Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by Shark_Attack: Yea should put TCU in the group with W Virginia, or possibly with Okie St and K St... Big 12 is always on a par with the SEC and Pac 12, despite what the SEC homers will say... although I think this year the Big 12 is not as deep as usual. on par? Five teams in the western division inside the top 10?
|
bookieassassin | 51 |
|
|
Anyone who actually believes Kansas State has a chance of staying within 21 points has not seen Auburn play this year. This team is much better than last year's championship team.
Aside from our #1 ranked offense, our defense has even improved as well. We held Arkansas to 3 rushing yards in the second half. That's right; the same team that rushed for 450 on a piteous Big XII team. My prediction is that Malzahn doesn't run the score up against CBS. Auburn 52 Kansas State 21
|
Shark_Attack | 38 |
|
|
I don't boast but it's evident that we're a top 3 team in the nation. They absolutely will not be able to stop us. I'd be surpised if we win by any less than 28, but it's looking like we'll win by at least 40.
|
Shark_Attack | 38 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by HypoHandi: Arkansas should roadgrade Tech. Here's the wildcard. Tech is one of the toughest home field advantages in the country. And they have been waiting to play Arkansas since the old SWC broke up. The fans are going to be going nuts for the game. This is a HUGE game for Tech. The Hogs don't care a thing about playing Tech and don't have any idea what awaits them in Lubbock. They are likely to get waylaid by a Tech team ready to prove itself after two embarrassing performances and a crowd going absolutely crazy. Big home field advantage to Tech which probably plays one of its best games of the year and catches the Hogs a step slow. Tech 34, Arkansas 27. good call buddy
|
jmyane | 67 |
|
|
Lol that's hilarious. Has Vegas not learned a single thing yet? Look at what the 7th ranked SEC Western Division team just did to a Top 3 Big XII team.
We'll beat them by 40.
|
bookieassassin | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by HypoHandi: The Hogs don't care a thing about playing Tech and don't have any idea what awaits them in Lubbock. Where do you get this garbage from? Beliema could very well be fired if he loses this game, because he sure won't be winning many others in the SEC West.
|
jmyane | 67 |
|
|
I put small money on UGA -6 on the road. Never put big dough on an intense rivalry matchup. Beating UGA would make USC's season, and the way their defense plays against a high-powered spread is light and dead opposed to the boring, pro-set scheme like UGA utilizes. Would not be surprised if either team gets blown out.
|
BarrelledIn | 46 |
|
|
The way Texas plays football reminds me a lot of Iowa State.
|
GoGoplata123 | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LonghornHoosier:
see that's the problem, Tenn would be no better than 6th in BIG XII right now...that's just pure ignornance... ?? Please, tell me which Big XII team is a noticeably better football team than UT. Oklahoma, obviously. Baylor, yes. Kansas State? We'll beat them by 40 points next week. Texas Tech? Arkansas will beat them by 4 TD. The rest of the atrocious teams; Iowa State, Texas? God-awful, and don't deserve to be on a football field imo. problem?
|
GoGoplata123 | 28 |
|
|
Anyone who "follows" a capper will eventually lose. Capping is an art and takes a dilligent amount of research and creativity. I just don't care to read anything written by a <55%er, and I would appreciate if they'd stop spamming the forums with their senseless garbage.
|
TrebIecyde | 12 |
|
|
UT is around the 11th best SEC team, but would possibly be ranked 2nd in the Big XII. There's no measuring stick thus far.
Not touching it, but if I did, my lean would be an OU cover with a very late TD. GL...
|
GoGoplata123 | 28 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374: Yeah, I think Alt+F5 does it. epic win bro!!!!!!!!!!!! 47%
|
TrebIecyde | 12 |
|
|
UGA = 2-0 ATS
|
BarrelledIn | 46 |
|
|
My advice is to quit playing the spread/O-U and instead play strictly ML parlays. They've been very good to me over the years.
Of course, still put down your top four spreads of the week, but throw them in a parlay. I always throw down a minimal amount. $100 to win $1200 on a 4-team parlay, every single week. I win about 50% of the time. I'm strictly referring to college football, by the way. Every professional sport is 50/50 tossup. |
The_BigDog | 7 |
|
|
Teams 39>? Thank you for sharing
|
QBoption | 26 |
|
|
Arkansas will rush for 400 yards against that porous TTU "defense". We beat them handily in week one, but we're a top 3 team in the nation. TTU gave up 280 rushing yards to UTEP and 230 to Central Arkansas.
Arkansas' OL is pound for pound bigger than every NFL team. They will dominate the LOS and roll to an easy W. |
jmyane | 67 |
|
|
I don't understand why some people are so high on Marshall -20.5. They've lost three straight to the Bobcats, including a miserable 40-7 performance in 2011.
ECU +11 doesn't even pass the eye test. |
TRoe15 | 12 |
|
|
I don't follow anyone. I was 70% last year and 60% the year before. However, I always look for solid input throughout the forums. I just think it'd be nice to have the ability to filter out the garbage cappers.
|
TrebIecyde | 12 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12: UCF +10 (-115) (0.75) Seems reasonable, but Mizzou is the #3 team in the country ATS over the past two years. Not touching it, too risky. I can easily see Mizzou beating UCF by 21+. |
nostradamus12 | 57 |
|
|
TTU gave up 280 rushing yards to UTEP and 230 to Central Arkansas. VERY long day in Lubbock.
|
Learning | 3 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.