If Christ died on the cross for all of humanity

LOLOL, i dont know what it means. I have explained over 15000 times , just like everything else, you dodge and duck out of the way.

This is the atheists problem and how they equivocate.

If i asked someone to give me the definition of time in a philospohy exam, and they answer me with, "it is a magazine"......That is an equivocation, a deliberate misuse of words.  

2) I had you read the definition of "confirmation bias" because you CONSTANTLY reference the ONE argument you think you have that "renders atheism false." As a side note, I love that you said god either definitely exists or maybe exists. It's impossible for him not to exist, so it's interesting that you include "maybe" as a choice when you eliminated "no." Anyways, you like to hang on to the one crumb of "evidence" you deem worthy of discussion and you say nobody "refutes" it. A) None of us (including you, clearly) are astrophysicists, so to attempt to discuss something above our heads and WAY above yours would be a travesty. B) You apparently haven't checked up on science lately, as there is a belief gaining popularity that we actually live in one of multiple universes, now collectively called a "multiverse." C) You seem to love your one (outdated) claim, but you tend to ignore other things that might put a huge dent in your argument. For instance, now that we know now that the Earth supports approximately 1.7 species of animal. Noah must've built a pretty big fuckin boat, lemme tell ya. This, my friend, is confirmation bias.

I am not going to repeat it again, i have repeated this over thousands of times, the nature of your response indicates it has hit a raw nerve,,,,,

3) You think that without Christianity or "God," there'd be no such thing as morality. You think that by not killing others, not stealing, et cetera, we have a great moral code. This is only a moral code because we are self-aware. If I said to you, "Wow, these ants are good people because they share everything and work hard and don't kill each other," you'd say (with more spelling errors) "That's ridiculous. Ants don't know what they're doing, they just do it to help keep the species alive." Interesting that you'd say that more-well-spoken-version-of-Rostos, because that's another way of viewing morality. Maybe morality EVOLVED because we collectively realize that killing each other and stealing and raping and doing other "bad" things would not promote the betterment and life of the species. It could be argued that morality is simply a higher form of self-preservation. You say things like "good" and "evil" as if there's always a clear cut way to determine one from the other. Is murder good? What about murdering a dictator seconds before he sets off a nuclear bomb? "Nothing in the world is 'good' or 'bad'... thinking only makes it so."

Nope, i said there is an absence of absolute morals....Read properly.

4) Why would nonbelievers want to convince believers? If you thought your dad was going crazy and about to join a cult that sapped him of his money, time, and general life blood, you'd try to stop him as well, no? Why do I want to see my fellow man dedicate his life to a fairy tale world that condones corruption and prejudice? Why would I not my fellow man to be rational, logical, reasonable? If I saw a man about to cross the street he BELIEVED to be safe, and I had good reason to think a car would come and strike him down, should I not stop him because it's his right to believe? If it's really important to you to painted onto the hood of a car, be my guest Rostos. Be my guest

You still havent answered my question, ....

This is the end of the Thread!!!!

next thread will be about....

sports+220

Chicks +300

Dream Cars +25000000 (only site on the web where people dont want to talk cars)

oh, i almost forgot....

religion -15000