Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
The man puts up at 50:1 speculative future bet, and you guys respond by telling him that it's not likely to win? Obviously not or it wouldn't be +5000 in the first place. And it's probably safe to assume that these are small bets, maybe 0.1 units or so, who knows. Let's say you do a few of these +5000 bets per year, you can be profitable getting one right every 10-15 years. The question is whether or not the true odds are better than this. I'd say in this case the answer is clearly yes. Lock had a strong finish to last season, then his organization went to work adding important pieces to the offense, including speedy WRs with their first 2 draft picks to go along with Courtland Sutton. They also added Melvin Gordon in FA to pair up with Phillip Lindsay, as well as shoring up some depth issues at OL and TE. Perhaps most importantly, though, the Broncos brought in a new OC in Pat Shurmur, who has a long and successful record as a coordinator or bringing out the best in young QBs. The first of these was Donovan McNabb, who developed into a better pocket passer than most expected him to be coming out of college. He then headed to St. Louis to coach Sam Bradford in his excellent rookie season. Shurmur kinda lost his way in Cleveland with Holmgren at the helm and Brandon Weeden taking snaps, but then he went back to Philly and coached Nick Foles to his famous 27 TD, 2 INT season. Then onto Minnesota, where he squeezed every last drop of ability out of Case Keenum during the Minneapolis Miracle season in which the Vikings went 13-3. Keenum was actually the 3rd stringer that year, but first Teddy Bridgewater went down in training camp, then Sam Bradford was traded for just a few days later and a had a remarkable 2016. Keenum was an afterthought going into 2017 but actually led the Vikings to top 3 in most scoring was never that good before or after his one year with Shurmur, who was really only there to work again with Sam Bradford until his season ended in week 1 with a bad ankle. After a few years as head coach of the Giants, he's back doing what he does best, in charge of offense and of the development of a 2nd-year QB. Just for fun, I looked up last year's winner and whatever odds I could find posted for him, which varied from +1000 to +4000. (can any of you name the player without checking?).These were just google results, nothing official from the books. As I said, it's hard to tell where the odds were listed, and at what time during the preseason, as books don't tend to keep these histories around, especially not on futures bets, but I found some interesting stuff. Listed in order, without names, are the top 10 QBs in terms of passing yards at the end of the 2019 season. Different books had different prices at different times during the offseason the numbers vary wildly (shop around!). 1st - +2300/+1500/+4000 2nd - +900/+10000 (not a typo, maybe injury or hold out or something else?) 3rd - +2300/+1200 4th - +1100/+2000/+2500 5th - +500/+450/+800 6th - +1600/+7500 7th - +1600/+800 8th - +5000/+3300 9th - +2000/+2000 10th - +360/+450/+600 (preseason favorite lol) I'm sure you can all operate your google boxes to reveal who's who once you're ready. Do what you want with this info, but I'd say this looks like a tasty opportunity. Thanks ckattar8. |
User592150 | 10 |
|
|
replied to
MEMPHIS GRIZZLIES > LAKERS BECAUSE KOBE DIED AT 41 AND GIANNA DIED AT 13.
in NBA Betting
GET A BRAIN, MORANS
lol at the people who believe in this stuff. If only life were this simple. Kobe wore #24 and Monday is the 24th and Grover Cleveland was the 24th president of the USA and 2*4 = 6 and 6*4 = 24 so figure it out!
|
Scripterino | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: If what you said was true, you'd be able to point directly at something to prove it. You cant. Listen assh@t, the burden of proof is on you. You're the one claiming something far-fetched, so you have a prove it, not us. Proof, by the way, is not 'the defender didn't tackle the guy with the ball' or 'lots of games come down to the final minute' (or, what is really going on the heads of the tall babies who believe this stuff, 'i lost my bet'). It is impossible to prove a negative, this is a fundamental truth in logic. You don't know this because you have the mind of a 3-year-old. (I may perhaps have rounded up.) Now, nobody cares if you believe something ridiculous to be true. I have no doubt that you believe in chemtrails, that the moon landing was faked, Sandy Hook didn't happen, etc. But, the adults around here are busy talking, so you need to run along. Maybe go read about how the coronavirus was created in a biological warfare lab or something. Nobody around here values your input, so please get fvcked. |
Phillip2002 | 68 |
|
|
People don't need to do anything lol.
Of course it is nice when a capper shares their thoughts/process on top of providing their plays, but they don't need to do anything for you. I mean, who are you anyway? It's not like cappers come on here trying to convince to follow them, or that they're right. What an insane post.
|
danasal | 31 |
|
|
Interesting and well thought out points here, SDS. I do feel like the regular season blowout provides a tactical advantage for GB. SF doesn't need to change anything, right? Just trot out the same game plan and the results should follow. Whereas GB needs to overhaul their approach.
This IMO is the essence of the revenge game angle -- it is not that the losing team is so darn mad about the prior game, which is kinda silly. This happens in-game, too. If one team is up big at halftime, the other team (if well coached, anyway) makes the adjustments that allow them to get back in the game. Anyway, I do believe that SF is the better team overall, but this angle, plus the experience edge at QB, may be enough for GB to pull this one out, or at least cover the spread. Best of luck with your plays, thanks for all you do around here.
|
SettleDownSpaz | 24 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by SettleDownSpaz: Overall : 116-100-5 +109.18 units Playoffs : 4-5-0 -41.80 units Regular Season Futures : 7-6-0 +36.60 units Playoff Futures : 0-0-0 (three pending) Green Bay to win NFC +600 (3 units) Houston to win AFC +1800 (1 unit) Tennessee to win AFC +4000 (1 unit) Profitable weekend until the second half of Seahawks-Eagles when I got cracked. I'm not sure if I had this belief Wentz would be back or just felt McCown could move the ball on Seattle's defense. The latter actually became the reality, but the Eagles couldn't find the end zone - all I needed was one of those FGs to be TDs, but, alas, it wasn't in the script. I lost. Nobody else lost those bets, but me. I place no blame on any referees, coaches, players, fans, conspiracy theorists, etc. I've already dusted off and have moved on... Leans for now as I want to see how lines move early in the week - no real injury concerns hanging over any team, but, also want to see if anything unexpected comes to light. Minnesota-San Francisco under 45.5 Tennessee-Baltimore over 47.5 Houston +10 Green Bay -4 and over 46 Be in and out all week, good luck to everyone in the coming weekend I don't comment too often, but your thread is one of the few must-reads for me every week. Love your insights, happy to see you posting, and am looking forward to what you come up with as the week moves along. Thanks for sharing your hard work with us.
|
SettleDownSpaz | 25 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by BlackCannons:
You talk and talk and talk..and you say nothing.. +1
|
ActionMagnet | 22 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by CALB: Philip- it’s a hold at first but the ref missed it. You could not challenge the hold but you could challenge the PI. I have seen a lot of time the offensive PI called in the same situations In the last two minutes of each half, and for the duration of overtime, coaches cannot initiate challenges. Everything is done from the booth. Furthermore, all scoring plays that occur at any point during the game are automatically reviewed by the booth. This play, since it was a scoring play, was looked at immediately by the booth. They saw nothing. End of story. We can argue if it should have been called, but the same people who are saying it was OPI are saying 'let 'em play' when it's against their own team. The defender initiated the contact, I suspect that's why there was no call. They were handfighting the whole time, how could you even choose one player to penalize in that scenario?
|
CALB | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy: Ml parlay Niners + Balty 6 units to win 4 at -155 Ml parlay Niners + Chiefs 6 units to win 4 at -155 Will have writeup later... I've resisted opening your threads for a long time, because you're so fvcking stupid it makes my eyes bleed. You and zebrakiller would do the world a favor if you never posted again. But I couldn't resist this one. The Vikings played a mediocre game at best. Cousins was bad for most of it, Dalvin Cook averaged fewer than 4 yards per carry. The defense was pretty good, I'll give you that. Especially considering they were down two of their starting CBs. I don't have a play in the Vikes-49ers game as of yet, still work to do. But trying to convince others that you're anything other than a 49ers homer is embarrassing. Now, please...shut up, don't create any more threads, and fvck off to nowhere immediately. P.S. You should at least learn how to spell your own username.
|
begginerboy | 111 |
|
|
replied to
J.J Watts is expected to be back for Texans, can he make an impact?? Brady still has what it take to win another Superbowl???AFC matchup Bill/ Texan$$$! Titan's/ Patriots who y'all got???
in NFL Betting Quote Originally Posted by savanh1: Bol Gents! Short and Sweet Texans-2.5 Patriots-4.5 Short write up why!! Last year meeting Texan win 13-20 last minute int. Return for a touch down give Texans the lead!!With J.J Watts back given Houston edge in defense.. 1. Houston home field advantage crowd noise will be a factor 2. Bills first year for Josh Allen will he shows up or he still needs more playoff experience.. 3. Or will Allen gets motivation for this game.. Enough said lay the points with the veteran squad of Houston and home field advantage. N.England. sample to be the best you have to. Beat the best.. To be the Legend you have to beat the Legend..unless Titan's prove other wise.. Go with the Legend himself Brady.. Will Brady downfall or he still has what it takes to win another Superbowl..In the mean time takes the Legend himself until times prove otherwise.. Patriots -5.. Bol Gents today..
R.I.P. the English language
|
savanh1 | 14 |
|
|
I wish somebody would post a thread like this everyday, we'd all be rich
|
Jerseyboy89 | 49 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by zebrakiller: number is complete whole number and wheneever you multiply it by any when you add the results to lowest number you always get 9 like so 9 x 2585 = 23,265 2 +3 =5 +2=7 +6=13 +5 = 18 1+8 = 9 any number you want X 9 add the numbers together you will always get 9 9 X 11 = 99 9+9 =18 8+1 = 9 9X22 =198 1+9 =10 10+8 =18 8+1 = 9 9X23 = 207 2+0 = 2 2+7 = 9 had to do it because it seemed like always 18 final this is true (and also true of the number 3), but I think he was asking for the 9th item in the list, of which he gave the first 8. and I believe the 9th item is to get a fountain lol. what this has to do with betting on the NFL escapes me, though.
|
LB_Dirtbags | 60 |
|
|
The human brain's ability to identify patterns in the chaos of life played a huge part in the evolution of the species. We are the descendants of those who accurately detected hazards in the environment and avoided them (this plant caused illness, so it should not be eaten). The penalty for not recognizing such hazards (call it a false negative) was, in many cases, death.
However, there was no evolutionary penalty for false positives. (Although that rustle in the grass was due to wind and not a predator, running away has no negative consequences.) So, our brains are conditioned to identify patterns and assign meaning whether or not the pattern is real. This is a long way of saying that feng shui, or the fact that a player's jersey number matches the spread and his length of time in the league, has no predictive value. This is true even if the Vikings win this weekend.
|
LB_Dirtbags | 60 |
|
|
wow
|
LB_Dirtbags | 60 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Snorkel: erjag - beat me to that statement - dumbest post I have ever read |
MarginMan | 8 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by clubtnt: this will be a preseason game got the ravens, and ravens have never cared to win preseason game. LOL the Ravens are the best bet-on preseason team in football. Harbaugh is 37-12 straight up since he took over the team in '08, including 17-0 over the last four seasons. I don't necessarily agree that this should be capped like a preseason game, and I don't have a strong feeling for the side, but the quoted text here is dead wrong.
|
MarginMan | 8 |
|
|
Hey everybody, look! The user who calls himself "Let's go Packers" (I corrected his grammar) is predicting that the Packers will go to the Super Bowl. I'm shocked!
|
LETGOPACK1234 | 26 |
|
|
Sorry, I made a mistake in post 12 -- the Texans can move up to the 3 seed if they win next week and KC loses either of their final 2 games (SNF at Chicago, week 17 hosting the Chargers).
Somehow the Chiefs have tiebreakers over the Ravens and Patriots, but lose the tiebreaker to the Texans. Houston has no shot at a bye, though.
|
lancer89074 | 28 |
|
|
Furthermore, if the Ravens win tomorrow, both the Titans and Steelers will need to win next week to make the playoffs, and will be facing teams (Texans, Ravens) whose playoff seedings are set in stone. Houston is already locked into the 4 seed in the AFC, and with a win Baltimore will be locked into the 1 seed.
In this scenario (Ravens beat Browns, which is obviously likely) I will be betting the first lines I see in those games (Pitt over Bal and Tenn over Hou). This is perhaps the one and only time that we as bettors can steal money. These lines could move a full TD by kickoff, and will almost certainly move by more than a field goal. This is especially true for the Texans, who won't have a bye week to rest up before playing their first playoff game wild card weekend. The Ravens will have a bye, and combined with their hatred of the Steelers are more likely to try to knock them out of the playoffs than the Texans will be against the Titans. Hope this helps some of you/us...
|
lancer89074 | 28 |
|
|
Both teams have motivation to win, so IMO that should be dropped from your handicap here. No matter the consequences of losing for either team, they're both gonna go all out here.
Personally I like the over, with a lean to the Tits, but not because they need it more. The motivation angle is really only worthwhile if there are no stakes at all for one of the teams. For example, if the Ravens win tomorrow, their playoff seeding will be locked no matter what happens in their week 17 game with the Steelers. That is a motivation angle that can be useful (even though the rivalry makes every Bal/Pit game important).
|
lancer89074 | 28 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.