• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | The Archives

    MRBator You might want to read this

    «First Previous 8910 ... 131415 Next Last»
    MrBator
    MortgageMan
    TomCurtisNY
    stuff
    gmitran
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 84286
    Posts: 368
    «First Previous 8910 ... 131415 Next Last»
     
    MrBator
    MrBator
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2004
    Posts: 53262
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:06 AM ET #176

    Quote Originally Posted by greenmon$ter:

    Maybe I am underestimating Tom Brady's will to win, but here's the thing.  I believe the guy is maniacal about winning, and puts that goal above all else.  But even as driven as he is, I just can't magine that any athlete can maintain the same drive and the same hunger after having achieved so much success.  There may not be much of a dropoff in desire in Brady's case, because he is the consumate team player, but there has to be some. 

    I firmly believe that Peyton Manning's desire to finally get one over on Tom Brady in an AFC title game outweighs Brady's desire to stick it to Manning for a third time.

    not so sure about that one b, try running that by sir charles or the mailman.
    i could easily see the colts pulling the redsox in '04 this year... but i could also easily see them as this decade's equivalent to the buffalo bills of the early 90's...





    greenmon$ter,

    Charles Barkley and Karl Malone were great, but they weren't better than Michael Jordan.  He had the sickest combination of talent and desire I've ever seen.  Bastard even scored 38 points on the Jazz in '97 when he was on death's door (Game 5).
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by greenmon$ter:

    Maybe I am underestimating Tom Brady's will to win, but here's the thing.  I believe the guy is maniacal about winning, and puts that goal above all else.  But even as driven as he is, I just can't magine that any athlete can maintain the same drive and the same hunger after having achieved so much success.  There may not be much of a dropoff in desire in Brady's case, because he is the consumate team player, but there has to be some. 

    I firmly believe that Peyton Manning's desire to finally get one over on Tom Brady in an AFC title game outweighs Brady's desire to stick it to Manning for a third time.

    not so sure about that one b, try running that by sir charles or the mailman.
    i could easily see the colts pulling the redsox in '04 this year... but i could also easily see them as this decade's equivalent to the buffalo bills of the early 90's...





    greenmon$ter,

    Charles Barkley and Karl Malone were great, but they weren't better than Michael Jordan.  He had the sickest combination of talent and desire I've ever seen.  Bastard even scored 38 points on the Jazz in '97 when he was on death's door (Game 5).
     
    MortgageMan
    MortgageMan
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 333
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:22 AM ET #177

    Mr Bator said:
     
    Maybe I am underestimating Tom Brady's will to win, but here's the thing.  I believe the guy is maniacal about winning, and puts that goal above all else.  But even as driven as he is, I just can't magine that any athlete can maintain the same drive and the same hunger after having achieved so much success.  There may not be much of a dropoff in desire in Brady's case, because he is the consumate team player, but there has to be some. 
     
    I would like to chime in. I am a Steelers fan and I have been saying all year that the Steelers biggest problem was getting that drive back to win another Super Bowl. This was basically the same team from last year yet, they didn't come close to dominating like they did the year before when they went on their end of year run. My contention is that they had achieved their goal and it became hard to re-establish that same goal because their hunger had been satiated. I do believe that the difference between good and great in pro football hinges on mental preparation and mental hunger (if that is even a proper term). You get your ass beat enough and you will find a way to eventually beat their ass.  An analogy I can site is that my nephew is a national caliber wrestler. He has won some national tournaments and our goal is to continue wrestling him against the best competition. If he can't beat someone now, we continue to wrestle him and eventually he finds a way to beat him. Dungy & Manning have wrestled Bellichek & Brady enough to now know how to pin their asses. This is the Colts biggest game in decades & I don't think they fail in their attempt to beat the Patriots.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Mr Bator said:
     
    Maybe I am underestimating Tom Brady's will to win, but here's the thing.  I believe the guy is maniacal about winning, and puts that goal above all else.  But even as driven as he is, I just can't magine that any athlete can maintain the same drive and the same hunger after having achieved so much success.  There may not be much of a dropoff in desire in Brady's case, because he is the consumate team player, but there has to be some. 
     
    I would like to chime in. I am a Steelers fan and I have been saying all year that the Steelers biggest problem was getting that drive back to win another Super Bowl. This was basically the same team from last year yet, they didn't come close to dominating like they did the year before when they went on their end of year run. My contention is that they had achieved their goal and it became hard to re-establish that same goal because their hunger had been satiated. I do believe that the difference between good and great in pro football hinges on mental preparation and mental hunger (if that is even a proper term). You get your ass beat enough and you will find a way to eventually beat their ass.  An analogy I can site is that my nephew is a national caliber wrestler. He has won some national tournaments and our goal is to continue wrestling him against the best competition. If he can't beat someone now, we continue to wrestle him and eventually he finds a way to beat him. Dungy & Manning have wrestled Bellichek & Brady enough to now know how to pin their asses. This is the Colts biggest game in decades & I don't think they fail in their attempt to beat the Patriots.
     
    TomCurtisNY
    TomCurtisNY
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:32 AM ET #178

    Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:






    If I remember it correctly, the Boston Globe recently ran a story about how their are now just 8 or 9 players left from that first Super Bowl team, not to mention different offensive and defensive coordinators.
     
    Mr. B,
     
    If the Patriots have proved one thing, over and over and over and over again,
    is that the ONLY two guys they cannot do without, is Brady and Belichek.
     
    Last time I looked they were planning on participating Sunday.
     
    I cannot believe the level of disrespect you are giving NE a team with ONE LOSS
    in thirteen post season games or the amount of
    respect you are giving the Colts, a team that has SIX losses in eleven playoff games.
     
    If the Colts had at least won a big game ONCE, than their 5-6 playoff record could somewhat
    be discounted but they have not so it can't.
     
    One of the things I have learned over the years when betting horses is
    that you never ask a horse to do something he has never done before,
    distance, two turns, stepping up in class etc...
     
    While men are men and horses are horses, this rule is also
    applicable in sports betting.
     
    You are asking the Colts to win a championship game
    (something they have never done with Manning)
    asking the Pats to lose a championship game 
    (something they have never done with Brady)
     
    It could happen but not sound logic says it won't
     
     
    I have to admit you have got my competiveness (sp?) roaring
    on my New England pick.
     
    A pick I was just looking at Monday now has turned into somethin like
    a quest
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:






    If I remember it correctly, the Boston Globe recently ran a story about how their are now just 8 or 9 players left from that first Super Bowl team, not to mention different offensive and defensive coordinators.
     
    Mr. B,
     
    If the Patriots have proved one thing, over and over and over and over again,
    is that the ONLY two guys they cannot do without, is Brady and Belichek.
     
    Last time I looked they were planning on participating Sunday.
     
    I cannot believe the level of disrespect you are giving NE a team with ONE LOSS
    in thirteen post season games or the amount of
    respect you are giving the Colts, a team that has SIX losses in eleven playoff games.
     
    If the Colts had at least won a big game ONCE, than their 5-6 playoff record could somewhat
    be discounted but they have not so it can't.
     
    One of the things I have learned over the years when betting horses is
    that you never ask a horse to do something he has never done before,
    distance, two turns, stepping up in class etc...
     
    While men are men and horses are horses, this rule is also
    applicable in sports betting.
     
    You are asking the Colts to win a championship game
    (something they have never done with Manning)
    asking the Pats to lose a championship game 
    (something they have never done with Brady)
     
    It could happen but not sound logic says it won't
     
     
    I have to admit you have got my competiveness (sp?) roaring
    on my New England pick.
     
    A pick I was just looking at Monday now has turned into somethin like
    a quest
     
    TomCurtisNY
    TomCurtisNY
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:33 AM ET #179

    It could happen but not sound logic says it won't (lose the not)
     
    OMG a freudian slip???!!!!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    It could happen but not sound logic says it won't (lose the not)
     
    OMG a freudian slip???!!!!
     
    stuff
    stuff
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 682
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:34 AM ET #180

    Great reading for the football investor,intellectually orgasmic.TomCurtisNY started this informative
    topic about the Colts and Patriots. I would like to ask Tom if at some point can we flip over to the less
    controversial game in Chicago.
                                                              Thanks to all who posted...........
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Great reading for the football investor,intellectually orgasmic.TomCurtisNY started this informative
    topic about the Colts and Patriots. I would like to ask Tom if at some point can we flip over to the less
    controversial game in Chicago.
                                                              Thanks to all who posted...........
     
    gmitran
    gmitran
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 1744
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:39 AM ET #181

    I do agree that SD handed the game to NE.  At the same time, Indy definitely had luck on their side against Bal.  There were 2 plays that Jamal Lewis stuck out his hand at the last sec and tipped the ball ever so slightly that prevented two easy INT by sure-handed Ed Reed.  Once was 20 yds down the field and other on a blitz.  On the blitz, I honestly believe that Reed? had a decent chance of returning it for TD as he was standing couple yds beyond the line of scrimmage and only Indy lineman and Manning were between him and endzone.  Even if Reed didn't return the INT for TD, Bal would have had momentum and Manning .

    And let's not forget McNair threw that INT down in Indy endzone.  Though this was lack of execution vs. bad luck.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I do agree that SD handed the game to NE.  At the same time, Indy definitely had luck on their side against Bal.  There were 2 plays that Jamal Lewis stuck out his hand at the last sec and tipped the ball ever so slightly that prevented two easy INT by sure-handed Ed Reed.  Once was 20 yds down the field and other on a blitz.  On the blitz, I honestly believe that Reed? had a decent chance of returning it for TD as he was standing couple yds beyond the line of scrimmage and only Indy lineman and Manning were between him and endzone.  Even if Reed didn't return the INT for TD, Bal would have had momentum and Manning .

    And let's not forget McNair threw that INT down in Indy endzone.  Though this was lack of execution vs. bad luck.
     
    TomCurtisNY
    TomCurtisNY
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:42 AM ET #182

    Mr. B,
     
    Dungy blinks first...................
     
    "The Colts are taking three days off this week..."
     
    A trip to the SB on the line and this cat takes three days off!
     
    Gee I wonder what Belichek was doing in those 72 hours with his team???
     
    I LOVE it 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Mr. B,
     
    Dungy blinks first...................
     
    "The Colts are taking three days off this week..."
     
    A trip to the SB on the line and this cat takes three days off!
     
    Gee I wonder what Belichek was doing in those 72 hours with his team???
     
    I LOVE it 
     
    gmitran
    gmitran
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 1744
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:43 AM ET #183

    ... Manning would start thinking, "Here we go again" and start second-guessing himself.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    ... Manning would start thinking, "Here we go again" and start second-guessing himself.
     
    TomCurtisNY
    TomCurtisNY
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:49 AM ET #184

    Quote Originally Posted by stuff:

    Great reading for the football investor,intellectually orgasmic.TomCurtisNY started this informative
    topic about the Colts and Patriots. I would like to ask Tom if at some point can we flip over to the less
    controversial game in Chicago.
                                                              Thanks to all who posted...........
     
    Slight lean (and I do mean slight) to the A'ints right now.
     
    NO offense looks too quick for Chi Town's banged up D right now.
     
    I will watching the line moves and the weather very closely, this will probably
    be a gametime decision (which is NEVER a good sign when betting a game)
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by stuff:

    Great reading for the football investor,intellectually orgasmic.TomCurtisNY started this informative
    topic about the Colts and Patriots. I would like to ask Tom if at some point can we flip over to the less
    controversial game in Chicago.
                                                              Thanks to all who posted...........
     
    Slight lean (and I do mean slight) to the A'ints right now.
     
    NO offense looks too quick for Chi Town's banged up D right now.
     
    I will watching the line moves and the weather very closely, this will probably
    be a gametime decision (which is NEVER a good sign when betting a game)
     
    MrBator
    MrBator
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2004
    Posts: 53262
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 10:58 AM ET #185

    I cannot believe the level of disrespect you are giving NE a team with ONE LOSS
    in thirteen post season games or the amount of
    respect you are giving the Colts, a team that has SIX losses in eleven playoff games.
     


    Tom, if you think I regard the Patriots as has beens, far from it, but unfortunately for them, they're in a very tough spot this time.  They can't win this game.  The Colts have unexpectedly lucked into playing for the AFC title at home.  It's about time they got lucky and found themselves in an optimal playoff situation, rather than the usual horrible situations from the past, such as playing in Foxboro, twice, in wintery conditions against much better Patriots teams than this one.

    I respect the Patriots as much as I feel they deserve to be respected.   I almost bet against them in the Wild Card game, but backed off.  I did bet them last week.  But that's as far as it goes for me.  Now they're screwed. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I cannot believe the level of disrespect you are giving NE a team with ONE LOSS
    in thirteen post season games or the amount of
    respect you are giving the Colts, a team that has SIX losses in eleven playoff games.
     


    Tom, if you think I regard the Patriots as has beens, far from it, but unfortunately for them, they're in a very tough spot this time.  They can't win this game.  The Colts have unexpectedly lucked into playing for the AFC title at home.  It's about time they got lucky and found themselves in an optimal playoff situation, rather than the usual horrible situations from the past, such as playing in Foxboro, twice, in wintery conditions against much better Patriots teams than this one.

    I respect the Patriots as much as I feel they deserve to be respected.   I almost bet against them in the Wild Card game, but backed off.  I did bet them last week.  But that's as far as it goes for me.  Now they're screwed. 
     
    TomCurtisNY
    TomCurtisNY
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:02 AM ET #186

    Mr. B,
     
    I hear you but you are giving NE no chance (alright, alright 5%) of
    winning and whether the Pats win or not, past history (and RECENT
    past history, like last week) says they have closer to a 50% of of
    winning not 5%.
     
    P.S. The line of the Colts -3 also says the same thing.
     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Mr. B,
     
    I hear you but you are giving NE no chance (alright, alright 5%) of
    winning and whether the Pats win or not, past history (and RECENT
    past history, like last week) says they have closer to a 50% of of
    winning not 5%.
     
    P.S. The line of the Colts -3 also says the same thing.
     
     
    MrBator
    MrBator
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2004
    Posts: 53262
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:02 AM ET #187

    Quote Originally Posted by TomCurtisNY:

    Mr. B,
     
    Dungy blinks first...................
     
    "The Colts are taking three days off this week..."
     
    A trip to the SB on the line and this cat takes three days off!
     
    Gee I wonder what Belichek was doing in those 72 hours with his team???
     
    I LOVE it 




    Bill Belichick is no doubt relentlessly preparing his team, and all for naught.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by TomCurtisNY:

    Mr. B,
     
    Dungy blinks first...................
     
    "The Colts are taking three days off this week..."
     
    A trip to the SB on the line and this cat takes three days off!
     
    Gee I wonder what Belichek was doing in those 72 hours with his team???
     
    I LOVE it 




    Bill Belichick is no doubt relentlessly preparing his team, and all for naught.
     
    TomCurtisNY
    TomCurtisNY
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:06 AM ET #188

    I'm sorry I do not undertand francais.
     
    Does naught mean three Super Bowl rings?
     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm sorry I do not undertand francais.
     
    Does naught mean three Super Bowl rings?
     
     
    MrBator
    MrBator
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2004
    Posts: 53262
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:07 AM ET #189

    Quote Originally Posted by TomCurtisNY:

    Mr. B,
     
    I hear you but you are giving NE no chance (alright, alright 5%) of
    winning and whether the Pats win or not, past history (and RECENT
    past history, like last week) says they have closer to a 50% of of
    winning not 5%.
     
    P.S. The line of the Colts -3 also says the same thing.
     




    You're right, I give the Patriots a 5% chance of winning this game.  I can't even give them a 10% chance.  That feels like too much.

    And the line on this game is wrong.  The Colts should be -3 on a neutral field.  Here they should be -6 (and silly me would make them -7).
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by TomCurtisNY:

    Mr. B,
     
    I hear you but you are giving NE no chance (alright, alright 5%) of
    winning and whether the Pats win or not, past history (and RECENT
    past history, like last week) says they have closer to a 50% of of
    winning not 5%.
     
    P.S. The line of the Colts -3 also says the same thing.
     




    You're right, I give the Patriots a 5% chance of winning this game.  I can't even give them a 10% chance.  That feels like too much.

    And the line on this game is wrong.  The Colts should be -3 on a neutral field.  Here they should be -6 (and silly me would make them -7).
     
    TomCurtisNY
    TomCurtisNY
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:14 AM ET #190

    Mr. B,
     
    I was just thinking .........(do you smell the smoke?)
     
    "Me, a long haired haired leaping unknown" who has never won anything
    going against a proven champion, head to head.
     
    Sound familiar?
     
    Ironic...isn't it?
     
    P.S. Five bonus points to anyone who names the song the quoted line is from
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Mr. B,
     
    I was just thinking .........(do you smell the smoke?)
     
    "Me, a long haired haired leaping unknown" who has never won anything
    going against a proven champion, head to head.
     
    Sound familiar?
     
    Ironic...isn't it?
     
    P.S. Five bonus points to anyone who names the song the quoted line is from
     
    SteelCash
    SteelCash
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 5605
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:16 AM ET #191

    Taking a stab... Signs by Tesla
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Taking a stab... Signs by Tesla
     
    TomCurtisNY
    TomCurtisNY
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:18 AM ET #192

    Steel,
     
    Almost! 
     
    You just missed by thirty years or so 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Steel,
     
    Almost! 
     
    You just missed by thirty years or so 
     
    SteelCash
    SteelCash
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 5605
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:21 AM ET #193

    I'm thinking of teasing and getting NO +8-1/2 and the O37 in that game.  I think it's a real good bet... any thoughts?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm thinking of teasing and getting NO +8-1/2 and the O37 in that game.  I think it's a real good bet... any thoughts?
     
    SteelCash
    SteelCash
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 5605
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:22 AM ET #194

    Nevermind... This thread is all about NE/Ind.  I'll post a new thread.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nevermind... This thread is all about NE/Ind.  I'll post a new thread.
     
    SteelCash
    SteelCash
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 5605
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:26 AM ET #195

    I figured as much... one more guess... Led Zepplin
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I figured as much... one more guess... Led Zepplin
     
    TomCurtisNY
    TomCurtisNY
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:27 AM ET #196

    Nope...try this one who did the original version of "Signs"?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nope...try this one who did the original version of "Signs"?
     
    stuff
    stuff
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 682
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:27 AM ET #197

    TomCurtisNY        A couple of weeks ago the Dallas/Seattle game was an all time low for
                                     pro football viewing. Dallas had 326 yds total rushing to Seattle's 235.
                                      Seattle playing terrible wins the game as you know and the next week plays
                                      Chicago down to overtime. Rex threw the ball better than usual but this is because
                                      Seattle is playing so poor. I really think Chicago peaked probably a month or
                                      two ago when Tommie Harris and Mike Brown were healthy. Bush , Mcalister
                                      Drew  Brees and Sean Payton will have an easier time with Chicago than they had
                                        with Philly. I know the Saints have little playoff experience, but I'm happy that the game is
                                      Chicago and I like the fact that the Saints are the Dog. This isn't quite like Boise St.
                                        and Oklahoma but its pretty good. Love to get pts. also.
                                                                                                                       
                                                                   
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    TomCurtisNY        A couple of weeks ago the Dallas/Seattle game was an all time low for
                                     pro football viewing. Dallas had 326 yds total rushing to Seattle's 235.
                                      Seattle playing terrible wins the game as you know and the next week plays
                                      Chicago down to overtime. Rex threw the ball better than usual but this is because
                                      Seattle is playing so poor. I really think Chicago peaked probably a month or
                                      two ago when Tommie Harris and Mike Brown were healthy. Bush , Mcalister
                                      Drew  Brees and Sean Payton will have an easier time with Chicago than they had
                                        with Philly. I know the Saints have little playoff experience, but I'm happy that the game is
                                      Chicago and I like the fact that the Saints are the Dog. This isn't quite like Boise St.
                                        and Oklahoma but its pretty good. Love to get pts. also.
                                                                                                                       
                                                                   
     
    SteelCash
    SteelCash
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 5605
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 11:50 AM ET #198

    Five Man Electrical Band in '72.  I think it was '72...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Five Man Electrical Band in '72.  I think it was '72...
     
    STEELERS in 07
    STEELERS in 07
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2006
    Posts: 3425
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 12:18 PM ET #199

    Mr. B,
     
    in taking the small play on Balt ML.  Are you saying that you thought Balt had a better chance than N.E. does?  You could have just made the small Balt ML play for some action,  but if you liked Balt to beat Indy SU than what makes you like Indy so much this week (100,000) against a N.E. team that is far and away a better team (QB and coaching maybe not Defense) than Balt?  Or does the homefield advantage of Indy and the magnitude of this game play more into your decision than I can tell?
     
     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Mr. B,
     
    in taking the small play on Balt ML.  Are you saying that you thought Balt had a better chance than N.E. does?  You could have just made the small Balt ML play for some action,  but if you liked Balt to beat Indy SU than what makes you like Indy so much this week (100,000) against a N.E. team that is far and away a better team (QB and coaching maybe not Defense) than Balt?  Or does the homefield advantage of Indy and the magnitude of this game play more into your decision than I can tell?
     
     
     
     
    papageorgio
    papageorgio
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2003
    Posts: 7035
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2007 - 5:53 PM ET #200

    Quote Originally Posted by TomCurtisNY:

     
    Papa,
     
    Wouldn't have Peyton been chomping at the bit last week also?
     
    His QB rating was 36.9.
     
    P.S. I am not sure I would call a three time champion "scrappy"
     
    Try "dominant"
     
    well mr.bator's  answer to what i meant by scrappy is exactly what i meant by it. the few guys left make them scrappy not dominate now.  They were dominate back then.
     
    as for mannings Qb rating he was on the road and had a bad game, but baltimores defense is arguably the best in the league. actaully ratings wise they are the best in the league.
     
    hell baltimore lead the league in interceptions and was 1 sack behind SD that defense can shut down any quarterback.
     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by TomCurtisNY:

     
    Papa,
     
    Wouldn't have Peyton been chomping at the bit last week also?
     
    His QB rating was 36.9.
     
    P.S. I am not sure I would call a three time champion "scrappy"
     
    Try "dominant"
     
    well mr.bator's  answer to what i meant by scrappy is exactly what i meant by it. the few guys left make them scrappy not dominate now.  They were dominate back then.
     
    as for mannings Qb rating he was on the road and had a bad game, but baltimores defense is arguably the best in the league. actaully ratings wise they are the best in the league.
     
    hell baltimore lead the league in interceptions and was 1 sack behind SD that defense can shut down any quarterback.
     
    All Forums | The Archives
    «First Previous 8910 ... 131415 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,893 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,921 Covers arrow
    • Friday 09/18/2026 726 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 189 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,810 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 5,281 Covers arrow
    • DET/BILLS live in game comments welcome 707 Covers arrow
    • Dumb Political Statements 12,953 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 1,291 Covers arrow
    • Week Two-Post Plays Here 568 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.