If Christ died on the cross for all of humanity

QUOTE Originally Posted by Mikniks:
It says to kill people. How is that ok?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On pg. 143 #3564 you made that statement above. Then now you make a statement, "If nobody I cared about died, then it wouldn't bother me one bit. I'd just be annoyed about all the radiation."

Let's analyze these two statements made by you. Because it clearly defines a confused inconsistent person.

In the first statement it signifies a person that is compassionate and doesn't understand why in The Old Testament homosexuality (as well as other sinful acts) were punishable by death and it was not okay and unjustified in your view.

Then in the second statement it signifies a person that just doesn't care about billions upon billions of people getting killed during an all out nuclear World War as long as people that is cared about didn't die.

There is no consistency here. If you cared about just a handful of homosexuals that you didn't know personally then clearly you would overwhelmingly care about billions upon billions of people dying in an unjustified crazy nuclear holocaust of a war.

You would be outraged that such a horrific act could have possibly occurred and done so much damage to humanity.

But I clearly understand why you couldn't say that it would terribly upset you, it would make you sound foolish and inconsistent as to why you would care because to you life is just meaningless.

But to you a homosexuals life isn't meaningless based on you first statement. Regardless though on how you answered the question you would still be looked upon as being a confused inconsistent person...lol

Do you clearly see your inconsistencies?...probably not cause you are blind and confused...lol

QUOTE Originally Posted by Mikniks:
It says to kill people. How is that ok?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On pg. 143 #3564 you made that statement above. Then now you make a statement, "If nobody I cared about died, then it wouldn't bother me one bit. I'd just be annoyed about all the radiation."

Let's analyze these two statements made by you. Because it clearly defines a confused inconsistent person.

In the first statement it signifies a person that is compassionate and doesn't understand why in The Old Testament homosexuality (as well as other sinful acts) were punishable by death and it was not okay and unjustified in your view.

Then in the second statement it signifies a person that just doesn't care about billions upon billions of people getting killed during an all out nuclear World War as long as people that is cared about didn't die.

There is no consistency here. If you cared about just a handful of homosexuals that you didn't know personally then clearly you would overwhelmingly care about billions upon billions of people dying in an unjustified crazy nuclear holocaust of a war.

You would be outraged that such a horrific act could have possibly occurred and done so much damage to humanity.

But I clearly understand why you couldn't say that it would terribly upset you, it would make you sound foolish and inconsistent as to why you would care because to you life is just meaningless.

But to you a homosexuals life isn't meaningless based on you first statement. Regardless though on how you answered the question you would still be looked upon as being a confused inconsistent person...lol

Do you clearly see your inconsistencies?...probably not cause you are blind and confused...lol