All Forums | Systems & Strategies

NCAA Football -6 game chase 3480-1 since 1980

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 61507
Posts: 307
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 15
Posted: #126
He said "Treat the game as if it never happened" So I would assume the teams like Michigan should have already completed.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2084
Posted: #127

Basically should this be looked at as a teams 1st 6 games (not counting any 1-aa games in their 1st 6) OR the 1st 6 weeks of the season. That might clear up some confusion.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 108
Posted: #128
Anyone know the official answer? that the record of this system is based off of?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 15
Posted: #129

Does anyone know which teams, if any, are left?  I really goofed last week because I was real confused at the ramifications. Thanks

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 104
Posted: #130

Miami(oh) was a game 6 today. The play was under 53. The score at half time was Cinn. 45 - Miami(oh) 3 and no one scored in the second half.  Unbelievable!!  Texas is a game six next week. They are the only team I have left.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 288
Posted: #131
Easy win 

I also only have Texas Longhorn left on the list.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 15
Posted: #132
So just to make sure before I play this next year, we are looking for overs in the first 3 weeks only, disregarding any NL or pushes, then we automatically bet unders on the remaining teams in the next 3 weeks?  For example, if a team went U NL U, the next game we would bet the under?  I screwed up two weeks ago with this.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #133
Playing the first 6 week system discarding any NL games, there are 6 teams still in play.

Texas (6) Under  (last team to play only D-1 opponents)
Iowa St (6) Under
Baylor (6) Under
Rutgers (5) Under
C. Fla (5) Under
Boston C. (5) Under

Please advise if I have overlooked any team. For anyone playing this system since week 1, best of luck. Miami (O) would have made any player age 20 years with their game (6) last week.

GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 15
Posted: #134
Luckydan, are you sure this is the right way to look at it?  It was said that you should look at ONLY the first 6 games of the season and you simply pass up the NL or pushes.  If this was the case, Iowa State would have already been a system loss and all the others except Texas would have been finished.  I think it would make a lot more sense if I was doing this research to simply look at 3 U's followed by 3 O's for every team, but I'm not really sure.  I wish Neilsy would come back to explain it better.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 159
Posted: #135

Quote Originally Posted by Luckydan:

Playing the first 6 week system discarding any NL games, there are 6 teams still in play.

Texas (6) Under  (last team to play only D-1 opponents)
Iowa St (6) Under
Baylor (6) Under
Rutgers (5) Under
C. Fla (5) Under
Boston C. (5) Under

Please advise if I have overlooked any team. For anyone playing this system since week 1, best of luck. Miami (O) would have made any player age 20 years with their game (6) last week.

GL

This looks correct to me using covers data.  We are betting AGAINST the trend UUUOOO and all of the teams have fallen into this pattern so far (not including non division 1 games).  Bet against this trend and take the under.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1080
Posted: #136

Central Florida went over, so this goes to a game (6).

AM I READING THIS RIGHT?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #137
That is correct. Amazing that prior years have had very few game 6's, but this year will have at least 5 and the possibility of 2 more (Rutgers and BC).

GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 159
Posted: #138

Texas,Iowa St.,Boston Col   covers.

Rutgers and C. Flor go to game 6

Baylor is a system loss(2nd sys loss since 1980)

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #139
Oklahoma State lost in 2005.
Saturday 11/26/05 @ Oklahoma L 14-42 Week 13 L 17.5 O 52
Saturday 11/19/05 @ Baylor L 34-44 Week 12 L 3 O 46
Saturday 11/12/05 Texas Tech W 24-17 Week 11 W 23 U 63.5
Saturday 10/29/05 Texas L 28-47 Week 9 W 37 O 59
Saturday 10/22/05 @ Iowa State L 10-37 Week 8 L 13 O 44.5
Saturday 10/15/05 @ Texas A&M L 23-62 Week 7 L 20.5 O 53
Saturday 10/08/05 Missouri L 31-38 Week 6 L 5.5 O 50
Saturday 10/01/05 Colorado L 0-34 Week 5 L 3.5 U 43
Saturday 09/17/05 Arkansas State W 20-10 Week 3 L -24.5 U 48.5
Thursday 09/08/05 @ Florida Atlantic W 23-3 Week 2 W -13.5 U 49
Saturday 09/03/05 Montana State W 15-10 Week 1 N N
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 159
Posted: #140
Luckydan,  does your research only have 3 losses as far as you've gone back. Also when did you start playing this system.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #141
roguewager,

I started in week 2 using only teams with all games vs D-1 opponents. With this system (modified or regular), I would encourage you not to play week one. I did this in the NFL as well. It seems that the first week rarely wins. The juice with a number of games kills you.

Texas under vs Nebraska was the last one standing using teams with only D-1 opponents. Talk about cutting it close. The week before with Miami (O) was even worse. Very lucky.

I randomly researched teams over the past 10 years or so. While I am sure that there are other teams that lost, OSU in 2005 is the only one that I can show. The matter with the non lined games seems to be the biggest obstacle with this system. How to use or not use games with these teams, thus why I looked for a "clean" schedule using only teams that are void of these 1-AA teams. Also, there have been a number of games where 1 point in the total makes a world of difference. A win in week 2 (with a favorable total) beats a loss and having to chase till week 5. This year there have been games that close as well. Shopping lines in totals is as important as anything using this system. UCLA vs SDS is a good example in 2009.

I am looking forward to next year already. While the last two weeks have been stressful (games 5 and 6), this way of using the system eliminates any doubt.

GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 159
Posted: #142
Thanks Luckydan for the info, I'm lookin forward to next year too
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 159
Posted: #143

Quote Originally Posted by roguewager:

Thanks Luckydan for the info, I'm lookin forward to next year too

Luckydan i noticed that you are following this system for NFL (original syst) starting week one. Do you know how many week 4 and 5 chases occurred this year. I think you said the last final team is Min this week betting under( week 6 chase). Thanks

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2001
Posts: 845
Posted: #144
roguewager,

This is a copy of a partial post made in the NFL thread regarding this system. The chase was over pretty quick with the exception of GB and Mn. Mn has been pain to say the least. Hopefully they will finish the system in style this weekend.

GL



The original system starting from week one has two remaining teams: Minnesota and GB. The first week was a nightmare: 8 O, 22 U and 2 Pushes. Week two was 14 O and 10 U=plus approx.7 units. Week three (last week) is where one made the money. 8 O and 2 U : plus approx. 25 units. Chasing the last two teams will take some guts. Laying 10+ units on each team to win one unit each. Tough call. Pray that you win both as week 5 (21 units) and week 6 (45 units) will test any player's makeup. In theory, the system appears to be a good one. The potential of having 2 teams in week six would make it very uncomfortable.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 159
Posted: #145
Quote Originally Posted by roguewager:

Texas,Iowa St.,Boston Col   covers.

Rutgers and C. Flor go to game 6

Baylor is a system loss(2nd sys loss since 1980)

Rutgers and C Flo   LOSE game 6

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 288
Posted: #146
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 1332
Posted: #147
Anyone have a list of teams who ONLY play D1 schools the first 6 weeks of the season?  If I'm reading this correctly....If u obly played those teams last year, Texas was the only one to go to a game 6.

I would like to go this route if anyone had the list?

Thanks!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #148
Came across this thread and figured I'd test it out on paper before putting any money down. Still pending is tonights Ga Tech/Va Tech game. Results for week one are 44 teams went over and are now done, 36 teams went under and go to game 2, while 42 teams either didn't play or played a non Div1 team, thus no line.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #149

After week 2 here are the results:

Week 1: Game 1 - 44 wins, 38 losses, 42 did not play (80 teams left)

Week 2: Game 1 - 20 wins, 20 losses, 2 did not play

Week 2: Game 2 - 12 wins, 12 losses, 14 did not play

Totals - 76 wins, 48 teams remain - 2 still need to play game 1, 34 go to game 2, 12 to game 3.

Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 909
Posted: #150
and the remaining 48 teams are........drum roll.....?
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.