Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Overall: 38 - 31 - 2 +6.12 Sides: 27 - 19 - 1 +6.68 Totals: 7 - 9 - 1 -2.86 Props: 4 - 2 +2.80 Parlays: 0 - 1 - .50
Green Bay -3.5 -108 FanDuel Arizona +4 -110 BetRivers Atlanta -2 -110 BetRivers Buffalo -3 -110 BetRivers Carolina +11 -108 DraftKings Over 45 IND/HOU -112 DraftKings
Good Luck |
TumblingDice75 | 4 |
|
|
Overall: 37 - 28 - 2 +8.33 Sides: 26 - 17 - 1 +7.80 Totals: 7 - 8 - 1 -1.77 Props: 4 - 2 +2.80 Parlays: 0 - 1 - .50
Totals have been garbage the last two weeks. See if it's corrected tonight...
Tampa Bay MoneyLine +170 BetRivers Tampa Bay +4.5 -112 BetRivers Arizona MoneyLine -100 FanDuel Over 44 LAC/ARZ -109 BetRivers
Good Luck
|
TumblingDice75 | 2 |
|
|
Internet shit the bed so running late. Will update record later. Atlanta -3 -110 Green Bay -3.5 -105 Philadelphia -3 -110 Detroit MoneyLine +108 Indianapolis -3 -100 Cincinnati -5.5 -110 Over 44 MIA/IND -110 Over 42 CIn/CLE -109
Good Luck |
TumblingDice75 | 2 |
|
|
Thanks Gents.
Tampa Bay -3.5 -105 FanDuel Arizona +5.5 -108 DraftKings Pittsburgh -3 -110 BetRivers Under 42.5 TAM/NOR -108 DraftKings Over 43 IND/TEN -109 BetRivers Under 47 ARI/GRB -108 DraftKings
Good Luck
|
TumblingDice75 | 5 |
|
|
Overall: 31 - 20 - 1 +11.16 Sides: 20 - 13 - 1 +6.17 Totals: 7 - 4 +2.69 Props: 4 - 2 +2.80 Parlays: 0 - 1 - .50
Jacksonville MoneyLine -102 FanDuel
Good Luck |
TumblingDice75 | 5 |
|
|
Says who? Whoever it is, is wrong.
|
Daddy_Freddie | 4 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit:
@TumblingDice75 I appreciate your thoughts. What resonated most with me is what you said about Clock could be running non-stop, Under at 49? Signs are pointing to both teams likely having more rushing attempts in this contest. Purdy last 2 games has just 55% completions and several INTs, so SFO may cut back a bit on pass attempts. SEA coaches have repeatedly stated they aim to get K Walker more involved after only 5 rush attempts vs NYG. So I could see this as a 23-20 slobberknocker type of game. BOL Agreed. I've been leaning that way more and more even though these receivers/big plays against beat-up defenses scare me with the Under but I see the script playing out very similarly to you. Good Luck Biscuit |
Biscuit | 15 |
|
|
Overall: 31 - 19 - 1 +11.66 Sides: 20 - 13 - 1 +6.17 Totals: 7 - 4 +2.69 Props: 4 - 2 +2.80
Not a big parlay player and risk only half units on them but I like this correlation tonight...
Seattle +3.5 and Under 49 +240 BetRivers .5 Units to win 1.20 Units
Good Luck |
TumblingDice75 | 5 |
|
|
Talking to myself and more concerning answering myself conversations along with random notes I have jotted down so far for this one... - SAF missing key players right down the middle of their defense at all three levels. 21st defensively in yds per rush - SAF averages 6th most rushing attempts per game offensively in NFL and SEA(last in rush attempts) wants to run more. Clock could be running non-stop, Under at 49? Tough w/ passing game advantages both teams have leaning heavily to big plays and Over. - SAF no actual practices with short turnaround while incorporating new safety(reportedly a rookie, *to be verified*) into secondary vs these SEA receivers. Communication, blown coverages? - SAF FG kicker could be sorely missed with their 29th Red Zone TD% ranking, add in Shanahan's questionable decision-making making and this could get interesting on fourth downs in SEA territory - SAF receivers mismatches against the SEA secondary more so w/ SEA injuries and SAF run game vs SEA banged up, struggling run defense. - SEA balance, balance, balance! And they know it... "I think if we get Ken 10 more touches, 15 more touches things are going to be different." -SEA OC Ryan Grubbs after NYG loss and Walker only got five carries - SEA can running game be effective enough against SAF banged-up, 21st ranked yards per rush allowed defense to help shaky OLine back off SAF pass rush and give time for vet QB to exploit matchup advantages SEA has downfield? - SEA is primetime home dog off a home loss, in one of the league's loudest stadiums, playing a banged-up, hated division rival, and getting three plus the hook? Sure sounds good - SEA new head coach MacDonald went into SAF and dominated Shanahan's offense in '23 as BAL DC, forcing five INT's from SAF(4 from Purdy) in 33-19 win. Was this the win that sealed deal on SEA HC job? Different talent level in SEA than BAL but scheme proven sound vs Shanahan offense.
|
Biscuit | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
No !! results is ats with the Vegas line, the teased value is in addition to the +EV from the query.
Good shit. You're kicking ass.
|
jowchoo | 72 |
|
|
Is the win-loss record with the teased line? I've been watching your posts and becoming increasingly curious about exactly what you're doing. Interesting for sure, not to mention pretty damn successful from what I've seen.
|
jowchoo | 72 |
|
|
Tough decision...
If it works, you're a genius. If it doesn't, you adjust quickly and pivot since you currently have a top pick in 2025. Ballsy call, because if it doesn't, you not only possibly lose Maye mentally/confidence-wise but probably also your job but I do agree with it. With no hope, as it stands, to do much this year, you have to see if this kid can be the answer. If you think he is, you fill one of their many other holes in the Draft.
|
NEGolfJosh3 | 20 |
|
|
Classic!
|
jlewin | 2 |
|
|
Overall: 31 - 19 - 1 +11.66 Sides: 20 - 13 - 1 +6.17 Totals: 7 - 4 +2.69 Props: 4 - 2 +2.80
Kansas City win to top off an 8 - 1 week. Onward to Week 6. |
TumblingDice75 | 13 |
|
|
Good Luck 2good! |
2goodhahaha | 17 |
|
|
Where are you seeing that and who are you saying is their Center? Ruiz is inactive and both Lemieux and McCoy are on IR. Nobody else has started a game at center for them this season. |
Irisheric777 | 2 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ilovefootballs:
Saints are balanced on the offense with running and throwing the ball. This kind of attack KC defense is not up against very good to stop a team like the Saints offensively. The KC defense won't stop the dual threats like the saint's offense. I'm still not sure what matchup you see that the Saints can exploit... What I will say is that if the Saints' backfield is consistently occupied by 300-pounders wearing red, a scenario likely due to injuries and the Chiefs' formidable defensive line, then the Saints will have problems establishing anything on the ground or in the air offensively. |
TumblingDice75 | 15 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Ilovefootballs:
Quote Originally Posted by aron25: @Ilovefootballs English please. lol. The Saints are hungry to win games. They wanted to stop the two-game losing streak. They also like to play on prime time. They are matching up well against the KC offense and defense. This is the game I think KC will lose to the Saints. Can you expand on exactly what matchups you see as favorable for the Saints? Especially offensively? |
TumblingDice75 | 15 |
|
|
Overall: 30 - 19 - 1 +10.66
Sides: 19 - 13 - 1 +5.17 Totals: 7 - 4 +2.69 Props: 4 - 2 +2.80
Kansas City -5.5 -108 DraftKings Copied and pasted from a post I made in another thread... For me, it comes down to injuries but not the high-profile, skill position ones most want to talk about. The Saints are completely decimated on the interior offensive line with injuries to multiple centers and guards. This is problematic for a team that relies on the run to establish the play-action, over-the-top explosives they thrive on. And against a Chiefs team with Chris Jones lining up over that same patchwork interior, it could be devastating. Center is one of the most underrated positions in the NFL because of, amongst other things, their communication responsibilities. Because of a rash of injuries at the position, they are going on the road, in a loud, hostile Arrowhead with a center they just signed from the Jets practice squad that was recently pondering retirement and hasn't played a game in over a year. DC Spagnuolo will exploit this weakness. On the other side of the ball, the Saints' linebacking corps is also decimated with two of the starting three missing. The one starter that is playing tonight is just returning from injury. For a team that has had problems with tight ends (see recent game vs Goedert and multiple 2023 games vs top-notch tight ends) running into the Chiefs, who are sure to feature Kelce more with their injuries, could be a major issue. Add in, a dome team built for speed outside on natural grass, Kansas City easily having the better of the two quarterbacks, and an overall physical advantage (especially in the trenches) in the Chiefs' favor, and I don't see the Saints keeping up.
Good Luck |
TumblingDice75 | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jizzy66:
Chiefs -5 x1 The Saints might win this outright, or lose by a touchdown. I don’t expect the Vikings to be the only team without a loss, So I’m going with the Chiefs at Home. For the Saints weapons aren’t that great if the the Chiefs take out Olave. Shaheed down for a quiet night in a loud stadium.
I agree with the Chiefs, but I'm not sold on the Total either way. I'm holding off to see if I can get a five at one of my outs. For me, it comes down to injuries but not the high-profile, skill position ones most want to talk about. The Saints are completely decimated on the interior offensive line with injuries to multiple centers and guards. This is problematic for a team that relies on the run to establish the play-action, over-the-top explosives they thrive on. And against a Chiefs team with Chris Jones lining up over that same patchwork interior, it could be devastating. Center is one of the most underrated positions in the NFL because of, amongst other things, their communication responsibilities. Because of a rash of injuries at the position, they are going on the road, in a loud, hostile Arrowhead with a center they just signed from the Jets practice squad that was recently pondering retirement and hasn't played a game in over a year. DC Spagnuolo will exploit this weakness. On the other side of the ball, the Saints' linebacking corps is also decimated with two of the starting three missing. The one starter that is playing tonight is just returning from injury. For a team that has had problems with tight ends (see recent game vs Goedert and multiple 2023 games vs top-notch tight ends) running into the Chiefs, who are sure to feature Kelce more with their injuries, could be a major issue. Add in, a dome team built for speed outside on natural grass, Kansas City easily having the better of the two quarterbacks, and an overall physical advantage (especially in the trenches) in the Chiefs' favor, and I don't see the Saints keeping up.
|
TumblingDice75 | 15 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.