Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by gambling-devil:
listen to the commentator ... they all think the BUCS should have went for two Man, anyone who does not think the BUCS should go for two does not know football. You are playing the top team in the NFL, against the QB that always win in OT, against the team that is just not fail on third down the whole game. And you got an opportunity to steal the game, and you did not .... come on!!! You're wrong. A lot of people who know football would disagree with you. There is a good case for either going for two or not going for two. If the Bucs win the toss in OT, the game could have ended differently. |
smellybunty | 30 |
|
|
Chiefs ML -111 |
Jimmy_Cats | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:
@sgvguy @ActionMagnet Its kind of like when McDonald's caved into you and gave you $15 per hour Funniest post I've read in a long time! |
ActionMagnet | 34 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ilovefootballs:
1h Detroit-1 bet da house Piece of crap LIAR! You said you'd never post NFL again. |
Ilovefootballs | 7 |
|
|
This is fucking insane! This game has been delayed for 5 hours now. I've got $500 on Navy and I don't even give a shit anymore. When I was a kid, we played football in ANY kind of weather. If someone got struck by lightning, TOUGH! That's the way it goes sometimes. We ran around getting concussions and getting struck by lightning and we enjoyed it! I'd never heard of a football game being delayed because of weather. Maybe I just forgot because of all those concussions. |
Jimmy_Cats | 13 |
|
|
@JFEEZEE
@D-Town
@the1toturn2
@Fuse
@tahoejoe2
Thanks guys. Good luck to you too! I'm gonna add one more game:
Bills -6 over Dolphins
|
Jimmy_Cats | 12 |
|
|
He's no longer on the injury report. |
Warnerjerry2200 | 3 |
|
|
@tjones1270 I've heard this horse shit before. The Saints lost to TB in 2009 and went on to win the Super Bowl. You Crazies say the game was meaningless because the Saints had clinched the #1 seed. I dont think that is true, as they didnt rest starters. Drew Brees played the entire game. He was 32-37-258 1 TD that day. The Bucs won in OT 20-17. This is one of the dumbest systems I've ever heard of. What is it a voodoo curse or something? You bet futures according to who appears on the cover of a magazine? You're picking the Chargers to advance past KC because Andy Reid was on the cover of a magazine? You also make many errors as you type. Are you intoxicated or just a Dumb-Ass? |
tjones1270 | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tjones1270:
here we are this was after week 7 complete on 10/21 ok remind you teams facing top playoff caliber teams will be ranked higher even if they have losing record 1 Arizona (2-4) 3.1 1 24 62 Kansas City (6-0) 2.3 1 10 4 playing a very soft schedule only team they beat which they always do is 49ers 3 Baltimore (4-2) 2.2 1 6 1 on play book cover 4 Minnesota (5-1) 2.1 3 26 5 played in london 5 Tampa Bay (4-2) 1.8 4 30 12 lost top WR's plus others and Todd Bowles will never be coaching n a SB 6 Houston (5-2) 1.3 6 20 9 i cant see this afc south team getting there 7 LA Rams (2-4) 1.1 1 14 38 NY Jets (2-5) 1.0 2 26 189 Detroit (5-1) 1.0 4 28 27 LOST TO BUCS10 Tennessee (1-5) 0.8 4 26 17 11 Dallas (3-3) 0.6 7 17 1012 Denver (4-3) 0.4 6 30 1913 Buffalo (5-2) 0.3 5 25 13 doing good 14 San Francisco (3-4) 0.2 2 22 21 ehh the SB loser on the play book cover 15 Green Bay (5-2) 0.0 2 18 14 VERY STRONG 16 NY Giants (2-5) -0.1 14 29 1517 Indianapolis (4-3) -0.1 3 20 1618 Philadelphia (4-2) -0.2 2 19 2 LOST TO BUCS 19 Pittsburgh (5-2) -0.2 9 26 11 comon man the qb's 20 LA Chargers (3-2) -0.5 18 32 26 goota finsh in top 15 21 Atlanta (4-3) -0.6 2 23 722 New Orleans (2-5) -0.7 8 32 823 Washington (5-2) -1.0 10 32 25 LOST TO BUCS 24 New England (1-6) -1.0 3 31 2025 Jacksonville (2-5) -1.1 4 27 2226 Carolina (1-6) -1.3 12 32 2327 Seattle (4-3) -1.4 21 32 3128 Cincinnati (3-4) -1.6 6 31 2429 Las Vegas (2-5) -1.7 1 30 2930 Cleveland (1-6) -1.7 9 32 2831 Miami (2-4) -2.2 10 32 3032 Chicago (4-2) -2.9 16 32 32 eh rookie QB Chiefs beat Falcons and Ravens too - not such a soft schedule. They've beaten EVERY TEAM THEY'VE PLAYED! |
tjones1270 | 10 |
|
|
Broncos +9.5 over Ravens |
Jimmy_Cats | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Texans once again terrible on the road. They were like 3.9 ave per pass attempt In GB there were like 2.9. They lost the pts per plays again dropping to 22cd. Looking at road/home splits........ Home .040 Road (-.123) If we only counted their home games, let's throw out the bad road games. .040 would rank only 16th in the league. Think about this, 2015 through 2023 not counting the 2 covid years, 2020 & 2021 of the 14 teams to make the SB only 2 ranked outside the top 6 as of Nov 1 in pts per plays. No team ranked as low as 16th which would be only using the Texans home games giving g the Texans every advantage the odds are so stacked against them. Of the 28 teams to make the conference title game only 2 ranked as low as 16th, 0-2 SU. Only 4 of 28 ranked outside the top 10. Texans don't come close to the top 10 using only home games. And I am giving the Texans every advantage by only counting their strongest performances at home and they still cannot stack up with past successful playoff teams. Losing their top 2 receivers really hurt the Texans. They don't have the depth to overcome this. |
theclaw | 69 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by the1toturn2:
How many times do I have to tell you it is The Twin Peaks Angle and it is from Dave Cokin Dave Cokin died a few months ago. Shame, he was a good guy. |
MrBatorVegas | 54 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34:
@LonghornHoosier What are you laughing about? Indiana has covered 7 games in a row, beating the line by an average of 18 points a game. |
putterspitt | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Actually I found it: p:margin>10 and pp:margin>10 and season>=2021 and n:rest>10 Since 2021 there have only been 4 occurrences with these conditions and the the ATS record is (2-2) You are right Pittsburg fits this querry but your info is faulty according to killersports data base..................gl The guy asked about back to back double digit wins. Use >9 instead of >10. |
jowchoo | 40 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Vegasweed:
Every primetime Rodgers game they rig it for him If that's the case, then a clever fellow such as yourself should easily make a lot of money with live bets. |
Vegasweed | 16 |
|
|
Last week vs NE, the Jets became the first team in NFL history to score 20 points, not have a turnover, hold their opponent to less than 250 total yards and lose the game. Teams with those numbers before that game were 750 wins and 0 losses. Now, it's halftime, and Aaron Rodgers has 14 yards passing, and the Jets have held the ball for 9:32 minutes. The Jets suck! |
nfl_brosuf | 72 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34: @ActionMagnet Any crypto will never have the staying power of physical gold and silver in your hands. It is not a digit on a computer. You do not need electricity to keep it. Any computer crime and your crypto disappears. Gold and silver hidden in the great outdoors is almost impossible to steal. With all the hacking going on, electric grid going down in various segments of the USA, I wish you luck over the next 5 years. I disagree. Can you carry 5 million dollars worth of gold in your luggage? how are you trading gold? I can send anyone in the world 5M worth of Bitcoin in 5 seconds. The future is digitial once the boomers have passed. You are incredibly stupid. |
vanzack | 109 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Interesting this is the 3rd year in a row Bills became a Bator fade the week of playing the Dolphins. 1-1 ATS. And the 4th time Bills been a Bator fade past 3 years. The method is 2-1 ATS thus far in those Bills games. They did beat the method last year at home pounding Dolphins 48-20 then losing the next week at home to Jags. 2 years ago the method was correct with Bills losing at Miami and the method was correct earlier this season fading Bills VS Ravens. Good info, although the game against the Jags last year was in London. |
MrBatorVegas | 54 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by RXistrash:
Quote Originally Posted by maxwagers781: @RXistrash I can find plenty of reasons to rule out commanders. But saying the Texans won’t make it there or saying they don’t have a shot is a mistake. You’re joking? They can’t beat KC, Buffalo, or Baltimore. So how are they going to be able to advance to the superbowl? Texans beat Buffalo 3 weeks ago. Anybody can beat the Ravens. |
maxwagers781 | 92 |
|
|
@Emanyl You are a fucking piece of shit! They should ban you, loser. |
Emanyl | 55 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.