Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
@gambling-devil Dunno where you're seeing that..FLorida is -2 everywhere...some -2.5 also |
gambling-devil | 22 |
|
![]() |
@ColinMac Yes I saw this, but doesn't make sense when looking at Pfeff1 profile. He's picking all point spreads, over/unders...not just ML favorites. He has over 100 more wins than losses and yet has zero stars..contrary to what the relative strength index table seems to indicate |
dmsr320 | 6 |
|
![]() |
@tammy296 Thanks much Tammy...I was curious and hopefully Colin or Flynt can follow up when they get the chance |
dmsr320 | 6 |
|
![]() |
Pfeff1 has a 13 game streak with over 100 more wins than losses...yet has zero RSI stars when checking his picks profile. Can someone explain this to me? |
dmsr320 | 6 |
|
![]() |
Modify the 3 pt line to eliminate the easy corner threes...would give defenders more of a chance to contest threes and discourage jacking up so many threes |
calicappin | 5 |
|
![]() |
watt brothers will be in...sterling shouldn't be |
Fuse | 5 |
|
![]() |
sterling shouldn't be there |
Fuse | 5 |
|
![]() |
@UnderdogKing Goff owns that heavy blitzing vikings defense |
sherriffics | 23 |
|
![]() |
@Dragons2010 It was strategic. Giving the packers the ball back with 38 seconds left was plenty of time even without timeouts. Blame the dumb nfl rule changes promoting more offense. Its a big difference having touchbacks start at the 30 yard line now with kickers easily able to boot 50-60 + yard fgs. Lions defense was totally decimated with injuries, packers only needed about 30 yards to tie it and would have huge advantage to win the game in OT if they got the ball first against lions defense full of practice squad players and guys off the street. |
ActionMagnet | 28 |
|
![]() |
@ActionMagnet I could see it now.
LIONS up 26-20 in the Super Bowl vs KC. Lions ball at the KC 25 yard line with 1 minute left (KC all timeouts) 4th and 1...
Campbell lines up to go for it, KC defender jumps offsides and Campbell laughs all the way to the Lombardi Trophy after setting that up all season with his aggressiveness...we will never know if he really planned to hike the ball hahaha
|
ActionMagnet | 28 |
|
![]() |
Florida got this |
MIZARD | 18 |
|
![]() |
@MrBator All the better for Florida...5 goals or less in the last 10 game 7's implies less power plays which hurts mcdavid and the oilers way more. Sounds like Panthers win 4-1 or 3-2 if this trend continues...give me Evan Rodrigues, tarasenko, verhaege, draisatl as the goal scorers |
smellybunty | 10 |
|
![]() |
@Hoyasaxa If the Panthers had won a Cup before I could see that helping them figure this out like the 2002 Lakers beating Sacramento in game 7 on the road. But no they have not.
Actually Tarasenko has won a Cup before and I wouldn't be surprised if he scores a big goal in this game to help secure his second Stanley Cup |
MrBator | 68 |
|
![]() |
Panthers win, end of the road for Edmonton |
Eprince | 22 |
|
![]() |
@Hoyasaxa This is game 7 in Florida...highly doubt oilers gonna get enough power plays to be so deadly...refs gonna let them play on and only call the blatantly egregious penalties. Also the game changing generational leader was totally shut down in game 6, highly unlikely guys like warren foegele gonna have big games again at Florida if Panthers keep the clamps on Mcdavid, don't forget they have last change as well |
MrBator | 68 |
|
![]() |
Zero...Florida fixing to sweep that 1 line team |
Vic-Vega | 37 |
|
![]() |
@Flynt Thank u very much Flynt...I just now saw the email u sent and have replied with the info requested!=) |
Covers-Team | 548 |
|
![]() |
@grillo08 same here...did u get an email notification yet about your prize? |
Covers-Team | 548 |
|
![]() |
@DonnyTwoTimes I just hit 9 wins...did u ever get a prize? |
Covers-Team | 548 |
|
![]() |
Still no results, unbelievable |
Hawky | 6 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.