Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
As long as Cooper Rush is behind center, I don’t have any faith in the Cowboys ability to put up enough points to keep it a close game. |
ActionMagnet | 13 |
|
|
Yankees playing like hot garbage yet again |
Seymourbukz | 24 |
|
|
Yankees looked they didn’t even want to be there today. |
Jameson2954 | 5 |
|
|
As much as Detroit flip flops, I cant see Nick Mullens beating them. Yes, he had a great game against the Bengals last week, but so did Mason Rudolph yesterday... |
buffer | 6 |
|
|
@nuggins Had mine parlayed with the Aves. What a wild win haha |
Charo757 | 4 |
|
|
How’s this under 9 looking now? A win this Sunday against a three win Cardinals team, and the helpless Jets in two weeks puts them at nine wins. With a little luck they may get another one against the Bills or Ravens. And Tomlin looking like coach of the year. |
lordbettington | 46 |
|
|
replied to
Packers less than a TD neighbor, Friends, Family, Aunt, Uncle, Cousins, Brother and lil sis has them
in NFL Betting Don't over think it. It’s the best bet on the board imo, just like Baltimore was last week and Ohio St. was today. Sometime even Vegas makes bad lines. |
justliketoplay | 7 |
|
|
replied to
***Macwesties Fri. Sat. Oct. 25, 26, 2019 * NCAAF College Football * Week #9 * MacAttack * Plays***
in College Football Solid picks! The only one i would go the other way with is with Penn St. I think they can cover that 6. |
Macwestie1 | 42 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Donkey_Punch_: Vegas has KC @ 5 1/2
Also there are no books with KC @ -5 not sure if that is a typo by the Herd or what. |
Dogjimbo | 21 |
|
|
Well, the way you describe the Steelers, it sounds like they’ll be tripping over themselves every single game. I just find it funny how optimistic you are about the Bills and Jets getting “dramatically” better, yet everything is doom and gloom about the Steelers. You’re trying to convince yourself without looking at the whole picture. Yea, Ben can get hurt, so can anyone. He’s missed one game in the past two years, and never more than four in any single season, so you are reaching on that. Alex smith got hurt bad, but it had nothing to do with his age. I’m intrigued to see how Bell does without one of the best O-lines in the league. And Brown with Carr throwing him the ball. I’m not saying they won’t, but don’t be surprised if they don’t put up numbers similar to their days in Pittsburgh. I actually expect Ju Ju’s numbers to go down, but it won’t be a bad thing. I believe it’ll happen because the Steelers will look to spread the ball around a lot more now that Brown is gone. A lot will depend on how guys like Moncrief and Washington step up. If they do, watch out, it not, then it’ll be a struggle. We just won’t know until they start playing. Lots of things can happen over the course of a season that can influence wins and losses. And I won’t argue that the Steelers have a knack for playing down to bad teams. But they also offset that by beating tough games against good teams as well. But statistically speaking, the odds are that the Steelers will get at least nine wins this year. Most experts predict them to win 10-12 games. It’s your money, so do what you want. Just don’t say I didn’t warn you. |
lordbettington | 46 |
|
|
You clearly do not look at the Steelers objectively. You make it sound like they’re going to be one of the worst teams in the league. Secondly, you put waaaay too much stock into Brown. Look what happen when Holmes left, Wallace put up big numbers the next season. When Wallace left, Brown put up big numbers the following season, too. History has shown the Steelers WR’s will still produce at a high rate without AB. Ben is not pushing 40 (he’s only 37). Even then, Brees is 40, Brady 42. Do you hold that against them? Bills and Jets are terrible, so are the Bengals, yet you try to paint a pretty picture about them to try and justify your argument. The Bengals are the new “garbage Browns”. And even if they lose one game to a bad team, they have plenty of other very winnable games to cover the nine wins. You say the “absolute ceiling” for the Steeers is 8-8? If you think they’re not capable of a winning season, you don’t know football very well. |
lordbettington | 46 |
|
|
Some of these comments just make me laugh. Big Ben has NEVER had a losing season. Let that sink in. And now you want to go large on them having one now just because AB left?!? Yes I’m a Steelers fan, but I know football. And you guys keep focusing too much on one game. The Pats game will be close and could easily go either way. Now look at their schedule, since that’s what this is all about. The teams they are undisputedly better than and and should beat are the Bengals x2, Bills, Jets, Dolphins, Cardinals. And let’s say they split with both the Browns and Ravens. That right there is 8 wins. Throw in a likely win at home against the Colts and make it 9. Now you are telling me they can’t get one more win against the Seahawks, Niners, Rams, Chargers, or Pats??? All I can say is good luck to you... |
lordbettington | 46 |
|
|
At home in prime time, I’m taking Steelers -3.5. Pittsburgh will likely control the ToS and readers themselves in the run game. And with Gordon being out, I feel SD will end up being a little one dimensional. |
sideJOBplay | 7 |
|
|
I’d lean Pittsburgh based on how they play at home in prime time games. Melvin Gordon being out is also huge.
|
lancer89074 | 11 |
|
|
Can’t believe he Steelers pulled that one out. No cover, but a hell of a comeback in the second half. Once they decided to stop Fournette and force Bortles to win the game, then the tides turned. Great game. |
yorosan | 23 |
|
|
The only way Jacksonville has a chance in this game is if Fournette has a monster game. They need to control the ToP and keep the Steelers offense on the sideline.
Under normal circumstances, this would be a game where you could easily see the Steelers having a let down. But considering what the Jags did to them twice last year, I don’t see the Steelers taking them lightly.
|
yorosan | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by yorosan: And also they haven’t won as a road favorite yet this season remember the first game they’re a 4 pt favorite against browns, I don’t think jax is much worse than browns at home in my opinion yes the line -5 definitely said Pitts should win in fashion but I don’t buy that now Pittsburgh is 3-1 ATS on the road this year, 3-0-1 SU
|
yorosan | 23 |
|
|
I knew this game was too good to be true.
|
chazutx | 7 |
|
|
replied to
Play of the Year and if it doesn't win, I won't post again until Trump is out of Office...
in Penalty Box
Let’s face it, the only reason this thread has become this long is because of the political bs. The write up for the pick was spot on, but everything else has just been mindless dribble. If you want to argue politics, go to Facebook.
|
scalabrine | 263 |
|
|
I know it’s only one game, but Conner showed why Bell isn’t that important to pay that much for. Let a losing team take him and blow all their money on him. I think Pittsburgh is confident that they can get similar production out of Conner, while saving a ton of money in the process for more important positions.
|
Ikid2groove035 | 80 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.