Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
If I understand this correctly, the Nationals are the only home team here who are a 4th place team which would also correlate to the 0-10 home trend. So of all picks, Reds ml appears to be the best choice? |
Sladerunningfox | 17 |
|
|
Not one other person in this Forum on Red Sox today. GL me I suppose. |
Nuscas | 7 |
|
|
I love a good situational bet, so I'm looking ahead to Tuesday when the Phillies and Mets play - their first games back from London. Generally speaking I'm looking for reasons to fade the Phillies or Cubs based on travel, out of routine and less focus on baseball overall in the past week. If history is any indication on how they'll fare, I will be fading the Phillies specially and ignoring the Mets series (reasoning below). In 2023, the Cubs, who won the first game and then were up 4-0 in the 2nd game and lost, were then swept 0-3 upon returning to home soil. This plays into a similar situation with the Phillies who won the first game this year in London and had an improbable loss in game 2. Both the Cubs and Phillies had won their last game prior to the London series as well. The Phillies will be facing the Boston Red Sox in a 3-ame series which should set up for a home dog in game 1 with Zack Wheeler vs Kutter Crawford and additionally the Red Sox may be without Devers who didn't play last game, providing us with an even better price. Whether Devers plays or not, we'll be getting a great price on Boston ml vs a Phillies team who have been exceptional as of late, but fall into this London return from home trap, but important to note that Boston won their last game without Devers so they know this new lineup can succeed already. And just like Boston who won their last game, so did the 2023 Phillies prior to playing the Cubs upon their return. Also it's likely the Phillies are due for a little regression overall and if they are ever in a position to have a let down game/series on the year, this could be it. I'll be on Boston ml and rl in game 1 and likely the same each game, but also I'll be betting for them to win the series with Pivetta going Wednesday who's been sharp and Tanner Houck on Thursday who's sporting a 1.91 ERA and 0.92 whip including 4 ER total in last 4 starts. Kutter is definitely the worst of the 3 for the series, but again the price we'll get vs Wheeler in this situation will be too good to pass up. |
Nuscas | 7 |
|
|
Possible to post the picks in this thread? A little hard to follow the system with all the conditions it lists. |
sundance | 24 |
|
|
I like the Washington picks. I'll be adding in Verlander fades also. Verlander over 1.5 walks (+100) |
TIPOF-THE-SWORD | 15 |
|
|
On Xander, Brewers and Twins/Tigers Und 7 as well. GL us |
biggiantkiller | 7 |
|
|
Probably 'LeagueCapper' |
BornToDie | 103 |
|
|
I'm headed to Las Vegas in July 2022 for a week and was wondering if there is anyone who has taken advantage of virtually every online/mobile app sportsbook signup bonus available in a single trip or even a local who has exhausted all the bonus offers, and how that went? Any advice or recommendations or other? Thanks! |
Nuscas | 1 |
|
|
I'm headed to Las Vegas in July 2022 for a week and was wondering if there is anyone who has taken advantage of virtually every online/mobile app sportsbook signup bonus available in a single trip or even a local who has exhausted all the bonus offers, and how that went? Any advice or recommendations or other? |
Nuscas | 2 |
|
|
replied to
According to FiveThirtyEight Celtics have the best chance of winning the Finals!
in NBA Betting @begginerboy Was that Boston rating out prior to losing Williams? |
begginerboy | 31 |
|
|
In a nice hole to start off. 2021/22 NBA Season (-$300): 0-3-0; 0% wp; -3 units; avg odds -105; ROI 0% 1/27/2022
|
Nuscas | 4 |
|
|
2021/22 NBA Season: 0-0-0; +/- 0 units; avg odds 100 1/26/2022 |
Nuscas | 4 |
|
|
2021/22 NBA Season: 0-0-0; +/- 0 units; avg odds 100 1/26/2022
|
Nuscas | 4 |
|
|
It's been a while since I posted and I'm looking to get back in the swing of things more so for my own betting accountability than anything else, so here goes. I don't stick to any strict betting unit, but for the sake of tracking I'll use 1 unit per bet and at the same time show how much I'm actually betting. I'll also track my wins-losses-ties and average odds. If there's anything else you'd like to see recorded please let me know. Let's get it!
|
Nuscas | 4 |
|
|
One game too early on the Blazers pick. It's Wednesday against Cavs when they smash. |
StraightWagers | 9 |
|
|
Just seeing this now, I wrote almost the identical analysis for a private betting group of mine. Strange. Glad we cashed it! |
jdukes0004 | 4 |
|
|
@carl42 I'm saying look up his picks history in the Forum which you can see here: https://www.covers.com/forum/profile/leaguecapper |
ColinMac | 78 |
|
|
@gambling-devil 1 week? Are you off your meds? The guy has been in this Forum since 2011 and has crushed it overall throughout the years. You don't have to believe me, look it up for yourself. Also he finished 6-0 week 1 just for the record. |
ColinMac | 78 |
|
|
3-0 start! |
liquidwolf | 10 |
|
|
3-0 start...he's back! |
praisebuddha | 50 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.