Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
replied to
What happened to that guy saying he LOST 20K and freaked out…then bragged yesterday because he had +650 San Fran Futures lmao
in Penalty Box Quote Originally Posted by AshyLarry:
Someone posted that…then everyone was giving him good advice and he responded back with “HAHA I have a ton of San Fran futures at +650 so forget you guys”… I told him Karma Is Always Undefeated…and it looks like it still is All karma pointed to 49ers beating the chiefs, I guess 49ers will have to wait |
AshyLarry | 23 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DefenseWinsSB:
Quote Originally Posted by Digitalkarma: A record of $185.6 million was bet on the SB in Nevada shattering the previous record set in 2022. How much did the books earn? $6.8 mil , about 3.7% return . It was an increase from the 5.4 mil made last year, 3.6% return in SB57 All in all, the first Super Bowl in Las Vegas is off to a promising start https://twitter.com/howardstutz/status/1757243085665566853?t=xpfHb2BzDOF1jAk8SNKbrg&s=19and all the money was still on the chiefs so that goes to show you they will never lose. I believe they have only lost 2 times on the Super Bowl in the history of superbowls money wasn't lopsided in lv because 49ers fans at the game bet on them. the article said kc60- sf40 in lv everywhere else is was 75-25 or so, and all those books lost. If the game wasn't in lv, vegas would have lost just like all the other books nationwide. "shows you why books will never lose". books lost, read the article. It is not a vegas monoply anymore. |
Digitalkarma | 17 |
|
|
@IAMTEDDYKGB nice hit on the parlays |
Ballerz | 52 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by FSerpico:
KC recovered 9 of 10 fumbles in the playoffs that is beyond lucky. but mahomes is the goat right? |
DogbiteWilliams | 29 |
|
|
@Digitalkarma I was shocked by your headline, then I read the article. "Beynon estimated sportsbooks nationwide suffered a 4 percent loss on all wagers, which was “not as bad as our worst-case scenario.” Still, based on his predicted total of $1.5 billion in bets placed on the game nationally, the loss translated into an estimated $64 million." 64 million loss nationwide - 6.8 milllion revenue in vegas equals a loss of 57.2 million nationwide. house lost. |
Digitalkarma | 17 |
|
|
good post. mahomes gets all the credit for the win, but he was lousy up until that injury to greenlaw. Its very similiar to brady in how the other teams have miscues or injuries at key points that allow them to win. Chiefs got miami in 0 degrees, then bills had injuries to so many key defensive players, vs balty harbaugh decides to not run when that is his teams strength, then all the points you made just in the sb. Chiefs are champs but they aren't as good as past chiefs teams. much like some of the patriots teams that won. It seems like the universe or destiny rigs it for them, when they play good they win, when they don't the other team messes up worse and they still win. 49ers bad luck has been going on for awhile now I believe patrick willis suffered an injury during the nfc title game that helped 49ers lose to seattle like 10 years ago. |
FSerpico | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jerseyj24:
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy: ..Just some advice bro..in the future, dont be so braggadocious..post the play, give an insight and let it ride. And never bet the bank with your heart. unless you are a chiefs fan. |
JimmyGape | 77 |
|
|
I'm pretty sure there is a transparency law that force books to report betting splits. when the action is lopsided and books make no effort to even it out they generally win. books took a position on sf and lost on the biggest bet game. Considering the teasers its an epic loss for them. the only brightside for them is alot of new bettors won on kc and some will be hooked now. |
DogbiteWilliams | 29 |
|
|
@KTriple let them keep betting kc. I am a share holder of draftkings. Record profits for them if sf and over come in. |
lordbettington | 30 |
|
|
parlay sf -1.5 ov 47 +260 |
lordbettington | 30 |
|
|
@KTriple Very interesting, thanks for posting it, I figured it had something to do with the theatre release. I just realized the raiders won sb 15 in jan of 1981 before raiders of lost ark came out, they also won sb 18 in 1984 before temple of doom came out. |
lordbettington | 30 |
|
|
@KTriple looks good. you like the 3's, what about sf 33 kc 30 final |
KTriple | 6 |
|
|
smaller bets 49ers total pts scored 31-40 +350 49ers win by exactly 11 pts 60-1 49ers pts scored 38 35-1 final score squares sf 8 kc 4 60-1 exact score 49ers 34 kc 31 100-1 49ers 31 kc 20 200-1
|
lordbettington | 30 |
|
|
@KTriple Interesting. I thought about the swift song karma, did not factor in the anti hero. still waiting on the indiana jones connection post |
KTriple | 6 |
|
|
replied to
It is interesting to note that of the 24 states where we could view the dollars taken in, only New Jersey, the second-largest betting market, is favoring the 49ers at over 60%.
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by Buffalobob89074:
@KTriple So what is not to believe? That the Chiefs are huge public and to a degree sharp favorites in some quarters aside from some pockets of 49er strength like in New Jersey and in the Bay Area? Southern Californians and Northern Californians at one time didn't even want to be a part of the same state. There is little 49er allegiance in the Southland, just because they are Californians. I totally believe the original poster that it is the case too. KC is the flavor of the week, even more popular than the songstress princess who sings in her underwear and shouts into her microphone about ex boyfriends who did her wrong. The op has made atleast 3 threads that contradict the official numbers where the money is on the chiefs. He really wants everyone to bet the chiefs for some reason. |
1betting | 12 |
|
|
replied to
It is interesting to note that of the 24 states where we could view the dollars taken in, only New Jersey, the second-largest betting market, is favoring the 49ers at over 60%.
in NFL Betting @1betting odds 1betting works for fanduel, dk or caesars -5000 |
1betting | 12 |
|
|
@NR114 With you on 49ers. |
andarmac99 | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NR114:
Some 83 percent of all bets and 82 percent of all the money laid down is in the favor of Kansas City, according to sportsbettingdime.com. One reason for the Niners giving two points is due to a significant amount of futures bets on the team that need to be balanced.
Don't believe that futures excuse. They balance them during the season and don't let any outcome be devasting. Books already won with futures, 30 teams have been eliminated, probably a lot of money on bills, ravens, eagles, cowboys, lions earlier in the year, put them all together and it should outweigh any outcome. Not to mention the chiefs futures, which are probably pretty high from before the season. add chiefs futures to all the money wagered on them now and there is no way sf is a major liability. They are setting a trap and taking a position on sf. the public is getting more experienced so they have to make up a reason why they are not moving the line |
andarmac99 | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:
To sum up: I think the modelers and stats guys are missing some key pieces of context. They aren’t truly digging deep enough. Statistics and models don’t allow them to. They are betting against Mahomes and KC as underdogs yet AGAIN. It is true definition of insanity. Not the same as before, Books took a position on kc last year, as the money was on the favorite eagles. So last year they bet on mahomes and cleaned up. For sb 55 mahomes was favored and had the money on him, once again, and books won with tampa. Judge by the lack of line moves this year it seems the books are betting on sf. nothing insane about it. |
andarmac99 | 51 |
|
|
@ActionMagnet kittle td is |
jesron1269 | 26 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.