Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
he comes off as incompetent. body language, throwing motion. there were plenty of replays where they showed open receivers that he didn't even consider.
|
ActionMagnet | 18 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
the nfl is a matchup league. alex smith lights the patriots up and winston looks like he doesnt belong on the same field. why? because they are almost literal opposites.
winston is just not smart enough as a quarterback to compete with a belichick style defende. |
bpickin | 19 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
im not sold on romo yet. he is a huge upgrade over phil simms; this is indisputable fact.
in romo’s first few weeks i found him to be overly talkative. i think he has minimized this problem. call me crazy, but i like fouts. charles davis is also solid. my personal worst has to be chris spielman. |
Unplug | 10 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
perhaps ward is playing which is why gronk isnt ??
i have the pats and the under too, but i had to make that reference/joke |
Jimkellybeer | 3 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
under is the correct play. david and ward likely out as well, and now a 50% chance of rain.
|
xslim12 | 15 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by TheBankJob007: Hasn't played them yet this season yea you're right, why consider past results at all, unless they occur in the current season.
|
TheBankJob007 | 16 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
whats belichick's record vs tyrod taylor?
|
TheBankJob007 | 16 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
pats cover but this goes under. i see the pats doing their best to keep their defense off the field, which means brady slows things down somewhat, and more running the ball from gillislee and co.
30-20 final.
|
JohnAnthony56 | 2 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
time and place to say it.
|
erratic | 14 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
GB.
|
BettingTheHouze | 3 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moonstormsnow | 12 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by BettingTheHouze: And has any team givikng 5.5 covered this year? OVER looks better the favorite of more than 6 has covered in the last 3 prime time games (gb, sea, and kc) |
josbran | 10 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by GENERALWIZDOM: Fade away bro... you'll be joining the majority of folks takin the points and moneyline lol cant fault you for that lol money is pretty even on this game. and more people are on miami.
|
GENERALWIZDOM | 28 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
this is fade material.
|
GENERALWIZDOM | 28 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PapaShango | 17 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
i think this is quite a solid spot for KC.
i am going with dallas, as i don't see too many other spots to use them in. i have seattle left, but am keeping them as an ace in the hole for possibly week 17. I'm down to actually me and one other guy in my pool, started with 43ish. looking ahead, weeks 13 and 17 look the most difficult, specifically 13. 17 may be easy if a team has something to play for and the other doesn't, but there is a lot of divisional games which can be unpredictable. these are my forecasted picks the rest of the way: 8dal, 9philly, 10arizona, 11 san diego, 12 chi, 13 nyg, 14SF, 15KC 16bal, 17sea. i've used detroit, GB, norleans, indy, NE, ATL, and denver.
|
Blazoo | 31 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by Luvv-to-gamble: I wish someone pointed out to me my squareness when I laying -250 or greater on Oil Can Boyd 25 years ago. It might have stung initially but in time I would've grown to appreciate the wake-up slap in the face. Fixed that for ya :) Yea free bator. His post was nuthin but a constructive criticism. He meant no ill will and did not use offensive language.
|
MrBator | 179 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bator
|
HiHoldem | 22 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by pucku27:
A mets over! You have some stones
|
pucku27 | 25 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fuckin sweet dp
|
cisco | 42 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.