GL Scal, still undecided in this one. Tough to go against the Heatles especially with that #1 seed within reach
It is precisely because people feel this way about a spot (uncertain like you) that I do these lengthy write-ups. You are feeling the exact same way now than BEFORE you read it.
Like it or not, the points within heavily bolster the Knicks side and it is not fluff in OP. There really isn't a good argument to lay 10 with the Heat other than "they're hot." How do I know this? No one has one other than a single sentence in support of the Heat.
And That is not a winning mentality. Therefore, the side you should be on is obvious.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Champ_Iz_Here:
GL Scal, still undecided in this one. Tough to go against the Heatles especially with that #1 seed within reach
It is precisely because people feel this way about a spot (uncertain like you) that I do these lengthy write-ups. You are feeling the exact same way now than BEFORE you read it.
Like it or not, the points within heavily bolster the Knicks side and it is not fluff in OP. There really isn't a good argument to lay 10 with the Heat other than "they're hot." How do I know this? No one has one other than a single sentence in support of the Heat.
And That is not a winning mentality. Therefore, the side you should be on is obvious.
my respect for you at all ... and learned something from you concerning the knicks and they can not stop the three-point shots .. I think there will be party-3pointers in the heat ..BOL TODAY
0
my respect for you at all ... and learned something from you concerning the knicks and they can not stop the three-point shots .. I think there will be party-3pointers in the heat ..BOL TODAY
my respect for you at all ... and learned something from you concerning the knicks and they can not stop the three-point shots .. I think there will be party-3pointers in the heat ..BOL TODAY
They will get bombed from 3 as usual, but I see a cover with a truckload of points.
0
Quote Originally Posted by venezolanisimo:
my respect for you at all ... and learned something from you concerning the knicks and they can not stop the three-point shots .. I think there will be party-3pointers in the heat ..BOL TODAY
They will get bombed from 3 as usual, but I see a cover with a truckload of points.
I agree with what you said at some point that 1q or 1h bets are kinda sucker bets, cuz when you lose youll try and double down...but knicks have been covering 1h spreads wayy more than FG spreads. do you think 5 is to low for a half cuz one simple run late in 2nd q and the heat will cover?
0
I agree with what you said at some point that 1q or 1h bets are kinda sucker bets, cuz when you lose youll try and double down...but knicks have been covering 1h spreads wayy more than FG spreads. do you think 5 is to low for a half cuz one simple run late in 2nd q and the heat will cover?
love when people wanna muck up a thread trying to argue and drag up stats from basically completely different teams 6 years ago.
but only wwhen it has opposing information. you didn't mention anything about the guy with the stats supporting the Knicks, despite one of his games being from 2008...
2-3 superstars surrounded by 7-8 joes on a court. That's basketball. doesn't matter if it's 1984 or 2014.
keep banging, Scal.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BaggerVANCE:
love when people wanna muck up a thread trying to argue and drag up stats from basically completely different teams 6 years ago.
but only wwhen it has opposing information. you didn't mention anything about the guy with the stats supporting the Knicks, despite one of his games being from 2008...
2-3 superstars surrounded by 7-8 joes on a court. That's basketball. doesn't matter if it's 1984 or 2014.
Gamblorman. please do not say Durant will overtake lebron. Lebron has been the greatest player in the NBA for a while. The only thing Durant is better at is shooting the 3.. Overall ? Lebron by a mile. Stronger. Faster. Bigger. He makes everyone better around him. Durant doesn't.
0
Gamblorman. please do not say Durant will overtake lebron. Lebron has been the greatest player in the NBA for a while. The only thing Durant is better at is shooting the 3.. Overall ? Lebron by a mile. Stronger. Faster. Bigger. He makes everyone better around him. Durant doesn't.
I ain't gon lie (50-tyson quote), I usually scroll down to see your pick, but this time I actually took the time to read it. I'm not much of a reader, but you're great at write-ups and before you posted this I already had Knicks as a play. This just makes me feel more pleasant about my picks. Sure, no one is right all the time, but your record with the write-ups is outstanding and you bring entertainment here to the threads. Great job bud. Keep it up cause you're one of the reasons why I'm still here after 9 years.
0
I ain't gon lie (50-tyson quote), I usually scroll down to see your pick, but this time I actually took the time to read it. I'm not much of a reader, but you're great at write-ups and before you posted this I already had Knicks as a play. This just makes me feel more pleasant about my picks. Sure, no one is right all the time, but your record with the write-ups is outstanding and you bring entertainment here to the threads. Great job bud. Keep it up cause you're one of the reasons why I'm still here after 9 years.
but only wwhen it has opposing information. you didn't mention anything about the guy with the stats supporting the Knicks, despite one of his games being from 2008...
2-3 superstars surrounded by 7-8 joes on a court. That's basketball. doesn't matter if it's 1984 or 2014.
keep banging, Scal.
Knicks didn't have any stars in 2008-2009-2010 unless you want to count one good half year by Amare before Melo came. You can not find one bonafide 'star' on that roster before that.
Anyhow, it is precisely the 'joes' that matter on opposing teams when it comes to the Knicks and I have a lost of them in the OP. The 'joes' matter for the Knicks tonight too. Melo always gets his points as the star. It's the supporting cast that decides the game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by henrymethbreath:
but only wwhen it has opposing information. you didn't mention anything about the guy with the stats supporting the Knicks, despite one of his games being from 2008...
2-3 superstars surrounded by 7-8 joes on a court. That's basketball. doesn't matter if it's 1984 or 2014.
keep banging, Scal.
Knicks didn't have any stars in 2008-2009-2010 unless you want to count one good half year by Amare before Melo came. You can not find one bonafide 'star' on that roster before that.
Anyhow, it is precisely the 'joes' that matter on opposing teams when it comes to the Knicks and I have a lost of them in the OP. The 'joes' matter for the Knicks tonight too. Melo always gets his points as the star. It's the supporting cast that decides the game.
I ain't gon lie (50-tyson quote), I usually scroll down to see your pick, but this time I actually took the time to read it. I'm not much of a reader, but you're great at write-ups and before you posted this I already had Knicks as a play. This just makes me feel more pleasant about my picks. Sure, no one is right all the time, but your record with the write-ups is outstanding and you bring entertainment here to the threads. Great job bud. Keep it up cause you're one of the reasons why I'm still here after 9 years.
I put the "FOR YOU" in the thread title specifically for posters like you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by instinctpicks:
I ain't gon lie (50-tyson quote), I usually scroll down to see your pick, but this time I actually took the time to read it. I'm not much of a reader, but you're great at write-ups and before you posted this I already had Knicks as a play. This just makes me feel more pleasant about my picks. Sure, no one is right all the time, but your record with the write-ups is outstanding and you bring entertainment here to the threads. Great job bud. Keep it up cause you're one of the reasons why I'm still here after 9 years.
I put the "FOR YOU" in the thread title specifically for posters like you.
I agree with what you said at some point that 1q or 1h bets are kinda sucker bets, cuz when you lose youll try and double down...but knicks have been covering 1h spreads wayy more than FG spreads. do you think 5 is to low for a half cuz one simple run late in 2nd q and the heat will cover?
I don't play halves flor quarters. I have enough experience to know they simply feed the need to bet more and more and more. I don't even pay attention to them anymore.
Look at my last Knicks post.
Knicks trailed the Grizz by 13 at HT. Guys called the game in the thread.
They covered by .5 and easily could have won outright.
You can't gauge motivation or psychology for a half better than you can for a full game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by takeaseatvegas:
I agree with what you said at some point that 1q or 1h bets are kinda sucker bets, cuz when you lose youll try and double down...but knicks have been covering 1h spreads wayy more than FG spreads. do you think 5 is to low for a half cuz one simple run late in 2nd q and the heat will cover?
I don't play halves flor quarters. I have enough experience to know they simply feed the need to bet more and more and more. I don't even pay attention to them anymore.
Look at my last Knicks post.
Knicks trailed the Grizz by 13 at HT. Guys called the game in the thread.
They covered by .5 and easily could have won outright.
You can't gauge motivation or psychology for a half better than you can for a full game.
Knicks didn't have any stars in 2008-2009-2010 unless you want to count one good half year by Amare before Melo came. You can not find one bonafide 'star' on that roster before that.
Anyhow, it is precisely the 'joes' that matter on opposing teams when it comes to the Knicks and I have a lost of them in the OP. The 'joes' matter for the Knicks tonight too. Melo always gets his points as the star. It's the supporting cast that decides the game.
bingo.
thank you, scal, for pointing this out. teams that win are teams that go 10-12 guys deep.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Knicks didn't have any stars in 2008-2009-2010 unless you want to count one good half year by Amare before Melo came. You can not find one bonafide 'star' on that roster before that.
Anyhow, it is precisely the 'joes' that matter on opposing teams when it comes to the Knicks and I have a lost of them in the OP. The 'joes' matter for the Knicks tonight too. Melo always gets his points as the star. It's the supporting cast that decides the game.
bingo.
thank you, scal, for pointing this out. teams that win are teams that go 10-12 guys deep.
I don't play halves flor quarters. I have enough experience to know they simply feed the need to bet more and more and more. I don't even pay attention to them anymore.
Look at my last Knicks post.
Knicks trailed the Grizz by 13 at HT. Guys called the game in the thread.
They covered by .5 and easily could have won outright.
You can't gauge motivation or psychology for a half better than you can for a full game.
Agree with you on that, why i havent been playing them especially when i really want knicks to win everygame, (false hopes i know, also met fan so i am very used to this)
just a trend i picked up on, if you wanna call it that.
Lets go knicks
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I don't play halves flor quarters. I have enough experience to know they simply feed the need to bet more and more and more. I don't even pay attention to them anymore.
Look at my last Knicks post.
Knicks trailed the Grizz by 13 at HT. Guys called the game in the thread.
They covered by .5 and easily could have won outright.
You can't gauge motivation or psychology for a half better than you can for a full game.
Agree with you on that, why i havent been playing them especially when i really want knicks to win everygame, (false hopes i know, also met fan so i am very used to this)
just a trend i picked up on, if you wanna call it that.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
