Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Any news on these QB situations: AZ,New Mexico ,Akron Zona going with Gunner Cruz again after Mccloud out for the year; prob wont be a popular opinion, esp with Colorado off the bye, but I think zona keeps this close with cruz getting all first string snaps this week. |
BWS77 | 34 |
|
|
Some nice looking picks there, Hitormiss, especially Minny and Hoosiers (both off byes).
Now, as for the guy who thinks purdue is going into the kinnick environment and come out with a W… yeesh. If it were in W Laf, I’d give boiler a 25% chance (and I do like this purdue team getting healthy, esp next week v Wisco). Take your +430 big bet amount, triple it on +11’ and sit back and enjoy yourself as Iowa runs the clock out on the ground. |
HitorMiss | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tooltones:
Ga Southern's starting QB, who won the job after Shai Werts left for L'ville (to switch to WR for some reason), is suspended for the first two games; due back for the Arkansas game on 9/18. It's an option offense, obviously, but this kid Justin Tomlin beat out, among others, a Paul Johnson style QB from GT (who himself switched to WR in the offseason). He was on the active roster this weekend: https://twitter.com/rotowirecfb/status/1432417515326656513?s=21 |
Zeus4par | 9 |
|
|
Ga Southern's starting QB, who won the job after Shai Werts left for L'ville (to switch to WR for some reason), is suspended for the first two games; due back for the Arkansas game on 9/18. It's an option offense, obviously, but this kid Justin Tomlin beat out, among others, a Paul Johnson style QB from GT (who himself switched to WR in the offseason). |
Zeus4par | 9 |
|
|
If you were expecting Alabama to cover 6+ here, you didn’t watch this game... Bama was lucky to sniff a win here, much less win by more than a few buckets. Right team/bettors got the money here. |
jroc1247 | 6 |
|
|
Yup, we see it and it looks rather obvious. Rice should be able to rush for 250+ but I’m slightly worried about UNT getting their “half.” Rice hasn’t played anyone, truly, but their D has shown to be decent in spurts and their rush-based attack should keep the clock running. To boot, Rice hasn’t played since Halloween and UNT hasn’t played since mid-October! I’m laying off but this could easily be get to 80+ total points. Having said reasoned all that, UNT will probably win something like 34-24. |
wegstar21 | 5 |
|
|
Haha, I think he means Iowa St and Okie St... |
bett0r | 7 |
|
|
Hilarious that a first time poster has the very best of all his lines that, as of an hour or so ago, most don't exist within a few points or he's bought a full point to 1.5 points; to boot Syracuse over doesn't have even a number, just believe him. I'm not saying these picks are anywhere close to bad or wrong, just need to be realistic my man. G/L |
abc123maddox | 6 |
|
|
UTEP opened 7 (at betonline at least), so don’t think we’ll be seeing anything better than 3’ between now and kick; looks like you took 4’ which is almost getting the best of it, considering 7 went to 5 within no time at BOL. Quote Originally Posted by steponaduck:
Train. Initial thoughts on your post. UTEP. Yes. Waiting for 6-7 or so. Will play unquestionably at 4.5 |
steponaduck | 163 |
|
|
Colorado 0 Washington 0 Washington State 0 North Carolina 0 Virginia 0 Virginia Tech 0 Baylor 0 Iowa State 0 Kansas 0 Kansas State 0 Texas 0 West Virginia 0 Illinois 0 Iowa 0 Maryland 0 Michigan 0 Michigan State 0 Penn State 0 Rutgers 0 Wisconsin 0 FIU 0 Florida Atlantic 0 Louisiana Tech 0 Marshall 0 Middle Tennessee 0 North Texas 0 Old Dominion 0 Southern Miss 0 UTSA 0 Western Kentucky 0 Akron 0 Ball State 0 South Alabama 0 Alabama 0 Arkansas 0 Auburn 0 Florida 0 Georgia 0 Ole Miss 0 Mississippi State 0 Texas A&M 0 New Mexico State 0 Army 0 UMass 0
|
tooltones | 6 |
|
|
Wake Forest 5 Kent State 5 Louisiana-Monroe 5 Troy 5 Texas State 5 Kentucky 5 Liberty 5 UCF 4 Tulane 4 Arizona 4 Cal 4 Oregon 4 Miami 4 TCU 4 Texas Tech 4 Indiana 4 Vanderbilt 4 SMU 3 Boise State 3 UCLA 3 Utah 3 Duke 3 Florida State 3 Pitt 3 Syracuse 3 Oklahoma State 3 Minnesota 3 Ohio State 3 Bowling Green 3 Northern Illinois 3 Toledo 3 Louisiana 3 LSU 3 Missouri 3 Cincinnati 2 Temple 2 Nebraska 2 Miami (Ohio) 2 Ohio 2 Tennessee 2 South Florida 1 Utah State 1 USC 1 Oklahoma 1 Eastern Michigan 1 Notre Dame 1 East Carolina 0 Memphis 0 Navy 0 Fresno State 0 Hawaii 0 Nevada 0 UNLV 0 Wyoming 0
|
tooltones | 6 |
|
|
School Practices UConn 15 Tulsa 7 Arizona State 7 Stanford 7 Louisville 7 Charlotte 7 San Diego State 6 San Jose State 6 Georgia Tech 6 UAB 6 UTEP 6 Georgia Southern 6 Georgia State 6 South Carolina 6 BYU 6 Colorado State 5 Oregon State 5 Boston College 5 NC State 5
|
tooltones | 6 |
|
|
Apologies, sizzle. I took it from the bottom link of an SI article, I'll post here: https://www.si.com/college/2020/05/08/college-football-spring-practice-coronavirus If mods want to delete this thread because the link could be malicious, I suggest they do - my computer runs a spyware check on every link opened and it showed no problem. |
tooltones | 6 |
|
|
Not sure if anyone has posted this (I'm sure someone did at some point on here), but as more than half D-1 teams still haven't played their first game, heres the spring practice numbers from early 2020. I looked for a complete list for quite a while and figured I'd share when I actually found it yesterday.
https://images.saymedia-content.com/.image/cs_srgb/MTcyNDA3MDcyNjE1MzEwNzIz/list.pdf |
tooltones | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BucktownOzzie: If today was round 1, which team would be the biggest favorite in their matchup? At what number? 7 Illinois 10 USC 6 Iowa 11 Virginia 8 Wisco 9 Rhode Island Assuming true neutral site, i.e. not an Omaha for Iowa or a Greensboro for Virginia, I’d say:
ILLY -1’ Iowa -3’ Wisco -1 I realize, combined with the seeding, those seem a bit on the nose but I cross-checked my own numbers with kenpom too. |
BucktownOzzie | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by PhillyGuy2377: I have Charlotte as well. Got it at +3.5 though. Not sure how you got +6.5 it did open at 6 flat, almost across the board, but that number hasn’t been seen since this morning. |
AlgerWong | 5 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SCORVER: I could go on and on with research and stats on why I like this play. In the end, Utah has a sound defense, but their offense isn’t quite explosive enough to turn this game into a shootout. I also think the Washington passing attack is good enough to put a dent in the Utah defense. I think the Utes have a good chance to win this game, but I’d be surprised if they won by a comfortable margin, which is why I’m taking the Huskies and the points. I’m willing and ready to hear all the research and stats to back this play up. TY |
SCORVER | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799: Why do people cry when losing? WOW! Stop betting on bad teams As pathetic as it is to start a thread to complain about the coach (when you should be complaining about getting the worst of the number, wtf is with the random 9.5? A halftime line??), it’s funny to watch. The full game line was never in doubt. |
aaironworks | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DblAAron:
Quote Originally Posted by tooltones: Im not sure what time the lines get posted at the bigger casinos, but you can definitely place bigger bets than 1k. I was in line at the window on a Saturday night in Aria 3 weeks ago and the guy next to me cashed 5-6 tickets for just under 40k (there are monitors at each window that show tickets bought/cashed cost/collect). They have a line specifically for transactions over 5k.Just a heads up - if you’re looking to bet into what you feel are some soft openers (and these books don’t know you as a customer), expect to get limited pretty badly* *not sure how much you want to get down, but would be shocked if they took more than a dime.
I’m not talking about a guy betting $5k/game throughout the week, I’m talking about most openers getting circled as they are released (and early in the week) before the lines settle across all betting markets. If the casino knows you, they’ll let you bet almost as much as you want... on high profile college games and any pro game. But if you want to hammer that mid-day Saturday Sun Belt game over, or the soft NCAAF line Sunday afternoon six days in advance, expect to be limited. |
Mackcrabs | 23 |
|
|
Just a heads up - if you’re looking to bet into what you feel are some soft openers (and these books don’t know you as a customer), expect to get limited pretty badly* *not sure how much you want to get down, but would be shocked if they took more than a dime. |
Mackcrabs | 23 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.