Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Haha...LB
Xavier hasn't played anyone remotely challenging in this tournament. They saw an Ole Miss team on short rest and then they got a Georgia St team (who is good) won on a last second shot to win. But if that isn't enough look at this. Based on Defense Efficiency, FT, Rebounding, Offense Efficiency, RPI, and BPI...here are the comparisons of each team.... Xavier eDef Ranked - 147th FT - 52nd Rebounding - 46th eOff - 31st RPI - 30 BPI - 26 Arizona eDef - 4th FT - 115th Rebounding - 2nd eOff - 11th RPI - 6th BPI - 3rd There is not one category you can make an argument that Xavier is a better team in. Now I am not saying they will cover but they won't win this game. Just my 2 cents!!!1 |
LB_Dirtbags | 33 |
|
|
BigTimeSwimma....where do you get they lose by 1 based on the RPI as you stayed in BigDude's thread...where
Nebraska's RPI is 0.5193 and Maryland's is 0.6300...please explain your
logic.
|
BigTimeSwimma | 2 |
|
|
I am not calling myself an expert but the #s I figured Maryland should win by 19 but if you look at the game Maryland isn't that good on the road (5-4) and Nebraska has 77% of there wins at home.
Now they are a good lean for me but I will probably stay off Wisconsin and Maryland. |
bigdude | 16 |
|
|
BigTimeSwimma....where do you get they lose by 1 based on the RPI where Nebraska's RPI is 0.5193 and Maryland's is 0.6300...please explain your logic.
|
bigdude | 16 |
|
|
I am with you AJ. I live down here and I think I going to attend Saturday's action....I like...
Dustin (-105) over Spieth Dustin (-120) over Scott Reed (-125) over Stenson To Win I like.... Dustin Johnson (+2,000) Matt Kuchar (+4,000) Justin Rose (+4,000) Charl Schwartzel (+11,000) - too much value not to take him |
AJLightning | 32 |
|
|
I have to disagree with ND because of this stat, since 2010 a team that plays Navy and then goes on the road the following week is 1-6 SU and ATS and since 2004 ND is 1-9 ATS after they play Navy.
|
warcameagle56 | 11 |
|
|
Does anyone have Phil Steele's plays for NCAAF Week 2? I am curious to see what he has.
|
b18swim | 2 |
|
|
Double Up,
I know your a busy man and have numerous/interesting topics but I am curious if you are going to finish this SEC thread because I feel that the information could help a lot of people out and is an interesting read. |
DoubleUp4Life | 45 |
|
|
appreciate the info...I will look forward to your write ups whenever you post them.
|
sweem | 46 |
|
|
Thanks for getting back to me Sweem...I ended up not playing it and only playing Columbia (Regular Time) -114.
As for tomorrow I agree with the Costa Rica play but I am struggling on the Netherlands play. I think Holland has too many weapons for the Mexicans to defend but everywhere I look or have talked to loves Mexico. If you have a second would love to know what you think. |
sweem | 46 |
|
|
Quick question Sweem,
First off I want to add I really enjoy your write ups and reasons behind all your plays. My question is what do you think about Chile beating Brazil and Netherlands destroying Mexico. If you have time I would like to know what you think. Thanks |
sweem | 46 |
|
|
Gurley is impressive and I do agree he is a stud but the way you said it is if Gurley and Clowney would be in the same draft class that Gurley would have been #1. I appreciate the response and I do value your opinion but the only way to answer that is to whatever the team that has the #1 pick really needs and most teams need an effective pass rusher more than they can use a dominate RB since you can get RB talent in the later rounds. Keep up the good work and I will be around later this week. |
Boom_Boom | 93 |
|
|
Boom, I normally don't say much and I do like your posts but I read something today that in my opinion is wrong and hate for the Gamecocks since you are a Clemson Fan. You said in #2.... If you dont know by now 2 things are true. Gurshal is a beast and Clowny is over hyped right now. If Gurshal were draft eligible, no question he is the #1 pick. Clowney isn't overhyped and if you compare stats to last season he is pretty much having the same season as last. Also he is the only player in college that teams have to change their game plan completely. Here is proof...https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/9/10/4713760/jadeveon-clowney-south-carolina-stats-2013 Clowney is still the #1 pick and best player in college football. |
Boom_Boom | 93 |
|
|
Here's who I believe can win it all with the breakdown from conferences.... SEC - UGA, Bama, and SC BIG 12 - Texas BIG 10 - Michigan and Ohio St ACC - Miami, FSU, and possibly Clemson Big East - Louisville (maybe) PAC 10 - Oregon Stanford and UCLA |
Workhorse | 16 |
|
|
Hey everyone I hate to ask but I need a little help with something. It has nothing to do with a play or a game but I am looking for a site or multiple sites that give sports handicapper reviews. What I am trying to do is to prove that JR Stevens (winningsportsplays.com) is a fraud and isn't worth the time nor money? Please help if you can. Thanks |
b18swim | 1 |
|
|
Thank you..appreciate that.
|
HappyKane | 13 |
|
|
HappyKane, Not questioning your plays or anything just curious how do you have Verlander as a C pitcher in your MOJO rating. In my opinion he is the best pitcher in baseball? Just curious. |
HappyKane | 13 |
|
|
I appreciate the info...GL today.
|
atlasshrugged | 28 |
|
|
Handikapper1, I am looking at a couple of Horses at the Florida Derby tomorrow. Here is what I have come up with.... Race #2: 4-3-5 Race #4: 1-3-4 Race#6: 4-7-6 Race#7: 8 to WPS Race #8: 6-3-5 Race #10: 9 to WPS Race #12: 6-1-3-5 (with side bets on the 3 and 5 and 1) Would like your feedback and what you think. |
handikapper1 | 22 |
|
|
MeSlew, I am looking at a couple of Horses at the Florida Derby tomorrow. Here is what I have come up with.... Race #2: 4-3-5 Race #4: 1-3-4 Race#6: 4-7-6 Race#7: 8 to WPS Race #8: 6-3-5 Race #10: 9 to WPS Race #12: 6-1-3-5 (with side bets on the 3 and 5 and 1) Would like your feedback and what you think. |
MeSlew | 5 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.