Brown8535

Prospect

Posts: 74

Member Since: January 2010

Status: Offline

About me:

Signature:

Filter Posts by:

Entries	Thread Author	Posts	Activity
replied to My first and only proper preseason play - Car/Hou in NFL Betting To be fair, I don't think most of your posts would be considered "contributing". It's an open forum so volume doesn't equal quality FYI. View Post \| View Thread	PhillyBrown	27	August 10, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to My first and only proper preseason play - Car/Hou in NFL Betting I apologize, I guess when I was reading your original post I glossed over the 20 dollars part. I will disregard your posts in the future View Post \| View Thread	PhillyBrown	27	August 10, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to hou ml with watson in NFL Betting Eh, philly, based on your write up, I don't think you should either View Post \| View Thread	User592150	6	August 09, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to My first and only proper preseason play - Car/Hou in NFL Betting It's preseason so you shouldn't be betting regardless, too many unknowns. But yeah pretty much everything philly said doesn't make any sense. The only one which he kinda touched on but still completely missed is the qb competition. It's not about trying to win the job, it's about a potential starter getting serious minutes. But super bowl hangovers, revenge in preseason and previous records in preseason...umm ok? Two things: qb competition, so potential starters getting long looks. And layers upon layers of depth for the leagues best defense. That is why the line moved View Post \| View Thread	PhillyBrown	27	August 09, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Week One in NFL Betting There a couple reasons why we are viewing this game through a different lens, other than me being a Texans/afc south homer lol. I'm not as high on Fournette as you are. I would take cook or mixon as being the best back out of this class. As for fit, jags have run mostly a zone scheme in the past and that is not Fournettes strong suit. If they do switch to more of a gap scheme that would better fit him, but it also bodes well for the Texans defense. You are right. The jags defense was way better last year than anyone gave them credit for. Ramsey, smith and jack are the real deal. I don't know if bouye is yet because of scheme. The rest I'm not sold on. Back to your point, neither Watson or savage has to be good for Houston to win. Call it stubbornness, but obrien will repeatedly run Miller into the teeth despite the results. As long as whomever plays qb avoids turnovers, that is good enough. Speaking of which, I don't really care who the qb is, it's automatically plus over 2016 because it can't really get worse. Finally, biggest reason is the game is at nrg. Most teams play better at home, but for whatever reason the gap is even larger with the Texans. So while I understand the jags getting points with an improved defense against a subpar Texans offense, the jags are still the bottom feeder of the afc south. View Post \| View Thread	porcelainfist	43	May 30, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Week One in NFL Betting At first I was going to stay away. But Houston/jax game is fairly simple. Watch the first two games of 2016 again. If you are taking the jags, you believe they can score 14-17 against that defense, and that may not be enough. In regards to Fournette, he is a bad matchup for them. Backs who are smaller/shifty with speed out of the backfield can give that defense problems. Of which he is neither. Couple that with the disparity of how the team plays at home, they should be in control from start to finish. Price of admission is paid for with the Hopkins/Ramsey matchup View Post \| View Thread	porcelainfist	43	May 30, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Atlanta, New England, Dallas and Pittsburgh in NFL Betting Also, watch the film of the Oakland game again. I know you're big into the names and not what's happening, but Carr playing wouldn't have changed the result. It was that ugly. Also, the constant onslaught that Houston shouldn't even play the game is an advantage View Post \| View Thread	Vanrush	40	January 14, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Atlanta, New England, Dallas and Pittsburgh in NFL Betting Watch the film. They ended up as the number one defense in yards allowed, which is not a complete stat. But they did that without watt. They also did it without much help from their offense or special teams. They haven't allowed a 300 yd passer all year. If they win this game, it won't be because of Brady. The pats best hope on offense is their scat backs, white and Lewis, that is where they can find their mismatches. Their defense can get pressure while dropping seven or eight. And other than Denver, they have the best secondary in the league. But just to be clear your reason for the pats winning are two players who haven't played in 15 weeks and a childish nickname? View Post \| View Thread	Vanrush	40	January 14, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Atlanta, New England, Dallas and Pittsburgh in NFL Betting It a week of interesting matchups that one could make a compelling argument for either side. Don't sleep on Houston, they are a team that plays better as the year goes on. They are capable of doing all the things required to slow a tom Brady down. When it comes to that many points in playoffs, it's Houston or a no play View Post \| View Thread	Vanrush	40	January 13, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to suuma's NFL Week Nine in NFL Betting Two things: As an afc south guy, at this moment the Titans are the second best team in the division, which I know isn't saying much. But their offensive line is on their way to being the real deal. And while I'm not a fan of Murray, you can't argue with what he has done. On defense, their front seven is live. They will hold up against the run and can get occasional pressure. To truly punish their secondary, you need legit number one wrs, which I haven't seen from the Chargers. The coaching matchup is a draw between McCoy and mularkey. Finally, the Titans are playing with confidence. For the first time in a long while, they believe they can win. I would consider laying a field goal with San Diego, but anymore is too much. On Prescott, I gambled quite a bit on him in college. He had a great defense and his athleticism carried him against inferior opponents. He rarely beat teams with great qb play. That isn't a good sign going into the nfl. He landed in an ideal situation. But at the midway point, never mind the numbers, he doesn't pass the eye test. He hasn't been asked to do much, and hasn't done much. I would be very careful against a well coached hard playing Browns team in search of their first win View Post \| View Thread	suuma	187	November 03, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Den v Hou in NFL Betting Also, who has Denver beat? Cincy and Carolina wins aren't as impressive in hindsight. View Post \| View Thread	ChickMagnut	31	October 24, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Den v Hou in NFL Betting Also, those two losses were against the probable super bowl matchup. Denver isn't in their class. View Post \| View Thread	ChickMagnut	31	October 24, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Den v Hou in NFL Betting I picked it up at +9 yesterday. Houstons offense is deservedly the worst in the nfl. If you are laying the points, you are predicting that Houston gets shut out because Houston's defense is still a top ten unit without JJ watt. 9 points is just too much with two good defenses and two not so good offenses View Post \| View Thread	ChickMagnut	31	October 24, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to DENVER -7.5 BIG....Largest bet i've ever made...... in NFL Betting If you are betting the Broncos, you want Osweiler to make it the entire game. You don't want savage coming off the bench View Post \| View Thread	rjk281	15	October 24, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to 11-6 for the season in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by UnderlinePicks: Bills line moved to +2.Eagles is a square play, I am aware of that but Detroit has been terrible so far, backed them twice this season and did anything they could to lose. That statement is contradictory. Eagles are a square play but the lions are terrible and you've lost money on them? I don't understand labeling picks as square on this forum. It's almost as if people would rather be contrarian than win money View Post \| View Thread	UnderlinePicks	20	October 07, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Week 5 in NFL Betting In Vegas at the moment, line is -3 most places but no juice View Post \| View Thread	suuma	108	October 04, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to JJ Watt re injures back in NFL Betting Look at it this way, it's free money with the books overreacting in regards to the lines View Post \| View Thread	undermysac	11	September 27, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to What truly is a "Houston Texan"? in NFL Betting Do you guys even watch the games before you wager? View Post \| View Thread	TheFootball77	4	September 25, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Week 3 in NFL Betting In regards to Texans/pats, everything says take the patriots. As a Texans fan, i know our history against the pats better than anybody and it isn't good. Thankfully this isn't the lettermans jackets debacle of 2011. The one caveat I will give for those taking the pats. You are looking at a historically dominant defense. There are a few chinks in the armor, namely running the ball between the tackles and covering dominant te's(although bouye locked Kelce). But the Texans are deep in the secondary, and what other defense boasts three elite pass rushers? The biggest advantage their defense has is they drop 7 or 8 and still get pressure. View Post \| View Thread	suuma	105	September 20, 2016 View Post \| View Thread
replied to MRxKRAZZ NFL Week #2 in NFL Betting its amazing a thread with so little information has gotten so many responses. Why not post a picture of a dart board with this weeks picks? View Post \| View Thread	MRxKrazz	86	September 18, 2016 View Post \| View Thread

About Us

Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials

Betting Guides

Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming

Sports Betting

US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps

Contests

Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools

The Covers community has

618,670

lifetime members worldwide

Join our community today

Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.

Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.

Brown8535 Follow Follow Unfollow

Brown8535