Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
I was on Texas. Mike are you my secret arch nemesis?
|
MikeMed | 7 |
|
![]() |
I hear you Mike (wish I heard you Saturday
![]() Good luck to all
|
Mikie2Times | 4 |
|
![]() |
Dayton is hot winners of 8 of 10, 9 lined games 6 ATS wins. They just came off a nationally televised game in which they had John Gruden speak prior crushing rival Xavier by 15 at home. They expended a lot of energy in that game. They have a 14-5 mark on the year, with only 4 road games played, 1-3 in those games. The one win was of quality verse Temple the 3 losses they faired poorly in. St Joseph is in deep need of a win here, losers of 3 straight all on the road. 4-4 in lined games over the last 10, losers of 5 of the last 7, 5 games in that group on the road. The 2-5 L7 doesn’t bother me much, a lot of away games against some good competition. At home this team is 8-1, with good size wins over Penn State, Drexel, Creighton, and Villanova. So they can beat good teams at home, no question. For what it is worth Home teams have won 10 of 10 in this series and St Josephs has showed a good history of playing Dayton hard even in defeat. *Edge to Dayton in Rebounding and Turnovers *Edge to Saint Josephs in 2 point FG% and FT attempts (always like a good edge for a home team here) and SOS. Seeing a very high % of action toward Dayton, Pomeroy has St Josephs -2, one book opens -5 the others -4. Not a subtle tip of the hand by odds maker’s in my opinion. They certainly would be expecting more Dayton action following Saturday especially. Yet they release a number that still looks attractive to take Dayton in? 1. Dayton Limited Road action 2. Dayton off a large win in front of national audience 3. Potential set up for a let down game 4. St Josephs in need of a win 5. St Josephs proving strong home play against good competition 6. Major FT advantage in attempts toward St Josephs at Home 7. All perception favors Dayton, favorable number still given to them 8. Pomeroy confirming line at -2, which makes #7 more relevant St Josephs -4 is my play @3 units or 3% risk My plays are tracked by a play monitor since FEB 5, 2011. Basketball is 298-298 +74.33 Units (I like the +money). 0-3 and stuck in a bit of a losing streak, but I sense things will start to heat up and I like writing out my thoughts when I’m in a bit of a slump so that’s what this is. Good Luck |
Mikie2Times | 4 |
|
![]() |
Deadwood is an incredible show Mike, one of my favorites. Good luck as well.
|
Mikie2Times | 3 |
|
![]() |
Most between 8-10am.
|
poketjjax | 4 |
|
![]() |
By chasing line movements in that fashion your guaranteed to always get the worst number. The goal is to get ahead of the line. If you don't know how to build a good set of power rankings I suggest utilizing one of the many resources available online.Power rankings are critical in college hoops with so many games and teams.
|
Sal_Tessio | 7 |
|
![]() |
Duke -10.5 Northern Colorado ML Marshall +4 Pittsburgh -2.5 All 3%/3 units of bankroll. My plays are tracked by a play monitor. Since I started tracking Feb 5th 2011, Basketball plays are 298-294 +87.53 Units. Good luck on your card.
|
Mikie2Times | 3 |
|
![]() |
What you fail to understand is last years game was early in the year. FSU hadn't even begun the recovery cycle yet. They played an Oklahoma team in which they see nothing like in the ACC. The pace, the style, Oklahoma is a unique team. Oklahoma plays much better at home then on the road. This will be a rabid environment, with a team much more prepared for the Sooner's Pace and Aerial prowess. Certainly motivated to all hell behind a strong crowd. Stop referencing 2010 as one poster mentioned, 2010 does nothing but help FSU, and it further then just motivation.
|
joewashington | 48 |
|
![]() |
I don't care for how popular this play is, but I think Pineda sets up more for bust then boom. Michael Pineda made the AL All Star team as a Rookie. In his first 12 starts he went 77.1 innings, 1.00 WHIP, and 2.33 ERA. He has the 22nd adjusted ERA in baseball on the year. But for Pineda, like many Rookie pitchers, it’s been a tale of two seasons. Since his dominating start he’s followed with 9 starts, 52.2 innings, a 1.20 WHIP, and 5.30 ERA, his adjusted ERA over the last 30 days ranks 112th. Lot’s of things are catching up to Pineda. Foremost being the fatigue of a 162 game season. Seattle has recognized this, outwardly admitting that they will be taking him out of the normal 5 day rotation. That itself can cause problems as pitchers historically perform below average outside of a standard 4 to 5 day rotation. Other variables stack up against Pineda. His ERA/BA allowed in home starts is 2.33 / .176, road starts 4.50 / .227, day starts 2.74 / .189, night starts 3.92 / .212. He’s also facing further scouting reports and repetition. You often hear about the sophomore jinx for pitchers, well it tends to start toward then end of year once film accumulates. This as well as fatigue coincide with factors for his decline. This will also mark his 3rd start against the Rangers, more then any team this season. He faced them twice in the midst of his hot start, 13 innings, 12 hits, 7 ER’s. With Texas already getting to him during his best stretch of the year and with little to go on, |
DA_BOYS | 12 |
|
![]() |
I've turned $100 into 10k several times using the strategy I said (going all in very selectively). I would never suggest it at this point, again it's suicide, but I have never won close to that amount with a small bankroll grinding out profits. From a professional/safe point of view to turn 1k to 10k it will take about 3 1/2 years. A very good handicapper can make 100% return a year, but you would have be among the top 5% or so to accomplish that.
|
Ovation | 37 |
|
![]() |
Do yourself a favor. If this is your goal fine, it's a disastrous strategy to think you could, with any safety, turn 1k into 10k, Shortly. But some people aren't here for realistic expectations. So if your going to do this at least go about it the way that has the most potential to hit your goal. If your going to bet 100-200 a game the odds of you losing everything before 10k are pretty much a certainty.Certainly above 98% before you hit 10k. You will never even come close to your goal. Wait it out, play it safe and go all in 3 times. That will give you about 7k, this way you have about a 12% chance at 50% hit rate of almost reaching your goal.
Both strategies are suicide, I'm just providing one that is a lot less painful.
|
Ovation | 37 |
|
![]() |
FYI Bodio, that H/A on Bum is from the Twins game. Take that game out, rework the numbers and everything looks much more normal. Good luck tonight.
|
bodio | 98 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by bodio: Great analysis buddy. Like the play! Thanks Bodio, GL to you and everybody else on today's game.
|
Mikie2Times | 7 |
|
![]() |
National League ML -115 So what we have here is a high profile game, strong historical evidence that shows complete dominance by the AL, public perception toward the AL, and odds-makers open with the NL at -125. As I've stated numerous times odds makers do not give away free money, and they seem to have tipped the hand a little bit in releasing this number so high (it since been bet down to a more reasonable -115) . Upon further review the AL has several key pitchers opting out. Verlander, Shields, Hernandez, Price, Sabathia, Lester and Rivera. That is the cream of the crop as far as AL pitching is concerned. Verlander will win the AL Cy Young, and the rest of his competition is on that list. That leaves the AL with Weaver (the only other true Cy Young candidate), Beckett, CJ Wilson, Ogando, and Pineda. Now those aren't bad players by any means, but many are young, and nobody on this planet would trade those players for the ones who are sitting. The gap between the two groups is large. The AL hopes to cover up pitching deficiencies with a devastating left handed line up. That could prove difficult, as once Doc (NL Cy Young?) has had his 2-3 innings, take your pick from Kershaw or Lee, both destroy lefty's with minimal effort. Need more righties? How about Jurrjens or Lincecum. The NL lineup does not have a hitting advantage, but were splitting hairs when talking about so many all star caliber batters. Great pitchers will beat great batters, cliche, but true. I would much rather side with the clearly more dominant pitching squad and the side the sports book is on in this type of situation. We will go with a standard 2 unit play on the National League. |
Mikie2Times | 7 |
|
![]() |
The man likes his Peavy, good luck today.
|
bodio | 68 |
|
![]() |
1-1-0 Posted. +2.0 Units
I suggest 2% of your bank roll per play, to win 2% on favorites, and a flat 2% on underdogs. Tuesday's play is.... Brewers 5 inning RL -120 Duke vs Wolf Verified Record since 2/5/11 Best of Luck. A Quick Look at Mike McClain's PicksOverall: 297 - 277, +117.88 unitsBaseball: 145 - 141, +38.89 unitsBasketball: 151 - 135, +77.99 unitsFootball: 1 - 0, +3.00 unitsHockey: 0 - 1, -2.00 unitsOn Average, Mike McClain...Bets 2.33 units per pick.Wagers on +109 lines. |
Mikie2Times | 1 |
|
![]() |
Forgot to add a unit = 1% of your bankroll, this history is tracked from 2/11/11. So approaching 6 months.
|
Mikie2Times | 3 |
|
![]() |
Here is my record and it's independently verified. I'm 1-0 on these posts, unfortunately the last was deleted and if I say why this one will probably get deleted to. In any event here is the play followed by my record. I suggest 2% risk in proportion to your bank roll per wager. On favorites to win 2%, on underdogs just a flat 2%.
Cardinals 5 inning ML -120 Cueto vs Carpenter A Quick Look at Mike McClain's PicksOverall: 296 - 275, +119.96 unitsBaseball: 144 - 139, +40.97 unitsBasketball: 151 - 135, +77.99 unitsFootball: 1 - 0, +3.00 unitsHockey: 0 - 1, -2.00 unitsOn Average, Mike McClain...Bets 2.33 units per pick.Wagers on +109 lines. |
Mikie2Times | 3 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by bodio: Yeah, Cole leaving made it very dangerous for the UNDER as Philly BP is pretty bad. Who knows if we would have won with him in there since Lester was 'dealing' too today. Glad 'fat Bobby' got yanked prior to blowing the UNDER play (even though he made it a push for a lot of people too). Yeah, I saw your post this morning. I do not know what rules covers has in place in regards to those. Contact their customer support as I really have no clue. Good luck buddy and glad to have you drop by and share your insights! Thanks, looks like you closed out the night strong, and it begins
![]() |
bodio | 137 |
|
![]() |
Bodio, good start buddy. Ball will start to roll here soon. Cole leaving like that hurt do doubt.
Quick question for you or anybody who can respond. I posted a free play last night, said I ran a sports service and that I would post one free play a day. I specifically said I was not selling here, just wanted to increase name exposure. I wanted to do a free play a day. Posted no links to my services, nothing. I mean literally, I had no intention of crossing that line because I know covers would not allow that. They banned that account, deleted the free play. So if you mention in any type of fashion you offer a sports service it's automatic bye bye? That stinks. We have had many conversations. You know I'm not a sleaze ball tout, and I have high integrity. I said specifically I was not selling my services. I love these forums, wish I could post more plays. But yes, I do sell my plays, and I wanted people to be aware that I do that, but I certainly was not going to direct them how to do so or ask them to do so. So that's a violation of the forums? Again great start. Looks like we both had some accurate reads on the Colorado game.
|
bodio | 137 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.