Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Glad you are back Beware GL my friend as usual !!!!!!!!!!!
|
beware | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by m0rtgageguy: Nice. I go to T.Dot almost every week to visit family, sometimes work and poker. Here is what I do for baseball: Basically study every possible angle minus the umpys. If I get contradicting angles, I leave the game alone. That happens a lot. Usually on a full board I am going to find 3 or 4 totals that I REALLY like. I will make a 3-team parlay as a recreational bet. Sometimes 4 but I am VERY selective when it comes to 4 games and review them to see if there is one I'd like to "fold" out. I also go by certain "rules". Eg: Never touch a Yankees game. Never touch a Cubs game. Never touch a Cards game (for this season of course). Almost always stick to what's been working. Ie: Coors Field games OV, LAD home game UN, especially 10PM EST time. My standard bets for parlays are betweek $150 and $300, maybe more if I had recently won. So far about 100 days in the season, I am up about 5K. Of all the losing days, I cannot remember a day when I lost more than 1 game. 95% of the time I lose the parlay, it is by 1 game. 3/4, 2/3, etc. Yesterday I had one of my worst bad beats ever. Needed LAD Under, Oakland OV, SF UN. SF was 2-0 after 6 and they give up a 4-spot in the 7th with 2 outs. Of ocurse the LA game costed under and the Oakland game errupted. living downtown boys if you want a beer
|
Last2thirst | 34 |
|
|
Wow line still jumping... 83% on Giants but still jumping Hummmmm
|
BayArea342 | 15 |
|
|
Nice to read you everyday !~ BOL
|
pkleves | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by chaimonster: Piggy backing off the RLM question. How do you know if line is moving because of public vs line is moving because of sharp $$$ You know it if 75% of bet are on Team A and line is moving in favor of team B which means 25% of bettor on Team B are laying tremendous amount of $$ |
BricklayerML | 8 |
|
|
same here Tin BOL
|
tinfoils | 17 |
|
|
Bol Mr Sandman ! Nice record !
|
Metallica2467 | 18 |
|
|
Love to fade Reds bullpen this season ! $$$$ every game are the same with them
|
davemsh | 7 |
|
|
as usual MELTDOWn :0 so predictable
|
Loops33 | 2 |
|
|
Nice Input davemsh. Thx for sharing Brother
|
Loops33 | 3 |
|
|
Any chance tonight that Drew Pomeranz and the Padres got that game tonight ?
On terms of Pitching, fielding and batting advantage S.F. But as much as i like Cueto this year i feel tonight Pomeranz might have a chance to do something, he got really good stats at home and during night game..... not sure if i will pull the trigger on the Padres but just some thoughts ..... Feel free to add you POV :) As usual thx to all fellow covers on MLB forum for great picks and write up everyday !
|
Loops33 | 3 |
|
|
Hello fellow Cappers' as usual thx for all the great picks and all the write-up every single day !
the question of the day will be : Fade J. Peavy again ? I know is a gas-can and fade him since game 1 as been really good with $ but can we fade him longer ? Would like to ear from you guys ! Thx in advance. |
Loops33 | 3 |
|
|
BOL brother !
|
beware | 6 |
|
|
Sharp $$ on Houston
|
lvsportpro | 7 |
|
|
73% of ppl are on WSH
|
J_Dash_Score | 6 |
|
|
Go KEY !!!!!!!!!!!!
|
KeyElement | 63 |
|
|
....
|
Loops33 | 1 |
|
|
I know O's as been on fire lately, i know o's are 9-1 at home, i know Gausman is good against CWS, bu Latos lately as been really good rank#2 in MLB....just can't figure why the line is so high.....
Thx in advance for your input
|
Loops33 | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TimeTraveler75: I started posting suspicious lines since 2 days ago only on favorites over -150, to potentially let the backers of the favorite that something seems fishy. Ok so today's fishy line, it's the Kc Royals@ Seattle Mariners The Mariners are currently @ -150 After studying this one for only 5 mins it became super obvious what's going on here, not going into too much, but i'll have a small bet on the Royals spread. The purpose of this thread is only to warn. Appreciate it will check more carefully this one
|
TimeTraveler75 | 17 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TimeTraveler75: I think the odds makers know more then what the sharps know, they might even work together, and yes those numbers are close but not really accurate. Thx for input TimeTraveler.... note that i've never said that the numbers i was providing were accurate or true at a 100%.
|
Loops33 | 11 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.