Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Im from a state that just recently legalized sports gambling (might have some blue grass). Ive run $500 on draft kings into about $27,000 since October. I have a simple startegy that has paid that off. I'm obviously not looking to sell it. Before this opened up...I found a system that worked only with college basketball....only about 6 weeks into the season...and then till conference season kicked in. So basically about 8 weeks....I'm a stockbroker and real estate guy by trade and worked and algorithm for about 5 years till realizing this works. its successful at a clip of about 78% for only that time I talked about. Got to be be about 4 weeks into season and right up to conference play. And then it fall apart... to about 52% success .....so nothing.
From that......I've found a way, nothing to do with college BBall, That Im doing returns of about %120 a day? Im not tring to sell anything, I'm just wondering if anybody else has something similar to colaborate with to make it even better. Im more than happy to show my returns.....and again I'm not wanting to sell anything. I Have worked this since I was an early day trader in college in late 1990's and successful with that, and even today took $100 on a bet and made over $1,900 on the Washington game tonight. |
potter36 | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: Premiums are a result of costs increasing.. So maybe instead of focusing on premium increases we should focus on why costs have, are and will continue to massively outpace CPI? Not saying anyone in this thread of course but premiums have to go up when costs outpace revenues and since there is no end in sight to cost containment and most of the population are not willing to subsidize healthcare, the reality is premiums will keep going up...benefit will keep going down, co-pays up. This is absolutley spot on. Why are we constantly talking about how we are going to subsidize or throw more money at an issue instead of asking why the cost is so high.
|
skoda | 22 |
|
|
Quick....flip over to cnn. Completely unbiased with no pandering to any political side. Crisis averted.
|
mattbrot | 4 |
|
|
Not sure if you've being serious or sarcastic with this, but kasich remark was both pointless and completely irrelevant. The question was addressed as bailouts for banks and he attached it to the indivually wealthy vs. Not. Deposit insurance has nothing to do with the corporate side. He needs to get off the stage.
|
sicknesscity | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Quote Originally Posted by potter36: The murder of Dr George Tiller. Was it condemned by every Christian you know?What exactly are you calling radical? And I'm pretty sure any Christian group blowing up a building will get condemned by every Christian I know. Then again I can't think of the last time a head was cut off or a bomb went off in the name of Jesus. Tiller....SHOT in 2009. And yes every Christian I know would not condone. (Insert stupid popcorn eating figure) |
canovsp | 98 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: You don't hear many Christians condemning their radical side either. Why is that? Of course if they're asked, they'll say "oh, I don't agree with that" What exactly are you calling radical? And I'm pretty sure any Christian group blowing up a building will get condemned by every Christian I know. Then again I can't think of the last time a head was cut off or a bomb went off in the name of Jesus. |
canovsp | 98 |
|
|
First of all none of that is free. Second, they don't have a democratic party flooding their country with illegal aliens calling their opposers bigots and simply trying to breed their voting base.
|
joe pockets | 30 |
|
|
replied to
I said it before and I'll say it again: Trump is trying his damndest to lose GOP support
in Politics
Bernie sanders showed he has no respect for himself or backbone for his supporters when he stood by and let that mob dictate time a lotted to him. If a man can't control that situation, how could he be expected to run a country. Just showed he's a potential cabinet member but no where near presidential material.
|
scalabrine | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by don juan: Take the Ten Commandments out of schools and what do you get ? Fast forward, generations later.. More murder, more violence, more weapons, more... Abortion Theft Adultery Divorce Happy's Large cities have not been destroyed, there are still 50 people of faith remaining. But when the time comes, Don't look back ! Don, out of curiosity, what party, do you think, have the people that have continually fought to have them taken from schools and other public places. |
wallstreetcappers | 69 |
|
|
Struck out jason veritek when he was at ga tech. Grandfather struck out babe Ruth and got gehrig to hit into double play. Roomed a season with dizzy dean. Great uncle roomed with Walter Johnson when he played with senators.
|
JEFFMARKETCAP | 26 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow: Quote Originally Posted by potter36: Lot of hard truth in that. That situation was one of definitely trying to choose the lesser of two evils. The same could have easily happened with dissolving the USSR. Every body on the outside gets to armchair quarter back how bad the current situation is, without ever realizing the possible after effects. You raise a good point about the lesser of two evils, but I disagree about the USSR comparision. Even with the rise of Putin, modern day Russia is a far cry from the USSR of the Cold War era. But what this thread does is remind of the absolute disaster Obama has been in foreign policy. One need look no further than his 2008 where he discussed how the Iraq War created the power vacuum in Iraq (and incidently, showcasing why the OP is so wrong...a house of cards propped up by the blood of American soldiers lives is no full deck. Yet what does Obama do? He pushes for the removal of Saddam like leaders in three other countries, thus creating the same vacuum. Pure disaster. Dj, my thought about the USSR was about our view of communism rather than a leader. I know growing up, whenever we viewed the soviet people being subject to communism, all we could speculate was how awful it was that was their way of life. However it never occurred to anyone in the west the transition it must have been for them to wake up one day to Sudden massive self reliance that wasn't required before. |
Killer_B | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: When Saddam was removed, the potential for any normalcy was also removed.The only solution to normalcy in that area is forced peace between the different religious groups.When Bush's group put in the local leadership they did this assured ZERO chance for success. You dont put in power the leader of the religious minority and expect things to work out. Lot of hard truth in that. That situation was one of definitely trying to choose the lesser of two evils. The same could have easily happened with dissolving the USSR. Every body on the outside gets to armchair quarter back how bad the current situation is, without ever realizing the possible after effects. |
Killer_B | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bettingforfun: If the majority of people thought like Michael Moore and ran this country we wouldn't even be having this discussion. You're absolutely correct. We wouldn't even have the country. |
AStefani | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by don juan: Quote Originally Posted by potter36: See Don, here's the skinny. If you don't understand, it's because you can't comprehend. I only say that in response to the way responded to my question to you (again that has been asked several times in the past). You can try to condescend on me all you want, but everyone on here can read my post and your response and make their own judgement as to that. WSC, who I don't often agree with, b t can at least respect what he says and step back and learn from his perspective, somehow answered previously, what you said was incoherent. Your answer...."Because they would be doing the opposite of what they were hired to do!".......I hope is only a joke. I'm trying to be respectful but I really don't know a simpler way to ask it. Do you really not get it? IF UNIONS KNOW BETTER, HOW TO RUN A COMPANY, WHY NOT START......AND RUN THEIR OWN COMPANY? Free of corporate influence, they should be able create, from cradle to grave, a better mousetrap (i.e. more fair and better performing company). I have tried to straight to the point (and with proper grammar). I respectfully await your answer. Pots36. I like your writing much better, easier to read, thank you. Now you're learning, Soon you'll learn that unions are on your side, the middle class, which I am sure you are included. The problem is that your head is soft. What I say goes in one ear and out the other. Try again and Re-read my WHOLE answer, then get back to me. Again, you refuse to answer the straight forward question I asked. I do understand why though. Let me tell you about my head. It has started and sold a few small businesses. Now i work for myself. I negotiate my own contracts. I believe if people want to belong to a union they should. If they don't I believe they deserve that right as well. I also believe unions don't even come close to serving the same purpose they used to and now are primarilly a shake down for the higher ups. Still waiting for an answer to that question. Now at least the 4th time I've asked it. |
djbrow | 120 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
I can hardly read what in the world you are saying, in your mumbo jumbo rambling. Is the following correct ? Don, the question I've asked several times deals with unions. Pro union types are constantly talking about corporate greed and owners taking advantage if the workers. ...Unions have manpower, financial backing, and democratic political backing. Question...... If the union knows how to do it better, why not just start competing businesses with their own manpower and run as they see fit ? That way union leaders could run companies, pay workers the exact wages they demand and provide the exact environment they wish. If their way is better, they drive out all the corporate competitors. Answer...Because they would be doing the opposite of what they were voted in to do !. That would be the same as building a Walmart across the street from a Walmart and hiring scab workers. Or paying below a living wage, Walmart was built on cheap labor. That's why the middle class is in the position they're in. The Walton family are billionaires. Not a millionaires, BILLIONAIRES. That's the last question I'll answer until you write it where we don't have to decipher what you're trying to convey to me. See Don, here's the skinny. If you don't understand, it's because you can't comprehend. I only say that in response to the way responded to my question to you (again that has been asked several times in the past). You can try to condescend on me all you want, but everyone on here can read my post and your response and make their own judgement as to that. WSC, who I don't often agree with, b t can at least respect what he says and step back and learn from his perspective, somehow answered previously, what you said was incoherent. Your answer...."Because they would be doing the opposite of what they were hired to do!".......I hope is only a joke. I'm trying to be respectful but I really don't know a simpler way to ask it. Do you really not get it? IF UNIONS KNOW BETTER, HOW TO RUN A COMPANY, WHY NOT START......AND RUN THEIR OWN COMPANY? Free of corporate influence, they should be able create, from cradle to grave, a better mousetrap (i.e. more fair and better performing company). I have tried to straight to the point (and with proper grammar). I respectfully await your answer. |
djbrow | 120 |
|
|
Don, the question I've asked several times deals with unions. pro union types are constantly talking about corporate greed and owners taking advantage if the workers. Unions have manpower, financial backing, and democratic political backing. If the union knows how to do it better, why not just start competing businesses with their own manpower and run as they see fit? That way union leaders could run companies, pay workers the exact wages they demand and provide the exact environment they Wish. If their way is better, they drive out all the corporate competitors.
|
djbrow | 120 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by don juan: Someone please tell this guy how to make a paragraph, so we can understand what the H he's saying ? Go ahead and make your little sarcastic comments Don. Wonder if your ready to answer one question I've asked you at least twice before without a whiff of a response. I'll ask again if you need it. Or is you need to continue to play comedian....I guess carry on.
|
djbrow | 120 |
|
|
It's a shame to see grown men metaphorically constantly live on their knees swallowing the seed of civil servants instead of demanding they do their job and just respecting their position. Proud ive never went into a voting booth and voted a straight ticket. One of my favorite campaign signs I ever saw was in a small town in michigan about 5 years ago. It read "vote joe smith democrat for road commisioner" not joe smith civil engineer, not joe smith paving company owner, not joe smith [insert any qualification or experience ] but simply a political party To get your voting base. Well joe smith won, and last year when I was there again, it was that much worse. Congrats, you get what you deserve.
|
djbrow | 120 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by don juan: Brows, I not hypocritical . I have stated what I believe for years. I may be partisan but that's because the right will not negotiate, as evidenced by the past 6 years. Everything Obama has gotten done, he had to circumvent the repulsicans. Not with Clinton either. not with Carter..... So screw them. They are dug in so deep. They don't give a squat about anybody but themselves. In all seriousness, this is exactly why it's impossible for you to have a meaningful objective conversation with anyone. If guess this is your outlet though for your relentless frustration. |
djbrow | 120 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow: With the responses so far, it is really hard to see how the parties have been so successful in making the sheep think one is so much better than the other. So very well put. |
djbrow | 120 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.