Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yea, my first bet of the year. NYJ +4. This is mainly assuming Trent Williams doesn't play. He's the most important part of their offense. I'm no Niners hater. They'll be fine as long as Williams comes back, but this is a tough first test for their OL. |
ActionMagnet | 24 |
|
|
Bookmaker had it at +780 on gameday. I didn't take it cause that number should be +1200 or more..
|
barronio | 11 |
|
|
the collective unconscious works outside of linear time. visions are good. stats are lame. looking forward to it!! |
dertydude | 46 |
|
|
Thanks for this early reminder, Action.. I think this is a great way to bet this game if you're a Niners backer. If they win, its Purdy, CMC, or Deebo.. BM only let me put down $66 for a max payout of $1998 (+3000) on Deebo. Then they moved the line down to +2672.. Movin' lines here on Covers y'all!!
|
ActionMagnet | 6 |
|
|
Deebo is +3300 at Bookmaker. If you like the Niners at all in this game, how do you not put a little on that?? CMC is at +350. |
ActionMagnet | 6 |
|
|
replied to
49ers considering benching star defensive lineman for the Super Bowl due to lack of effort
in NFL Betting Wow. That is crazy. He's gotta go, immediately. |
begginerboy | 41 |
|
|
@Europa I did not know this...when the refs miss a call like that, they fine the player, not the ref!!! Bahahahahahaha!!!! That's effing funny.. "Five days after the game, the NFL fined Robey-Coleman $26,739 for the play. A fine issued on a play where no penalty was called is the League's informal post hoc penalty for plays that likely should have been flagged. The fine was an admission that not only was the play a defensive pass interference violation, but it also should have been called a personal foul for an illegal hit on a defenseless receiver." |
Interstellar | 26 |
|
|
What's the likelihood that the Niners will completely implode with a doofus coach and an emotionally unstable QB? |
weathersharp | 10 |
|
|
Rush yards per attempt: Mia 1st KC 13th
Rush yards per game: Mia 6th KC 19th
There's no mystery who runs the ball better |
rosswin97 | 41 |
|
|
existential philosophy tells us that humans have a hard time taking responsibility and accountability for our own actions in a chaotic and absurd world. we therefore have to make up stories to make ourselves feel better and make sense of anything. our deepest held truths are in made up, fictitious stories. my fantasy team scored a historic league low 40 points one week this year. next week, it scored 140 points. therefore, my fantasy league is scripted. it's so obvious there's some secret presence hiding in the clouds controlling everything!!! bahahahahahaha!!! |
WesJ | 108 |
|
|
Sides: 42-37-6 (53%) UDMLP: (-5.5u)
2022 reg season sides: 40-29-3 (58%) 2021 reg season sides: 45-30-1 (60%)
Pit @ Bal (+4) This exact scenario occurred in 2019. Lamar’s MVP year. Bal locked in #1 seed, rested a lot of players (including Lamar). Pit came to Bal as -2 faves. Bal won 28-10. This line would be fishy if it stayed at +4, but I see it’s coming down since last night. Hou @ Ind (+1.5) Lotsa love, lotsa bets, lotsa money on the division road favorite here. You know what that means.
Atl (+3) @ NO Cle @ Cin (-7) Jax @ Ten (+4) TB @ Car (+4.5) KC @ LAC (-3.5)
UDMLP 3 Team RR: Bal, Atl, Chi, Ten, Car (1u)
|
YouWish | 2 |
|
|
Sides: 40-36-6 UDMLP: (-4.5u)
Mia (+3.5) @ Bal LAR @ NYG (+6) AZ (+13) @ Phi
UDMLP 3 Team RR: Mia, Car, NYG, AZ, NO
|
YouWish | 1 |
|
|
replied to
Yes, the ref messed up, but the Lions tried to be too tricky on that one..
in NFL Betting it sure looks like the official is looking over at #70 running up the whole time, and ignoring Decker and the other guy who are right in front of him.. |
YouWish | 7 |
|
|
@brn2loslive2win I think the official is actually looking at 70 the whole time, as he runs up. The official appears to be ignoring the two guys right in front of him. Which would explain why he'd run over to the defense with 70 in his mind, even though it was Decker who was actually reporting. |
HockeyNight11 | 48 |
|
|
replied to
Yes, the ref messed up, but the Lions tried to be too tricky on that one..
in NFL Betting not Decker and Goff, but Decker and someone, Sewell, probably...walk up to the official. Which raises the same question. Why are three guys walking up to the official, when one guy is reporting as eligible? this "reporting eligible" happens hundreds of times every season, I'd guess. so it's not surprising that the official would look at three numbers as one guy is reporting, then run over to the defense, and brain fart the number wrong.. |
YouWish | 7 |
|
|
created a topic
Yes, the ref messed up, but the Lions tried to be too tricky on that one..
in NFL Betting Decker and Goff clearly walk up to the official to report. But why is #70 running out there to also talk to the refs, when he lined up on the right side, inside Sewell, the right tackle?? There'd be no reason for him to talk to the official, except to try to trick the Cowboys. #70 had allegedly reported eligible a couple times during the game already, so this makes perfect sense, to set up the trick. Obviously the ref messed up. But the Lions didn't help by setting it all up like that. I'm no coach, so I'd like anyone to answer this: why did #70 run up to the official, instead of just running into the huddle? The official was obviously looking over at #70 instead of looking at Decker as they talked to him. |
YouWish | 7 |
|
|
Cle (-2.5 -118) @ Hou Sea @ Ten (+3) Det @ Min (+3) Bal (+6) @ SF
|
YouWish | 2 |
|
|
Sides: 37-35-5 UDMLP: (-3.5u)
Cin @ Pit (+2.5) missed the better line. don't think it matters here.
UDMLP: Pit, Ten, Car, Min, Bal (1u) |
YouWish | 2 |
|
|
Sides: 36-32-4 UDMLP: (-2.5u)
Pit (+2) @ Ind Atl @ Car (+3) Chi (+3) @ Cle Hou @ Ten (-2.5 -120) NYG (+6) @ NO
UDMLP 3 Team RR: Car, Chi, NYG, Was, Jax
|
YouWish | 1 |
|
|
making up stories make us feel better |
Brisker23 | 31 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.