Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
But yeah also...
Browns Bills Bolts
|
DvsRob | 8 |
|
|
Well rested Vikings vs Redskins returning from Seattle. Redskins offense will struggle in this contest imo. Vikings are my favorite pick in the supercontest.
|
DvsRob | 8 |
|
|
Jags roll
|
ROCKON | 12 |
|
|
2001. His first year coaching BG
|
undermysac | 56 |
|
|
I like saints +6. Panthers indicating they would game plan out the Newton runs and that seems to be happening. 6 attempts in the 1st game and 5 in the 2nd for a total of 34 yds. Newton is a subpar passer. If he's not a dual threat, he's not much of a threat. Olsen the security blanket is out. Carolina D has looked great w/ Kuechly back; however, they haven't faced a good offense. FWIW saints were 5-1 ATS outdoors last year. Good luck.
|
hillardoh1 | 9 |
|
|
Lock city!!
Kenpom #13 team vs kenpom #20 team + home floor + only have to lay 5. It's a slam dunk lock!!!!!
|
JamieLanister | 1 |
|
|
Need Big West Specialist ASAP (yesterday)
|
maac_specialist | 137 |
|
|
Their scoring pace increased by 300 percent or so at some point. They only had 12 with 11 minutes to play.
|
concavecapital | 4 |
|
|
But these teams aren't in the MAAC. Why should I trust a foot specialist with my brain surgery, for example?
|
maac_specialist | 34 |
|
|
Seems to be the thing to do. Kenpom #12 team vs #38 team. Maryland AP ranked ahead of Purdue and home court but catching points whaaaaa???. Line says Purdue big time IMO. Maryland has outperformed expectations...but WILL THAT TREND CONTINUE??? That is the question. Almost ready to pull the trigger on Purdue but might wait till tipoff.
|
JamieLanister | 2 |
|
|
replied to
TULANE @ EAST CAROLINA: It's the battle of the bottom feeders and one must rise from the abyss!!!
in College Basketball
I have a fun parlay of Tulane ML, Seton Hall ML and Illinois State ML which is +8400 at Cloudbet. Bol to us. Get em Green Wave
|
scalabrine | 36 |
|
|
San Diego St. is #75 Kenpom + Wyoming is #156 + home court advantage.
The other line is inexplicable from what little information I have about the game. Playing CMU...possible TARP. |
Dsr_9 | 2 |
|
|
what's his face for BYU was upgraded to probable and the line stayed between 4 and 3.5. Large money split on this game according to Vegas Insider...BYU is also top consensus on covers. In conclusion it's a trap. Good luck
|
miggitymiggs420 | 7 |
|
|
It's not ESPN hype, it's football nerd analysis https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef.
Some other stuff-- Carr has never been a 6 point favorite Carr has rarely been a favorite at all but is 3-6 ATS as a favorite, out of 40 total games played |
JamieLanister | 7 |
|
|
The Raiders are a one dimensional team with no defense that benefits from improbable comeback wins. They're the new Colts! Sure, I wish the Texans had a better QB. I keep waiting for the perfect bet to come along but it hasn't shown up yet. GL
|
JamieLanister | 7 |
|
|
3-2
Ravens +7 Ravens have been by far the most dominating team in the NFL against the rush (https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/teamdef). In a match up of best defense vs. best offense, I'll take the defense and the TD, please. The ATS demise of everybody's darling Cowboys is inevitable. Baltimore has a good chance to win the game outright as well IMHO Texans +6 Derek Carr has sure lit up some garbage secondaries but take a look at his numbers against a good pass defense, such as the Chiefs or Broncos. They are very poor. The Texans boast the (FO) 7th best pass defense in the league. By yards alone, they are #3. The Texans rushing attack and pass D should see them through here. Oakland has been a great dog but is this the team you want to be laying 6 points with? They've got a Swiss cheese defense and a QB who is not necessarily up for a real challenge. (Mexico City venue) |
JamieLanister | 7 |
|
|
0-0
Bengals -10: laying 10 points on a 2-4 team? Don't mind if I do. This opponent should reveal the Bengals we were expecting to see this year. They are who we thought they were, hopefully. Browns worst team in NFL. Jets -2: a fade the world play. Game opened at Baltimore -1, Geno Smith in, 80% of $ on Balt and now it's Jets -2. Fishy. Jaguars -1: kind of a Raiders doubter. Jags defense is quietly legit, rated 11th in (weighted) efficiency by Football Outsiders. This is also a fade the world thing. Chiefs -6: feels like a blowout. Saints are #28 in team D (FO) and they are a dome team. Don't think their offense in Arrowhead venue will be as effective as it has been zis season. Chargers +6.5: Seattle hangover since 2013: 2013 - 5/9/1 SU; 2014 - 3/11 SU; 2015 - 6/9 SU and 8/7 ATS; 2016; 1/3 and 1/3 ATS. Also kind of a Falcons doubter. |
JamieLanister | 1 |
|
|
sportsbook.ag has 55% of spread bets on Giants and 70% of ML bets on Rams. Football Outsiders ranks the two teams at 22 (Rams) and 17 (Giants). Action is normal, line is appropriate, game seems awfully difficult to handicap at least from a line reading perspective. The teams that the sports book will be really rooting for are the Jets and the Jaguars, with around 80% of money on their opponents, per sportsbook.ag.
|
meraby | 13 |
|
|
Justise was served!
|
prestige33 | 27 |
|
|
Cardinals - anything under 10 sure looks tasty to me. Vikes offense is horrible. On the other hand, I'm an idiot.
|
Mancity | 39 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.