Pablo989

@SLRams_0

Probably an algo being used. There are resources online you can pay for that track +vig bets aka line value movement. That is probably what they are doing since the odds on Covers seem to lag the live odds that are out there.

Using such a resource still doesn't mean they are going to win anything though in the long run. Even a great very likely to occur +EV bet will lose over 30% of the time.

This streak contest mostly comes down to luck in the end.

@OWENS81

There is some sort of a glitch. Most picks today were insta-graded with a win or a loss. I believe all plus picks immediately showed up as wins and minus picks were losses.

Example Jets -2.5 = LOSS

Example Clippers +4.5 = WIN

You can still see everyone's picks but the results won't be accurate until corrected. I'm sure this will be fixed soon.

@duken

 Problem has been FIXED

With 3 seconds left in the 4th

@BFLO66FAN

He had Atlanta ml. Reynaldo Lopez got his first loss of the season to the Mariners.

@Madworld

 How about people play fair and not abuse free contests by using multiple accounts.

This guys has at least 6 accounts that I was able to easily spot... all 6 accounts have roughly 80% of the same picks.

All of these accounts were started around the same time, with similar screen names, and a similar total number of picks. All of these accounts picked the same exact games 7x in a row recently. The odds of no foul play being involved here is statistically impossible.

Cheaters should be banned from all contests and not allowed to win any prizes.

Hopefully COVERS doesn't reward people who cheat. Am seeing a lot of similar use names with mostly the same entries lately.

Am looking at you "assets" with your aliases and mostly identical picks. That guy must have close to 10 accounts going at once.

...last week he had 4-5 accounts with the same exact picks and winning streak.

*7 game win streak with ALL 7 games the same

@bullshark

Click on my profile and shoot me an email.

Found an interesting betting trend you'll want to see... don't really want to post it on here / jinx it.

@Raidernator76

True they seem to make a habit of it. Lack of effort is the only reason they are down right now...

@packersbackers

 Thanks for the heads up. Just checked Miracling2. Places a ton of bets. Goes all in and loses a lot.

When a person is on tilt and runs through their bankroll multiple times you'd think they would stop betting for a while, meaning a few weeks or months not hours... unless they are posting fake bets or like you said it is a bot account.

@Day-trader1

He's in covers rehab.

His 0-10 record that day was impressive as hell. It was a thing of legend.

@philschnaars

I agree. He created this thread 2 weeks before the Super Bowl.

And 30+ posts later still no pick.

Why was this penalty boxed? That's a rhetorical question. Not sure how he can't see it.

Mahomes has been money in the playoffs regardless of opponent. Check out his playoff record. Making the Super Bowl in 4 of 5 years = dominance. It's always a risk betting against a trend like that.

Mahomes is an elite passer and is clutch when it counts.

I had Chiefs/Lions in the Super Bowl and posted a writeup elsewhere. I relied on the conspiracy angle to pick the SB which certainly is looking legit. This site misses out on a lot of good info by shitting on people who make picks based off of the conspiracy angle.

The whole Ravens/49ers color scheme matchup was never going to happen 3 years in a row... what better way to convince the public that these games are real than by having both #1 seeds miss the Super Bowl.

@PayMeHardRock

 Medvedev return game is on point.

This is looking like a mirror image of Joker/Sinner match. Medvedev is dominating in all aspects and can't be stopped on his serves.

Soon to be up 2-0

@Ppkay

I agree but the Bears still need a QB. I expect Marvin Harrison to be great in the NFL just not as a Bear.

Locking in Justin Fields longterm would be a huge financial mistake.

A lot of games Justin Fields seems to disappear. Maybe its on him or maybe the playcalling just sucks. Either way most teams would be far better off with a pocket passer than a QB always looking to run the ball.

If the Bears trade down a few spots from #1 they could get an extra 1st round pick for 2025. Then they could use both 1st round picks in the 2024 draft on a QB and hope to hit on one of them.

@lmb4321

Bears have two 1st round picks in the draft

1st > QB

9th > WR not named Marvin Harrison

Even if they trade down a few spots there is no reason they can't add both a top QB & WR in the draft.

@ActionMagnet

 Who would you trust more in a big game Mahomes/Jackson OR Purdy?

Both AFC teams have better QBs with experience.

If Deebo is limited or sits out, I can't see the 49ers beating either team in the Super Bowl.

But like another poster said, 49ers are a heavy favorite on Sunday and should make it there. The AFC side is a toss up at least on paper.

@Grinder360

Chiefs will be back next year with better receivers. This is probably the Bills only chance to make a Super Bowl and they have momentum on their side.

I don't see the Chiefs winning this one unless they cause a lot of turnovers.

@Footballbiker

 2-0 is a great start.

Good chance Cowherd finishes 3-1 this week. 

Spurs were down by 10 in the 4th.

Spurs star played great.

Spurs came back to win by 4.

Where's the tank???