Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by 2169: I don't know but 221.5 is alot of points to be scored in a game. It's probably set that high because neither team can play defense. A final of 111 - 110 and your under would hit. Definately seems reasonable.
what about the total then...... i'm starting to like the under. |
2169 | 8 |
|
|
I'd probably take Washington seeing how close they got to winning their last few games. But both teams have some nice losing streaks going.
|
2169 | 8 |
|
|
Damn it, I took New Orleans. I didn't think about the addition by subtraction thing with Ty Lawson over Chauncy Billups. I was just thinking without Billups, they'd be weaker. Obviously not the case.
|
3Technique | 32 |
|
|
The thing with New Jersey, I keep expecting them to start playing more respectable. I should just think that they can't win anymore games this year. I'd be better off I think. I know Toronto can be tough especially at home, but I expect New Jersey to beat somebody at some point on the road that's better than them. I guess trying to pin point this is futile as I'm finding out tonight. Oh well, at least the parlay is killed early so I don't have the disappointment of something failing later. |
sammy11 | 74 |
|
|
I hope you're right with NJ+8, because I have them with a moneyline play. Dallas should win, but they blow a gasket every so often at home... like the GS game and almost blew the game to NO. I'd lean Knicks and Twolves as well, but just not confident in them. Well, let's check out the results at the end of the night for: NJ+8, DL-5.5, MN +2 and NY-2
Good Luck |
sammy11 | 74 |
|
|
Both might lose. Shouldn't that be an option? I think Indy loses. But, obviously lots of others think that too. |
BigNiner | 57 |
|
|
I like Washington here. I just don't think the Raiders are any good. With or without Bradkowski.
|
1bajalife | 19 |
|
|
Depends on how many points you're getting with each or giving with each. I like the selections. I'm kind of wishy washy on the Baltimore pick at -14. Jets are missing Sanchez at quarterback and it's unlikely Josh Freeman will have another 6 interception day so soon. Brady has a few problems, but one still has to go with the Pats until they show us they can't do it.
|
StonedPenguin | 8 |
|
|
Packers win by 40 or more points. Isn't there a prop or something that will pay pretty good for winning by 40 or more?
|
Dbarsch | 22 |
|
|
I just read the thread. I was thinking the exact same thing prior to coming into the NFL threads. I have the Denver spread as my top pick for the week, thinking that Denver can win this outright as well. It kind of scares me though that someone else was thinking this. Denver would love to knock Indy down on their home turf here. They will be totally juiced. I think Denver will be able to run on Indy with Moreno/ Buckhalter. Orton will be smart with the ball and take what the Indy defense gives him. Good luck with Denver, I think it's a great play! |
XFactor411 | 34 |
|
|
Come on Billups, you got to make those free throws
|
MrBator | 210 |
|
|
I need Denver moneyline. 1:39 to go in the 4th , Denver up 100-97
|
MrBator | 210 |
|
|
Nice
|
cropdusters | 60 |
|
|
Can't afford another OT with 2 key players out for the BUcks
|
cropdusters | 60 |
|
|
Bucks 106-101 ,42 seconds left
|
cropdusters | 60 |
|
|
just score a bucket, trade buckets
|
cropdusters | 60 |
|
|
Bogut just fouled out of the game now
|
cropdusters | 60 |
|
|
Why are the Bucks shooting 3s now
|
cropdusters | 60 |
|
|
1:49 Bucks 104-99
|
cropdusters | 60 |
|
|
Bucks up 102-99, 3 second violation on the Bucks
|
cropdusters | 60 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.