Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@undermysac @cubd80 Good observations in the last 4 games Bears D has allowed avg 24.5 ppg in the previous 12 games including last season, they allowed 16.3 ppg |
usikbasterd | 35 |
|
|
replied to
Justliketoplay 4-0 posted and this pick is a tall order in more ways than one
in NFL Betting Tommy D has attempted 178 passes and been sacked 37 times. That’s 1 in every 5 dropbacks. Those are historically bad numbers. I looked at DK and the only sack props I could get was Lavonte David Over 0.25 sacks +260. (He has 3 sacks this season). The only other offer was Will TBY record a Sack? NO +1600 no YES offered……lol
GL with the G-men
|
justliketoplay | 29 |
|
|
@undermysac Nice analysis I also wonder if the team is close to quitting on the HC. They got the OC fired, I’m pretty sure they’d like to see the whole coaching staff gone. They’re ruining the QB, and the offense is pathetic for the amount of talent they possess at skill positions. in the last 3 games the Bears rank #31 with 151 pass yards per game, and are dead last scoring about 10 pts per game. Also in the last 3 games Vikes allowed 52 rush yards/game, bears allow 154 rush yds/game. Vikes have won last 3 meetings in Chicago and could easily win this game by DD. One thing I don’t like, this is their 3rd straight road game, and 4th in 5 games. Still, I think they win by at least a TD BOL
|
undermysac | 39 |
|
|
@NONEED4LUCK Nice writeup, I agree with most of it, but I disagree with characterizing this as a MUST WIN game for the Steelers. IMO the only “must win” games are the ones that eliminate you from the playoffs, or qualifying for the playoffs. as for the Browns……this is a classic high/low play, a Steelers team coming off a big win traveling to a division rival who got crushed in the last couple of games, on a short week, and giving points in a location where they’ve lost the last couple of meetings. If I’m laying points with a division rival as a visitor, I like to see that they’ve won in that stadium at least once in the last 2 years. I don’t like this game much, so I’m gonna give it a miss, but I lean to Browns
GL |
Interstellar | 18 |
|
|
This season teams are 3-7 ATS in their next game after playing the Ravens |
begginerboy | 22 |
|
|
I think Hawks got their mojo back with a big win @SFO and they’ll end their home losing streak by beating the Cards |
begginerboy | 31 |
|
|
@dogball BOL |
Biscuit | 7 |
|
|
@Taipei-Tony
re Packers game, not sure I like either side, but I took Bears TT Over 17’ +105
Yeah I’m not a Mac Jones believer but he is capable of having a decent game and keeping the Jags within 2 TDs. He DID win vs the Bills last year. Mostly I think the Lions might be flat in this spot.
Seahawks coming off a bye week, but it was a bye-bye week for their center Connor Williams who just said I’m outta here, and retired at age 27. Their O-line was already pretty shaky, now they have Oluwatimi to take his place, drafted last year in the 5th round, and doesn’t have much experience. Don’t love either side, but at least the 49ers are good teaser material, I think.
I like McCaffey Over 122’ rush + rec yds. In 5 games vs Hawks he’s averaged 167 yds from scrimmage. GL |
Biscuit | 7 |
|
|
@Fuse |
Biscuit | 7 |
|
|
Lions hangover updated record
1-6 SU 0-7 ATS
Rams +1 lose to Cards 41-10 Bucs -6 lose to Broncos 26-7 Cards -3’ lose to Commandos 42-14 Seahawks -7 lose to Giants 29-20 Cowboys +5’ lose to 49ers 30-24 (after bye) Vikes -3 lose to Rams 30-20 Titans -3’ vs Patriots win 20-17 Packers -5’ at Bears ??? (after bye) Texans -7’ at Cowboys ???
Whatever the negative impact of playing the Lions may have on a team, it’s certainly less of an issue after two weeks, so other factors would seem to take precedence in the Packers game. While they’ve dominated Chicago in recent years, the Bears may rally behind their new offensive play caller to get the win, or at least the cover. Just as the Saints with a new HC beat the Falcons last weekend, the Bears with a new OC may exceed expectations in this game. My initial reaction was to side with the packers, but in the past couple of days I’m thinking bears might be the play here.
Will the Texans have a letdown after snatching defeat from the jaws of victory vs the Lions? After getting blown out in their last 2 home games, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Cowboys keep this one close.
Will the Lions hangover affect the Lions this week? In the past 2 weeks they’ve played games requiring high intensity vs the rival Packers, then they spent a lot of energy to overcome a 16 point deficit at the Texans. They might be a bit flat here vs the Jags, who are 2-8 but are still playing hard for their HC, and have won last 4 ATS.
Not sure I can say the same for the Raiders. I’m suspicious of teams who play lackluster defense. They held the Ravens to 23 points in Baltimore but since then have allowed an average of 31 pts in their last 5 games. Maybe they’ll give a better effort after their bye week, but the Fins TT Over still seems like the best option in this matchup.
49ers have beaten the Hawks last 6 meetings, out scoring them 184-96. Seattle is coming off of a bye, which gave them a chance to make adjustments going forward. I think they will have QB Smith taking more snaps under center, and try to put more emphasis on the running attack. I like Kenneth Walker Over 13’ rush attempts -115 in this game.
Not sure what to think about KC @Bills. I lean to the Bills here, but Chiefs have won 15 straight, and it’s best to bet into a streak, not against it. Chiefs have held opponents under 28 points in their last 30 games, so this could be a close, low scoring game
Any thoughts welcome |
Biscuit | 7 |
|
|
Eagles D allowing 13 pts/game last 5 allowing 213 yds/game last 3 lean to birds tonight |
Interstellar | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
Quote Originally Posted by tboyyyy47: Can you imagine how bad and irrelevant Patrick Mahomes would be right now if he got drafted to the Bears instead of Trubisky? It all starts with the ownership, the front office, etc... and CHI doesn't have it. And then you have to put the right people in place (GM, coaches) that understand the way to build a football team is from the inside out. Think linemen that can protect the QB. Chicago went about it all the wrong way w/ the sexy WR picks and trades. Who gives a shit if the QB doesn't have the ability/time to make the throws. Contrast this with the LAC. Now, LAC already has their QB, but you didn't see Harbaugh drafting a WR in the first round, even though they had lost considerable depth in the position in the offseason. Harbaugh drafted an offensive lineman. great post, agree 100%
|
tboyyyy47 | 52 |
|
|
Home team + better defense + getting points I got Steelers +3’ -120
GL AM |
ActionMagnet | 14 |
|
|
I like the packers and they are also great teaser material wheel them on teasers with teams like Steelers chiefs 49ers etc
BOL |
Malakismeno1 | 23 |
|
|
Waldron out=rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic theyve got a lot of other problems
So if you think they can get to 7 wins you can get +135 at DK but I’m gonna pass on that and fade them every reasonable chance I get
|
tt_boy | 15 |
|
|
The Geriatric Bowl in a few weeks Rodgers turns 41, Flacco turns 40 |
cd329 | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by rosswin97:
Quote Originally Posted by Dutch1976: What game has the bears played so far this season that would make anyone bet on them tho?carolina and jacksonville Bears are a mediocre organization that can dominate other mediocre organizations teams from time to time, but I’d think twice about backing them vs good organization teams like Steelers 49ers chiefs ravens etc |
crazy1464 | 49 |
|
|
I estimate what the lines will be before I actually look at them. Usually I’m spot on, or within a point, or maybe two. I figured the Steelers would be -2, so getting points seems like a gift BOL Biggs |
biggs33 | 8 |
|
|
He definitely should’ve gone for it no riskit no biskit what happened in OT was entirely predictable |
smellybunty | 30 |
|
|
Putting aide the “rigged” angle, I think you made 2 fundamental errors 1) you violated the “don’t take the worst of it” rule……you could’ve had Lions -2’ before the game started, why would you then lay -13 to the packers in game? In Green Bay? Especially considering that they can rally and close the deficit, since they are like #6 in PPG. The only play worth consideration would’ve been packers +13 in game…..or pass on any in game action 2) this is not the NBA, where a team can be expected to score a certain number of points in a game. In football, if a team scores 20 points in the first half, that doesn’t mean they are on track to score 40 in the full game. They might get shut out in the second half, or maybe only manage 3 more points, or whatever. As it is, they scored pretty close to the expected TT, just under, so it’s not too surprising that the second half scoring didn’t match what they did in the first half. I believe some call this “regression to the mean”
GL with future plays |
nikisongo | 50 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.