Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
I just came across your post. Interesting read. My bookie only offers the game itself (both teams combined) to land Odd or Even. Would your same law of averages be in play? Meaning if a team's combined score has been Even 6 times in succession, the 7th would be at 3.5% etc...
|
calinreddog | 47 |
|
|
Colorado Rockies Under 80.5
My data has them at 75 for the season. Pound the Under
|
Captfyre98 | 1 |
|
|
Charlotte 63% of winning. Minus 1 is the play
Memphis 74% of winning. M/L wager at -170 Utah 66% of winning. M/L wager at -140
|
Captfyre98 | 1 |
|
|
My numbers have the Bulls a 55% chance of winning vs Cavs. Take the generous money line at plus 185.
|
Captfyre98 | 1 |
|
|
I do think Miami is a player and overlooked in the ACC this year. Mixed feelings about the Duke game, but I think your other plays are solid. GL
|
GoCapYourself | 5 |
|
|
I'm on both of your picks. Smaller M/L wagers as well. Let's do this!!
|
capskip | 8 |
|
|
I like Toledo. Very underated team and amazing stats ATS. May be their coming out party on National TV
|
mjaxx5 | 6 |
|
|
I agree with all your picks. Solid...Good Luck
|
hershey717 | 4 |
|
|
I hope you are right about it being the best card ever. Does seem stacked. However it seems these cards disappoint in the end. Look no further than UFC 200
|
WahooS | 9 |
|
|
The comment earlier about Stanford being "one dimensional" must be defined as the team that keeps on winning. Stanford is the play
|
Johnjj72 | 30 |
|
|
Im not a fan of any team but I agree, Oregon wins this game laying very little points. It's still Oregon vs Wazzu. Keep it simple, people
|
Tomkopec | 12 |
|
|
I understand the steam Washington is getting this year. Just a bettor from the "show me state" mentality. Until that potential is reached, I'm going with old reliable. :)
|
Johnjj72 | 30 |
|
|
And a home record of 11-6 sounds borderline mediocre to me
|
Johnjj72 | 30 |
|
|
If Washington is such a "tough place to play", guess Stanford "lucked out" 2 years winning by a touchdown.
|
Johnjj72 | 30 |
|
|
Same to you, even if youre on the other side. I agree stats can be over rated. But those two I picked out, are variables I follow with success. Let's hope for an entertaining game if nothing else.
|
bonilla420 | 27 |
|
|
Since Louisville still hasnt won/played a game in those situations this year, I think the stats mean something. I thought Lamar Jackson was there last year?? Is this a different guy with the same name??
|
bonilla420 | 27 |
|
|
I for one was more impressed with Stanford winning on the road as a 3 pt favorite than Washington surviving OT as a 16 pt favorite vs a team missing Offensive starters. Lean to the Conference Heavyweight.
|
Johnjj72 | 30 |
|
|
Louisville is 5-5 vs winning teams and only 3-5 ON GRASS. Clemson is 13-2 and 23-4 respectively. Go with the team that is supposed to be in the top 5. Tigers!!!
|
bonilla420 | 27 |
|
|
Good read. Thanks for the work you put in. I have noticed (from a distance), the Over/Under totals are higher than in the past. Rarely see a mid 40's line anymore.
|
xflrejects | 4 |
|
|
Great work as always. Much appreciated!!
|
RLeith35 | 50 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.