Hoping to cement some 3 out of 4 here with both 'flights' on the Exotics:
Tuesday Exotic play > HALFU each > 5 pt teaser:
FLIGHT A. OVER Tarleton 130 with OVER A.Peay 127.5 with :
FLIGHT B.UNDER SEATTLE 142.5 with OVER A. Peay 127.5 with:
1. Princeton Over 129.5
2. Baylor/Oreg St Over 135.5
3. UC River -Mont St. Under 137
4. Harvard- Colgate Under 142 NO!
If you peered in my thread yesterday....that was Jekyll, TODAY was Hyde ....WOW! Completely wrong and 2-3 games went completely opposite trends. It happens
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Hoping to cement some 3 out of 4 here with both 'flights' on the Exotics:
Tuesday Exotic play > HALFU each > 5 pt teaser:
FLIGHT A. OVER Tarleton 130 with OVER A.Peay 127.5 with :
FLIGHT B.UNDER SEATTLE 142.5 with OVER A. Peay 127.5 with:
1. Princeton Over 129.5
2. Baylor/Oreg St Over 135.5
3. UC River -Mont St. Under 137
4. Harvard- Colgate Under 142 NO!
If you peered in my thread yesterday....that was Jekyll, TODAY was Hyde ....WOW! Completely wrong and 2-3 games went completely opposite trends. It happens
-using my mismatch hat on this one..... LOYCH is not good defending 3 pt and rebounding.....not a good combo to have when B.C. is a decent 3 pt shooting team and offensive rebounder
1. VCU Under 131.5 (0-4 UNDER)
2. Iowa/Okie OVER 157.5 (both tend to go OV) ....both like uptempo offense with lots of scoring
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Parlays Half U each - Boston College -3 with:
-using my mismatch hat on this one..... LOYCH is not good defending 3 pt and rebounding.....not a good combo to have when B.C. is a decent 3 pt shooting team and offensive rebounder
1. VCU Under 131.5 (0-4 UNDER)
2. Iowa/Okie OVER 157.5 (both tend to go OV) ....both like uptempo offense with lots of scoring
Play #5 November - Penn St /Butler Under 147.5 x 2 U
-Penn St an UNDER team exclusively, had their first Over game and did not win vs an OVER team and so, I suspect the coach will remind them to play their style of gritty defense and now they play a team that has excellent defensive stats. This will likely be a half court battle and unlikely to crack 142 pts
-Butler is in top 100 vs FG and 3pt
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Play #5 November - Penn St /Butler Under 147.5 x 2 U
-Penn St an UNDER team exclusively, had their first Over game and did not win vs an OVER team and so, I suspect the coach will remind them to play their style of gritty defense and now they play a team that has excellent defensive stats. This will likely be a half court battle and unlikely to crack 142 pts
Play #5 November - Penn St /Butler Under 147.5 x 2 U -Penn St an UNDER team exclusively, had their first Over game and did not win vs an OVER team and so, I suspect the coach will remind them to play their style of gritty defense and now they play a team that has excellent defensive stats. This will likely be a half court battle and unlikely to crack 142 pts -Butler is in top 100 vs FG and 3pt
Its not working.... need to watch and gather more data maybe. Not a coinflip bettor. I need an edge
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst:
Play #5 November - Penn St /Butler Under 147.5 x 2 U -Penn St an UNDER team exclusively, had their first Over game and did not win vs an OVER team and so, I suspect the coach will remind them to play their style of gritty defense and now they play a team that has excellent defensive stats. This will likely be a half court battle and unlikely to crack 142 pts -Butler is in top 100 vs FG and 3pt
Its not working.... need to watch and gather more data maybe. Not a coinflip bettor. I need an edge
Back in the saddle today and think I have a couple of strong ones:
Play #1 today = Army Under 132.5 x 2U
- I simulate this one, based on their stats and competition so far.....to come up with one team at 65 - 68 points MAYBE ...which to me implies the other team should score less than 65 so we definitely sail UNDER this total
- my simulations have been good but just not posting plays until I have more confidence and today I do....be cautious here though
Friend play who is killing it on his total suggestions..... 20 - 5 recently in all sports
His suggestion: OVER Harvard last night and with the total I see and what I simulate, Harvard alone should score well over 80 if they shoot the ball like they have been....and early in the shot clock...hitting 3 pters when I follow the game flow
Play #2 today - Harvard OVER 143.5 x 1U
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Back in the saddle today and think I have a couple of strong ones:
Play #1 today = Army Under 132.5 x 2U
- I simulate this one, based on their stats and competition so far.....to come up with one team at 65 - 68 points MAYBE ...which to me implies the other team should score less than 65 so we definitely sail UNDER this total
- my simulations have been good but just not posting plays until I have more confidence and today I do....be cautious here though
Friend play who is killing it on his total suggestions..... 20 - 5 recently in all sports
His suggestion: OVER Harvard last night and with the total I see and what I simulate, Harvard alone should score well over 80 if they shoot the ball like they have been....and early in the shot clock...hitting 3 pters when I follow the game flow
Thanks Fuse.... I need some in-game love for my totals but the social love is equally important
Play #3 today I am mulling ...... Mass Lowell -15.5 parlay with UNDER 149.5 ....total is too high for a team that has one of the best defensive stats in all of NCAAB and they gained it playing decent teams
-made lots of cash following this team all ready so what the hell.....making it official for x HALF U
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Fuse:
GL today thirst
Thanks Fuse.... I need some in-game love for my totals but the social love is equally important
Play #3 today I am mulling ...... Mass Lowell -15.5 parlay with UNDER 149.5 ....total is too high for a team that has one of the best defensive stats in all of NCAAB and they gained it playing decent teams
-made lots of cash following this team all ready so what the hell.....making it official for x HALF U
Quote Originally Posted by Fuse: GL today thirst Thanks Fuse.... I need some in-game love for my totals but the social love is equally important Play #3 today I am mulling ...... Mass Lowell -15.5 parlay with UNDER 149.5 ....total is too high for a team that has one of the best defensive stats in all of NCAAB and they gained it playing decent teams -made lots of cash following this team all ready so what the hell.....making it official for x HALF U
UMASS Lowell has to play some defense next half and keep them under 24 pts....would take a 41 - 23 >> 2nd half score
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Last2thirst:
Quote Originally Posted by Fuse: GL today thirst Thanks Fuse.... I need some in-game love for my totals but the social love is equally important Play #3 today I am mulling ...... Mass Lowell -15.5 parlay with UNDER 149.5 ....total is too high for a team that has one of the best defensive stats in all of NCAAB and they gained it playing decent teams -made lots of cash following this team all ready so what the hell.....making it official for x HALF U
UMASS Lowell has to play some defense next half and keep them under 24 pts....would take a 41 - 23 >> 2nd half score
Decembers PLAYS.....starting. Non -conference is transitioning to Conference play soon!
PLAY #1 - South Dakota St JackRabbits -4.5/-5 x 1U @ Towson (might buy the -5 or take -4.5 for -125)
-Towson is a defensive UNDER team but strangely, when you look at their stats, their ranks are not the greatest in FG% or 3 pt and facing a SouDST team that has played some strong teams and can put the ball in the hoop
-was looking at this game as an UNDER but see better value at -4.5 OR to use as a parlay key
-I see the Total dropping from 131.5 to 129.5 but think I like the OVER on that total....so which one is safer way to go here for a UNIT win? The way I am going in my opinion!
Play #2/3 - double play but place them separately > Arkansas Little Rock -1.5 x1 U and Over 158.5 x 1U
-believe I can get both
-was looking at this one hard for an OVER and also like the home ATS line given the fact that Arkansas St. is not as good on the FT line and relies on the 3 pt a little too much ....but, AKLR can play the same but with better defense and FT and excellent 3pt
-check these OVER totals set on these two plays for verification, AKLR can score !
Nov 17 @ IOWA L 74-88 W 20.5 (U 173.5) Nov 14 ALCN W 100-86 W -10 (O 154.5)
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
Decembers PLAYS.....starting. Non -conference is transitioning to Conference play soon!
PLAY #1 - South Dakota St JackRabbits -4.5/-5 x 1U @ Towson (might buy the -5 or take -4.5 for -125)
-Towson is a defensive UNDER team but strangely, when you look at their stats, their ranks are not the greatest in FG% or 3 pt and facing a SouDST team that has played some strong teams and can put the ball in the hoop
-was looking at this game as an UNDER but see better value at -4.5 OR to use as a parlay key
-I see the Total dropping from 131.5 to 129.5 but think I like the OVER on that total....so which one is safer way to go here for a UNIT win? The way I am going in my opinion!
Play #2/3 - double play but place them separately > Arkansas Little Rock -1.5 x1 U and Over 158.5 x 1U
-believe I can get both
-was looking at this one hard for an OVER and also like the home ATS line given the fact that Arkansas St. is not as good on the FT line and relies on the 3 pt a little too much ....but, AKLR can play the same but with better defense and FT and excellent 3pt
-check these OVER totals set on these two plays for verification, AKLR can score !
Nov 17 @ IOWA L 74-88 W 20.5 (U 173.5) Nov 14 ALCN W 100-86 W -10 (O 154.5)
- just focused on teams with certain Totals tendencies until later in the season when I get my other metrics solidified after 10-15 games, then I will focus about 50-50 on sides vs totals
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
0
2 - 1 Tonight (+1 U)
Season:
7 - 4 ( +4 U)
- just focused on teams with certain Totals tendencies until later in the season when I get my other metrics solidified after 10-15 games, then I will focus about 50-50 on sides vs totals
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.