HotRod11

I was/is 3 technique. 

I use pretty much all the numbers, but as efficiently as possible. Everything gets :33, :44, :55, 1:11, 2:22, 3:33. So actually 5 numbers and the start button. I don't think i microwave anything over 5 mins.

@vanzack

 Nice couple hits today. I have no idea regarding soccer tactics or reading what's happening on the field, but looks like this Spain/Sweden game hopefully made up for some of the earlier games that seemed like they were called correctly without getting the result. Thats probably an odd thing to say when you had U2.5 and it ended 0-0. 

The Belgium/Russia 3-0 exact score +1325 was appreciated!

@packersbackers

 Going great, hope you're doing good also. Figured with a big international tourney, I would check for a Vanzack thread, and the legend came through. Otherwise, since the format change, only poked my head in for a few CD newsletters which weren't really the same either because of the rona. 

@LucasPortela

 It takes about 2 seconds to find...

"What would you say you do here?" - the Bobs from Office Space

They're still here.

https://experts.covers.com/

For any competent developer, this would take 2 seconds to turn off. It's obvious they do not want to. "I'll add it to the task list." Sure, Jan.

It's impressive how bad covers developers are. Do they not do any testing or think about user experience?

was definitely not looking for end all be all, just maybe a general either avoid big dogs or avoid  teams that were +3 or whatever. I’ll be taking bills bengals broncos rams washington football team see how it goes. Unless Hugh Jordan goes against then I reserve the right to change my terrible opinions

First time I've been on this site since college basketball shut down. Didn't miss it.

The newsletter still worth it though. Anyways, I've been in a pool for the past how many years that rewards not just winning ATS but gives you points by how much you beat the spread by (or negative points for losing). Ex. last nights game was KC -9.5, so you take the chiefs you got 4.5 points, you took texans you got -4.5. Pretty simple. 

Anybody got any links or info or theories on what ranges or spreads would be best to take advantage of, or avoid? So a -3 favorite has a 50/50 shot at covering, but maybe there's info out there about how much that favorite covers by, or how much they lose by when they don't cover? Should a dog of 10+ be avoided because they don't have much potential of blowing out a far superior opponent? 

Hi covers, big fan. Please ban the faustos and trigonometrias in the NCAAF King of covers contest since it is obvious they are using multiple entries. Thanks