Isn’t this an extreme over-generalization? There are a lot of top-level folks that are not for funding this war and say it is unwinnable BUT are certainly not pro-Putin.
And it’s people like that who got us into WW2 by naively believing we could simply ignore the threats from Japan and Germany.
That’s why Republicans like John McCain - whose grandpa stood on the deck of the USS Missouri as the Japanese surrendered - have a far greater understanding of foreign policy than Dotard Trump, who calls our brave vets losers and suckers according to his Chief of Staff John Kelly.
This is a ‘tad’ oversimplification of the analogousness of these situations.
McCain may have understood foreign policy but it does not necessarily follow because one’s family understands something that they do also. Plus McCain was a known war hawk and would gladly sign onto any incursion. Whereas, Trump at least does not seem open to getting involved in every skirmish around the world.
0
@Sidehatch
And it’s people like that who got us into WW2 by naively believing we could simply ignore the threats from Japan and Germany.
That’s why Republicans like John McCain - whose grandpa stood on the deck of the USS Missouri as the Japanese surrendered - have a far greater understanding of foreign policy than Dotard Trump, who calls our brave vets losers and suckers according to his Chief of Staff John Kelly.
This is a ‘tad’ oversimplification of the analogousness of these situations.
McCain may have understood foreign policy but it does not necessarily follow because one’s family understands something that they do also. Plus McCain was a known war hawk and would gladly sign onto any incursion. Whereas, Trump at least does not seem open to getting involved in every skirmish around the world.
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Wants Putin to succeed is one way of puting it. I would say one party doesn't care to involve itself in such affairs. One party doesn't want to continue to finance an unwinnable proxy war, simply to pump more money into defense contractors. @Sidehatch What incentive is there to support Ukraine? "Protecting Europe's bread basket?" We should've never involved ourselves in the first place. The only people saying it’s an unwinnable proxy war are those who are pro-Putin. Meanwhile, the rest of the sane world wants to prevent Russian invasions of its neighbors, because we have important relationships with our NATO allies who need our help. I get it - some politicos don’t believe in helping our allies. And it’s people like that who got us into WW2 by naively believing we could simply ignore the threats from Japan and Germany. That’s why Republicans like John McCain - whose grandpa stood on the deck of the USS Missouri as the Japanese surrendered - have a far greater understanding of foreign policy than Dotard Trump, who calls our brave vets losers and suckers according to his Chief of Staff John Kelly.
Why is our "relationship" with Ukraine, which is not a member of NATO, why is that relationship important?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Wants Putin to succeed is one way of puting it. I would say one party doesn't care to involve itself in such affairs. One party doesn't want to continue to finance an unwinnable proxy war, simply to pump more money into defense contractors. @Sidehatch What incentive is there to support Ukraine? "Protecting Europe's bread basket?" We should've never involved ourselves in the first place. The only people saying it’s an unwinnable proxy war are those who are pro-Putin. Meanwhile, the rest of the sane world wants to prevent Russian invasions of its neighbors, because we have important relationships with our NATO allies who need our help. I get it - some politicos don’t believe in helping our allies. And it’s people like that who got us into WW2 by naively believing we could simply ignore the threats from Japan and Germany. That’s why Republicans like John McCain - whose grandpa stood on the deck of the USS Missouri as the Japanese surrendered - have a far greater understanding of foreign policy than Dotard Trump, who calls our brave vets losers and suckers according to his Chief of Staff John Kelly.
Why is our "relationship" with Ukraine, which is not a member of NATO, why is that relationship important?
To use the lines you use on some of us...that is your opinion We are still entitled to our opinion on this site, correct? Or, has that also now been added to the manifesto of unposted rules that we are to abide by because you say so.... Practice what you preach is what I was taught as young man...are you, sir, practicing what you preach here in these forums? I think this is a question many people would like to know and I believe where the slight of hand is deceiving..... One Russian Cosmonaut said to another, "Look, Yuri, you can tell the Americans have been here already. See, they opened a _____ on the moon!"
As a conspiracy theorist I answered your claims as I always have for so many years. If you and others cannot stop from trolling, baiting, harassing, stalking then you will be boxed/banned...that is what the site rules state. The site rules do not state that if a member posts stuff about Trump or the RNC then they should be boxed, even if you do not like it. I find it highly offensive when people throw around dementia as it happens daily here, I have a close relative that died not long ago from complications from dementia so when you guys toss around that phrase as a way of slandering Biden it is QUITE annoying, but nobody has ever been boxed for that..see how it works? I do not think you do see how it works and that is why you constantly run the conspiracy theorist angle.
If someone is stalking or harassing or breaking the rules member to member, REPORT IT...do not expect results when a report is sent because one of those guys called Trump a rapist, that is his opinion and there is enough subjective evidence that says it is possible, if you want someone boxed for calling Trump a rapist or a clown or a potential felon that will not get a result no more than if you guys slander the Biden men.
Or just keep with the conspiracy stuff its the same angle Trump uses and it seems to work in certain crowds so maybe you are onto something.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:
To use the lines you use on some of us...that is your opinion We are still entitled to our opinion on this site, correct? Or, has that also now been added to the manifesto of unposted rules that we are to abide by because you say so.... Practice what you preach is what I was taught as young man...are you, sir, practicing what you preach here in these forums? I think this is a question many people would like to know and I believe where the slight of hand is deceiving..... One Russian Cosmonaut said to another, "Look, Yuri, you can tell the Americans have been here already. See, they opened a _____ on the moon!"
As a conspiracy theorist I answered your claims as I always have for so many years. If you and others cannot stop from trolling, baiting, harassing, stalking then you will be boxed/banned...that is what the site rules state. The site rules do not state that if a member posts stuff about Trump or the RNC then they should be boxed, even if you do not like it. I find it highly offensive when people throw around dementia as it happens daily here, I have a close relative that died not long ago from complications from dementia so when you guys toss around that phrase as a way of slandering Biden it is QUITE annoying, but nobody has ever been boxed for that..see how it works? I do not think you do see how it works and that is why you constantly run the conspiracy theorist angle.
If someone is stalking or harassing or breaking the rules member to member, REPORT IT...do not expect results when a report is sent because one of those guys called Trump a rapist, that is his opinion and there is enough subjective evidence that says it is possible, if you want someone boxed for calling Trump a rapist or a clown or a potential felon that will not get a result no more than if you guys slander the Biden men.
Or just keep with the conspiracy stuff its the same angle Trump uses and it seems to work in certain crowds so maybe you are onto something.
No matter how much you dislike Trump , or how much preferential treatment you give to those that dislike him too because of that fact , please at least keep the Adolf Hitler comparisons at bay because that is highly offensive to me and to many other people . We don’t need to take it that far and that statement is self explanatory .
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
0
No matter how much you dislike Trump , or how much preferential treatment you give to those that dislike him too because of that fact , please at least keep the Adolf Hitler comparisons at bay because that is highly offensive to me and to many other people . We don’t need to take it that far and that statement is self explanatory .
so commenting in another persons thread about what they said on a public forum is one of those three??? Essentially, not agreeing with someone is baiting, harassing and stalking, correct? But, what about the incessant name calling that ensues on this site? Is that not baiting as you so eloquently put it, because you let that go and say nothing?
Ok, so when I was having that done to me I didn't see you step in and tell anyone to stop, not that I expected or needed you to, but you didn't is the point....you let it go and if truth be known probably high fived in mod chat...however, if it is happening to someone you like in these forums or side with in these forums then you step in like you did here...in fact, I didn't mention your name at all in this thread, yet you felt so inclined to call me out in it...why is that? It's because you don't like me...that's fairly evident and that's what you do to those in these forums when you don't like them...you call them out but rarely do I see you call out those that are claiming to be antagonized...instead, you come in a ridicule them and belittle them and acting like you are biased in your moderating of these forums but you are not....by definition, someone who is biased means they prefer one group of people to another and behave unfairly as result...do you think you really fall under this definition?
You keep putting me in a class of Republicans over your precious Democratic party even though I have said over and over both party lines are scum...why do you feel the need to class or group me like that...are you baiting me? Are you harassing me? And, are you stalking me?
By definition, I believe you are....I believe this goes against your mod badge and against what you claim your rationale is to be biased....based on your actions, you are not biased and that is my opinion and I'm sure there are others in here that will say the same thing....you keep calling the kettle black but it points right back at you....
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
Baiting, harassing, stalking...interesting....
so commenting in another persons thread about what they said on a public forum is one of those three??? Essentially, not agreeing with someone is baiting, harassing and stalking, correct? But, what about the incessant name calling that ensues on this site? Is that not baiting as you so eloquently put it, because you let that go and say nothing?
Ok, so when I was having that done to me I didn't see you step in and tell anyone to stop, not that I expected or needed you to, but you didn't is the point....you let it go and if truth be known probably high fived in mod chat...however, if it is happening to someone you like in these forums or side with in these forums then you step in like you did here...in fact, I didn't mention your name at all in this thread, yet you felt so inclined to call me out in it...why is that? It's because you don't like me...that's fairly evident and that's what you do to those in these forums when you don't like them...you call them out but rarely do I see you call out those that are claiming to be antagonized...instead, you come in a ridicule them and belittle them and acting like you are biased in your moderating of these forums but you are not....by definition, someone who is biased means they prefer one group of people to another and behave unfairly as result...do you think you really fall under this definition?
You keep putting me in a class of Republicans over your precious Democratic party even though I have said over and over both party lines are scum...why do you feel the need to class or group me like that...are you baiting me? Are you harassing me? And, are you stalking me?
By definition, I believe you are....I believe this goes against your mod badge and against what you claim your rationale is to be biased....based on your actions, you are not biased and that is my opinion and I'm sure there are others in here that will say the same thing....you keep calling the kettle black but it points right back at you....
they don't care spock...it's a site moderated by the left and instead of seeking that out this gut seeks out other conflict...just the norm, but your point is very valid...I don't expect it to be addressed like it should by you being offended is not enough like calling someone a racists is ok even though it was not found to be true...it's ok if you are democrat to call others names but ass soon as republican does it then it's wrong and you are reprimanded...
and some of us are not even the label they claim we are
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
@spockgato
they don't care spock...it's a site moderated by the left and instead of seeking that out this gut seeks out other conflict...just the norm, but your point is very valid...I don't expect it to be addressed like it should by you being offended is not enough like calling someone a racists is ok even though it was not found to be true...it's ok if you are democrat to call others names but ass soon as republican does it then it's wrong and you are reprimanded...
and some of us are not even the label they claim we are
Vintage Trump, must make a stupid grandstanding comment in social media and look like the dope that he is. Yes Trump Syria and their leaders are garbage, we know that...but so is Putin. Putin is an abusive killer leader just as your other buddy in North Korea. It would be super cool if Trump thought more about being a leader than being first in line to blab on social media like a clown.
Whose "buddy" from North Korea? How the hell is Kim a buddy to anyone but Dennis Rodman?
I got news for all the simpletons who think Trump likes Putin and Jong Un. Your idiots in my eyes.
Putin has thousands of Nukes and maybe even in space. He is a ruthless dictator who has to be tough, smart, and ruthless to stay in power. We all know that. And he has to save face.
So how do handle him? Do you stick out your skinny old man chest and say; "Putin is a crazy son of a bitch!" "He has no soul." STUPID. Unless you want him to respond to save face. And you just eliminated any chance of negotating with him in the future.
Really liked it when Lindsey Graham was booed in SC. Another idiot who said we need to overthrow Putin. This guy wants WW3.
How do handle crazy Jung Un? "He is a thug!" Oh, that's gonna work. Real smart.
Trump met Jung Un, came back and said, "He is "different". A lot better than saying crazy son a bitch, which I am sure Trump thinks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Vintage Trump, must make a stupid grandstanding comment in social media and look like the dope that he is. Yes Trump Syria and their leaders are garbage, we know that...but so is Putin. Putin is an abusive killer leader just as your other buddy in North Korea. It would be super cool if Trump thought more about being a leader than being first in line to blab on social media like a clown.
Whose "buddy" from North Korea? How the hell is Kim a buddy to anyone but Dennis Rodman?
I got news for all the simpletons who think Trump likes Putin and Jong Un. Your idiots in my eyes.
Putin has thousands of Nukes and maybe even in space. He is a ruthless dictator who has to be tough, smart, and ruthless to stay in power. We all know that. And he has to save face.
So how do handle him? Do you stick out your skinny old man chest and say; "Putin is a crazy son of a bitch!" "He has no soul." STUPID. Unless you want him to respond to save face. And you just eliminated any chance of negotating with him in the future.
Really liked it when Lindsey Graham was booed in SC. Another idiot who said we need to overthrow Putin. This guy wants WW3.
How do handle crazy Jung Un? "He is a thug!" Oh, that's gonna work. Real smart.
Trump met Jung Un, came back and said, "He is "different". A lot better than saying crazy son a bitch, which I am sure Trump thinks.
1) Clean hands...if you want to see someone boxed for breaking the rules then you must have clean hands with regards to the other party. Face it you have never had clean hands and have been boxed, warned, boxed, warned over and over and refuse to be above the crap you are complaining about so how can you claim harm when you regularly pester and harass as bad or worse than nearly any member here?
2) User Report- if you feel a member is breaking the rules then file a report and let the staff deal with it. Anything else you cannot make claim, so if you think treatment is biased then when someone is intentionally breaking the rules then REPORT IT. Do not break the rules yourself because you feel justified or frustrated, that is the wrong thing to do.
With regards to #2 you really must improve with #1 before you can complain about what happens to any other member, be completely above reproach and keep the rules spotlessly before you get on the conspiracy theory wagon again.
I group you with people who stalk, harass, antagonize, not sure how you could try and claim otherwise, you have a multi year history of doing this and yet you still are here, must be a conspiracy huh?
0
@ABooksNightmare
Two quick points to you-
1) Clean hands...if you want to see someone boxed for breaking the rules then you must have clean hands with regards to the other party. Face it you have never had clean hands and have been boxed, warned, boxed, warned over and over and refuse to be above the crap you are complaining about so how can you claim harm when you regularly pester and harass as bad or worse than nearly any member here?
2) User Report- if you feel a member is breaking the rules then file a report and let the staff deal with it. Anything else you cannot make claim, so if you think treatment is biased then when someone is intentionally breaking the rules then REPORT IT. Do not break the rules yourself because you feel justified or frustrated, that is the wrong thing to do.
With regards to #2 you really must improve with #1 before you can complain about what happens to any other member, be completely above reproach and keep the rules spotlessly before you get on the conspiracy theory wagon again.
I group you with people who stalk, harass, antagonize, not sure how you could try and claim otherwise, you have a multi year history of doing this and yet you still are here, must be a conspiracy huh?
I’m still a little uneasy with the throwing around of the “ useful idiots “ comment . That’s a little “ too antagonistic “ and “ attacking “ for my tastes and I assure you a better choice of words or something that doesn’t put others done would lead to a more successful and fruitful discussion . I think that we can all do a little bit better gentleman . Let’s work with each other and let’s not take the easy way out by name calling . It’s simply counterproductive .
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
0
I’m still a little uneasy with the throwing around of the “ useful idiots “ comment . That’s a little “ too antagonistic “ and “ attacking “ for my tastes and I assure you a better choice of words or something that doesn’t put others done would lead to a more successful and fruitful discussion . I think that we can all do a little bit better gentleman . Let’s work with each other and let’s not take the easy way out by name calling . It’s simply counterproductive .
But that's who he is... He isn't your typical politician He was running a game show before he was president, yet people voted for him... He likes being the center of attention like most people on TV Don't blame Trump, blame social media as it has and will continue to ruin millions of people...oh look, lil timmy just took his first bite of pizza...imagine how we all got on with our lives before social media...no one gave two shits about lil timmy eating pizza except his family now everyone has to know about it.... social media has no business in our politics, yet here we are....it's the day and times we are in....don't like it and it doesn't belong but is the sign of the times unfortunately....
Why does support of one party’s politician endorse “no consequences because he’s an idiot”, yet you expect 150% consequences for the other party?
Also, Trump’s not a newcomer. The “I have no policy ideas because I’m a failed business owner” trope flew the coop in 2017. It sure looks like you’re willing to let one party skate by with zero consequences for their idiotic actions, while trying to punish the other party for any feigned slight and more.
My advice? Stop being a snowflake. Stop your victim complex. Grow a pair. Figure it out. If you’re sexually confused like Matt Gaetz or Jim Jordan, admit it and get your life sorted. Don’t confuse that with me giving a feck about your circumstances, just get it sorted and return if you can. But cut the crybaby cut and run cowardice. Nobody is impressed by the GOP’s victim card, backed by trillions of dollars of corporate tax cuts while the middle class get screwed. The scam is over. Buckle up and pretend you have a pair.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:
But that's who he is... He isn't your typical politician He was running a game show before he was president, yet people voted for him... He likes being the center of attention like most people on TV Don't blame Trump, blame social media as it has and will continue to ruin millions of people...oh look, lil timmy just took his first bite of pizza...imagine how we all got on with our lives before social media...no one gave two shits about lil timmy eating pizza except his family now everyone has to know about it.... social media has no business in our politics, yet here we are....it's the day and times we are in....don't like it and it doesn't belong but is the sign of the times unfortunately....
Why does support of one party’s politician endorse “no consequences because he’s an idiot”, yet you expect 150% consequences for the other party?
Also, Trump’s not a newcomer. The “I have no policy ideas because I’m a failed business owner” trope flew the coop in 2017. It sure looks like you’re willing to let one party skate by with zero consequences for their idiotic actions, while trying to punish the other party for any feigned slight and more.
My advice? Stop being a snowflake. Stop your victim complex. Grow a pair. Figure it out. If you’re sexually confused like Matt Gaetz or Jim Jordan, admit it and get your life sorted. Don’t confuse that with me giving a feck about your circumstances, just get it sorted and return if you can. But cut the crybaby cut and run cowardice. Nobody is impressed by the GOP’s victim card, backed by trillions of dollars of corporate tax cuts while the middle class get screwed. The scam is over. Buckle up and pretend you have a pair.
I’m still a little uneasy with the throwing around of the “ useful idiots “ comment . That’s a little “ too antagonistic “ and “ attacking “ for my tastes and I assure you a better choice of words or something that doesn’t put others done would lead to a more successful and fruitful discussion . I think that we can all do a little bit better gentleman . Let’s work with each other and let’s not take the easy way out by name calling . It’s simply counterproductive .
Victim complex much? Sorry librul, you ain’t used to tough talk. Sounds like you need to grow a pair and learn how the world works. You can’t be a snowflake forever! (The term useful idiot predates the Reagan era. I see you don’t know what it means. Google is your friend lil buddy.)
0
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato:
I’m still a little uneasy with the throwing around of the “ useful idiots “ comment . That’s a little “ too antagonistic “ and “ attacking “ for my tastes and I assure you a better choice of words or something that doesn’t put others done would lead to a more successful and fruitful discussion . I think that we can all do a little bit better gentleman . Let’s work with each other and let’s not take the easy way out by name calling . It’s simply counterproductive .
Victim complex much? Sorry librul, you ain’t used to tough talk. Sounds like you need to grow a pair and learn how the world works. You can’t be a snowflake forever! (The term useful idiot predates the Reagan era. I see you don’t know what it means. Google is your friend lil buddy.)
@Sidehatch The only people saying it’s an unwinnable proxy war are those who are pro-Putin. Isn’t this an extreme over-generalization? There are a lot of top-level folks that are not for funding this war and say it is unwinnable BUT are certainly not pro-Putin.
Gee, isn’t saying it is a unwinnable war is a gross oversimplification? E tu Brute?
Hypocrite much? Ukraine repelled Russian forces and regained ground pretty quickly, then brought the fight to Moscow. They will not be the next Crimea, which has major implications for Eastern Europe. So what military qualifications do you have that the invasion of Ukraine is unwinnable? If it was unwinnable, then how has Ukraine repelled the Russians for 730 days now? Gee, seems like they are doing an above-average job against the unwinnable war lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@Sidehatch The only people saying it’s an unwinnable proxy war are those who are pro-Putin. Isn’t this an extreme over-generalization? There are a lot of top-level folks that are not for funding this war and say it is unwinnable BUT are certainly not pro-Putin.
Gee, isn’t saying it is a unwinnable war is a gross oversimplification? E tu Brute?
Hypocrite much? Ukraine repelled Russian forces and regained ground pretty quickly, then brought the fight to Moscow. They will not be the next Crimea, which has major implications for Eastern Europe. So what military qualifications do you have that the invasion of Ukraine is unwinnable? If it was unwinnable, then how has Ukraine repelled the Russians for 730 days now? Gee, seems like they are doing an above-average job against the unwinnable war lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
it's a site moderated by the left and instead of seeking that out this gut seeks out other conflict...just the norm, but your point is very valid...I don't expect it to be addressed like it should by you being offended is not enough like calling someone a racists is ok even though it was not found to be true...it's ok if you are democrat to call others names but ass soon as republican does it then it's wrong and you are reprimanded...
Hot Forum Topics
